Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2008. 17% of Hillary supporters say they will vote for McCain. 22% say they will not vote if (Original Post) Luminous Animal Mar 2016 OP
I love your Memory Lane posts. merrily Mar 2016 #1
"Kissinger, Cheney and Kagen conference call on the line..." John Poet Mar 2016 #24
Took me a second. I was sitting here thinking, "Gee, I don't think I remember that call." merrily Mar 2016 #25
Did they make a difference? LyndaG Mar 2016 #2
And after her resounding speech at the convention it all turned around Renew Deal Mar 2016 #3
She does them so well, I think she should do one for Bernie. GreenPartyVoter Mar 2016 #32
McCain's not running Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2016 #4
PUMA!!! TDale313 Mar 2016 #5
Yes indeed NWCorona Mar 2016 #35
Then we would have the PUMA of 2016, only Sanders? And ya, wasn't effective. Nt seabeyond Mar 2016 #36
Where people live matters on this, I would say. TDale313 Mar 2016 #52
Except as we all know, the popular vote matters in a presidency, and as a woman, Clinton especially seabeyond Mar 2016 #55
And that's why I don't worry about the 22% of the 40% RandySF Mar 2016 #6
In combination with 65 perc of the Indy vote who hate her guts it sure worries me leveymg Mar 2016 #29
The point is RandySF Mar 2016 #33
My feeling is that it's a little different this year. revbones Mar 2016 #7
I 100% agree! Luminous Animal Mar 2016 #8
lol KMOD Mar 2016 #12
ROFLMAO! sheshe2 Mar 2016 #73
Agreed. And what does that say of her followers? Kittycat Mar 2016 #9
yeah, the establishment backers on DU have long said "it literally does not matter what policies MisterP Mar 2016 #10
Bingo eggman67 Mar 2016 #13
This. nt vintx Mar 2016 #18
By your adjective, ya I think worship/disciples/idiolizing is appropriate verbiage. So... seabeyond Mar 2016 #37
The PUMAs this year are much worse KMOD Mar 2016 #11
It's rather insulting to presume that revbones Mar 2016 #14
Well, thankfully the vast majority of Democrats, and KMOD Mar 2016 #15
Well, honestly you're wrong. revbones Mar 2016 #17
I did not guilt anyone, like I said, KMOD Mar 2016 #20
Well, you are incorrect. revbones Mar 2016 #45
Yes, Democratic voters are backing Hillary overwhelmingly KMOD Mar 2016 #68
Yes majority but not "overwhelmingly" nt revbones Mar 2016 #69
"bend principles" The same "principles" that would allow death of women and girls, per law? seabeyond Mar 2016 #38
I"m not sure what leap of logic got you to that. revbones Mar 2016 #41
Republicans get a hold of the Supreme Court, it will result in women and girls death. That simple. seabeyond Mar 2016 #44
Wow. revbones Mar 2016 #46
That would be an explanation. You do not like it. Sanders is as much into battle as Clinton. seabeyond Mar 2016 #48
Brown ones don't matter though right? Nothing changes ..... polly7 Mar 2016 #50
"Brown ones don't matter though right?" Please do not accuse me of being a racist. seabeyond Mar 2016 #53
I didn't. polly7 Mar 2016 #56
"Brown ones don't matter though right?" Yes. you did. I stopped reading when you accused seabeyond Mar 2016 #58
Brown women and girls and childen don't MATTER when it comes to war and polly7 Mar 2016 #60
That is suggesting I am racist. You cannot clean it up. Later, woman. seabeyond Mar 2016 #61
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #65
Yep, there are unprincipled sore losers every open primary geek tragedy Mar 2016 #16
Maligning people with principles revbones Mar 2016 #19
People who vote Nader/Green have vanity not principles nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #21
Fortunately that's your subjective belief revbones Mar 2016 #22
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #23
But the humping of the Bush-Cheney neoconservative foreign policy John Poet Mar 2016 #27
"humping"? Fucking? Really? They are getting off on it or something? Orgasm and all? seabeyond Mar 2016 #40
did you read the comment this was a reply to before getting outraged?… PaulaFarrell Mar 2016 #51
It means fucking.... Hence my questions to you. seabeyond Mar 2016 #54
as well as other things PaulaFarrell Mar 2016 #57
No... Not other things. One way or another, it comes back tot hat. But hey, you want to suggest seabeyond Mar 2016 #62
so i guess you refuse to read the other hidden comment PaulaFarrell Mar 2016 #64
ALWAYS. nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #67
lmfao. nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #66
'Cluster bomb', possibly. Saudi Arabia is already using weapons obtained polly7 Mar 2016 #47
The same could easily be said by those revbones Mar 2016 #42
Or the lack of principles. I guess it depends on IF your life hangs in the balance. seabeyond Mar 2016 #39
Sure, whatever you say. revbones Mar 2016 #43
"As I said before:..." And I proved otherwise. seabeyond Mar 2016 #49
"And I proved otherwise." rofl revbones Mar 2016 #63
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Mar 2016 #71
Careful, you might get a hide for not making it clear this is from 2008. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #26
Another oldie from that time... pugetres Mar 2016 #28
If DU had a Death Star . . . Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #30
And they came home for the most part. iandhr Mar 2016 #31
And they ended up voting for Obama at 87%,actually sufrommich Mar 2016 #34
And there was record voter turnout, so it seem that most of those who said they wouldn't vote StevieM Mar 2016 #59
Well now have they forgotten their big issue? SCOTUS? jwirr Mar 2016 #70
It will be interesting to see how many say they won't vote for Bernie after Zorra Mar 2016 #72

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. I love your Memory Lane posts.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:56 PM
Mar 2016

"Senator McCain and I are ready for that 3 a.m. phone call. Senator Obama is not."

Renew Deal

(81,858 posts)
3. And after her resounding speech at the convention it all turned around
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:56 PM
Mar 2016

I expect the same tear jerking endorsement speech from Sanders at the convention.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
52. Where people live matters on this, I would say.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:51 AM
Mar 2016

Since we have the Electoral College and not direct election for president. If someone lives in a safely blue or red state- sure, vote however you want. The calculation gets trickier if you live anywhere remotely likely to be a swing state.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
55. Except as we all know, the popular vote matters in a presidency, and as a woman, Clinton especially
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:54 AM
Mar 2016

needs a strong call to be President, per the popular vote to make her presidency legitimate. That is just how it works for women and blacks.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
29. In combination with 65 perc of the Indy vote who hate her guts it sure worries me
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 04:28 AM
Mar 2016

She is Secretary unelectable and is becoming more so every month. That should worry you too.

RandySF

(58,806 posts)
33. The point is
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:50 AM
Mar 2016

Hillary's voters came around and voted for Obama, just as the vast majority of Sanders supporters who don't hang out on DU will vote for Hillary.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
7. My feeling is that it's a little different this year.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:10 PM
Mar 2016

Rank idolization like many had for Hillary is more transferrable to another idol.

I think many Bernie supporters don't worship at the altar of Bernie, but rather are enthusiastic about his policies and the fact that for once we have an honest, uncorrupted, politician that isn't on the take, or a warmonger running for office.

I think asking many of those supporters to flip to support someone they literally watched tell lie after lie on TV - that is corrupt, is a warmonger, is probably guilty of crimes even without indictments, and so on - is going to be a tougher sell than many think.

Bernie's supporters aren't Bernie disciples like Hillary followers. They are supporting the policies, practices, positions of Bernie and not idolizing him in the same way that many idolize Hillary. Even if Bernie loses and endorses Hillary, just because Bernie says he endorses her isn't going to change how people view Hillary.


For the inevitable jurors
The Terms of Service clearly state "But that does not mean that DU members are required to always be completely supportive of Democrats. During the ups-and-downs of politics and policy-making, it is perfectly normal to have mixed feelings about the Democratic officials we worked hard to help elect."

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
8. I 100% agree!
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:12 PM
Mar 2016

"Bernie's supporters aren't Bernie disciples like Hillary followers. They are supporting the policies, practices, positions of Bernie and not idolizing him in the same way that many idolize Hillary. Even if Bernie loses and endorses Hillary, just because Bernie says he endorses her isn't going to change how people view Hillary. "

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
9. Agreed. And what does that say of her followers?
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:24 PM
Mar 2016

They're cool voting for a republican. That shows you where her policies are. Our policies are on the left, which is why we aren't aligned with Hillary. And her speech today at AIPAC is one more glowing reason why we don't support her.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
10. yeah, the establishment backers on DU have long said "it literally does not matter what policies
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:56 PM
Mar 2016

or actions X takes, I only care that it's X doing it"

the perfect voter for a politics that's had all the air pumped out of it

eggman67

(837 posts)
13. Bingo
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:22 PM
Mar 2016

While I have enormous respect for Senator Sanders as a human being, this is not a cult of personality it's a cult of policy & principles. It wouldn't matter to me if God himself opened the heavens and endorsed HRC, there is simply no chance whatsoever that my conscience will ever allow me to vote for her.

To quote Hillary herself: "that will never, ever come to pass."

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
37. By your adjective, ya I think worship/disciples/idiolizing is appropriate verbiage. So...
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:06 AM
Mar 2016

You have rationalized not voting Clinton and allowing deaths of women and girls, but you are not "worship/disciples/idiolizing".

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
11. The PUMAs this year are much worse
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:08 PM
Mar 2016

80% of Bernie Supporters on Democratic Underground will help Trump in his election if they can't have their candidate.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
14. It's rather insulting to presume that
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:25 PM
Mar 2016

because some people might have issues voting for someone that is a corrupt and bought politician, that they are actively helping someone else that is a racist and buys politicians.

0 + 0 = 0
Not voting for Hillary (if she's the nominee) does not magically give Trump a vote.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
15. Well, thankfully the vast majority of Democrats, and
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:32 PM
Mar 2016

Democratic leaning voters do not share your views.

And thankfully, she will prevail anyway.

And you're wrong. Any democratic voter, who does not participate in exercising their voting right, helps idiots like Trump.

Vote how you wish, but facts are facts.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
17. Well, honestly you're wrong.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
Mar 2016

She may prevail.

But don't try to guilt or insult other people because they can't bend their principles as far as you might be able to, in order to vote for Hillary.

Facts are indeed facts. Subjective beliefs and insults are subjective. You may eventually realize that your beliefs are not necessarily that of others, and it's wrong to assume such.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
20. I did not guilt anyone, like I said,
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:58 PM
Mar 2016

vote as you wish.

But once again, Democratic voters and Democratic leaning voters, overwhelming support Hillary Clinton.

That's a fact.

The majority of Democratic voters do not view both parties as the same, and they will overwhelmingly support Hillary Clinton in the General Election. They will do so based on their beliefs.

Your beliefs are yours. Do what you think is best. But don't claim that you speak for the majority of Democrats, because you don't.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
45. Well, you are incorrect.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:43 AM
Mar 2016

First, you are guilting people. If you can't see that, well then there are other problems at hand.

Second, your statements are not facts. Democratic voters in the primarys have favored Hillary but not "overwhelmingly". "Democratic leaning voters" which I'm guessing you mean Independents that voted in Democratic primarys, overwhelmingly favor Bernie.

Those are actual facts.

You are the one claiming to speak for a majority of people which would seem to indicate quite the ego. I'm the one saying don't speak for people.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
68. Yes, Democratic voters are backing Hillary overwhelmingly
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 12:19 PM
Mar 2016

She has twice as many delegates and 2.5 million more votes.

Those facts equal a majority.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
38. "bend principles" The same "principles" that would allow death of women and girls, per law?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:08 AM
Mar 2016

Where would the guilting be?

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
41. I"m not sure what leap of logic got you to that.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:31 AM
Mar 2016

Or how you got to talking about allowing the "death of women and girls" since you didn't elaborate at all.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
44. Republicans get a hold of the Supreme Court, it will result in women and girls death. That simple.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:42 AM
Mar 2016

No quibble. No justifications, validations or excuses. It bottom lines to our lives.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
46. Wow.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:45 AM
Mar 2016

Rather than explain your position, you just provide a doomsday scenario. By that logic I could say that if Hillary gets elected, it will result in the death of thousands if not millions of men, women and children.

Does that work? Didn't think so. Even though unlike your premise I could substantiate that one by saying she would enter us into many wars.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
48. That would be an explanation. You do not like it. Sanders is as much into battle as Clinton.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:48 AM
Mar 2016

Kosovo War, Afghanistan, Sanders supported only a gradual withdrawal from Iraq. Sanders supported the resolution that gave support to George W. Bush in both Iraq and in the larger war against terrorism. Sanders has supported Israel’s aggressive Middle East policies against Palestinian statehood. Sanders supported HR 282, the Iran Freedom Support Act, which was similar to the resolutions leading to the Iraq War. And Sanders has stated that he too would use drones.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
50. Brown ones don't matter though right? Nothing changes .....
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:50 AM
Mar 2016

weapons makers and the war machine have gotta make money. Those women and girls are expendable.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
58. "Brown ones don't matter though right?" Yes. you did. I stopped reading when you accused
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:59 AM
Mar 2016

me of being a racist. I often do that with your posts. You start with the most extreme insults. Ask and answer.... No thank you. I feel that is a dishonest way to have a conversation. I do not read any further.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
60. Brown women and girls and childen don't MATTER when it comes to war and
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:01 AM
Mar 2016

which candidate wants more of it, right??? That's not a fucking racist question, it's the truth.

You're so pure .......... don't you have some private medical info to steal and pm around?

Response to seabeyond (Reply #61)

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
16. Yep, there are unprincipled sore losers every open primary
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:46 PM
Mar 2016

But the vast majority come together when it counts.

A lot of the PUMAs were conservadems and the BernieorBusters are largely Nader fans.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
22. Fortunately that's your subjective belief
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 12:06 AM
Mar 2016

Nader didn't lose the election for Gore. Asking for a partial recount and not taking the full recount lost it. Otherwise as was proven by the subsequent recount paid for by news media, Gore would have won.

People can whine and insult others for having the principles they themselves lack, but doing so won't make it true.

Response to revbones (Reply #22)

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
27. But the humping of the Bush-Cheney neoconservative foreign policy
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 04:12 AM
Mar 2016

by Hillary's supporters will continue.


'Who Will Hillary Bomb?'



PaulaFarrell

(1,236 posts)
51. did you read the comment this was a reply to before getting outraged?…
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:51 AM
Mar 2016

And humping has other meanings, certainly colloquially when I was growing up it meant to push or promote, eg try to sell. So a good play on the words of the previous poster's Ott comment.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
62. No... Not other things. One way or another, it comes back tot hat. But hey, you want to suggest
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:06 AM
Mar 2016

People are having orgasms over what? death? WTF ever. I am outta here. All this is pretty much too vile for me.

PaulaFarrell

(1,236 posts)
64. so i guess you refuse to read the other hidden comment
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:22 AM
Mar 2016

Which was much more explicit and vile. You are practicing selective outrage.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
47. 'Cluster bomb', possibly. Saudi Arabia is already using weapons obtained
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:47 AM
Mar 2016

by donating to the Clinton Foundation to bomb and commit war-crimes in Yemen. I think yours is a fair question. I believe it will first be Syria, then possibly Iran - 'obliterate them'.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
42. The same could easily be said by those
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:32 AM
Mar 2016

that people that vote Hillary are part of a cult of personality and have no principles. You don't even provide an argument, just an insult. Nice.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
43. Sure, whatever you say.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:37 AM
Mar 2016

As I said before:

Bernie's supporters aren't Bernie disciples like Hillary followers. They are supporting the policies, practices, positions of Bernie and not idolizing him in the same way that many idolize Hillary. Even if Bernie loses and endorses Hillary, just because Bernie says he endorses her isn't going to change how people view Hillary.

You may be able to live with yourself after voting for Hillary, but my thinking is that many will not be able to bend their principles as easily. There was a difference in 2008, and despite her running what many saw as an overtly racist campain against Obama and being pro DOMA at the time, most of the policy proposals and actual decisionsactions were similar enough to allow an easier transition in support. I don't feel that will be the case for many this year.

Response to revbones (Reply #63)

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
26. Careful, you might get a hide for not making it clear this is from 2008.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 04:09 AM
Mar 2016

Just putting that number in your OP is not enough clarification for the Hill-and-Billie-Hide-Patrol.

remember this:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511325387

 

pugetres

(507 posts)
28. Another oldie from that time...
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 04:26 AM
Mar 2016
According to the exit polls, half of Clinton's supporters in Indiana would not vote for Obama in a general election match up with John McCain. A third of Clinton voters said they would pick McCain over Obama, while 17 percent said they would not vote at all. Just 48 percent of Clinton supporters said they would back Obama in November.
[link:http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/06/exit-polls-half-of-clintons-supporters-wont-back-obama/|

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
30. If DU had a Death Star . . .
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 04:35 AM
Mar 2016

. . . I could imagine Skinner saying, "The rebels must be destroyed".

In 2008 when the PUMA mantra first began here at DU, I felt that either they didn't understand how selfish they were to only support Hillary -- who constantly told lies about then-Senator Obama -- or that they were simply closet racists hoping to smash Obama and the rebellion.

When Hillary's own aides put pictures of Obama online wearing the traditional dress in Kenya, that was it for me.
I no longer wasted 5 minutes arguing with them, or discussing anything with them on this forum, I just left of my own accord.

But, this year, with the FBI conducting an investigation in to Hillary's server problems, there is only one candidate running for the office of President that even comes close to representing what I want the President to be . . . and that is Bernie Sanders.






sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
34. And they ended up voting for Obama at 87%,actually
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:54 AM
Mar 2016

a higher percentage than John Edward's supporters,who had the lowest percentage of Obama voters.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
59. And there was record voter turnout, so it seem that most of those who said they wouldn't vote
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:00 AM
Mar 2016

wound up voting after all.

I was extremely bitter after the primaries were over, but I eventually moved passed it. I voted for Obama and am glad that I did. Eventually I became a big supporter of his and now believe that he has been a very good president.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
70. Well now have they forgotten their big issue? SCOTUS?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 12:48 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie will do what they want in filling SCOTUS seats but will Trump or Cruz?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»2008. 17% of Hillary supp...