Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 06:33 PM Mar 2016

BIG UPDATE: Clinton Surrogate Jarrett Maupin comes to rescue of Maricopa Co.Recorder Helen Purcell

:large

Clinton supporter Jarrett Maupin absolves Maricopa County elections organizers of any wrong doing, and declares mission accomplished on Civil Rights and Voting Right in Arizona after calling for legal action less than 24 hours earlier.

Video at link. Don't trip over your jaw.


http://www.12news.com/news/politics/civil-rights-activist-forgives-maricopa-county-elections-organizer/98913425

On edit: Thanks Mike__M for the timeline. Updated meme in light of.

UPDATE:

:large

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Purcell

:large
113 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BIG UPDATE: Clinton Surrogate Jarrett Maupin comes to rescue of Maricopa Co.Recorder Helen Purcell (Original Post) Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 OP
What did he learn that everyone else hasn't? NWCorona Mar 2016 #1
Wonder who called him. dchill Mar 2016 #2
"Well you know, I didn't see anyone havin' to wait in line." Raster Mar 2016 #52
Truthfully, neither did I... dchill Mar 2016 #65
Ding! Raster Mar 2016 #69
Well isn't that just such a surprise. Jester Messiah Mar 2016 #3
yeah, tell that to the many people in Az who waited 5+ hours to vote dana_b Mar 2016 #4
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #5
Democratic Party...LOL FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #6
On a serious note...Clinton Mafia involvement in the Arizona voter rolls just became FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #7
My new running joke. Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #11
"“There is no present threat to voting rights and civil rights in Arizona’s elections,” " arcane1 Mar 2016 #8
Just in case anybody drops by and tries to claim hes not a supporter. Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #9
He's got some history. Wilms Mar 2016 #32
is that the same Jarrett Maupin? if so, WTF! nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #40
He's got FBI issue too huh? NWCorona Mar 2016 #68
Nothing to see here folks, nope. Nothing at all except the giagantic octopus in the room. nt nc4bo Mar 2016 #10
WOW noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #12
Guy's a fast researcher Mike__M Mar 2016 #13
An hour? I was giving him the benefit of doubt. That almost confirms my Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #14
OMG.... Punkingal Mar 2016 #19
More likely that somebody delivered him an envelope stuffed with cash BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #20
And then what? newblewtoo Mar 2016 #33
I'm under no illusions that anything will be done about it BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #36
Somebody got a fat envelope. FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #30
What a tool! Segami Mar 2016 #60
If you see Jarrett sitting at the head table with Clinton & the Clooneys Segami Mar 2016 #66
The petition to demand a federal investigation: Tom Rinaldo Mar 2016 #105
Establishment R's & D's Stick Together noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #15
I dont know if the web site "Consortium News" was your cup of tea back in the day - truedelphi Mar 2016 #23
Again. I will NEVER vote for Hillary. Period. peacebird Mar 2016 #27
Did she fear a 2004 Kerry presidency would ruin her 2008 candidacy? senz Mar 2016 #39
That is exactly it. truedelphi Mar 2016 #47
I think you understand her perfectly, truedelphi. senz Mar 2016 #53
Are you suggesting Kerry "took a dive" so Hillary could run in 2008? Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #78
No one is "suggesting" anything. truedelphi Mar 2016 #109
Dang.... wow..... and the Clinton camp was behind that at least in part? That's insane. Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #110
Want some further proof of how bad it was in 2004? truedelphi Mar 2016 #113
That was Hillary? I thought it was Dodd. hmm..maybe it was both. 2banon Mar 2016 #82
We are getting a hint of what's behind the curtain during this primary season AZ Progressive Mar 2016 #25
With the DNC being in the tank for Hillary, the election shenanigans BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #38
Don't Think He Will noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #41
I think as this shit continues to occur, and it will, he will see the light and run Independent or GoneFishin Mar 2016 #54
I think it is unlikely, but sure wish he would BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #59
We haven't gotten a fair shot. People are donating money they could use for other things, but they GoneFishin Mar 2016 #63
I'm with you on that. Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #64
You do know the DNC is also involved in all of this, don't you ? agracie Mar 2016 #92
Such a sad spectacle tabasco Mar 2016 #16
The fix is in. coyote Mar 2016 #17
So sad. But, that's how the game is played. Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #18
Remember His Name noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #31
AH Campaiign Hillary -thy name is deceit, treachery and truedelphi Mar 2016 #21
I'm appalled. If Hillary had made a statement about the appalling situation in Arizona Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #22
might have just seal the deal for me in november. Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #24
What a nauseating spectacle. But an unsurprising one. CharlotteVale Mar 2016 #26
Who Do They Think Ccarmona Mar 2016 #28
Fire them all. 840high Mar 2016 #44
"Stay In Line" libodem Mar 2016 #29
To hell with with camp fraud Kittycat Mar 2016 #34
Google this guy. He's batshit RandySF Mar 2016 #35
Has Clinton Made Any Statements About The Investigation? noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #42
He's your guy. And it seems he's protecting a Hillary friend. Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #72
He's still batshit. RandySF Mar 2016 #73
So are the Clinton... to think we wouldn't figure this out. Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #74
I thought we were talking about Jarrett Maupin RandySF Mar 2016 #75
Yeah. He's protecting Mrs. Joe Purcell wife of Fmr. Arkansas Lt. Governor. Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #77
This message was self-deleted by its author jfern Mar 2016 #37
u can thank our SCOTUS cons for rolling back the Voting Rights Act TheDormouse Mar 2016 #43
Why has no one stopped her long before this? senz Mar 2016 #45
Hmmm curious nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #46
Cause some school board election this summer is more important Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #49
I find the whole thing curious nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #50
He was nearly calling for their heads just hours before. Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #55
I know and this is why a lot of the kids are losing patience. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #67
OMFG! I am... WTF?? AzDar Mar 2016 #48
Strange days indeed.... think Mar 2016 #51
Nice of them to confirm what we already knew, that Clinton is connected to the election GoneFishin Mar 2016 #56
So, voter suppression & election fraud are A-OK with the Clintonsphere when it benefits her. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #57
This guy have any legal standing to prevent an investigation Half-Century Man Mar 2016 #58
Fuck. This. Shit. TDale313 Mar 2016 #61
Anybody notice the lack of push back from the Clintoneers? Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #62
Dude, you are making shit up. Read your own thread. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #95
Thats because its been debunked before already - NOT the same Helen Purcell Lucinda Mar 2016 #112
sick. sick. sick. It is obvious what has happened. bbgrunt Mar 2016 #70
Where does "surrogate" come from? creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #71
How about lackey. There to protect Hillary's old friend/inside girl. Blue State Bandit Mar 2016 #76
Must be the wrong Helen Purcell creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #80
Same Purcell, she left ARKANSAS out of her Arizona biography Wernothelpless Mar 2016 #103
Its been debunked creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #107
WTF? Is that for real? kristopher Mar 2016 #81
Its not for real creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #85
You do not know that--and name calling is not needed. 'work with them rather than riversedge Mar 2016 #86
Well his Facebook feed certainly looks like he's 100% involved promoting her. kristopher Mar 2016 #79
It says he's voting for her creeksneakers2 Mar 2016 #84
Mmmm, a local preacher and politico? I think that might qualify... kristopher Mar 2016 #89
How old do you think Helen Purcell may be? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #83
Have no idea, but this is a direct result of the SC whittling about the Voters Rights Act still_one Mar 2016 #87
Since Joe Purcell met his wife in 1948 the likelihood of this being the same person Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #91
Probably 90+ if J Purcell's spouse kristopher Mar 2016 #88
More than likely, doubt this is the same lady, but guess it thrilled someone for a few minutes. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #90
See post #100 think Mar 2016 #102
This article from 2007 seems to indicate this is indeed Joe Purcell's widow: think Mar 2016 #100
This lady is not in her nineties. Her husband may have been a Joe Purcell but nothing in this Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #104
A Traitor To His Race corbettkroehler Mar 2016 #93
So, he was against voter suppression... malokvale77 Mar 2016 #94
I am SO TIRED of voting being such a sh*tshow renate Mar 2016 #96
If this assclown expects Clinton to be the nominee-- eridani Mar 2016 #97
So Hillary says nada and her surrogate says all is well despite five-hour lines to vote. Scuba Mar 2016 #98
I have never seen such a BS presentation since Nixon. Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #99
Darkness at the break of noon. Somebody better investigate soon. AxionExcel Mar 2016 #101
Voter sabotage and suppression - TBF Mar 2016 #106
Excuse my language but FUCK YOU! 1000s of people had their right to vote suppressed. Shame on YOU!! jillan Mar 2016 #108
Not the same Helen Purcell Lucinda Mar 2016 #111

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
4. yeah, tell that to the many people in Az who waited 5+ hours to vote
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 06:38 PM
Mar 2016

and so many of them were told that they would have to vote on provisional ballots and that they wouldn't count!! Some went home, found their registration to the Democratic party and STILL were not allowed to vote!!

Such b.s.

And then how ANYONE could defend this is beyond me:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017342942

She blames the voters! Is that what Hillary thinks? That it's the fault of the voters?? If she becomes the nominee, how will she feel in November if this happens to her? THEN it would be a problem?

So UN democratic.

Response to Blue State Bandit (Original post)

FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)
7. On a serious note...Clinton Mafia involvement in the Arizona voter rolls just became
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 06:45 PM
Mar 2016

a significant probability.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
8. "“There is no present threat to voting rights and civil rights in Arizona’s elections,” "
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 06:47 PM
Mar 2016

Um, yes there is.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
32. He's got some history.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:38 PM
Mar 2016
Maupin was unable to vote for himself in the primary election due to the fact that he was a felon still serving probation. The U.S. Constitution does not bar felons from running for office, but the Arizona Constitution does forbid felons on probation or with outstanding restitution from voting. He was convicted of a felony for lying to the FBI about criminal behavior by former Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon. As a result of the conviction, Maupin was required to resign from the Phoenix school board, pay restitution for offering legal services without a law degree to at least two people and serve five years of probation. Maupin's probation was set to end in April but was extended by a judge after prosecutors claimed his performance while on probation was "nothing more than a continuation of his predilection for lying and half-truths."

https://ballotpedia.org/Jarrett_Maupin

Mike__M

(1,052 posts)
13. Guy's a fast researcher
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 06:50 PM
Mar 2016
Just an hour earlier, Maupin issued a press release. In the release, Maupin stated: "We cannot afford for her (Purcell) or her director of elections to be in charge of administrating a general election with so much at stake. It is 2016 not 1956 or 1966, what happened during yesterday's election was highly immoral and highly illegal."

but then

During the press conference, Maupin said he had researched the issue and was satisfied Purcell simply miscalculated the amount of polling places that would be needed.


Sounds like someone personally delivered the answer he was "researching" for.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
20. More likely that somebody delivered him an envelope stuffed with cash
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:08 PM
Mar 2016

or the promise of a future political appointment.

And he says she "miscalculated"? One person decides to have only 60 of 728 polling stations open and nobody else knew about it?

This should trigger a Justice Department investigation. Bernie needs to send a letter to Loretta Lynch and President Obama demanding it.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
36. I'm under no illusions that anything will be done about it
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:52 PM
Mar 2016

But Bernie should be raising hell about it with Obama. One would think Obama and Lynch would be interesting in publicizing this fiasco and doing what they can to prevent a replay of anything like it in November.

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
60. What a tool!
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:25 PM
Mar 2016

Talk about doing a complete 180........Reminds me of a scene from The Godfather.....

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
66. If you see Jarrett sitting at the head table with Clinton & the Clooneys
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:47 PM
Mar 2016

at the upcoming April 15 fundraiser, then you know what went down......


noretreatnosurrender

(1,890 posts)
15. Establishment R's & D's Stick Together
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 06:54 PM
Mar 2016

He may as well have just come out and said...ah about that investigation...I found out today that the Clinton campaign rigged this election so I've changed my mind. I really don't want to have that investigation and anyone who does....ah...must not be a Clinton supporter. Holy Shit. I've been posting here about the Republicans suppressing the vote not the Hillary campaign but now...WOW Looks like we have a joint effort going on.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
23. I dont know if the web site "Consortium News" was your cup of tea back in the day -
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:16 PM
Mar 2016

But Parry reported that on the day after the Nov 2004 election, James Carville, who was one of Hillary's top people, convinced candidate John Kerry to immediately concede due to "the fact" that there were not enough outstanding uncounted ballots in Ohio to make a difference. (There actually were over 235,000 ballots and since many of those were from counties where the Dems had a following, this was a lie.)

So the way Hillary gets things to come out in her favor has been underhanded for a long, long time.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
39. Did she fear a 2004 Kerry presidency would ruin her 2008 candidacy?
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:07 PM
Mar 2016

It may be obvious, but I just want to make sure I'm reading it right.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
47. That is exactly it.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:44 PM
Mar 2016

And of course there is footage of Hillary telling some interviewer, maybe Diane Sawyer, that it was inevitable that she would become the 2008 candidate. (That interview was either in 2007 or 2008.) I think she felt she had done so much to ensure that Kerry didn't get in, that she deserved it for that reason alone.)

She doesn't care at all about the public. So what if the public had to deal with George W for another four years? At least, in the "bigger scheme of things, she would end up with the Oval Office. All that is important to her is herself.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
53. I think you understand her perfectly, truedelphi.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:09 PM
Mar 2016

What amazes me is that her followers are just as monomaniacal about it as she is.

To me, that is just weird.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
109. No one is "suggesting" anything.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 05:57 PM
Mar 2016

The man who ran the website Consortium News reported it as fact.

Remember, Kerry had given a promise that his team of election lawyer would come into play if there was the slightest hint of impropriety.

And also that he would not concede until every last vote was counted.

Instead Kerry conceded less than eighteen hours after Andy Card, Bush's chief of staff, announced that Bush was the winner.





truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
113. Want some further proof of how bad it was in 2004?
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:14 PM
Mar 2016

You might wanna obtain the video "Stealing America, Vote by Vote" by Dorothy Fadiman.
Link is here: http://electionsatrisk.org/film.shtml


This is a great and detailed account of what went down as a "democratic and free election."

I wrote this account of the theft - which ended up on over 350 blogs across the globe

"We The People Do Not Concede"

http://www.coastalpost.com/05/01/01.htm

But what is most horrifying is that when the vote recount in Ohio went on, who funded it? Did the Democrats, whose "candidate" had lost, then take the time and energy and cash
to fund it?

No, actually Ralph Nader and David Cobb funded it! (To the tune of over $ 100,000 of their own monies)

And they did it Because they actually believe in free elections, unlike the Bush and Clinton families that could care less as long as they get to win!



 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
82. That was Hillary? I thought it was Dodd. hmm..maybe it was both.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 12:57 AM
Mar 2016

or maybe I had the info wrong then.

but to your point. soo spot on.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
25. We are getting a hint of what's behind the curtain during this primary season
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:22 PM
Mar 2016

And it's pretty damn ugly, not much different than third world countries.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
38. With the DNC being in the tank for Hillary, the election shenanigans
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:57 PM
Mar 2016

and virtually the entire Democratic establishment being aligned against Bernie, I hope he will reconsider running a 3rd party campaign if he is not the Democratic nominee. This has not been anything close to a fair fight.

noretreatnosurrender

(1,890 posts)
41. Don't Think He Will
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:08 PM
Mar 2016

I think the only way he would do that is if it could be proven there was election fraud. That's pretty tough to do. Those of us who have been watching believe that there has been because there have been so many bad things happening over and over, but we can't prove it. This is yet another reason why it is very, very hard to fight the establishment. They control the process.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
54. I think as this shit continues to occur, and it will, he will see the light and run Independent or
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:10 PM
Mar 2016

Green because of the horrific cheating.

It won't stop because Hillary can't win without cheating. So stay tuned for the fun because there is guaranteed to be more to come.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
59. I think it is unlikely, but sure wish he would
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:19 PM
Mar 2016

He has plenty of reasons to reconsider. He has not gotten anything resembling a fair shot and the political revolution is gaining momentum.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
63. We haven't gotten a fair shot. People are donating money they could use for other things, but they
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:29 PM
Mar 2016

know the country is screwed unless we change course.

He owes it to his supporters to go the mat and fight back.

Baitball Blogger

(46,753 posts)
18. So sad. But, that's how the game is played.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:03 PM
Mar 2016

A useful idiot was needed to squelch a petition that has over 100,000 names on it. I expect he will be rewarded handsomely.

Nanjeanne

(4,974 posts)
22. I'm appalled. If Hillary had made a statement about the appalling situation in Arizona
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:13 PM
Mar 2016

and stood up for small "d" democracy . . . it would have probably eased at least some of my misgivings about voting for her if she is the nominee. As it stands - she shows herself every day to be exactly the kind of politician that turns me away.

 

Ccarmona

(1,180 posts)
28. Who Do They Think
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:31 PM
Mar 2016

Is going to buy this especially the quick 180 turnaround. This is more insulting behavior from the Clinton steamroller.

libodem

(19,288 posts)
29. "Stay In Line"
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:31 PM
Mar 2016

The older you are the more diffict that is. I can't tolerate stsnding on concrete. There were many little old ladies with canes, in the wind and cold, in our Idaho lines.

RandySF

(59,097 posts)
35. Google this guy. He's batshit
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:46 PM
Mar 2016

Doesn't look like he represents anyone but himself. Yeah, it looks like he supports Hillary but was he even eligible to vote?

noretreatnosurrender

(1,890 posts)
42. Has Clinton Made Any Statements About The Investigation?
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:10 PM
Mar 2016

Do you know if Clinton has made any statements about the investigation into this?

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
72. He's your guy. And it seems he's protecting a Hillary friend.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 12:10 AM
Mar 2016

They were First and Second Ladies of Arkansas together.

Woopsie!

Response to Blue State Bandit (Original post)

TheDormouse

(1,168 posts)
43. u can thank our SCOTUS cons for rolling back the Voting Rights Act
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:13 PM
Mar 2016

for this.
Arizona was one of the states that used to have to have any changes they made to voting procedures OK'd by the Justice Department, due to their history of civil rights abuses.

That is, until the Supreme Court decided in 2013 that that part of the Voting Rights Act was no longer necessary.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/26/us/supreme-court-ruling.html

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
45. Why has no one stopped her long before this?
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:22 PM
Mar 2016

We cannot have this. Not here. Not in the United States of America.

I haven't felt this badly about the prospects for our country since December 12, 2000.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
46. Hmmm curious
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 08:24 PM
Mar 2016

So the tin foil theory might have some grounds to it? Most CT theories do by the way.

I love it, really. Oh and this is how democracies die by the way. How PRI-like this is becoming. Yup, voting in pretend elections now.

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
55. He was nearly calling for their heads just hours before.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:12 PM
Mar 2016

All I can think about is what Niko House said he was told by Chris Smith for breaking the NC Ops infiltration story. "Give up a little principal now, and get ahead later." Paraphrasing.

Niko puts it better:

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
67. I know and this is why a lot of the kids are losing patience.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:58 PM
Mar 2016


I am sure I will soon be "corrected" for my transgression
 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
57. So, voter suppression & election fraud are A-OK with the Clintonsphere when it benefits her.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:16 PM
Mar 2016

... and some Clinton fans wonder why so many won't vote for her if she's the nominee.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
61. Fuck. This. Shit.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:28 PM
Mar 2016

I am so totally over Dems pulling this kinda crap. It's disgusting. Now we're hearing about people's registration being switched or finding out they're not registered. If you're supporting Hillary and are turning a blind eye cause you think it helps her- You are the fucking problem!!!

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
62. Anybody notice the lack of push back from the Clintoneers?
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:29 PM
Mar 2016

I got nothing but accusations of CT when I first posted it down thread of some other op. I guess the meme is more powerful than the weathervane.

SunSeeker

(51,646 posts)
95. Dude, you are making shit up. Read your own thread.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 03:01 AM
Mar 2016

You got the wrong Purcell. How about responding to the people in this thread pointing that, like this post:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1571464

creeksneakers2

(7,476 posts)
71. Where does "surrogate" come from?
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 11:30 PM
Mar 2016

I don't see it in the article. This looks like a dishonest characterization to me. Amazing how many here are quick to believe Hillary has anything to do with this.

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
76. How about lackey. There to protect Hillary's old friend/inside girl.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 12:44 AM
Mar 2016

They were First and Second Ladies of Arkansas together.

Woopsie!

creeksneakers2

(7,476 posts)
80. Must be the wrong Helen Purcell
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 12:55 AM
Mar 2016

Here's the biography of the one in Arizona:

http://recorder.maricopa.gov/recorder/

"Born in Topeka, Kansas she’s been a Phoenix resident since 1964."

Now, will you take this nonsense back? Where did you get this in the first place?

Wernothelpless

(410 posts)
103. Same Purcell, she left ARKANSAS out of her Arizona biography
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 11:08 AM
Mar 2016

Helen Purcell: From Arkansas to Arizona ... Clinton friend ...

https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-10942184.html

Helen Purcell, Maricopa County's recorder and election director, shows no signs of slowing down - even in an off-election year. Managing her time is Purcell's biggest challenge, as she oversees recording 1 million documents annually and modernizing the state's largest election department. In her fifth term of office, Purcell also serves on a committee drafting new standards for voting systems throughout the United States and on the board of the National Association of Counties, among other organizations. "It's easier now that my family is grown," she says, the mother of two and grandmother of four. Her husband Joe, who Purcell says gave her the valued advice of being honest, consistent and to "learn everything you can," passed away several years ago after 43 years of marriage. …

creeksneakers2

(7,476 posts)
85. Its not for real
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 01:00 AM
Mar 2016

He has the wrong Helen Purcell. Here's a link to the recorders biography. She's been in Phoenix since 1964. Can't be the same person. The OP is as kooky as it looks.

http://recorder.maricopa.gov/recorder/

riversedge

(70,273 posts)
86. You do not know that--and name calling is not needed. 'work with them rather than
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 01:00 AM
Mar 2016

against them' I like that. And hope it will be done. We have a GE to win in November

still_one

(92,329 posts)
87. Have no idea, but this is a direct result of the SC whittling about the Voters Rights Act
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 01:10 AM
Mar 2016

and that is why it makes so much sense to me when I read these posts proudly declaring they won't vote for Hillary if she is the Democratic nominee. Yup, that will show em.

Just look at the awful appointments Bill Clinton did:

Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer





Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
91. Since Joe Purcell met his wife in 1948 the likelihood of this being the same person
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 01:22 AM
Mar 2016

shown in the photos is nil to none. Really, someone needs to use common sense when trying to push this.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
100. This article from 2007 seems to indicate this is indeed Joe Purcell's widow:
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:39 AM
Mar 2016

Poster here by another Duer, Wernothelpless:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=post&forum=1251&pid=1572662

Helen Purcell, Maricopa County's recorder and election director, shows no signs of slowing down - even in an off-election year. Managing her time is Purcell's biggest challenge, as she oversees recording 1 million documents annually and modernizing the state's largest election department. In her fifth term of office, Purcell also serves on a committee drafting new standards for voting systems throughout the United States and on the board of the National Association of Counties, among other organizations. "It's easier now that my family is grown," she says, the mother of two and grandmother of four. Her husband Joe, who Purcell says gave her the valued advice of being honest, consistent and to "learn everything you can," passed away several years ago after 43 years of marriage. …

https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-10942184.html



The Original Source. (You need a subscription to read the original story from it's source the Arizona Capitol Times in it's entirety):
http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2007/02/16/helen-purcell-maricopa-county-recorder/

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
104. This lady is not in her nineties. Her husband may have been a Joe Purcell but nothing in this
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 11:15 AM
Mar 2016

article shows he was governor of Arkansas who was born in 1923.

corbettkroehler

(1,898 posts)
93. A Traitor To His Race
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 02:26 AM
Mar 2016

Has he forgotten that voter disenfranchisement oppressed African Americans far more and for far longer than Hispanic Americans?

How could ANY self-respecting Democrat think that 5-hour lines are no one's fault, especially when the number of polling stations was reduced by half?

Our best response is to sign the new WH.gov petition demanding a re-vote:

http://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/do-revote-arizona-primary-due-voter-suppression

renate

(13,776 posts)
96. I am SO TIRED of voting being such a sh*tshow
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 03:14 AM
Mar 2016

This is AMERICA. It should NOT be COMPLICATED to let people VOTE in a DEMOCRACY. Just provide them with a sufficient number of polling places and ballots instead of voting machines that switch votes and are susceptible to hacking.

Instead our elections are an absolute embarrassment. There is no valid excuse for what happened in Arizona or in any other place where people have to wait more than 20 minutes to vote. Even that is too long, considering how lower-income people don't necessarily have the luxury of a long lunch hour, or not having to rush to a second job, to have the time to vote.

Voting by mail should be how it is done everywhere. I can't see a single valid argument against it.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
97. If this assclown expects Clinton to be the nominee--
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 05:06 AM
Mar 2016

--voter suppression will hurt her a hell of a lot in AZ.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
98. So Hillary says nada and her surrogate says all is well despite five-hour lines to vote.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:19 AM
Mar 2016

That's not the commitment to small 'd' democracy I want in a candidate.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
108. Excuse my language but FUCK YOU! 1000s of people had their right to vote suppressed. Shame on YOU!!
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 06:24 PM
Mar 2016

Leave it to the Hillary campaign to say this is okay.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»BIG UPDATE: Clinton Surro...