Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumabout rachel and the dc madam story
so last night i was watching rachel
she was talking about the dc madam's lawyer wanting to release the names on the list
she said,,,this is why vitter is not la gov...then the sound "cut out" for about 3 minuets
this was on the rerun
wondering if everyone's sound cut out or not?
wondering what i missed and exactly who is on that list that needs protected
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1160 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
about rachel and the dc madam story (Original Post)
questionseverything
Mar 2016
OP
seems odd that the sound was cut last night but today on the video replay
questionseverything
Mar 2016
#8
leveymg
(36,418 posts)1. Does she post her shows on-line? Might want to go back and check what she said.
questionseverything
(9,656 posts)3. the sound went off last night at the 13:27 mark
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/dc-madam-files-would-alter-2016-race-lawyer-654712387697
watching the video i don't see anything "big"except maybe the "threatening to release part"
i am probably over reacting but anytime the show goes "quiet" makes me curious
watching the video i don't see anything "big"except maybe the "threatening to release part"
i am probably over reacting but anytime the show goes "quiet" makes me curious
Armstead
(47,803 posts)6. My guess is they cut it to prevent lawsuits and potential slander
questionseverything
(9,656 posts)8. seems odd that the sound was cut last night but today on the video replay
nothing seems to be missing
thanks for your response arm
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)2. I didn't watch but that is interesting.
I wonder too.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)4. The sound was OK when I saw it
Here is some background on it. Sounds like the list might be released soon:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/274512-former-attorney-asks-supreme-court-to-allow-release-of-dc-madam
Here's the DU discussion thread about it:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7724904
Orsino
(37,428 posts)5. But the Supreme Court doesn't intervene in presidential elections! n/t
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)7. You mean since 2000, right? nt