Statesperson. Patriot. Democratic Socialist...

And they are all good!

"The Patriot Act."

Which seems odd to me as he is very much not a libertarian. I don't understand why he'd appeal to them at all.

Some people place truth telling before political leaning.

... a lot of people who call themselves "libertarian", don't really understand what that means. Many of them are simply people who think marijuana should be legalized, and are anti-war.

is totes the EXACT SAME THING as privatize fire departments, drown government in a bathtub "libertarianism".

It's convenient when people don't want to actually own up to the fact that they secretly support shit like censorship, unconstitutional spying, or putting pot smokers in prison.... so they can call their opponents names instead.

Just make sure he is called Mr. President come Jan. 20, 2019

As for the smears the H camp dishes out, well, lets just call them what those are: mere smears straight from the dear's rears.

Bless their hearts.

The earlier the better. How much you charge for proof reading? lol

left-libertarians. The Libertarian Party and the libertarian faction of the Republican Party are all right-libertarians. Plenty of people on the left are anti-authoritarian left libertarian socialists. Like me for example. Sanders is somewhere over on the libertarian socialist side as well.

Might I trouble you for a suggested link or two?

We are socialists in the anarchist tradition. The First International had two main factions. The anarchists led by Mikhail Bakunin, and the Marxists, led by Karl Marx. The enmity between the two were such that Marx out-maneuvered Bakunin and expelled his followers.

Anarchists characterized the State and Capitalism are inseparable, and should be destroyed to affect revolution; The Marxists believed in revolution in stages, and so the ideal march to revolution was to use the State to establish "The dictatorship of the proletariat," and the State would "wither away."

Bakunin turned out to be correct, foreseeing the failed Bolshevik revolution some 50 years later. He was not alive to enjoy his vindication, though.

A great starter is "Anarchism: From Theory to Practice" by Daniel Guerin. It's free and available online.

"Marxism has tended to be a theoretical or analytical discourse about revolutionary strategy.

Anarchism has tended to be an ethical discourse about revolutionary practice." ~ David Graeber

OMG! Is that where Rand Paul got his name? I'm slow sometimes.

I don't usually agree with you about politics, but that's funny. Thanks.

I had the usual high-school interest in Rand, but it didn't take me too long to despise her.

... his domestic policy is social democratic, though it's unclear where he currently stands on states rights.

Last edited Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:21 AM - Edit history (1)

that US foreign policy must be predicated on an endless series of war.

... Look on trade and military matters Bernie is very much America first. He does not have that much interest in the plight of the oppressed around the world. Sure, he's better than anyone on the right, but he really has not been associated that much with even the most righteous issues abroad. Even on Ebola he was almost completely silent. He's really very libertarian on foreign affairs in general. The alternative of course is that he's a pacifist, as the socialist were in the 1910s, but I don't think that's the case.

But please stop calling him a democratic socialist.

Please take that as a joke.

Sanders is Sanders.

I get it that you meant it as a joke but, unlike being a libertarian and a socialist all at once, being a democratic socialist is not an inherent contradiction.

Not everyone can say that, unfortunately.

But as far as Sanders he seems much more the rib-rock Republican a.k.a. Libertarian than any flavor of socialist, leaving aside his rather flimsy campaign promises which will be forgotten before the train leaves the station of his last whistle stop.

"All anarchists are socialists, though not all socialists are necessarily anarchists." Said at different times by both individualist anarchists, Adolf Fischer and Benjamin Tucker, referring to their brothers, the Marxists.

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, a socialist, was the first to declare himself am anarchist.

Before the events at the First International, when Marx expelled Bakunin and his anarchist sect, the prevailing theories on socialist organization was leaning towards the libertarian constructs. Even Marx was first enamored with Proudhon and his work, "What is Property?" They eventually had a falling out but not before Marx lifted his ideas on scientific socialism.

Now, granted, Sanders isn't an anarchist, but the degree of his anti-authoritarianism is sufficient for many anarchists.

... I like him quite a bit.

Many of his supporters are glibertarians ...

... I like them not so much.

Did I miss something?

are racists.