2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Sanders campaign - a post mortem
Bernie waited for Elizabeth Warren to make a decision. She was the progressive wing's first choice. Senator Warren astutely decided not to run because of the very problems Bernie encountered. She could not have garnered the African American and Latino support either. In any event, precious time was lost in deciding on a campaign.
Initially, there were high hopes of an "Obama like" campaign. Unfortunately, the Bernie campaign was clueless about what made Obama win, wrongly thinking that President Obama won because of social media. They didn't realize that there was a lot of ground work done by the Obama campaign with hundreds of foot-soldiers and the social media were simply one, albeit the most visible aspects of his campaign.
Bernie unleashed social media by spending a lot of money and won all online polls etc. Unfortunately, social media are impossible to control and the message became garbled. What is worse is that the social media warriors turned vicious, swarming Hillary supporters and alienating vast swaths of people.
When their positive message was not effective, the social media warriors turned vicious and started vilifying and demonizing Hillary which turned most mainstream democrats off. Eventually, no one believed those smears that were being perpetuated and Bernie supporters kept convincing other Bernie supporters how bad Hillary is - a classic definition of an echo chamber.
Take the "transcripts of Goldman Sachs speeches" for example. No one cared except Bernie supporters, stimulated into a frenzy by other Bernie supporters.
Such a frenzy turned into a series of false beliefs like "once people get to know Bernie, they will flock to him" or "this is just like 2008."
All this time, the Hillary campaign engaged in the hard work on the ground necessary to win which was mostly overlooked by the Bernie campaign till it was too late.
The desperation turned to blackmail with the evolution of the "Bernie or bust" threats. Most people laughed at it.
However, the biggest victim of all the social media frenzy was that a small segment of internet warriors were brainwashed into thinking that Hillary is not a progressive. Everyone except them laugh at this and suppress an eclamation of "brother (or sister), wake up and smell the coffee." On THIS planet, there is very little difference between Bernie's policies and Hillary's policies. Both Bernie and Hillary as president will accomplish exactly the same -- just what is possible in a political environment and negotiations in congress. Promising a gold roof on every house may be desirable but it doesn't mean it is doable. There is such a thing as reality. The fatal flaw in Bernie's campaign was not being realistic and it never recovered from it. Reality has its ways of exacting punishment, no matter how many internet polls one wins, no matter the size of the rallies and the number of bumper stickers.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)A lot of folks spend their time here doing nothing but looking for reasons to be butthurt.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)In the context of toxic DU Hillary supporter discourse.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(72,377 posts)after the convention.
Gothmog
(145,178 posts)Sanders will have very little if any success in this tactic. Super delegates and pledged delegates are party loyalists who will not flip bases on worthless match up polls. Sanders' policies and platform are toxic for down ballot candidates which is why Nancy Pelosi rejected this platform http://thehill.com/homenews/house/267236-pelosi-distances-dems-from-sanderss-plan-to-raise-taxes
Democrats are not on board with the tax hikes Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has proposed to pay for his single-payer healthcare proposal, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Wednesday.
"We're not running on any platform of raising taxes," Pelosi said during a press briefing to launch the Democrats' yearly issues conference in Baltimore, Md. "We do want to have a fairer tax system, and we hope that we can do that this year."
Cal33
(7,018 posts)the problems Trump has with the Republican Establishment. And both Establishments have been
losing large numbers of members. The Independents, on the other hand, are growing in size --
it has become larger than either of the two Major Parties. People finally are becoming fed up with
the feckless Establishments, and are leaving them. Enough is enough. This is also a part of the "math."
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)"Hillary is not a progressive"
fixed it for ya
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Ugly.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)astrophuss42
(290 posts)lmbradford
(517 posts)Every time someone calls for Bernie to quit at halftime, he gets more money from me.
woodsprite
(11,913 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)I've seen quite a few posts about that subject lately. Is that the new talking point?
How much does Podesta make from the ad sales? What is David Brock getting paid? How about Peter Daou over at the Blue Nation Review propaganda site?
Glass houses...
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)William769
(55,146 posts)doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein
casperthegm
(643 posts)Probably need to pace myself though, given the frequency of these desperate posts from HRC supporters.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)If they've got fork signatures, we should have flop sweat ones. Need to work on that.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)it kind of undercuts a major Sanders theme, the "my donors are little people giving small amounts of money".
No, they're not; they're actually just like any other donor, just donating in small chunks rather than all at once.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)tonedevil
(3,022 posts)felt and genuine concern.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)The longer Sanders stays in, the more chance that the next US president will have a lemming on his head.
But leftover money donated to his campaign will probably end up going on other progressive causes, so it won't be a complete waste.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I can certainly help out with this particular commitment of Bernie donors.
Bernie should drop out, save time, energy and donor money.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)Those average contributions of $27 don't seem to have magically turned into golden delegates lately.
iwillalwayswonderwhy
(2,602 posts)That's just a meme. <sarcasm>
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)With animals they often call it research.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)And many of the posters who benefit from Skinner's "amnesty plan" are followers of Senator Sanders.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Seems it's mostly Hillary's Hounds that were released from Hell.*
*Note: Hounds of Hell is a metaphor and doesn't represent any one particular poster.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)That's in another thread...
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Autumn
(45,071 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)in, oh, say, never.
Some people are like that
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Next time you feign ignorance over the multiple calls for Bernie to get out of the race.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Hell, the patient isn't even on life support.
But, boy howdy, do you Hillary fans want him to get out.
Pssttt: We're not going anywhere.
BTW, "Bernie or Bust" and/or "Bernie or Jill" isn't really blackmail since those voters don't give a rat's ass what you do with your corporate-owned war hawk criminal of a candidate.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)"Take the "transcripts of Goldman Sachs speeches" for example. No one cared except Bernie supporters, stimulated into a frenzy by other Bernie supporters." That's right. Nobody cares because our party needs the money it gets from banks and other financial institutions, and we can't afford to be too interested in right and wrong. As long as it's legal, we accept that our candidates will take money from the same special interests that donate to the Republicans. We pretend the other party is bought and paid for by that money, while we remain forthright and independent. We ignore the obvious proof that this is a lie, but we go on telling ourselves the lie because we feel we have no alternative. And that's true. We closed out our options when we took their money.
By the way, I enjoy how Clinton supporters contradict themselves so easily. "On THIS planet, there is very little difference between Bernie's policies and Hillary's policies. Both Bernie and Hillary as president will accomplish exactly the same -- just what is possible in a political environment and negotiations in congress. Promising a gold roof on every house may be desirable but it doesn't mean it is doable."
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)stupidicus
(2,570 posts)and all of the efforts of this kind from those who share her less than flattering povs ain't gonna hide that
http://www.juancole.com/2016/03/hillary-clinton-goes-full-neocon-at-aipac-demonizes-iran-palestinians.html
it just makes you a neocon supporter
LexVegas
(6,060 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)LexVegas
(6,060 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Hillary who claimed it was wrong to ask her to drop out in 08. Why is all of that different for Bernie, exactly? Why is he not allowed to pay people but Hillary can lavish the cash? What is your dog whistle here?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)"fiscal conservatism".
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)I haven't seen or heard of anything of the sort.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Sounds like blackmail to me.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)in which the voter pledges NOT to vote for Clinton.
Blackmail? You're playing awfully fast and loose with definitions.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)If I was asked to sign that initiative I would refuse.
But, the mentioned threat of Hillary or Trump looks to me like much the same thing. I won't that either.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)calguy
(5,306 posts)This is what they'll be saying after the convention maybe, and certainly in January when Hillary takes the oath of office.
rock
(13,218 posts)One of the sharpest articles I've ever read on DU. Thanks.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)The value of Bernie Sanders' campaign, and entire political career. I'm sorry because of what you are missing, along with all of the other voters who don't see the outstanding principles and vision that comes from the very core of what this nation was created for.
If you don't see it, there's little we can do to help other than describing the different worlds the politicians live in. It's obvious to many of us. Clearly, Trump isn't the American dream. Maybe not so clearly, Clinton is the American dream, tarnished. Sanders is the embodiment of the democratic experiment.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)I simply said the campaign made serious and unrealistic miscalculations which doomed it.
"I'm sorry because of what you are missing, along with all of the other voters who don't see the outstanding principles and vision that comes from the very core of what this nation was created for. " <<< That is the job of the campaign to get the voters on board -- if it couldn't, it failed. It is that simple.
postatomic
(1,771 posts)I'm amazed at how some Sandman supporters will just keep hammering the same tired talking points. As you said; no one gives a fuck about speech transcripts.
All you need to back up your post is this simple image:
mac56
(17,566 posts)Too cute by half.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)I really, really don't want to live in your version of reality. Scary, skewed and confined it is.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)dchill
(38,485 posts)Bash away.
Mike Nelson
(9,954 posts)...release those transcripts. Dumbest scandal of the year. We know Hillary said nice things about people paying. I don't like him suggesting she's "on the take" (quotes mine, not Bernie's). I like the early Bernie much better.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)It's really hard to believe anybody tried to equate these two politicians.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)Ignore is your friend.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)He still won't be the nominee, I'm sure, but he managed to generate a very credible campaign and is so far earning about 40% of the vote. I expect that 60:40 ratio to pretty much maintain through the rest of the primary season, within a couple of percentage points.
What should be remembered from the 2016 Democratic primaries is that nobody is absolutely assured of the nomination.
I hope Bernie continues to serve in the Senate, for as long as he wishes. He can be of material help to the new Clinton administration in getting progressive measures through that body.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)I think Bernie, having lost the Primary, will retire from his 25 years in Congress with his government pension and Social Security check intact and go home to Vermont, leaving the Dems to pick up the pieces of the Democratic Party (that he elected not to join, but chose to tarnish) and move forward in the Fall. I would have had more respect for Bernie had he spent that same energy getting his supporters in Congress to shore up the current social security system and pass a jobs program designed to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure system before embarking on any new, more grandiose spending program which was dead on arrival had he won the Presidency without his requisite (and more unlikely than not) Revolution in tow.
Yeh, yeh, yeh, I now Bernie had a plan for rebuilding our infrastructure, but that message was further down the line behind the Free College and Free universal health care, and wouldn't have ever seen the light of day either.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)He has always been in the minority - the extreme minority. All the same he has been effective in introducing and passing amendments to bills that have helped many. I have nothing but respect for Bernie Sanders.
He will not be the Democratic nominee, but he showed that it is possible to challenge the status quo. That will be the lesson he has taught.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)This nation has too many problems that need urgent attention, and this was not the year with a $19 trillion dollar deficit to be running on a platform of free college, free healthcare, and a doubling of the Social Security benefit payout, when anyone whose been paying attention over the last 8 years knows that there is no appetite in the current GOP dominated House and Senate for NEW entitlement programs, or the raising of taxes. It just wasn't going to happen. But in the meantime, you bloody up your primary opponent and sic your angry primary voters on her based on stuff that goes back 20 years, that no one cares about.
FTR, if voters cared about the truth, Trump wouldn't be leading the pack in the the GOP race. The only thing I agree with Bernie on is that Trump is a perpetual liar, and he lies about anything and everything. There is too much at stake in this election to hold Hillary to a higher standard than we've ever held any other previous candidate to. It's also wrong to hold her accountable for her husbands actions with other women where she was as much of a victim. The fact that they chose to stay together in spite of his infidelities is their business, not my business. I followed the Clintons throughout Bill Clinton's presidency and he was the first and only president who was ever hounded by a special prosecutor act with subpoena power his entire time in office with little to nothing to show for it. If every politician who lied about extramarital sex was subjected to the same processes that he faced, the halls of Congress, and legislative Houses across this nation would be empty.
bobthedrummer
(26,083 posts)BCCI, Iran Contra relevance: UAE, Saudi, Pakistan, money and Bush family (ProSense 10-7-2006 DU)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2870996
Dem2
(8,168 posts)I thought the O/P was silly too, but eye-for-eye isn't a good strategy.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
William769
(55,146 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)....Bernie's campaign was just like Obama's. We were bludgeoned with the timelines and charts that numbers for Hillary were on target for the same type of loss as in 2008.
No more accepting and chewing over the False Bernie memes. I am done. Enough already with those lies and falsehoods regarding the status of the campaigns. The op was spot on and has iterated the hell Bernie supporters have put so many Hillary supporters through.
The reality is a completely different path than the one the Bernie supporters attempt to create and even re-forge when reality is slapping them in the face.
ismnotwasm
(41,977 posts)Heh.
Vinca
(50,269 posts)And, re the transcripts. Of course no one cares about them if they're hidden in a vault under lock and key. You can't care much about what you don't get to see. How do you suppose voters would feel about the speeches if they were released? How would they feel if they knew, as reported, that Hillary sympathized with the poor banksters and assured them we all caused the problem and we would all solve it? The poor, poor banksters. Taxpayers who could least afford it bailed them out and what did the banksters do? Gave themselves big bonuses. Yep. I guess it's just my imagination running wild to think people might be bothered by those quarter-of-a-million-dollar-a-pop, big wet kisses . . . er speeches . . . Hillary gave to Wall Street.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Vinca
(50,269 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)jonno99
(2,620 posts)to happen in the next week - much less in the next few months...
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)on running commercial for Hillary and the 1%, and people are connecting the dots every second .
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)So how's the stock market doing?
Logical
(22,457 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)Yours not so much.