2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTwitter feed says 1.2 million turned away and they are staying in line AZ
https://twitter.com/shivani_112Feed says all NEW Dem's were turned away...polling places just for this primary from 200 to 60. Furious on Twitter and elsewhere...
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)800,000 voters to 60 poll locations ...was 200 before this primary...This is voter suppression plane and simple!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)a would draw major coverage
LisaM
(27,806 posts)I am sure it's maddening and I would be super pissed too, but you make your case more convincingly with facts.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)conservatives turning out hope the rapture takes them before this finishes playing out. Or will. How about all those who voted for Cruz in Utah? Just wait until they look closer and find out what was behind curtain #3.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)The entire state is turning out! They're still waiting to vote!!!111!1!1!1!1elevens!!!!
one_voice
(20,043 posts)because;
shivani patel
?@shivani_112
Applied to be a Bernie delegate for my district in Florida. Fingers crossed!
11:19 AM - 22 Mar 2016
shivani patel
?@shivani_112
I really think Bernie is going to win Utah. And Arizona is going to be our toughest state. So I hope you all phone bank Arizona.
11:19 PM - 19 Mar 2016
I don't think she lives in AZ.
I'm not commenting on how many are in line, just that I don't believe she's giving a first hand account.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)p.s., good catch
George II
(67,782 posts)...for a primary.
You may also want to research the reality of that "1.2 million" up above.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)system and you choose to side with them. Are you afraid of them or envy their power. In any case eventually we will throw those corrupt bastards that some worship, into the streets.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)presumably, like it or not.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)not the number to which you refer.
Solid Snake1
(95 posts)if some random person on twitter says then it must be true.
MattP
(3,304 posts)LonePirate
(13,419 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Lose with dignity.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Response to artislife (Reply #29)
Post removed
artislife
(9,497 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)I said I felt that is why I would put them on ignore so I wouldn't threaten them. So that I couldn't see their ugly words that was igniting these emotions.
Gee, you need to understand some things between actual threats and feelings.
Good try.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)They see me whip, they see me ne-ne. Now walk it back.
m.
Sure is interesting to see how you dance around that actual post.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)How could I miss the voice of a true progressive.
artislife
(9,497 posts)It conveys a thought not a threat. I put people on ignore so not to utter or post.
But I cannot help you if you cannot see the difference. Your education is your problem.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)And then you personally insult my intelligence?
On a roll tonight, better add me to that ignore list too.
artislife
(9,497 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)But I was warned about you out of the gate and you are not allowed to be on my jury. From week one.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Hopefully no harm comes my way.
artislife
(9,497 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:43 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Is that before or after you cause bodily harm to Clinton supporters?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1555685
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Bizarre personal attacks. Wtf. Over the top.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:56 PM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Eh, shitty but not hideworthy.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Mutual slapfight. And a pretty civil one, at that. Let them work it out. FWIW, I like the old days when the mods would just whack a whole subthread like this one.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The context of this is not clear to me. Based solely on the mention of violence, I vote to hide.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
artislife
(9,497 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)its okay, I guess its better than being called Yoshi, since that's a boys name.
Cha
(297,190 posts)No way he should have been hidden for telling the truth.
George II
(67,782 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=324396
Author: artislife
Subject = I didn't threaten kids
Alerter comments: "But I think you are a receptacle for shit". This poster has been OTT in a number of recent posts, even to the point of fantasizing harming children. Now they make this disgusting comment. No place for this on DU.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I think this entire post needs to be locked and several of the posters given a time out. Oh, that's right. We can't do that anymore
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Abusive
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Voting to hide since both of these posters appear incapable of using their big boy/girl words.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Agree with the alerter.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: An apparent child poster
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Good Lord.
George II
(67,782 posts)I felt my blood boiling and wishing harm to them and their children."
Cha
(297,190 posts)leave my kids out of this.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)No other way to put it.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)Damn
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I told you a few of my family members recieved nasty messages? I won't post what they wrote here, it was that evil. I think people need to calm down and not wish harm to family members of people they oppose on a message board.
Cha
(297,190 posts)to Hillary supporters and their children.
For all she knows my kids could be for BS.. that's how fucking brilliant that statement is. Forget about me.. I'll have to tell my kids what a BS fan said on DU about them. They already know about them piling on me because I blocked someone from Hillary's group who was later banned as a troll.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They would take one look and turn right around and RUN if they met the folks they talked to like that. I'm just trying to help them not hurt themselves.
But we will see more crap until this is over. Just keep blocking them.
bvf
(6,604 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)Do you see threats? I got a troll harassing me and Bravenek has some asshole sending her fucked up letters.
bvf
(6,604 posts)will be grateful, certainly.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)We are talking about someone threatening children, and you want to bring up a statement that was not only apologized for, but has nothing to do the the situation at hand simply to attack a active African American poster.
Bigots everywhere will be grateful, certainly
senz
(11,945 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 24, 2016, 11:37 PM - Edit history (1)
So is any apology that smacks of "I regret getting caught."
Of course you don't want to hash it out. You'd look ridiculous to even try.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)And so horribly wrong
One of the repeat trolls here (Name removed) know both my first name AND my husbands first name. Given the nature of social media it wouldn't be that hard to figure out, I guess. I hope it's not a sock. I hate this kind of shit you know? Attempts at intimidation, threats. It creeps me out and makes me want to have a long, long shower.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And just think of the time they put into obsessing over a poster on a message board. How troubling. I think some folks need to back off and find their own lives to live.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)It would be best.
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)I got some very nasty messages sent to me via my inbox. One I reported and the person got banned for saying "You aren't even a real Asian"...Urusai baka yaro! I read that crap on Discussionist because someone sent me a link. Nasty crap...racist, homophobic and full of misogyny. I never thought I would read that on a Democratic website.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'm glad they got banned. We need to clean things up and all just chill out.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)You wish harm to children?
WTF is wrong with you?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)sheshe2
(83,751 posts)What a stupid ugly post. You wish us AND OUR CHILDREN BODILY HARM! YOUR WORDS!!!!
YOUR WORDS^^^^^^^
You said it and you own it. When a poster here made like comments to Skinners children I alerted him. They were gone in a NY minute.
Spin and spin, you own your words. Who does that, who says that? Who wishes bodily harm on another DUer and their CHILDREN!
That was a threat pure and simple.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)Thanks for confessing and controlling yourself.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)What a sad little person you must be. What happened to the whole not letting supporters cloud your judgment? Maybe now you can understand why sooooo many nonSanders supporters are so turned off by his nasty grassroots campaign?
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Disgusting.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Or sign the death warrent on the middle east which gave rise to the terrorists who killed people today in Brussels.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Ain't no thang.
artislife
(9,497 posts)That seems very threatening.
I thought you were better than that.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)And no I'm not stalking you. Just sick of the double standard.
artislife
(9,497 posts)sheshe2
(83,751 posts)That is a fact. I thought you were better than that.
senz
(11,945 posts)I've sure you've read about witch hunts and witch trials. This is how they get started. People twist the words of others to mean what they want them to mean so they can do what they want to do to someone they don't like.
Please do not contribute to injustice and the persecution of an innocent woman.
senz
(11,945 posts)I have experienced something similar from the same person.
Please protect yourself. They're not being rational.
You are valued and appreciated.
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #47)
Post removed
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Just add it to the list tonight.
Only problem is... This is an adult saying they wish harm upon a candidates supporter and their kids.
Big difference.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)And it's not disgusting. It's human. Just because you have an "impure thought" doesn't make you a bad person. In fact, she or he is a good person for recognizing that having a thought like that means a time out is in order. By the way, by your standards, most every parent I've ever known, including my own, are horrible, horrible people.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Like I said upthread... Ain't no thang.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)Their OWN kids! Truly horrible, horrible people!
KMOD
(7,906 posts)WTF is wrong with you?
Response to tazkcmo (Reply #76)
Post removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)When Skinner told us there would no longer be bans for five hides, and he was reinstating hidden Hill supporters. Yeah, he didn't say Hillary, but we knew what he meant. In other words, hides have no meaning any more and all constraints are gone. Everyone is free to be as openly insulting to other members as they want because they know it will never hurt them.
Nice move Skinner.
And you thought it was ugly here before.
If anyone thinks this is going to wear off after the primaries are done, you're fooling yourself. There are permanent rifts that will never heal on this board.
Cha
(297,190 posts)Fla Dem
(23,656 posts)I wouldn't want you around my kids. It is not normal any more than fantasizing about having sex with kids is normal. It's distributing and far from normal. But then again, your candidate has disturbing fantasies as well.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Can't believe I'm reading this here.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)If that's a threat then John Elway should have me locked up as a dangerous, ranting, madman.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I wish harm upon them and their children.
You want supporters like that on your team like that? More power to you.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)No more than you get to pick and choose who supports your candidate. But for shits and giggles, I'll answer your question this way: I'll take this one.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)With friends like those... Well you know.
Response to Agschmid (Reply #82)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #92)
Post removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I do not think many here would ever think about that.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)We are dealing with a sick effer here.
This effer's banning can not come soon enough.
What a disgusting piece of filth.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Wow!!! Amazing.
Response to tazkcmo (Reply #58)
Post removed
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Some trolls are annoying.
Some trolls are humorous.
Some trolls are pathological asses who need to be shunned and locked out.
The fact that you are encouraging this pathological ass is crazy. Maybe it's time for you to go as well.
artislife
(9,497 posts)say it outloud.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)And I will proudly use my name to shout down sick effers.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Response to artislife (Reply #135)
Post removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)marble falls
(57,080 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Everybody has bad thoughts, I hope we just move on and stop trippin on each other constantly. Both candidates are good. Damn
Response to Post removed (Reply #139)
Post removed
I'll take the high road.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)You were in and out so much for your postings.
marble falls
(57,080 posts)how much time I've spent on the business of this nasty little thread. It should be locked. I've had to read everything here and it really is saddening.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)You think it's funny?
Response to Agschmid (Reply #37)
Post removed
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Go Hillary!
artislife
(9,497 posts)sheshe2
(83,751 posts)Then why are you answering us!?
You fibbed again. Lol!
artislife
(9,497 posts)But you are going, probably.
not achtmead, though. I like the photos.
sheshe2
(83,751 posts)I am going on time out again????
You are the arbitrator of who gets time out now?
Nice if you would respect them enough to spell their name correctly. One post alone you spelled it differently AND INCORRECTLY TWICE. It is spelled Agschmid
I alerted on your tweet or whatever it was. No answer so it was probably already alerted on. I do plan to follow up with Skinner tomorrow. He does not take kindly to children being threatened. I know this as I alerted him in a PM when his children came to play on DU. That said poster was gone the next day, You do not threaten children here. That is low.
artislife
(9,497 posts)is what I meant. which I didn't do obviously.
Oh and please....I "misspoke" there. That should be good enough for hill supporters.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Apparently, there are different standards of behavior for his supporters than for hers. I wonder if hers ever track people down and find their posts on different sites and harass their twitter followers and stuff like what I have dealt with. Bernie must be proud.
sheshe2
(83,751 posts)is what I meant. which I didn't do obviously.
Oh and please....I "misspoke" there. That should be good enough for hill supporters
WTF? Are you blathering about. It should be good enough for us hill supporters???? What? You only meant to put me on ignore and didn't?
Dig deeper. More snark from you.
You misspoke you misspoke you misspoke on threats on Duers and their children.
YOU MISSPOKE! YOU MISSPOKE YOU MISSPOKE.
I alerted Skinner on your jury leave. His children were threatened here as well. I mailed Skinner when that happened and he was not pleased. He does not take kindly to attacks on children.
artislife
(9,497 posts)What you get upset about is funny, herher3
sheshe2
(83,751 posts)All you have left is ridiculing my name on DU. That is so sad.
Shameful. This angry, vituperative and vindictive lashing out is over the top and absolutely vicious and nasty.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)And KMOD Making fun of screen names is similar to a Godwin's violation. Sure sign that the person committing the fallacy has already lost the argument.
senz
(11,945 posts)What you are doing is wrong.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)Hillarious
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)from Tons of Bernie supporters here and all over the web on multiple occasions. It's who they are.
Wishing harm to people's children? Wow.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)It's disgusting.
revmclaren
(2,520 posts)Lets hope mirt does the same for another disgusting poster.
revmclaren
(2,520 posts)The other disgusting poster on mirts radar.
The air around here slowly clearing up.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)I've read a lot a terrible things, usually lies about Hillary, but certainly not always. I've never read anything like that though. Jesus.
Response to ismnotwasm (Reply #99)
Post removed
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)--That's an area I disagree with Hillary as well, BTW.-
It's a ugly presentation for sure, and requires a bit of parsing out, but I'm still left with the question who SAYS stuff like that?
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)How many examples do we need of over the top anger and nastiness from Sanders supporters.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I still see that monster harassment op about you up and boy are people PROUD. Now wishing actual harm on people is kinda worse than saying stuff nice about Hillary, but what do I know?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)of anything done on FR or any of the DU stalker sites. I've read the stuff said about me on those sites and it's nasty but not like from Sanders supporters. At some point they are going to regret their behavior but it will be too late. They own it!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)kristopher
(29,798 posts)What you are doing is blatantly lying. You should be ashamed.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)The poster who said they wish harm on Hillary supporters and their kids should be fucking ashamed. Oh, and PPR'd. Like yesterday.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)So if you vote for Bernie, THAT would be the first time you voted for someone without a D after their name.
Which means the last time when? 2008? 2004?
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)This place used to have standards.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Hillary's gonna win in a landslide, and nobody will even remember the primary pouters who predicted otherwise enough to laugh at them.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #7)
Post removed
Zynx
(21,328 posts)That's with independents being able to vote for him and GE turnout.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)msongs
(67,405 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)XRubicon
(2,212 posts)Great Scott!
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)And this is just one precinct.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)As they say in Mumbai: "Sari".
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Lorien
(31,935 posts)voters to call. It's beyond absurd that the AP called the state with only TWO PERCENT of the precincts reporting EARLY VOTES, not even today's votes! This is looking more and more like full blown election fraud.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)methods directed against one candidate, then.
Presumably, MSM is not all over this, so other means should be employed to raise a stink.
My best wishes to all from an international observer.
https://mobile.twitter.com/shivani_112
yardwork
(61,599 posts)In North Carolina we had long lines and people turned away because of the voter suppression laws passed by the Teabag Republicans who took over our state. The voter suppression is aimed at reducing the Democratic vote, which affected both Hillary and Bernie.
Our enemy is the Republican Party.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)But isn't it the case that in the (D) primary, new or somehow unregistered or misregistered voters who want to vote are more likely to be for Mr. Sanders?
And what about where there are fewer ballot stations in certain districts compared to others, or is that not also relevant?
Were there any problems with running out of ballots thus time?
yardwork
(61,599 posts)Certainly, when the voter suppression laws were passed in NC years ago - planned to take effect in 2016 - nobody would have guessed that Bernie Sanders would be running.
The plan from the beginning was to suppress the vote of Democrats. Our teabag guv is up for reelection, along with one of our moran Rethug senators.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Lorien
(31,935 posts)Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)RandySF
(58,799 posts)Stallion
(6,474 posts)...but if you read it on Twitter
RandySF
(58,799 posts)we're in a lot of trouble.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)use mail-in ballots?
Why couldn't they register ahead of time?
How is this anyone else's fault but their own?
SMH
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)So, obviously, he's a member of the Democratic establishment. And you expect people to trust voting by mail?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)They're "oh so special?"
eyeroll
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)to read election rules.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)But I haven't seen the OP lately...
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)showing they were registered Dems. When they went to sign in the computers showed them as independents OR republicans.
Just want to remind you this happened to both Hillary and Bernie voters.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)I heard the lines to vote were so long, they crossed the border.
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)Every election it is the same story. I don't care how far back you go. Whether it be Chicago decades ago or Arizona today. Or Florida and Jeb in 2000. When will people demand honest elections?
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)MadBadger
(24,089 posts)Guess not.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)DU will get smarter when all the people who say they are leaving, do.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)#ArizonaElectionFraud
https://twitter.com/marcfox10/status/712489100725592064
revmclaren
(2,520 posts)desmiller
(747 posts)those 1.2 million might vote for your candidate. Injustice of this type should not be laughed at. To the naughty list with you!!
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)revmclaren
(2,520 posts)They simply don't understand that that figure is so absurdly stupid that it makes those supporting the 1.2 million number look like fools.
But in all seriousness... It's mathematically impossible to have that many voters left.
senz
(11,945 posts)72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Oh wait, sorry, that's not voters, it's how much Bernie is paying him this month.
Retrograde
(10,136 posts)Say a third of the population is ineligible to vote - that leaves about 4.5 million potential voters - and if only 2/3 of those are registered, that brings it down to about 3 million. Even if everyone registered to vote tried to do so, that's over 1/3 turned away. Pretty impressive voter suppression, if accurate - which I doubt.
(AZ population from Wikipedia, rest of numbers SWAGs by me)
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Response to bkkyosemite (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
TexasTowelie
(112,151 posts)I guess it could be possible if everybody showed up to vote five minutes before the polls closed though.
jillan
(39,451 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)>>HA!!! @BernieSanders is gaining delegates in Arizona!! He's picked up FOUR in the last hour!! STAY IN LINE!!!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)wait in line, etc.
I don't know why it's not implemented nationally.
Oh, wait, yes I do.
George II
(67,782 posts)...were turned away?
And how does someone standing on a line somewhere in Arizona know how many people all over the state were "turned away"?
In fact, just about the only people who were "turned away" were Independents that didn't even know their own state's election regulations.
George II
(67,782 posts)....which is about right for a primary (look at other states' primary vs. registered voters)
So just who are these "1.2 million" that were turned away?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Sorry you got the hide.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1556361
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Woah... so this poster says she wants to harm Hillary supporters and their children, then, apologizes to the guy that says he thinks about strangling kids, and then tries to go for the personal attack "achsmidts"? I cannot believe that this poster is still here after those remarks and that they would push this apology crap. Completely over the top and inappropriate.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:45 AM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Both posters should chill out.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Blah, blah, words.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Agschmidt seems to care about kids is a personal attack? Come on. Nothing in the post says a thing about this poster wanting to harm anyone. If another post says that, that's the one you should have alerted on.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Nothing hideworthy in this post.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This (and the subthread) is way over the lines of decency.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future
yawnmaster
(2,812 posts)mail in your ballots if one finds it difficult to vote!