2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDiane Rehm guests today finally admitting Bernie's lack of media coverage
Last edited Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:45 PM - Edit history (1)
Interesting discussion covering media generally and the primaries. Finally some admission of problems with the coverage and sort of satisfying to finally hear it in media: Kathleen Jamison Hall claiming the low coverage of Bernie created a self-fulfilling prophecy and that the coverage of Bernie isn't issues but always delegate math. If you listen, the Bernie part starts at 17.37 in.
http://thedianerehmshow.org/audio/#/shows/2016-03-29/controversy-over-media-coverage-of-the-2016-presidential-race/112173/@00:00
Transcript of show: https://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2016-03-29/controversy-over-media-coverage-of-the-2016-presidential-race
One of the guests gave himself a compliment saying he thought print media was still doing their job pretty well. I emailed the question why the NY Times needed to revise their article on Bernie if they were doing so well. No response. https://web.archive.org/web/20160314164825/http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/15/us/politics/bernie-sanders-amendments.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
I like Rehm but she's absent a lot and her guest hosts are always beltway media people who don't do a very good job. Rehm asks good questions.
elleng
(130,974 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Neither the final result or the process are difficult to ascertain if you are paying the slightest bit of attention... PSEUDOFAIRNESS!
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)but it is still satisfying to hear media people be truthful. And Jamison Hall isn't often asked for her opinion in most media circles. Used to hear/see her most on Bill Moyers programs. For me it was satisfying but, yes, I'm still angry about it all.
Triana
(22,666 posts)Good to hear they're covering their not covering Bernie - at least somewhat.
Agreed too about Rehm. She will ask good questions. Guest hosts don't.