Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

lancer78

(1,495 posts)
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:36 PM Mar 2016

Bernie was a concientous objector

to the war in Vietnam. Does this fact alone disqualify him from being the Commander-In-Cheif? Discuss.


Add some explanations why you feel that way please. I am dueling some FB friends from high school.

103 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie was a concientous objector (Original Post) lancer78 Mar 2016 OP
Nope, and it's an absurd question. arcane1 Mar 2016 #1
Agree. it might qualify him to be COC, though. Hortensis Mar 2016 #31
As a veteran, it matters to me, that someone running for Commander in Chief politicaljunkie41910 Mar 2016 #53
As a veteran tazkcmo Mar 2016 #68
Ditto. nt SusanCalvin Mar 2016 #73
Tritto. n/t Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #77
Another Veteran here that isn't bothered by it either HDSam Mar 2016 #78
Were you bothered by Bill Clinton's rather convoluted means of escaping the draft? Fumesucker Mar 2016 #81
Vietnam was a disgrace, and he was right to oppose it. It was nobody's "turn" to commit crimes. arcane1 Mar 2016 #88
the vietnam-era vet agrees 100% DrDan Mar 2016 #97
The Government does not have the right to define the conscience of the People. stone space Mar 2016 #98
it's extremely unlikely Bernie will be calling up your kids to war if he is President greymouse Mar 2016 #99
It makes him uniquely qualified. CanadaexPat Mar 2016 #2
Yes, we will be able to trust him not to go to war unless it is jwirr Mar 2016 #43
Fuck no whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #3
No. NV Whino Mar 2016 #4
Not only no, but hell no! hobbit709 Mar 2016 #5
You're joking, right? elleng Mar 2016 #6
Sorry lancer78 Mar 2016 #8
I did not intend to correct your spelling, lancer, elleng Mar 2016 #19
Good thing, too! Wilms Mar 2016 #7
what was Bill Clinton's excuse? TheDormouse Mar 2016 #9
One more thing he would have to explain in the GE redstateblues Mar 2016 #10
have they used it against Trump? nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #12
Well at least Hillary's attempt to join the Marines will count in her favor, huh? cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #32
Yeah tazkcmo Mar 2016 #75
Exactly how? HDSam Mar 2016 #87
It's just something that would give ammunition to the Rs redstateblues Mar 2016 #103
On what grounds? NCTraveler Mar 2016 #11
That was unfortunate NWCorona Mar 2016 #20
Thanks for the link. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #30
Quite the opposite. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #13
As a former service member NWCorona Mar 2016 #14
No, but it could hurt him politically nt firebrand80 Mar 2016 #15
Kudos to Bernie! Bjornsdotter Mar 2016 #16
Hillary was a Republcan. floriduck Mar 2016 #17
Hillary protested the war just like Bernie (who never got conscientious ... frazzled Mar 2016 #23
There is no lie in my statement. floriduck Mar 2016 #29
She still basically is. pangaia Mar 2016 #25
+1 BeanMusical Mar 2016 #84
Quite the opposite. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #18
Well said. elleng Mar 2016 #21
:) AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #33
True. Wild-ass invasions signify weakness of mind and soul. senz Mar 2016 #40
I'm not aware that he recieved that status, he says that he requested it which braddy Mar 2016 #22
Makes him more qualified, not less. Maedhros Mar 2016 #24
Thank you for replies lancer78 Mar 2016 #26
Not even then. No Afghani ever tried to take away my freedom of speech n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #34
Did you try a search of DU? I am sure this subject has been posted on here before. merrily Mar 2016 #27
If that was the standard for posting here, there would be a lot fewer OPs. onenote Mar 2016 #39
Sanders,and every other male college student,was protected from sufrommich Mar 2016 #28
Bernie came from a very poor home. Unlike Hillary. senz Mar 2016 #41
I didn't say he didn't. I said the draftees were mostly the sufrommich Mar 2016 #47
Bernie did not get a college deferment. senz Mar 2016 #49
Don't attribute shit to what I said that isn't there.He was eligible for a sufrommich Mar 2016 #59
Just responding to how your worded your comment. senz Mar 2016 #67
No, but it will be part of the right wing attacks on him - OhZone Mar 2016 #35
No it won't HDSam Mar 2016 #89
No, it won't because Bernie won't win the nomination, but Trump - OhZone Mar 2016 #94
As a vet I wonder workinclasszero Mar 2016 #36
There's this noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #60
Did you mean consciencetious? cosmicone Mar 2016 #37
Wrong. He applied for CO status but didn't receive it. senz Mar 2016 #38
Bernie was not a conscientious objector and it is false to say that he was. yardwork Mar 2016 #42
Imagine the eye rolling at the highest levels of the Pentagon. oasis Mar 2016 #44
This is just one of the reasons why republicans wanted Bernie to win the democratic nomination. workinclasszero Mar 2016 #45
His status was the same as Bill Clinton's: Student. Vinca Mar 2016 #46
Actually, Bernie didn't have a student deferment. senz Mar 2016 #51
I am a Hillary supporter and this subject would not make a difference to me. fun n serious Mar 2016 #64
And Dick Cheney... Skid Rogue Mar 2016 #52
I don't think any of the current candidates have served in the military. Vinca Mar 2016 #61
No, none have HDSam Mar 2016 #90
I don't fault anyone for not serving in Vietnam, even Trump. Vinca Mar 2016 #96
I've no problemswith CO, not sure voters in the GE share my sentiments. oasis Mar 2016 #70
I did a lot of eye rolling when I was in. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #65
Those with the scrambled eggs on their hats and fruit salad on their chests oasis Mar 2016 #71
They probably won't be backing Hillary either. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #85
Pentagon greymouse Mar 2016 #100
Who cares? I don't think anyone should worship at the feet of the military. alarimer Mar 2016 #101
Meh. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #48
I would say it qualifies him greymouse Mar 2016 #50
No. That's a stupid question. Codeine Mar 2016 #54
Is being a CO a bad thing, now? stone space Mar 2016 #55
Absolutely not... Skid Rogue Mar 2016 #62
make sure you all register reddread Mar 2016 #56
No. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #57
I spent 15 months madokie Mar 2016 #58
There are many of us that felt the same way OutNow Mar 2016 #92
No. No more than than not being a doctor disqualifies someone from running hospital. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #63
No Third Doctor Mar 2016 #66
Disqualify? No, not at all. Dem2 Mar 2016 #69
Dick Cheney and the chickenhawks tried the same thing, without... Armstead Mar 2016 #72
It would have hurt him badly in the GE. (If you're busy explainin' ... you're losin'.) NurseJackie Mar 2016 #74
Knowing his stance on issues over the past decades, no I don't think it disqualifies him. ladyVet Mar 2016 #76
He's been consistent in his philosophy all his life. Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #79
Nope. Now, how about Hillary's 6 years on the Walmart board of directors? jfern Mar 2016 #80
Good, bad, or indifferent, what's the 1960s alternative? thesquanderer Mar 2016 #82
No. daleanime Mar 2016 #83
+1 BeanMusical Mar 2016 #86
I know some older people who are bothered by this gollygee Mar 2016 #91
far as I know, we haven't had a president who served in that war rurallib Mar 2016 #93
Hillary tried to enlist in the marines Doctor_J Mar 2016 #95
Tell your HS Facebook buddies what JFK said about conscientious objectors like Bernie Sanders. Octafish Mar 2016 #102
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
1. Nope, and it's an absurd question.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:36 PM
Mar 2016

Hell, anyone who AGREED with invading Vietnam should have no business in the White House.

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
53. As a veteran, it matters to me, that someone running for Commander in Chief
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:30 PM
Mar 2016

was a concientous objector when it was was his turn to serve. Bernie actually didn't qualify as a CO because in order to qualify as such, one would have had to object to ALL WARS not any particular war. So instead, Bernie like many others, choose to use the Student Deferment policy until his clock ran out. By the time his number came up, he was too old. As someone with two sons, and 3 grandsons, I would have a problem with someone like Bernie calling up one of them to a war, when he chose not to serve when it was his turn.

HDSam

(251 posts)
78. Another Veteran here that isn't bothered by it either
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:13 PM
Mar 2016

The G.I. Bill was the only realistic way I was going to be able to afford a college education and like many before me, in 1987 I signed my name on the dotted line.

In retrospect, the cost was far too high. Desiring an education shouldn't require someone to put their life up as collateral.

On another note, I think free or very low cost education would decimate military recruiting because the G.I. Bill is an attractive carrot to offer to high school students. Sander's goal of free education is probably viewed with great concern by those candidates that are proponents of the MIC.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
81. Were you bothered by Bill Clinton's rather convoluted means of escaping the draft?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:16 PM
Mar 2016

If you didn't have a problem with Clinton then why with Sanders?

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
88. Vietnam was a disgrace, and he was right to oppose it. It was nobody's "turn" to commit crimes.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:23 PM
Mar 2016

Anyone who thinks invading that country was a Good Idea is someone who does not deserve the honor of being Commander in Chief.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
98. The Government does not have the right to define the conscience of the People.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:27 AM
Mar 2016
Bernie actually didn't qualify as a CO because in order to qualify as such, one would have had to object to ALL WARS not any particular war.


Since when is the government an expert on our own consciences?

greymouse

(872 posts)
99. it's extremely unlikely Bernie will be calling up your kids to war if he is President
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:34 AM
Mar 2016

Hillary, on the other hand, much more likely.

It is not serving one's country to fight in an unnecessary war.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
43. Yes, we will be able to trust him not to go to war unless it is
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:14 PM
Mar 2016

ABSOLUTELY necessary as a last resort.

My family tree is full of South Carolina Quakers who moved away from SC and joined the Union Army in the Civil War because they considered slavery to be the greater sin.

elleng

(130,895 posts)
19. I did not intend to correct your spelling, lancer,
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:43 PM
Mar 2016

but to suggest that he was and is a conscientious person: (of a person) wishing to do what is right, especially to do one's work or duty well and thoroughly.

HDSam

(251 posts)
87. Exactly how?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:21 PM
Mar 2016

None of the other candidates served to the best my knowledge and at least two, Kasich and Trump, were draft age during Vietnam.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
103. It's just something that would give ammunition to the Rs
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:14 AM
Mar 2016

I'm not saying it's fair or right but It would fit into the likely narrative they would use to define Bernie. If Bernie's campaign was smarter they would get out in front of it now like they should have done more effectively with the self proclaimed Socialism moniker. Bernie's motive for adding "democratic" when he decided to run just looks very self serving. If Bernie wins the nomination I will vote for him but he has a number of vulnerabilities that the Rs could make a lot of hay with. To her credit, Hillary has been very disciplined about going easy on Bernie for a number of reasons.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
30. Thanks for the link.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:57 PM
Mar 2016

Considering my fathers duties, he made it out a lot better than many of the men with him. Like many, he only recently started talking about it.

I have a hard time faulting anyone who didn't go for any reason. Our government had all the cannon fodder they needed.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
13. Quite the opposite.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:41 PM
Mar 2016

I'd expect him to be very stingy with the blood of our men and women in military service. That's how it should be. I trust Bernie to only support fighting wars that cannot and must not be avoided. If it had been WW2 and not Vietnam, I have no doubt in my mind he'd have served.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
23. Hillary protested the war just like Bernie (who never got conscientious ...
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:51 PM
Mar 2016

objector status, btw; it was rejected. By the time his number came up he was too old.).

Please don't tell lies. She was against the war in Vietnam, organized protests after Kent State, and campaigned for anti-war candidate George McGovern. Both opposed the war, and neither is unfit to be commander in chief.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
29. There is no lie in my statement.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:56 PM
Mar 2016

I said she was a Republican. She was. I never mentioned one word about her feelings on the Vietnam Nam war. So put your straw man back in the closet and back away from the ledge.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
18. Quite the opposite.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:43 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie has unimpeachable ethical standards.

Being pro-war in a PNAC kind of way like his opponent does not equate to being a strong leader.

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
22. I'm not aware that he recieved that status, he says that he requested it which
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:47 PM
Mar 2016

was very, very, very common at the time, but people don't realize that you had to be able to convince the draft board people that you were sincere and committed, just saying that you felt that way wasn't enough.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
24. Makes him more qualified, not less.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:52 PM
Mar 2016

He understands that bullshit wars are bullshit. I'd like someone like that in the White House.

 

lancer78

(1,495 posts)
26. Thank you for replies
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:55 PM
Mar 2016

I agree that it doesn't disqualify him. As I have stated before, the American soldier has not fought for our "freedom" since WW2 except maybe in Afghanistan.

onenote

(42,700 posts)
39. If that was the standard for posting here, there would be a lot fewer OPs.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:07 PM
Mar 2016

Topics get rehashed here endlessly, as you well know.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
28. Sanders,and every other male college student,was protected from
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:56 PM
Mar 2016

the draft by using a student deferment until 1964 when he graduated,after that he was too old to be drafted. That's why the drafted soldiers were almost exclusively working class and poor men who weren't in college up until that point.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
47. I didn't say he didn't. I said the draftees were mostly the
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:22 PM
Mar 2016

working class and poor who weren't eligible for college deferments. I grew up in a blue collar town where very few young males went on to college and went to work in the auto factories instead,many got drafted. My comment wasn't aimed at Bernie,it was aimed at a very hideous rule that allowed college kids to stay out of the war as if they "counted" more than other kids.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
49. Bernie did not get a college deferment.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:26 PM
Mar 2016

He applied for CO status and by the time it was rejected, he was too old for the draft.

Bernie's family were poor working class Jews, they lived in a small apartment, never had a house, and they worried about expenditures for things like curtains or a rug.

Please don't paint him as a a rich white privileged male. Especially when your candidate, a WASP, came from a very privileged background, grew up in what most people would regard as a mansion, and went to elite schools.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
59. Don't attribute shit to what I said that isn't there.He was eligible for a
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:34 PM
Mar 2016

college deferment until he graduated,just like every other college student at the time. He didn't have to worry about being drafted.

"Please don't paint him as a a rich white privileged male". I swear to God,some of you are in a permanent state of manufactured outrage.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
67. Just responding to how your worded your comment.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:46 PM
Mar 2016

You phrased it in terms of class privilege. I responded in kind.

HDSam

(251 posts)
89. No it won't
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:29 PM
Mar 2016

The likely republican nominee, Trump, was draft age during Vietnam, as was Kasich. They don't want to open that can of worms.

Cruz wasn't of age during a draft, but he'd still have to justify his lack of service if he wanted to question Sanders about his.

OhZone

(3,212 posts)
94. No, it won't because Bernie won't win the nomination, but Trump -
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:42 PM
Mar 2016

would attack anyone for anything. He has no shame.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
36. As a vet I wonder
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:03 PM
Mar 2016

How military personal would react to a CO CinC sending them to war if it was needed.

noretreatnosurrender

(1,890 posts)
60. There's this
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:36 PM
Mar 2016

Only thing we have to give us an idea at this point.


Military Times survey: Troops back Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders for president

In an exclusive survey of American military personnel, Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders emerged as active-duty service members' top choices to become the next commander in chief.

http://www.militarytimes.com/story/military/election/2016/03/14/military-times-election-survey-donald-trump-bernie-sanders/81767560/

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
37. Did you mean consciencetious?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:03 PM
Mar 2016

If yes, it doesn't officially disqualify him from serving ... but it will make a lot of Vietnam vets not like him very much.

yardwork

(61,599 posts)
42. Bernie was not a conscientious objector and it is false to say that he was.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:13 PM
Mar 2016

Honestly.

That status was very difficult to obtain.

Bernie was like most other college students of his time. He didn't want to be drafted. Totally understandable. However, he was not granted conscientious objector status.

I knew a genuine conscientious objector. There's no need to exaggerate in this way.

I suggest self-delete.

oasis

(49,382 posts)
44. Imagine the eye rolling at the highest levels of the Pentagon.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:15 PM
Mar 2016

And what about the morale of the rank and file members of our armed service men and women.?

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
51. Actually, Bernie didn't have a student deferment.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:30 PM
Mar 2016

He applied for CO status and by the time it was rejected he was too old for the draft.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
64. I am a Hillary supporter and this subject would not make a difference to me.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:37 PM
Mar 2016

I say he is an eligible Commander in chief no matter how this one spins..

Vinca

(50,269 posts)
96. I don't fault anyone for not serving in Vietnam, even Trump.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 07:16 AM
Mar 2016

The only more unjust war was Iraq.

oasis

(49,382 posts)
70. I've no problemswith CO, not sure voters in the GE share my sentiments.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:52 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie supporters have always insisted he does better once voters get to know him. Democrats who are not yet aware of his application for CO status are more likely to give him a pass.

Independents and moderate members of the GOP are likely to see it as a disqualifier.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
65. I did a lot of eye rolling when I was in.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:40 PM
Mar 2016

But, it wasn't about COs. Mostly about the idiots in charge who definitely weren't COs.

oasis

(49,382 posts)
71. Those with the scrambled eggs on their hats and fruit salad on their chests
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:01 PM
Mar 2016

get to call the shots on all things military. The retired brass won't be backing Bernie. No way, no how.

greymouse

(872 posts)
100. Pentagon
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:39 AM
Mar 2016

I think you underestimate the Pentagon. They aren't all crazy war mongers. Ike himself hated war.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
101. Who cares? I don't think anyone should worship at the feet of the military.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:46 AM
Mar 2016

I don't give a rat's ass what the Pentagon thinks about ANYTHING. They work for US, though they do not like that at all.

I'm so fucking sick of the kowtowing to the military on everything.

greymouse

(872 posts)
50. I would say it qualifies him
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:29 PM
Mar 2016

a heck of a lot more than a candidate who never met a war she didn't like. Plus, he was right about Vietnam, just like he was right about Iraq.

Those of us old enough remember the predictions that if the war in Vietnam was lost "the commies would be coming down the Potomac." I don't see any Commies coming down the Potomac except on tourist visas.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
58. I spent 15 months
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:34 PM
Mar 2016

in 'nam and I've no problem with Bernie's stance. In fact if I'd been a little more educated on the war I'd more than likely been a CO too. It took me all of a few days to realize the wrongness in what we were doing there.

OutNow

(863 posts)
92. There are many of us that felt the same way
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:37 PM
Mar 2016

I was raised in a poor family. I enlisted in the USAF as a way to get ahead in life. Really. Most of my childhood friends believed that going into the Navy or the Air Force was a good thing to do in 1968. It didn't take me too long to figure out the war was a big con job. The ARVN, up to and including General Thieu, later President Thieu, was deeply involved in drug smuggling. Many of our guys came back to the world hooked on smack, thanks to the ARVN. One day I mentioned to a friend of mine that we were on the wrong side in the Vietnam civil war. "I know that you moron", he replied. "But you shouldn't say that around here".

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
63. No. No more than than not being a doctor disqualifies someone from running hospital.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:37 PM
Mar 2016

We have had many presidents who never fought in a war.

Third Doctor

(1,574 posts)
66. No
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:44 PM
Mar 2016

Bill Clinton didn't go. On the other side it's ok to warmonger after refusing to serve one's self. Sometimes you have to fight. Vietnam was not one of them.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
69. Disqualify? No, not at all.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:49 PM
Mar 2016

We haven't had a President with real combat experience for a long time.

He might not get the votes of some rigid Republicans who care about such issues, but he wasn't going to get those votes anyway. Is conscientious objector any worse than "socialist"?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
72. Dick Cheney and the chickenhawks tried the same thing, without...
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:01 PM
Mar 2016

Calling themselves conscientuous objectors.

George Bush valiently defended Texas.

Bill Clinton just told them he didn't feel like honoring his committment to serve

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
74. It would have hurt him badly in the GE. (If you're busy explainin' ... you're losin'.)
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:03 PM
Mar 2016

Thankfully we won't have to worry about that.

ladyVet

(1,587 posts)
76. Knowing his stance on issues over the past decades, no I don't think it disqualifies him.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:09 PM
Mar 2016

He wasn't one of those who tried to get out of serving for selfish reasons. Like Hillary's husband, with endless student deferments.

I'm a veteran, the mother of three sons, and I'd much rather have someone who is not eager to go to war in the White House. That means Bernie, for those a few pages behind.

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
82. Good, bad, or indifferent, what's the 1960s alternative?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:16 PM
Mar 2016

You may or may not agree with his choice in the 60s, but Hillary's choice in the 60s was to be a Goldwater girl. Since those are the only two Dem candidates, if what they did in the 60s matters to you, those are your choices. (Though Bernie does have some good civil rights activity to his name from back then, too.)

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
91. I know some older people who are bothered by this
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:35 PM
Mar 2016

But by older I mean like 80 or something. And some right-wingers would object, but they aren't going to vote for him anyway.

The Constitution decides what disqualifies people for office. Your Facebook friends do not.

rurallib

(62,411 posts)
93. far as I know, we haven't had a president who served in that war
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:42 PM
Mar 2016

those who were eligible all found a way out.
At least with Bernie he stood up for something. He didn't just game the system.

I have less problems with someone who does not look to the gun as the first solution to any problem than I do with those who were cultured in fighting at first insult.
I believe history shows us that the founders feared a standing army for many reasons. One reason that if one has an army, one looks for fights.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
102. Tell your HS Facebook buddies what JFK said about conscientious objectors like Bernie Sanders.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:50 AM
Mar 2016

"War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today." -- John F. Kennedy

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie was a concientous ...