2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAnonymous is now reporting about AZ vote suppression!
Says that of 138 Dem voters who reported having problems voting:
2 were Clinton supporters
25 were unknown
111 were Sanders supporters
These numbers tell the story
https://twitter.com/HiveComm/with_replies
DhhD
(4,695 posts)Vinca
(50,303 posts)I wonder if Republicans still own all the voting machines?
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)When you are bored.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)We Need a Class Action Suit of the DNC and Wasserman Schultz... Call THEM to account!
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Response to mainer (Original post)
Chezboo This message was self-deleted by its author.
Chezboo
(230 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Interesting read...
https://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-history-of-sql-injection-the-hack-that-will-never-go-away
And this is even easier than what I suspected in the past.
Live Bait
(93 posts)SQL = Simple Query Language, it's a query language to make the modifications.
Access is a form of MS SQL
Oracle uses SQL
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)read that...
It would explain voter switching, If anybody wins access, they can do this remotely.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)There are other databases that are not SQL.Like NoSQL, . You are talking about A relational database which almost all them use SQL(some don't Dataphor, oringal version of Postgre which evoled from Ingress). But most likely they use a relational database and you are right I just being a anal retentive DB programmer:p
Live Bait
(93 posts)My knowledge is more systems and networking (taking care of the hardware that runs your databases!)
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)And not so hard to do. I know way back in 2000 a guy here in Florida demonstrated how the voting machines could be hacked.
But the big problem is making people ACTUALLY understand what may have happened is the big hurdle. They'll always call anyone a "sore loser!" It's so much easier. This is just SO WRONG for ANY DEMOCRACY!
appalachiablue
(41,171 posts)brooklynite
(94,727 posts)aspirant
(3,533 posts)138 is the absolute total so far?
brooklynite
(94,727 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)I'm not saying the reported number is higher. It's just from what I can tell there are a lot of people who don't even know that their actual votes don't count. There was a lot of ambiguity as to what circumstances a provisional ballot would indeed count.
A correct total of rejected ballots would give a better idea what's going on.
Response to brooklynite (Reply #19)
FourScore This message was self-deleted by its author.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)thankfully the Democratic Party of ARIZONA does not agree
They are even demanding... wait for it.. .FEDERAL OVERSIGHT
http://www.wsmv.com/story/31562805/az-democratic-party-demands-action-after-election-fiasco
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)to confirm my recollection of the Carter Center's opinion on the sorry state of US elections (which I haven't found yet), I found something cheerful: http://www.cartercenter.org/news/pr/democracy-092515.html
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)brooklynite
(94,727 posts)...that has a perfect record when it comes to voting rights? Thee will ALWAYS be some marginal number of complaints.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)And no. I'm not doubting your math.
I was just having some fun.
Can't be serious all the time.
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)But how to prove all of it is a YUUUUGE problem. Apparently the POWER BROKERS haven't covered ALL this up and the boat has a few leaks!
We can only hope we'll find many more leaks. And some call this a Democracy. Not so much THIS DEMOCRATIC PARTY right now!