Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 01:00 PM Mar 2016

2016 Campaign Television Tracker

This is an interesting website that lets you track the candidates running for POTUS in terms of their media coverage. You can use the drop down menu system to select the candidate you want to track, the date range, etc. From there, you can click on the individual date in the graph and it will bring up available media clips for the day selected.

From the website:

"As part of our efforts to leverage the Internet Archive's Television News Archive for understanding the role of television in politics, we've created the following dashboard, updated each morning, that records how many times each US presidential candidate was mentioned on each of the major television networks monitored by the Archive. These are based on scanning the closed captioning records of each broadcast, so are subject to some degree of error, so absolute counts may contain a certain margin of error. The Archive enforces a 24 hour rolling delay, so the most recent date displayed is 24 hours ago. The Archive currently monitors a selection of national networks (Aljazeera America, Bloomberg, CNBC, CNN, Comedy Central, FOX Business, FOX News, LinkTV, MSNBC) and a growing set of affiliates across the country...."


2016 Campaign Television Tracker

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2016 Campaign Television Tracker (Original Post) Lucinda Mar 2016 OP
MSNBC trocar Mar 2016 #1
Whoda thunk it, eh? :) Lucinda Mar 2016 #2
Like it. pat_k Mar 2016 #3
Yep. That would make it even more valuable, but it would probably be a nightmare Lucinda Mar 2016 #4
Very difficult to pull off. But who knows? pat_k Mar 2016 #5

trocar

(243 posts)
1. MSNBC
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 01:59 PM
Mar 2016

WHAT? MSNBC talks about Trump more than any other candidate?

The information provided is great, thanks

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
3. Like it.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 02:56 PM
Mar 2016

Kinda wish it were possible to distinguish neutral (facts, e.g., a win/loss), positive (e.g. a candidate's supporter), or negative mention.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
4. Yep. That would make it even more valuable, but it would probably be a nightmare
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 03:20 PM
Mar 2016

to organize. I would be a great resource for someone doing just that in an analysis of this election for college coursework.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
5. Very difficult to pull off. But who knows?
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:34 PM
Mar 2016

As you say, it might be a feasible thesis, particularly if the focus were on comparing a couple specific networks.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»2016 Campaign Television ...