2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie was a concientous objector
to the war in Vietnam. Does this fact alone disqualify him from being the Commander-In-Cheif? Discuss.
Add some explanations why you feel that way please. I am dueling some FB friends from high school.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Hell, anyone who AGREED with invading Vietnam should have no business in the White House.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Grandmother of four here.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)was a concientous objector when it was was his turn to serve. Bernie actually didn't qualify as a CO because in order to qualify as such, one would have had to object to ALL WARS not any particular war. So instead, Bernie like many others, choose to use the Student Deferment policy until his clock ran out. By the time his number came up, he was too old. As someone with two sons, and 3 grandsons, I would have a problem with someone like Bernie calling up one of them to a war, when he chose not to serve when it was his turn.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)It doesn't bother me at all.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)HDSam
(251 posts)The G.I. Bill was the only realistic way I was going to be able to afford a college education and like many before me, in 1987 I signed my name on the dotted line.
In retrospect, the cost was far too high. Desiring an education shouldn't require someone to put their life up as collateral.
On another note, I think free or very low cost education would decimate military recruiting because the G.I. Bill is an attractive carrot to offer to high school students. Sander's goal of free education is probably viewed with great concern by those candidates that are proponents of the MIC.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)If you didn't have a problem with Clinton then why with Sanders?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Anyone who thinks invading that country was a Good Idea is someone who does not deserve the honor of being Commander in Chief.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)Since when is the government an expert on our own consciences?
greymouse
(872 posts)Hillary, on the other hand, much more likely.
It is not serving one's country to fight in an unnecessary war.
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)ABSOLUTELY necessary as a last resort.
My family tree is full of South Carolina Quakers who moved away from SC and joined the Union Army in the Civil War because they considered slavery to be the greater sin.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)End of discussion.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)elleng
(130,895 posts)CONSCIENTIOUS!
My spelling sucks.
elleng
(130,895 posts)but to suggest that he was and is a conscientious person: (of a person) wishing to do what is right, especially to do one's work or duty well and thoroughly.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)and what was Trump's?
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Not fair but the Rs would use it
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)Because 5 deferment Cheney really weighed the Bush/Cheney ticket down.
HDSam
(251 posts)None of the other candidates served to the best my knowledge and at least two, Kasich and Trump, were draft age during Vietnam.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)I'm not saying it's fair or right but It would fit into the likely narrative they would use to define Bernie. If Bernie's campaign was smarter they would get out in front of it now like they should have done more effectively with the self proclaimed Socialism moniker. Bernie's motive for adding "democratic" when he decided to run just looks very self serving. If Bernie wins the nomination I will vote for him but he has a number of vulnerabilities that the Rs could make a lot of hay with. To her credit, Hillary has been very disciplined about going easy on Bernie for a number of reasons.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)My father objected. They still sent his ass.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)I'm glad he made it out.
FYI
http://www.snopes.com/bernie-sanders-dodged-draft/
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Considering my fathers duties, he made it out a lot better than many of the men with him. Like many, he only recently started talking about it.
I have a hard time faulting anyone who didn't go for any reason. Our government had all the cannon fodder they needed.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)I'd expect him to be very stingy with the blood of our men and women in military service. That's how it should be. I trust Bernie to only support fighting wars that cannot and must not be avoided. If it had been WW2 and not Vietnam, I have no doubt in my mind he'd have served.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)No.
I didnt hold it against Bill Clinton.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)FYI...Bill Clinton was considered to be a draft dodger by some.
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/02/14/opinion/bill-clinton-s-vietnam-test.html
floriduck
(2,262 posts)Does that disqualify her?
frazzled
(18,402 posts)objector status, btw; it was rejected. By the time his number came up he was too old.).
Please don't tell lies. She was against the war in Vietnam, organized protests after Kent State, and campaigned for anti-war candidate George McGovern. Both opposed the war, and neither is unfit to be commander in chief.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)I said she was a Republican. She was. I never mentioned one word about her feelings on the Vietnam Nam war. So put your straw man back in the closet and back away from the ledge.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Bernie has unimpeachable ethical standards.
Being pro-war in a PNAC kind of way like his opponent does not equate to being a strong leader.
elleng
(130,895 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)braddy
(3,585 posts)was very, very, very common at the time, but people don't realize that you had to be able to convince the draft board people that you were sincere and committed, just saying that you felt that way wasn't enough.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)He understands that bullshit wars are bullshit. I'd like someone like that in the White House.
lancer78
(1,495 posts)I agree that it doesn't disqualify him. As I have stated before, the American soldier has not fought for our "freedom" since WW2 except maybe in Afghanistan.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)onenote
(42,700 posts)Topics get rehashed here endlessly, as you well know.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)the draft by using a student deferment until 1964 when he graduated,after that he was too old to be drafted. That's why the drafted soldiers were almost exclusively working class and poor men who weren't in college up until that point.
senz
(11,945 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)working class and poor who weren't eligible for college deferments. I grew up in a blue collar town where very few young males went on to college and went to work in the auto factories instead,many got drafted. My comment wasn't aimed at Bernie,it was aimed at a very hideous rule that allowed college kids to stay out of the war as if they "counted" more than other kids.
senz
(11,945 posts)He applied for CO status and by the time it was rejected, he was too old for the draft.
Bernie's family were poor working class Jews, they lived in a small apartment, never had a house, and they worried about expenditures for things like curtains or a rug.
Please don't paint him as a a rich white privileged male. Especially when your candidate, a WASP, came from a very privileged background, grew up in what most people would regard as a mansion, and went to elite schools.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)college deferment until he graduated,just like every other college student at the time. He didn't have to worry about being drafted.
"Please don't paint him as a a rich white privileged male". I swear to God,some of you are in a permanent state of manufactured outrage.
senz
(11,945 posts)You phrased it in terms of class privilege. I responded in kind.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)if he were to win the nomination.
The likely republican nominee, Trump, was draft age during Vietnam, as was Kasich. They don't want to open that can of worms.
Cruz wasn't of age during a draft, but he'd still have to justify his lack of service if he wanted to question Sanders about his.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)would attack anyone for anything. He has no shame.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)How military personal would react to a CO CinC sending them to war if it was needed.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)Only thing we have to give us an idea at this point.
Military Times survey: Troops back Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders for president
In an exclusive survey of American military personnel, Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders emerged as active-duty service members' top choices to become the next commander in chief.
http://www.militarytimes.com/story/military/election/2016/03/14/military-times-election-survey-donald-trump-bernie-sanders/81767560/
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)If yes, it doesn't officially disqualify him from serving ... but it will make a lot of Vietnam vets not like him very much.
senz
(11,945 posts)yardwork
(61,599 posts)Honestly.
That status was very difficult to obtain.
Bernie was like most other college students of his time. He didn't want to be drafted. Totally understandable. However, he was not granted conscientious objector status.
I knew a genuine conscientious objector. There's no need to exaggerate in this way.
I suggest self-delete.
oasis
(49,382 posts)And what about the morale of the rank and file members of our armed service men and women.?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Vinca
(50,269 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)He applied for CO status and by the time it was rejected he was too old for the draft.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I say he is an eligible Commander in chief no matter how this one spins..
Skid Rogue
(711 posts)This is probably not a winning issue for him.
Vinca
(50,269 posts)It should be noted Trump and Kasich were draft age during Vietnam.
Vinca
(50,269 posts)The only more unjust war was Iraq.
oasis
(49,382 posts)Bernie supporters have always insisted he does better once voters get to know him. Democrats who are not yet aware of his application for CO status are more likely to give him a pass.
Independents and moderate members of the GOP are likely to see it as a disqualifier.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)But, it wasn't about COs. Mostly about the idiots in charge who definitely weren't COs.
oasis
(49,382 posts)get to call the shots on all things military. The retired brass won't be backing Bernie. No way, no how.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I think you underestimate the Pentagon. They aren't all crazy war mongers. Ike himself hated war.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)I don't give a rat's ass what the Pentagon thinks about ANYTHING. They work for US, though they do not like that at all.
I'm so fucking sick of the kowtowing to the military on everything.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)greymouse
(872 posts)a heck of a lot more than a candidate who never met a war she didn't like. Plus, he was right about Vietnam, just like he was right about Iraq.
Those of us old enough remember the predictions that if the war in Vietnam was lost "the commies would be coming down the Potomac." I don't see any Commies coming down the Potomac except on tourist visas.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)And I'm a Hillary guy.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Skid Rogue
(711 posts)I think folks are just wondering how well it will go over in the GE.
reddread
(6,896 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)in 'nam and I've no problem with Bernie's stance. In fact if I'd been a little more educated on the war I'd more than likely been a CO too. It took me all of a few days to realize the wrongness in what we were doing there.
OutNow
(863 posts)I was raised in a poor family. I enlisted in the USAF as a way to get ahead in life. Really. Most of my childhood friends believed that going into the Navy or the Air Force was a good thing to do in 1968. It didn't take me too long to figure out the war was a big con job. The ARVN, up to and including General Thieu, later President Thieu, was deeply involved in drug smuggling. Many of our guys came back to the world hooked on smack, thanks to the ARVN. One day I mentioned to a friend of mine that we were on the wrong side in the Vietnam civil war. "I know that you moron", he replied. "But you shouldn't say that around here".
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)We have had many presidents who never fought in a war.
Third Doctor
(1,574 posts)Bill Clinton didn't go. On the other side it's ok to warmonger after refusing to serve one's self. Sometimes you have to fight. Vietnam was not one of them.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)We haven't had a President with real combat experience for a long time.
He might not get the votes of some rigid Republicans who care about such issues, but he wasn't going to get those votes anyway. Is conscientious objector any worse than "socialist"?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Calling themselves conscientuous objectors.
George Bush valiently defended Texas.
Bill Clinton just told them he didn't feel like honoring his committment to serve
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Thankfully we won't have to worry about that.
ladyVet
(1,587 posts)He wasn't one of those who tried to get out of serving for selfish reasons. Like Hillary's husband, with endless student deferments.
I'm a veteran, the mother of three sons, and I'd much rather have someone who is not eager to go to war in the White House. That means Bernie, for those a few pages behind.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)He was smart enough to know an unjust war.
jfern
(5,204 posts)thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)You may or may not agree with his choice in the 60s, but Hillary's choice in the 60s was to be a Goldwater girl. Since those are the only two Dem candidates, if what they did in the 60s matters to you, those are your choices. (Though Bernie does have some good civil rights activity to his name from back then, too.)
daleanime
(17,796 posts)I think having a Commander-in-Chief who likes War is a very bad idea, don't you?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)But by older I mean like 80 or something. And some right-wingers would object, but they aren't going to vote for him anyway.
The Constitution decides what disqualifies people for office. Your Facebook friends do not.
rurallib
(62,411 posts)those who were eligible all found a way out.
At least with Bernie he stood up for something. He didn't just game the system.
I have less problems with someone who does not look to the gun as the first solution to any problem than I do with those who were cultured in fighting at first insult.
I believe history shows us that the founders feared a standing army for many reasons. One reason that if one has an army, one looks for fights.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)"War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today." -- John F. Kennedy