Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumStop false comparisons of Petraeus to Clinton. Here is why
Petraeus, 'knowingly' stored and shared classified information in violation of the law. Petraeus had physical black bookswhich contained his schedule and personal notes from his time as commander of U.S. military operations in Afghanistan. The black books contained sensitive, classified information about the identities of covert officers, secret operations and military strategy.
After he retired from the military in 2011, Gen. Petraeus kept the black books in his private residence.
He then shared the books to Paula Broadwell as she worked on his biography.
Petraeus was required by law and his oath to mark his journals as "top secret" and to store them in a Secured Compartmented Information Facility. He did not mark them as top secret and he did not properly store them.
CRITICAL POINT: Petraeus told Paula Broadwell on tape, "I mean, they are highly classified, some of them. They don't have it on it, but I mean there's code word stuff in there."
THEN Petraeus lied to FBI about how he stored the books and whether he gave them to Broadwell.
Completely different situation based on the facts as we know them now. I am sick and tired of people comparing the two.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 783 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stop false comparisons of Petraeus to Clinton. Here is why (Original Post)
Justice
Apr 2016
OP
True. Completely different circumstances ... But why let a good narrative go to waste?
1StrongBlackMan
Apr 2016
#1
I'm sure the SAP information she maintained in her private residence, on her
Press Virginia
Apr 2016
#4
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)1. True. Completely different circumstances ... But why let a good narrative go to waste?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,716 posts)2. Because
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)3. Cool story bro
Press Virginia
(2,329 posts)4. I'm sure the SAP information she maintained in her private residence, on her
unapproved server, after leaving office is pretty similar.
And before you start with the "it wasn't marked" narrative, I refer you to her NDA which specifically said she was responsible for classified information Marked and Unmarked.
What was the clearance level of Pagliano, did he access this stuff? How about the person, we now know, was in charge of reviewing her e-mails prior to turning them over to the rightful owner?