I think this one might be:




Omg I wish I could vote there.

Thanks for turning this ugly thread into something beautiful.

I wish somebody would put names on these "Hunk of the Month" posts.

for a friend who's getting his chopped off, it's down to his waist and I was teasing him how he should go. He donates his hair often, it's thick and beautiful blond; I've never seen anyone's hair grow that fast in my life.

Weathering's good for a man.

I just thought all those young girls first time voting might want to see there's (possibly/hopefully) those 'boys' down in hell just waiting for them.

He is quite stunning though ......... I'd love to draw him.

There are special places for old skanks who see children as collateral damage...

The women in my family got a shopping trip out of this!!!!: new flame resistant outfits for Hell. Re. Susan Sarandon: when did it become anybody's business who she votes for? I hope you don't think she cares what anyone thinks of her.

Although this hatred for her is unhinged, if I were her I would up my security.

I would the same about Sanrandon's remarks if she were a man.

... concern for your fellow countrymen used to be one of the cornerstones of progressivism.

I guess when you're a super rich Hollywood liberal, it's easy to forget about that.

Had she said this in October I could see the criticism.

If Sarandon were running for president, I'd vote for her.

argument?

For holding a rally with the people who were shooting at American servicemen.

On the nose.

I don't have recourses like she does to insulate myself and my family from the consequences of a Trump or Cruz presidency. I don't have a ping pong club to retreat to.

I don't have resources either but do not want to entrust the future of this country into the hands of either a Trump or a Hillary.

So let's get behind the only candidate actually cares about and represents the people of this country.

I respect one's right to back a candidate in a primary. But would you step back, like Sarandon is suggesting people will do, and let Trump or Cruz burn the country down?

and sees greater opportunity for rebellion under anyone else.

Who knows? If it comes down to the false dichotomy of Hill vs. Trump maybe someone else will step into the ring.

Your laughing is why your guy does so bad with minorities.

Thought you were referring to Hilly. But no matter, that was a non-incident and Sarandon did not attack her.

This is all so petty. Sarandon's an enemy because she doesn't fall in line and has some visibility.

You Hillary folks fail to recognize that some if not many Bernie supporters don't feel obligated, have never been obligated, and certainly don't feel represented by the Democratic Party or DNC. Your outrage at their "disloyalty" is pointless. There is some legitimacy to the their view that maybe things just need to get worse or very bad before they really do get better -- afterall, it's been the history of mankind/civilization generally.

People are upset with her for supporting Trump if Bernie loses the primary contest. Everybody here at DU should find that unconscionable.

They even slut shamed her the other night.

And another said "sex sells".

It reminds me of that, either your with us.... saying.

We don't have to agree with her. But she has that right & shouldn't be vilified.

Have people forgotten where they are posting nowadays?

followed it up with if Trump wins you will see the revolution in full force.

Paraphrasing here, but it was along those lines.

For basically pointing out that she doesn't see Hillary as the person who will push the nation in the direction it needs to move? My son has said the identical thing she said -- basically, that in the long run (i.e., several years down the road) maybe it would be better if Trump wins over Hillary. I understand where he's coming from: darkest just before the dawn. BTW, he's 32, college degree and makes a decent income. He's not inspired by the Democratic Party today any more than he is by the GOP, though he believes in long held democratic principles (which he feels today's party does not).

So should he be vilified for that thinking too, or me for understanding where he's coming from?

I said people should be figuratively raked over the coals here at DU for supporting Repubs. Therefore, if you disagree ...

Where did I say you should be vilified for something you have not done?

If you don't want flack here on DU, then do not advocate voting against the Dem in the GE (or voting for a third party candidate because of so-called principles).

It's not nice.

That's a bizarre interpretation of things.

Sad.Sigh.

Do you understand the purpose of the website? Do you oppose voting for Dems in the GE?

I already told you why I disagreed. Let's not chase our tail here. You don't like or agree with my explanation, fine.

I am not questioning you as in implying you are being dishonest but do you have a link?

She said some people will support Trump, not that she would.

Here's the quote:

She would probably write in Bernie's name or vote for Jill Stein.

She would never vote for a racist sexist asshole like Trump.

Those are the facts.

Speculation is fine but they cross the line into lying when they say she supports/is voting for Trump.

not run out and vote for Trump. Jeez.

altogether serious.

On trade, Bernie and Trump are closer than Hillary and Bernie.

Bernie is simply the best bet for our candidate.

But I don't think the Republicans will nominate Trump, so for me this question is irrelevant.

Trump will not have 50.1 percent of the votes in the primary season, and I have heard that according to Republican rules, that's what he needs to go into the Republican convention with his nomination pretty much in hand.

So don't worry about this too much.

Cruz, unless a scandal makes him an impossible candidate, will probably be the candidate in my opinion. And Hillary will not do well against Cruz. She is not a good enough speaker. Bernie will win against Cruz, but not Hillary.

such as what you've posted here.

There's no need to insult HRC's supporters when Sarandon's words are damning all on their own.

Stating that Sarandon is considering voting for Trump is a dishonest statement, and I think I'll just keep on saying so.

You may not like the statement but it is not dishonest. Her own words make that pretty clear.

of her statements. It on DU.

Here's the link to the DU discussion thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017346070

Here's the link to the YouTube post:

That's not nice, either.

and defense of others here. Good on you.

..............................

Unless I misread yours. I was referring to the disjunct between the avatar and the message. No insult meant.

Some kind of misunderstanding.

They have no right to stand in judgement of a women's political thoughts and feelings.

having had a relationship with a man 30 years her junior.

Still could happen, though.

And two DUers did slut shame her the other night.

to this, I am not surprised in the least, though.

back in the day. And I wasn't even very outspoken.

I do believe she stood for something in their minds, something they find deeply disturbing, definitely gender related. I've seen the same reaction on this thread. Brought all my old adolescent repudiation of such men, fresh as if it were yesterday.

And I will be the first to admit many men feel the same way about Hillary but the vast majority of them are Republicans.

Having been called a traitor, told I was going to hell and am supporting "white maIe rule" by OTHER WOMEN if I vote for Bernie I'm just a little sick and tired of these same types pretending they can take the high road now.

That ship has sailed.

Hillary has no principles and never takes a stand to protect anything.

Absorb that. Know it.

and define "stand in judgement" and "thoughts and feelings."

At first I wanted to agree with your post, but then I wondered if I am allowed to stand in judgement of Hillary's "thoughts and feelings" about the Iraq war, for example?

If we're talking about personal thoughts and feelings about something like reproductive rights, I'm with you.

If we're talking about publicly shared thoughts and feelings about how you plan to govern, then I say some things need to be judged. There is a difference between judgement, and being judgmental.

So, please help me understand what you mean.

Or not.

Like Bernie being a democrat and dictating what a democrat is.

Boy Bernie really chapped a lot of hides on Saturday.

Bernie represents the ideals of a large part of the Democratic party, as well as many Independents. You may not agree with him, but it is absurd to claim that only Hillary represents Democrats, which seems to be the assumption of many Hillary supporters. Nor is Sarandan dictating to anyone; she is stating her view, which is her right. She also has not said that she would vote for Trump if Hillary wins the nomination, as some Hillary supporters are claiming that she said.

I don't think there are enough inhalants in the world for me to continue with this stupid line of reasoning.

We decide if Bernie is a Democrat. ..

He is, by the nature of his policies ...

Now, begone ....

They keep his back bench warm for him in the Senate and Chuck Schumer isn't too hard on him when he gets back and let's him keep his committee assignments after his behavior the past few months.