Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amborin

(16,631 posts)
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 09:05 PM Mar 2016

Even Mainstream Economists Now Say Free Trade Harms US Workers & Does Long-Lasting Harm



Were the experts wrong about the benefits of trade for the American economy?

In a recent study, three economists — David Autor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, David Dorn at the University of Zurich and Gordon Hanson at the University of California, San Diego — raised a profound challenge to all of us brought up to believe that economies quickly recover from trade shocks. In theory, a developed industrial country like the United States adjusts to import competition by moving workers into more advanced industries that can successfully compete in global markets.


They examined the experience of American workers after China erupted onto world markets some two decades ago. The presumed adjustment, they concluded, never happened.
Or at least hasn’t happened yet. Wages remain low and unemployment high in the most affected local job markets. Nationally, there is no sign of offsetting job gains elsewhere in the economy. What’s more, they found that sagging wages in local labor markets exposed to Chinese competition reduced earnings by $213 per adult per year.

In another study they wrote with Daron Acemoglu and Brendan Price from M.I.T., they estimated that rising Chinese imports from 1999 to 2011 cost up to 2.4 million American jobs.


“These results should cause us to rethink the short- and medium-run gains from trade,” they argued. ......

snip

The new evidence from trade suggests American policy makers cannot continue to impose all the pain on the nation’s blue-collar workers if they are not going to provide a stronger safety net.

That might have been justified if the distributional costs of trade were indeed small and short-lived. But now that we know they are big and persistent, it looks unconscionable.


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-18/free-trade-agreements-used-help-american-workers-now-they-hurt-them
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Even Mainstream Economists Now Say Free Trade Harms US Workers & Does Long-Lasting Harm (Original Post) amborin Mar 2016 OP
Clinton and fans don't care. It's all about money and profits for the Wealthy. rhett o rick Mar 2016 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author PonyUp Mar 2016 #4
+1000 amborin Mar 2016 #6
Only 20 years later FreakinDJ Mar 2016 #2
K&R Scuba Mar 2016 #3
kicking amborin Mar 2016 #5
UNCONTROLLED anything will run amok. Hortensis Mar 2016 #7
unfortunately, even when Democrats were in office, NAFTA, as one example, was a disaster amborin Mar 2016 #8
NAFTA was passed in the 1990s. Hortensis Mar 2016 #9
no kidding; amborin Mar 2016 #10
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
1. Clinton and fans don't care. It's all about money and profits for the Wealthy.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 09:17 PM
Mar 2016

50 million Americans living in poverty and Clinton supports Goldman-Sachs. Of course they helped make her very wealthy.

Response to rhett o rick (Reply #1)

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
7. UNCONTROLLED anything will run amok.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 12:27 PM
Mar 2016

Claiming that free trade is bad in itself after witnessing what happens when it is inadequately regulated is about as foolish as claiming that baking powder is a bad thing after witnessing what happens when a whole box is dumped in a cake.

These things are extremely useful tools and ingredients, but they need to be used properly.

How silly to claim economists think free trade itself is a bad thing. They don't. Go try to find an article claiming they think we should return to mercantilism or some such silliness. You won't.

What we need is control of the process. And for that we need to put more Democrats in office and toss out the incompetent free-trade ideologues who have run us on the rocks.

amborin

(16,631 posts)
8. unfortunately, even when Democrats were in office, NAFTA, as one example, was a disaster
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:32 PM
Mar 2016

for American workers; and it harmed Mexicans, who are still paying down the bailouts to the banks

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
9. NAFTA was passed in the 1990s.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 03:51 PM
Mar 2016

Those who learn a bit about contemporary economic history can at least discuss this at a high school level.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Even Mainstream Economist...