2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMyths About Election Irregularities and Suppression in Arizona
Myths About Election Irregularities and Suppression in ArizonaBy delphine
Wednesday Mar 23, 2016 · 1:44 PM EST
Script from Yavapai County Recorder's Office in Arizona
There are several myths left floating around regarding yesterdays flawed election in Arizona:
FALSE
Lines were so long people literally spent an entire work day waiting in line. In Maricopa County, every polling location had to accommodate 20,000 voters.
FALSE.
Latino communities suffered disproportionately due to lack of polling places in their neighborhoods. Maricopa County is 40% Latino. Pima County had twice as many polling locations open than Maricopa County, with 1/3rd as many voters.
FALSE.
The SoS expressly stated that if you are listed as anything but Democrat in their system (even if its wrong), your provisional ballot will not be counted. The Script that Yavapais County Recorders Office uses:
Every provisional ballot is checked for eligibility. If you are registered as independent, other, party not designated, or libertarian, you are not eligible for this election and therefore, by law, your vote cannot be counted. If you are registered as a Democrat, Green, or Republican, and your ballot is otherwise eligible, then your provisional ballot will be counted.
FALSE.
Lifetime Democrats were erroneously listed as Independent, Republican, Libertarian, and no affiliation. None of their votes will count. People brought their hard copy voter ID with the correct affiliation and were still not allowed to vote with a regular ballot. It wont be easy to fight this even if the computer is wrong.
FALSE.
In Yavapai County, 2/3rds of voters in one precinct were mistakenly identified as independent. All of them were given provisional ballots (which as we now know, will not be counted). The election day technician in Yavapai indicates that this is the same exact thing that voters have been experiencing in Pima and Maricopa County all day.
FALSE.
This is a voting rights issue. Do we expect free and fair elections in the US or not? Do we say well this happens everywhere, oh well? or do we fight for everyones right to vote? Do we continue to put up with this simply because we like the outcome? How much did we love the outcome in FL? Would we like democrats to be able to elect Democrats to their state and federal offices in all states doesn't that mean they need to be able to vote fairly?
Unknown
In Yavapai County, the total number of votes counted was 8,401 to 7,108. Presumably many of those votes were case by mail. Assuming 60% of them were votes by mail, that means about 6,000 were cast yesterday. If 2/3rds of people hoping to vote as Democrats were turned away due to computer glitch, that could be up to 12,000 voters who were unable to vote almost as many as the current total.
Maricopa has 218,587 votes and Pima has 98,324 votes. Using this same analysis, 40% of these votes is 126,764. If this represents 1/3rd of voters who tried to vote yesterday (because the other 2/3rds were turned away because of incorrect affiliation in the computer record), then thats 253,528 voters turned away.
If only 10% were turned away, meaning that 126,764 represents 90% of votes, then more than 14,000 voters were unable to vote yesterday.
The candidates are separated by 72,299 votes.
It could make a difference in the number of delegates apportioned.
http://usuncut.com/politics/5-examples-voter-suppression-arizona-primary/
So what is the solution?
First and foremost, assuming the DNC does not fight for the rights of Democrats to have fair elections, the Sanders campaign and/or the Arizona Democratic Parter should take steps to protect and preserve the provisional ballots, and people should be told to keep their copies.
Second, attorneys should be brought in to represent voters who can prove the computer record is incorrect, so that their provisional votes can count despite the edict in the image above.
A class action lawsuit by disenfranchised voters should be brought to insist that there are sufficient polling places for them to vote in a reasonable time frame. A separate complaint alleging disenfranchisement on racial basis (lack of polling places in heavily Hispanic areas) should be brought to the Justice Department.
The court should be asked to decide whether anyone who was in line and turned away without voting at all should be given another chance to vote. Apparently they did order that in IL but it was overturned and now it is before the appeals court.
This isnt about partisan politics or Bernie/Hillary. This is about voting rights. Maybe this IS the hill to stand on, to finally start addressing these travesties.
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/3/23/1505343/-Myths-About-Election-Irregularities-and-Suppression-in-Arizona
jillan
(39,451 posts)members of the NAACP in Az were among those that were disenfranchised (including one member that is an attorney) and they are putting together investigations. Facebook groups are being put together as a place to gather data.
The wheels are turning.
Thank you so much for this post. We need to keep this exposed.
We need to see this thru or say hello to President Trump, because this was a just a test run for the GE.
We cannot let them get away with this.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Progressives have always fought for the rights of the 99% only to get disparaged by the minions of the corrupt Conservative Democrats and their idol, Clinton.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)that US Uncut is a propaganda site.
This should lead to a DOJ civil rights division investigation. I expect that to promptly happen after a light dusting of snow in hell though. (I am that cynical)
pat_k
(9,313 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)In MN caucuses, there are different locations for the Democratic caucus and the Republican caucus, and people choose which location to go to.
In MN primaries, people just ask for the ballot of the party they want to vote for candidates for.
The experience in Arizona shows it's better not have party registration, which can be a tool for disenfranchisement.