I am less sure about all of the underlings and staff.

What did her staff do wrong that makes them culpable?

I don't know where it will come down. I know that her IT was criminally exposed enough to invoke 5th amendment protections and be granted immunity. I can't imagine he's the only one exposed. The FBI had been going at it too long and two federal judges found some evidence of bad faith or worse from state.
I think Hillary is smart enough to not have put herself and her candidacy at risk.

I haven't been following that story very closely. I've only read a few things on DU about it.

before responding.

Winning more delegates and votes than Sanders?

It will likely be one of the three possibilities. It's not for me to decide.

FEEL THE BERN - 2016

should be, wont be. its a different standard.

For her selling of access while at State? I wish.

and the appearance of quid pro quo aspects in other Clinton Foundation donors, really investigate, that would be a good thing.

and the REAL scandal. Some GOPer is going to figure that out at some point and, voila!, a new Congressional investigation is born.

And I do agree it needs to be looked at because that shit stinks, regardless of a Dem or GOPer having done it.

It should not go unexamined.

The fact that the accusation has been made is proof that it is true.

and Republicans on this question. Zero daylight.

Imagine that.

The "should be indicted responses" are good source material for one's ignore list.

However, anything to help their lord and savior Unicorn J. Sparklepony.

who the actual Democrats are here.

They'll prove it by quoting articles from Townhall.com, Fox News, the New York Post, and Newsmax.

You know, where the activist left gets all of its news.

If I were to put up a poll like

"Will XXX be charged with pedophilia?" it insinuates that XXX is a pedophile.

Hillary has broken no laws and thus there cannot be any indictment. However, asking if she will is push-polling and is utterly pernicious, nefarious and pejorative.

if DU was rife with people accusing XXX of pedophilia, and I posted a neutrally-worded poll to find out who agreed with the accusations, how could you call it a push poll?

doesn't mean it is so.

It is a classic tactic. One person insinuates, another gives support and a whole bunch of people nod. There is a story in the "Panchatantra" about the phenomenon.

Read this and decide:
https://informedvote2016.wordpress.com/2016/03/18/do-i-really-need-to-worry-about-hillarys-emails-yes-she-will-be-indicted-full-form/

The author's bio (in his OWN words)

I haven't a fucking clue. If she is we're screwed for obvious reasons. If she isn't we're screwed because the Obama administration will be accused of a cover-up. It's a no-win situation and it was all self inflicted.

I've read everything there is about it but its hard to see what the FBI is doing.

Personally I sincerely hope nothing comes of this. It will be devastating to down ticket candidates that have already allied with her and I'll.be pissed if she jeopardizes any of them.

And President Obama doesn't need a scandal. I like him.

Rigged system and all.

One can only hope.

Hillary should be indicted? My god, what are people thinking. I wonder if this kind of law and order mentality is what makes many people mistrust the Bernie supporters. After all, the long arm of the law has a tendency to frame and abuse people at times. But, those who think Hillary should be indicted should not be trusted with the law, since the scandal is a Republican construction that is reduced to finding some kind of violation by combing through her legal emails.

Isn't that remarkable?

Remember? Polls show she's the least trusted 2016 candidate.

#feelthemath

I don't have enough info to form an opinion as to whether or not she should be.

See Robert Rubin.

(no need to respond, I'm putting every single one of the "throw Hillary in prison" crowd on Ignore)

If evidence indicates she broke the law, I hope she is. If there is no such evidence, this issue needs to be dropped. I'll wait and see what the FBI reports.

But is she does--OH, BOY.

Would not be good for Democrats. I don't think Hillary Clinton is good for this country to begin with. But, an indictment? Oh, boy.

Clintons and Bushes don't answer to the proletariat.

It's sad to see some people clinging to the notion that she will be, simply because it's their preferred candidate's ONLY hope of getting the nomination.

Obama won't allow her to be prosecuted. Not that that will do her any good. Half the country already believes she is a liar and suspects that she is a criminal as well. If she survives to be the nominee, her opponent in the general election won't let this thing drop. She won't fare well against most republicans. If the whole emailgate is handled as clumsily as I suspect it will be, even Trump will be competitive against her.

And Obama will get a lot of the blame. He'll stick his neck out for somebody who dislikes him and wind up trashing his "legacy".