Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 10:56 PM Apr 2016

The Pervasive Dishonesty of Bernie Sanders

https://medium.com/@DmitriMehlhorn/the-pervasive-dishonesty-of-the-sanders-campaign-ec6eff57f22f

Fact #1: Bernie Has A History of Selling Out
Bernie suggests that if powerful interest groups approached him, he would turn down their help — or, at a minimum, never use his political power to protect them. The truth is the opposite. In major cases when Bernie has faced a choice, he has taken the politically expedient path rather than standing up for what is right.
Exhibit A: Taking money from the NRA and then doing their bidding. In the largely rural and white state of Vermont, the left’s bête noire is the National Rifle Association. Did Bernie accept money, endorsements, and support from the NRA? Yes. Bernie had previously lost statewide office six times before the NRA decided to invest tens of thousands to elect him. Upon his election, Bernie did the NRA’s bidding, reversing the positions of his predecessor and voting against the common sense Brady Bill five times.
239 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Pervasive Dishonesty of Bernie Sanders (Original Post) bravenak Apr 2016 OP
Your link doesn't work Red Oak Apr 2016 #1
DU breaks links with @ signs. Try this one Recursion Apr 2016 #6
Got it. Thanks. Just a Bernie hit piece. Red Oak Apr 2016 #14
The truth is usually a "hit piece." nt Jitter65 Apr 2016 #111
So is a stinking pile of bullshit Red Oak Apr 2016 #115
At least too often. That is the POINT. Hortensis Apr 2016 #175
WashPost gave Sanders 3 (!) Pinocchios for Hortensis Apr 2016 #206
And yours isn't a Clinton "hit piece"? George II Apr 2016 #187
Is she lying? Red Oak Apr 2016 #194
That's okay, the argument doesn't work either. n/t hughee99 Apr 2016 #199
Hillary is the dishonest one jfern Apr 2016 #2
They're not mutually exclusive. lovemydog Apr 2016 #45
Bernie isn't perfect, but Hillary has been quite dishonest recently jfern Apr 2016 #47
You're entitled to you opinion lovemydog Apr 2016 #50
Hillary has repeatedly attacked Bernie with lies jfern Apr 2016 #54
We see it somewhat differently. lovemydog Apr 2016 #59
Well, there wouldn't be much talk of issues if Bernie wasn't running jfern Apr 2016 #69
Certainly less of the ones that mean the most lovemydog Apr 2016 #74
+1, Sander is losing more than just this primary... uponit7771 Apr 2016 #3
what does that mean? don't be coy,spit it out. hollysmom Apr 2016 #7
peoples respect for one, he's sounding like just another side of the same coin uponit7771 Apr 2016 #12
speak for yourself, unless you have documented proof. hollysmom Apr 2016 #15
lobbies money from wall street uponit7771 Apr 2016 #21
The OP is written by a man who sits on the board of a Prisons for Profit company. Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #189
What A LIE IS THIS POST No Matter WHat The Link Says! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #4
"If Bernie loses, VOTE FOR TRUMP!" baldguy Apr 2016 #23
I do not waste my time on Naderites bravenak Apr 2016 #24
Nor do I. lovemydog Apr 2016 #56
"Also don't waste my time on people who brag about not voting." SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #72
+1000 bravenak Apr 2016 #139
The sage Susan Sarandon. Thanks for Dubya, your brightness. oasis Apr 2016 #28
Videos are the worst possible way to make an argument Recursion Apr 2016 #37
Heh. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #73
Seriously? dchill Apr 2016 #5
It goes to an article with exactly the OP's subject line Recursion Apr 2016 #9
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #30
Another lying blogger shilling for Hillary, what a shock beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #8
Nobody "takes money from the NRA" per se, but they campaigned for him, which costs money Recursion Apr 2016 #13
The. NRA doesn't donate to campaigns? Really? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #19
They CAN spend money on ads. bravenak Apr 2016 #25
The blogger lied, he's another keyboard warrior who just wants to smear Bernie beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #42
Really, the NRA does not donate to campaigns Recursion Apr 2016 #27
WaPo: How the NRA exerts influence over Congress beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #41
"Campaign expenditures" -- that's not donations, and that's money Sanders got in '90 Recursion Apr 2016 #44
From open secrets, contribututions to house and senate members 1990, where's Bernie's name?: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #46
Then opensecrets is wrong, because they definitely ran those ads Recursion Apr 2016 #48
Bullshit, he never received money from the NRA. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #49
So, seriously, you actually think those ads and mailers were free? Recursion Apr 2016 #51
Those weren't donations, try to avoid using strawman arguments then yukking it up like you scored. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #55
They. Don't. Make. Donations. Recursion Apr 2016 #58
So those were illegal contributions? Why didn't they illegally donate to Bernie? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #60
They were campaign expenditures, which at the time were not capped Recursion Apr 2016 #63
Right. They just forgot to expend any on Bernie. WHEEEEEEEE! beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #66
so by your logic beedle Apr 2016 #205
So Bernie is guilty of "getting money" from the NRA, yet you post this .... Scuba Apr 2016 #191
What hypocrisy? I'm saying the exact same thing in both posts Recursion Apr 2016 #192
uummm at 10:09am this morning you thought clinton did questionseverything Apr 2016 #204
The OP is pimping a guy who profits from the school-to-prison pipeline... SMC22307 Apr 2016 #61
Figures. How does he feel about Jews? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #64
Site owners seem to be turning a blind eye. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #68
Not much they can do about links.They did ban one rabid anti-Semitic Hillary supporter though: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #71
I had her pegged from the get-go, and that PPR was long overdue. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #76
Indeed. I have heard of instances where they banned people for what they posted elsewhere. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #78
LOL! I almost added... SMC22307 Apr 2016 #82
Good idea, I'd better add a disclaimer. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #86
You did... "Orwell"! LOL SMC22307 Apr 2016 #90
It took a year. I had a few posts hidden for calling that bigot out but it was worth it. Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #182
I remember, no one should get their posts hidden for calling out bigoted trolls. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #200
Scottie...I salute you... Docreed2003 Apr 2016 #163
Well thank you very much. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #164
Your dishonest swiftboating is not working and will not work! Go,Bernie, go, in WI and NY and CA! highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #10
Apparently I'm not the liar bravenak Apr 2016 #17
No the blogger you cited is. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #20
Tell him then bravenak Apr 2016 #22
No one said Bernie is perfect jfern Apr 2016 #36
way to stand by the utter crap you post here. Warren Stupidity Apr 2016 #173
Why don't you say the same thing about the two "swiftboating" videos of Clinton? George II Apr 2016 #188
Straight demagogue alcibiades_mystery Apr 2016 #11
Yep bravenak Apr 2016 #18
And he's Jewish!!?!?!! dchill Apr 2016 #40
Among my Sanders supporter friends lovemydog Apr 2016 #87
OP poster has had some issues with Sanders' ... dchill Apr 2016 #92
I don't see that mentioned in this thread. fun n serious Apr 2016 #101
+ a damn million Number23 Apr 2016 #43
"He's attracted a lot of fanatics" jack_krass Apr 2016 #214
Thanks for doing absolutely nothing but confirming my point Number23 Apr 2016 #216
I think that's accurate. ucrdem Apr 2016 #53
+1...nt SidDithers Apr 2016 #179
'Nother post to trash nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #16
Dig deeper... it's "bad" and has been proven to be a big, fat lie. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #120
Truth is not something I expect anymore nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #123
Truth can still be found on DU... SMC22307 Apr 2016 #129
That is what I meant nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #160
Sanders has a complete lack of integrity. nt LexVegas Apr 2016 #26
You aint never lied bravenak Apr 2016 #31
that would be true. Warren Stupidity Apr 2016 #174
Hillary has integrity? Nedsdag Apr 2016 #208
The Clintonites have gone full Karl Rove! They're beyond the typical Republican. (nt) w4rma Apr 2016 #29
We knew this was coming. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #70
Well, I do think that's part of it. Human nature. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #80
Yep they have. zeemike Apr 2016 #98
Dishonesty. You betcha Autumn Apr 2016 #32
Mehlhorn was COO of Michelle Rhee's StudentsFirst. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #33
Michelle Rhee SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #84
DU had a field day with Michelle Rhee. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #88
Is that the source of the OP? Thanks for info. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #100
Yes, Dmitri Mehlhorn, anti-union and prison profiteer. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #102
Very interesting. I shall look it up. Thank you. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #106
A pattern has been established... SMC22307 Apr 2016 #117
this is exactly the kind of attack that I reject when bernie supporters post against hillary ... cloudythescribbler Apr 2016 #34
It's not doing the NRA's bidding when you get a D-minus rating from them. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #35
There is Pervasive Dishonesty noretreatnosurrender Apr 2016 #38
Silliness. immoderate Apr 2016 #39
The Washington Post and some other fact checkers have caught bernie in lies Gothmog Apr 2016 #52
The Washington Post said 147 FBI Agents were investigating Hillary but they got fact checked on that Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #195
Thankie much for the article! I hadn't seen the Wapo piece about the NRA and Lucinda Apr 2016 #57
Thank you for posting this article, Bravenak lunamagica Apr 2016 #62
No prob! bravenak Apr 2016 #142
One point I'd take issue with is that Bernie started clean and turned dirty. ucrdem Apr 2016 #65
True. Nobody knew him, so he was this shiny new thing. But little by little, the luster is lunamagica Apr 2016 #75
Wrong. If you were paying attention during the lead-up to the Iraq War... SMC22307 Apr 2016 #77
I was paying attention to the 92 campaign. ucrdem Apr 2016 #79
Yeah, the ONE war he voted against, sure lunamagica Apr 2016 #85
That "ONE war" has changed everything. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #89
Well, you are the ones who keep saying "They just don't know him. Once they do lunamagica Apr 2016 #91
I've never said that. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #93
What other "wars" did he vote for? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #94
Kosovo for one: ucrdem Apr 2016 #97
I covered that. You're comparing Iraq to stopping a genocide and preventing ethnic cleansing? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #99
His own constituents strongly disagreed. Bernie had them arrested: ucrdem Apr 2016 #104
Oh please, you're quoting an anti-Semitic bigot. *I* was one of his constiuents ... beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #113
You need to support your claim that Ashley Smith is anti-Semitic. nt ucrdem Apr 2016 #116
Read it for yourself. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #119
Different article, different journal, different author. Please support your claim or retract it. nt ucrdem Apr 2016 #121
I supported it. She's a loon who writes for the Socialist Worker and imo an anti-Semitic bigot. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #124
You cited nothing of the sort. Please support your claim or retract it. nt ucrdem Apr 2016 #127
Reading is fundamental: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #128
Please support your claim that Ashley Smith is an "anti-Semitic bigot" ucrdem Apr 2016 #122
Done: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #125
You made a serious claim. You've provided no proof. ucrdem Apr 2016 #130
I don't take orders from you and I cited proof, not everyone has to agree with you. Get over it beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #131
You've provided nothing showing Ashley Smith is an "anti-Semitic bigot." Please support your claim ucrdem Apr 2016 #133
I did and I'm entitled to my opinion. Relax, you'll get over it. Here is a nice picture for you: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #134
You need to retract your claim or support it. So far you haven't. nt ucrdem Apr 2016 #135
"retract your claim" beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #136
You made a serious claim. If it's false, as it appears to be, I suggest a self-delete. nt ucrdem Apr 2016 #137
I have a right to an opinion. Alert on it or stop telling me what to do. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #138
It's your credibility on the line not mine. ucrdem Apr 2016 #143
Oh noes! You're *bookmarking* my post! I am terrified. Really. This is me: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #144
The issue here you'll recall is "pervasive dishonesty." ucrdem Apr 2016 #145
Ashley is rabidly anti-Israel, to the point of being unhinged and she LOATHES Democrats: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #153
Justice for Palestinians is not "anti-Semitic bigotry." And Sanders is supposed to be a Socialist. ucrdem Apr 2016 #161
Logical fallacies, logical fallacies everywhere... beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #162
Sounds a little "stalker-ish" to me. opiate69 Apr 2016 #147
That too. nt ucrdem Apr 2016 #148
lol opiate69 Apr 2016 #149
Yes it does. This person seems to think he can intimidate me. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #152
Lol.. no, he do not! opiate69 Apr 2016 #154
Are you for the TPP? (NT) Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #105
Check my sig. ucrdem Apr 2016 #108
Totally agree...I think he considers this the only way to win Sheepshank Apr 2016 #183
Could you provide links please revbones Apr 2016 #230
Hmmmm... Have been pointed to info on the author (ETA) SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #67
Bernie was a C and now a D MattP Apr 2016 #81
thanks for posting this rbrnmw Apr 2016 #83
Yo. bravenak Apr 2016 #141
Campaign finance reform Yeah right! fun n serious Apr 2016 #95
WHY DOES BERNIE HATE AMERICA??? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #96
Obama has also spoken out against the Ex-Im Bank. NT Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #107
Did he receive money from Koch? nt fun n serious Apr 2016 #110
Bernie Sanders didn't take money from the NRA. Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #103
Without his permission fun n serious Apr 2016 #112
"But that year, he was the enemy of the NRA’s enemy." SMC22307 Apr 2016 #114
Posts hidden by Jury: 9 n/t. SixString Apr 2016 #109
That amnesty was a great idea! Warren Stupidity Apr 2016 #176
Seriously? Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #185
This is true. Thank you. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #190
Speaking of politically expedient paths...this sounds so familiar about Bernie Jitter65 Apr 2016 #118
Bernie Sanders wants the US to phase out nuclear power by not renewing plant licenses. Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #126
Doesn't New York send their sewage to Sierra Blanca? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #132
They did, for years 'The Poo Poo Choo Choo' trains delivered tons of NYC sewage to be spread over Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #180
If Clinton can deny it, so can Bernie. HassleCat Apr 2016 #140
Bernie is running a purity campaign talking about Clinton State to State fun n serious Apr 2016 #156
Pathetic, per usual eom noiretextatique Apr 2016 #146
Your posts are pure genius! n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #150
Seriously.nt bravenak Apr 2016 #151
Let's see... ZombieHorde Apr 2016 #155
Everybody mixes their own bullshit in with the facts. bravenak Apr 2016 #157
I know I do, but I keep trying not to. nt ZombieHorde Apr 2016 #159
Review this sty fun n serious Apr 2016 #158
what is a "seed investor"? TheDormouse Apr 2016 #165
A new term for vulture.. I mean venture capitalist... Fumesucker Apr 2016 #168
Exactly but also on the board of American Prison Data Systems, part of the prison for profit system Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #186
"Exhibit A: Taking money from the NRA and then doing their bidding. In the largely rural and white Cha Apr 2016 #166
K&R! murielm99 Apr 2016 #167
The Pervasive Swiftboating of Bernie Sanders Fumesucker Apr 2016 #169
A dark turn for the Sanders campaign Gothmog Apr 2016 #170
K&R ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #171
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #172
Google search for --> News NRA Sanders and New York News riversedge Apr 2016 #177
Pervasive Dishonesty Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #178
DU rec... SidDithers Apr 2016 #181
The author sits on the board of American Prison Data Systems.... Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #184
Thanks to the people who pointed me to info about the author of the piece. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #193
An unbelievable pile of garbage hellofromreddit Apr 2016 #196
because she is? wendylaroux Apr 2016 #201
When someone is on record saying they hate Jews... Marr Apr 2016 #197
I'd be too embarrassed to post anything if I were her. wendylaroux Apr 2016 #202
A lot of them are. bvf Apr 2016 #207
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #203
I have to assume so. Or at the very least Marr Apr 2016 #209
They are Skinner's All Stars. Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #211
"all the people who rec'd her post" jack_krass Apr 2016 #213
^^^THIS^^^ beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #210
She's on record saying Sanders' fans are racists, too Rob H. Apr 2016 #212
You are talking about dishonesty??? libtodeath Apr 2016 #198
Damn straight. I don't sit online all fucking day bravenak Apr 2016 #220
I'm not seeing much "revolution" here Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #232
Sad they have such limited lives... bravenak Apr 2016 #234
Damn. I can only see about fifty posts in this thread. bravenak Apr 2016 #215
That's what happens when you stick your head in the sand. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #218
Why would I give one fuck what people on the internet who would be SCARED SHITLESSS bravenak Apr 2016 #219
Oh please, you're not fooling anyone anymore. We can all see how desperate you are for attention. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #221
Bull bravenak Apr 2016 #222
Oh yeah, you're a real Legend in Your Own Mind Fozzledick Apr 2016 #227
Why are you giving me so much attention, then? bravenak Apr 2016 #228
I've just always had this thing about standing up to bullies. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #231
Ohhh! Posting on the internet is not standing up for jack. It's posting on the internet. bravenak Apr 2016 #236
You're not really challenging me to confront you in real life, are you? Fozzledick Apr 2016 #238
The only pervasive thing here is Clinton's camp's incessant projection. eom Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #217
Last time I checked he was the candidate NOT being investigated by the FBI. Vinca Apr 2016 #223
And not releasing his tax returns. bravenak Apr 2016 #224
I imagine you'll want those "idiots" to vote for Hillary if she's the nominee. Vinca Apr 2016 #235
Once again bravenak Apr 2016 #237
This is an excellent piece. Thanks very much for sharing it! nt NurseJackie Apr 2016 #225
Your welcome!! bravenak Apr 2016 #226
Just another load of slime and lies from Corruption Central. n/t Jester Messiah Apr 2016 #229
Excellent Read. Thanks. nt. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #233
K&R! Thanks for posting, brave. R B Garr Apr 2016 #239

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
175. At least too often. That is the POINT.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:25 AM
Apr 2016

Last edited Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:07 PM - Edit history (1)

Sanders sees that he could conceivably win, and the bern has turned derty. I hoped he would be the man he said he was, but for a far-left radical to pursue his goals ruthlessly and dishonestly is not only natural but to be expected IF he turned out to an extremist. The righteousness that characterizes extremists on both the left and right allows them to justify, under the wrong conditions, just about any behavior...

Of course, it is still possible that Sanders is only a bit radical and that his dirty tricks and lies are merely a combination of that and the typical behavior of amoral politicians in his position.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
206. WashPost gave Sanders 3 (!) Pinocchios for
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:16 PM
Apr 2016

a whole series of lies that accused HRC of selling out to oil companies. It's scarcely his only "series of" lies, either.

I call on Sanders' supporters to drop their holier-than-thou attitude. Sanders abandoned the top of hill almost before he occupied it -- for the far better returns he could get by fighting from the gutters. You know, what works better to take down a frontrunner -- GOP tactics.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
45. They're not mutually exclusive.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:26 PM
Apr 2016

I presume that anyone who wants to be president of the united states of america has some flaws, like all of us here and anyone I've ever met.

Both Sanders and Clinton are a million times better than any of the republican candidates. We need more like both of them as president, in congress, in state legislatures, on local school boards and as mayors etc.

I think it's foolish to presume that between Clinton and Sanders one is perfect and the other some constant lying warmongering corporate sellout. I think both would fight very hard for reducing inequality but I don't think either can do it without a tremendous upsurge in voting among all progressives, particularly in mid-term elections and in every damn local state and congressional election.

Among the remaining candidates in both parties, Clinton has actually been the most honest. I'm sorry I don't have a link but I did read that last week. To me it doesn't require a link because she is talking about what can and cannot be done. Sanders is just running to her left, and therefore making tons of promises even he knows he cannot keep.

Just my two cents.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
50. You're entitled to you opinion
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:34 PM
Apr 2016

and we may agree to disagree slightly. I still like you! To me, Bernie has gone very negative against Hillary lately and her campaign has been calling her a liar at every opportunity. For about the past two or three weeks. I find that disappointing. Hillary is focusing more on the absolutely incompetency, racism, venal economic policies and outrageous shortsightedness of the republicans. I happen to agree with that more than getting into pissing matches between democrats and the left who (at least in November) will need one another to defeat the enemies.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
54. Hillary has repeatedly attacked Bernie with lies
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:37 PM
Apr 2016

Why it is disappointing that he responds but not that she has been running a negative lying campaign?

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
59. We see it somewhat differently.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:43 PM
Apr 2016

I think campaigns get into some crazy stuff. I think both candidates themselves are pretty darn good. I think this democratic primary campaign has actually been much more issues oriented than many in the past. In their debates they've both done very well at presenting their cases to the American people. Unlike the republicans who to me look like a WWF fake freak. Maybe great for entertainment but not in the least sincere or real. As I've said, I'd vote for Sanders or Clinton in November, gladly.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
74. Certainly less of the ones that mean the most
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:54 PM
Apr 2016

to those of us on the left. I respect & appreciate that and hope it continue invigorating the left and the democratic party.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
189. The OP is written by a man who sits on the board of a Prisons for Profit company.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:21 AM
Apr 2016

He sits on that board while you all proudly stand with him!!!!

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
56. Nor do I.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:39 PM
Apr 2016

Also don't waste my time on people who brag about not voting. That's some of the most ignorant shit I've ever seen. Also, it's like talking to a fundamentalist. You just can't persuade them of anything. Eventually they just bore you to tears. 'Wanna go shoot hoops?' 'Not with the corporate blah blah blah blah.'

Response to Recursion (Reply #9)

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
8. Another lying blogger shilling for Hillary, what a shock
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 10:59 PM
Apr 2016
Exhibit A: Taking money from the NRA and then doing their bidding. In the largely rural and white state of Vermont, the left’s bête noire is the National Rifle Association. Did Bernie accept money, endorsements, and support from the NRA? Yes. Bernie had previously lost statewide office six times before the NRA decided to invest tens of thousands to elect him. Upon his election, Bernie did the NRA’s bidding, reversing the positions of his predecessor and voting against the common sense Brady Bill five times.


No, Bernie didn't take money from the NRA and he made good on a promise to vote to ban assault weapons earning him a F grade five years in a row.

Who is this idiot?

Let's look at his pro-gun control record:

Sanders voted against the pro-gun-control Brady Bill, writing that he believes states, not the federal government, can handle waiting periods for handguns. In 1994, he voted yes on an assault weapons ban. He has voted to ban some lawsuits against gun manufacturers and for the Manchin-Toomey legislation expanding federal background checks.

http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Bernie_Sanders_Gun_Control.htm


I want to shield gun shops from lawsuits, not manufacturers

Q: For a decade, you said that holding gun manufacturers legally responsible for mass shootings is a bad idea. Do you want to shield gun companies from lawsuits?

SANDERS: Of course not. This was a large and complicated bill. There were provisions in it that I think made sense. For example, do I think that a gun shop in the state of Vermont that sells legally a gun to somebody, and that somebody goes out and does something crazy, that that gun shop owner should be held responsible? I don't. On the other hand, where you have manufacturers and where you have gun shops knowingly giving guns to criminals or aiding and abetting that, of course we should take action.

Source: 2015 CNN Democratic primary debate in Las Vegas , Oct 13, 2015

http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Bernie_Sanders_Gun_Control.htm


Bernie Sanders’ critics misfire: The Vermont senator’s gun record is better than it looks

In that 1988 race, Bernie told Vermont sportsmen that he backed an assault weapons ban. Smith told the same sportsmen’s groups that he opposed it, but midway through his first term he changed his mind and co-sponsored an assault rifle ban—even bringing an AK-47 to his press conference. That about-face was seen as a betrayal and is the background to a June 1990 debate sponsored by the Vermont Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs.

I was at that debate with Smith and three other candidates—as the Sanders’ campaign press secretary—and recorded it. Bernie spoke at length three times and much of what he said is relevant today, and anticipates his congressional record on gun control ever since. Look at how Bernie describes what being a sportsperson is in a rural state, where he is quick to draw the line with weapons that threaten police and have no legitimate use in hunting—he previously was mayor of Vermont’s biggest city, and his record of being very clear with the gun lobby and rural people about where he stands. His approach, despite the Nation’s characterization, isn’t “open-minded.”

As you can see, Bernie—who moved to rural northeastern Vermont in the late 1960s—has an appreciation and feeling for where hunting and fishing fit into the lives of lower income rural people. He’s not a hunter or a fisherman. When he grew up in Brooklyn, he was a nerdy jock—being captivated by ideas and a high school miler who hoped for a track scholarship for college. But like many people who settled in Vermont for generations, he was drawn to its freer and greener pastures and respected its local culture.

“I went before the sportsmen of Vermont and said that I have concerns about certain types of assault weapons that have nothing to do with hunting. I believe in hunting. I will not support any legislation that limits the rights of Vermonters or any other hunters to practice what they have enjoyed for decades. I do have concerns about certain types of assault weapons.”

That was not the end of his remarks. But it is worth noting that his separating the rights of traditional hunters from the concerns of police chiefs has been a constant thread in many subsequent votes he would take in Congress. It’s also noteworthy that Bernie consistently has opposed assault weapons from the late 1980s—before he was in Congress—which he reiterated to the moderator.

http://www.salon.com/2015/10/10/what_bernies_gun_control_critics_get_wrong_partner/


Sanders Votes for Background Checks, Assault Weapons Ban

WASHINGTON, April 17 – Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) today voted for expanded background checks on gun buyers and for a ban on assault weapons but the Senate rejected those central planks of legislation inspired by the shootings of 20 first-grade students and six teachers in Newtown, Conn.

“Nobody believes that gun control by itself is going to end the horrors we have seen in Newtown, Conn., Aurora, Colo., Blacksburg, Va., Tucson, Ariz. and other American communities,” Sanders said. “There is a growing consensus, however, in Vermont and across America that we have got to do as much as we can to end the cold-blooded, mass murders of innocent people. I believe very strongly that we also have got to address the mental health crisis in our country and make certain that help is available for people who may be a danger to themselves and others,” Sanders added.

The amendment on expanded background checks needed 60 votes to pass but only 54 senators voted for it. “To my mind it makes common sense to keep these weapons out of the hands of people with criminal records or mental health histories,” Sanders said.

Under current federal law, background checks are not performed for tens of thousands of sales – up to 40 percent of all gun transfers – at gun shows or over the Internet. The amendment would have required background checks for all gun sales in commercial settings regardless of whether the seller is a licensed dealer. The compromise proposal would have exempted sales between “family, friends, and neighbors.”

In a separate roll call, the Senate rejected a proposal to ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. That proposal was defeated by a vote of 60 to 40.

http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-votes-for-background-checks-assault-weapons-ban


Bernie Sanders voted for the 1994 crime bill because it included the Violence against Women Act and assault weapons ban:

In 1994, however, Sanders voted in favor of the final version of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, a bill that expanded the federal death penalty. Sanders had voted for an amendment to the bill that would have replaced all federal death sentences with life in prison. Even though the amendment failed, Sanders still voted for the larger crime bill.

A spokesman for Sanders said he voted for the bill "because it included the Violence Against Women Act and the ban on certain assault weapons."

Sanders reiterated his opposition to capital punishment in 2015. "I just don’t think the state itself, whether it’s the state government or federal government, should be in the business of killing people," he said on a radio show.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/sep/02/viral-image/where-do-hillary-clinton-and-bernie-sanders-stand-/


If he's a pro-NRA/pro-gun industry shill why did the NRA give him a lifetime D- rating?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
13. Nobody "takes money from the NRA" per se, but they campaigned for him, which costs money
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:03 PM
Apr 2016

So, "the NRA spent a lot of money to get Sanders elected" would be a bit more accurate.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
27. Really, the NRA does not donate to campaigns
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:13 PM
Apr 2016

First off the NRA isn't legally allowed to donate to campaigns because it's a 501(c)(4). They do have a connected PAC, the NRA-ILA, which legally could donate directly to campaigns, but since they could only donate $2700 to a candidate they don't bother because they can have a bigger impact just by running ads.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
41. WaPo: How the NRA exerts influence over Congress
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:21 PM
Apr 2016
How the NRA exerts influence over Congress

The National Rifle Association uses campaign expenditures and a rating system based on members' voting histories to exert influence over members of Congress. Use this graphic to see who gets the most -- and least -- support.

...

About NRA ratings

The NRA grades candidates based on their voting record on gun issues or on a questionnaire.

A+ "Excellent voting record" and "vigorous effort" on gun rights.

A "Solidly pro-gun," backed NRA on key votes or has positive record on gun rights.

AQ Pro-gun rating based solely on a questionnaire and without a voting record.

B May have opposed "pro-gun reform" or backed some gun restrictions.

C "Not necessarily a passing grade." Mixed record" on gun votes.

D "Anti-gun" supporter of "gun control legislation" who "can usually be counted on to vote wrong on key issues."

F "True enemy of gun owners' rights."

NOTE: Career donations are totals since 1990.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/nra-congress/


Bernie never received money from them, the blogger lied.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
44. "Campaign expenditures" -- that's not donations, and that's money Sanders got in '90
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:23 PM
Apr 2016

The NRA spent $20,000 running ads telling people to vote for Bernie Sanders. If you don't count that as "getting money", then nobody has ever "gotten money" from the NRA.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
46. From open secrets, contribututions to house and senate members 1990, where's Bernie's name?:
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:28 PM
Apr 2016
The National Rifle Association goes to great lengths (and spends a huge sum of money) to defend the right to bear arms. It is opposed to virtually every form of gun regulation, including restrictions on owning assault weapons, retention of databases of gun purchases, background checks on purchasers at gun shows and changes in the registration of firearms.

Among Federal Candidates, 1990 Cycle
Total: $1,722,096


Total Contributions
Green, Gene ( - ) $16,900
Kopetski, Mike (D-OR) House $14,850
Taylor, Charles H (R-NC) House $14,850
Young, Don (R-AK) House $14,850
Sarpalius, William Clarence (D-TX) House $12,900
LaRocco, Larry (D-ID) House $10,950
Unsoeld, Jolene (D-WA) House $10,900
Rahall, Nick (D-WV) House $10,150
Hilliard, Earl F ( - ) $9,950
Allard, Wayne (R-CO) House $9,900
Bennett, Robert F ( - ) $9,900
Bond, Christopher "Kit" (R-MO) Senate $9,900
Breaux, John (D-LA) Senate $9,900
Brooks, Jack Bascom (D-TX) House $9,900
Bubba, Joseph L ( - ) $9,900
Burton, Dan (R-IN) House $9,900
Carr, Bob (D-MI) House $9,900
Coats, Dan (R-IN) Senate $9,900
Coleman, Ronald D (D-TX) House $9,900
Coverdell, Paul ( - ) $9,900
Cunningham, Randy (Duke) (R-CA) House $9,900
D'Amato, Alfonse M (R-NY) Senate $9,900
Danner, Pat ( - ) $9,900
Edmondson, W A Drew ( - ) $9,900
Erdreich, Ben (D-AL) House $9,900
Espy, Mike (D-MS) House $9,900
Faircloth, Lauch ( - ) $9,900
Foley, Thomas S (D-WA) House $9,900
Fox, Andrew H (Andy) (D-VA) House $9,900
Franks, Gary A (R-CT) House $9,900
Gallegly, Elton (R-CA) House $9,900
Gingrich, Newt (R-GA) House $9,900
Grant, Bill (R-FL) House $9,900
Grassley, Chuck (R-IA) Senate $9,900
Haar, Charlene K ( - ) $9,900
Hatcher, Charles Floyd (D-GA) House $9,900
Hogan, Lawrence J Jr (R-MD) House $9,900
Jontz, James (D-IN) House $9,900
Kasten, Bob (R-WI) Senate $9,900
Kyrillos, Joe ( - ) $9,900
Lightfoot, Jim (R-IA) House $9,900
Manzullo, Don (R-IL) House $9,900
McCain, John (R-AZ) Senate $9,900
McClintock, Tom (R-CA) House $9,900
McCuen, William James ( - ) $9,900
McEwen, Bob (R-OH) House $9,900
McHugh, John M ( - ) $9,900
McInnis, Scott ( - ) $9,900
McSlarrow, Kyle Eugene ( - ) $9,900
Meeker, Anthony ( - ) $9,900
Mollohan, Alan B (D-WV) House $9,900
Murkowski, Frank H (R-AK) Senate $9,900
Murphy, Austin J (D-PA) House $9,900
Nickles, Don (R-OK) Senate $9,900
Ortiz, Solomon P (D-TX) House $9,900
Paxon, Bill (R-NY) House $9,900
Peterson, Collin (D-MN) House $9,900
Quillen, James H (R-TN) House $9,900
Ray, Richard (D-GA) House $9,900
Rhodes, John Jacob III (R-AZ) House $9,900
Richardson, Hubert L ( - ) $9,900
Roma, Patrick J ( - ) $9,900
Roth, Toby (R-WI) House $9,900
Royce, Ed (R-CA) House $9,900
Rutan, Richard G (Dick) ( - ) $9,900
Santorum, Rick (R-PA) House $9,900
Solomon, Gerald B H (R-NY) House $9,900
Solomon, Lee A ( - ) $9,900
Specter, Arlen (R-PA) Senate $9,900
Stump, Bob (R-AZ) House $9,900
Thornburgh, Dick ( - ) $9,900
Thurman, Karen L ( - ) $9,900
Volkmer, Harold L (D-MO) House $9,900
Vucanovich, Barbara F (R-NV) House $9,900
Wilson, Charles (D-TX) House $9,900
Zeliff, Bill (R-NH) House $9,900
Herschensohn, Bruce (U-CA) Senate $9,540
Doolittle, John T (R-CA) House $9,500
Hollings, Fritz (D-SC) Senate $8,900
Bean, Linda ( - ) $8,450
Brewster, Bill (D-OK) House $8,450
Inhofe, James M (R-OK) House $7,450
Murtha, John P (D-PA) House $7,450
Petri, Tom (R-WI) House $7,450
Wise, Bob (D-WV) House $7,450
Stokley, Richard Matthew ( - ) $7,400
Taylor, Gene (D-MS) House $7,350
Keyes, Alan (R-MD) Senate $7,306
Boucher, Rick (D-VA) House $6,950
DeWine, Mike (R-OH) House $6,950
Dornan, Robert K (R-CA) House $6,950
Emerson, Bill (R-MO) House $6,950
Hancock, Mel (R-MO) House $6,950
Lewis, Jerry (R-CA) House $6,950
Orton, Bill (D-UT) House $6,950
Peterson, Pete (D-FL) House $6,950
Barrett, Bill (R-NE) House $6,850
Hansen, James V (R-UT) House $6,450
Kanjorski, Paul E (D-PA) House $6,450
Thomas, Craig (R-WY) House $6,450

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?id=D000000082&type=P&state=&sort=A&cycle=1990

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
51. So, seriously, you actually think those ads and mailers were free?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:34 PM
Apr 2016


OMG this is getting absurd.

No, you need to own up to this. The NRA spent a lot of money to get him elected in 1990. You can't seriously pretend otherwise.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-the-nra-helped-put-bernie-sanders-in-congress/2015/07/19/ed1be26c-2bfe-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html

A few days before Election Day in 1990, the National Rifle Association sent a letter to its 12,000 members in Vermont, with an urgent message about the race for the state’s single House seat.

Vote for the socialist, the gun rights group said. It’s important.

“Bernie Sanders is a more honorable choice for Vermont sportsmen than ­Peter Smith,” wrote Wayne LaPierre, who was — and still is — a top official at the national NRA, backing Sanders over the Republican incumbent.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
55. Those weren't donations, try to avoid using strawman arguments then yukking it up like you scored.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:39 PM
Apr 2016
So, seriously, you actually think those ads and mailers were free?


My claim is that he never received money from the NRA which you said didn't donate to legislators.



the National Rifle Association sent a letter


Not a donation.

Try again, so far you're 0 for 2.

Remember what you have to refute is open secrets' info proving Bernie never received money from the NRA.


Recursion

(56,582 posts)
58. They. Don't. Make. Donations.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:42 PM
Apr 2016

Hell, you can tell in your own link those aren't campaign donations, because they exceed the maximum allowable contributions.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
63. They were campaign expenditures, which at the time were not capped
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:46 PM
Apr 2016

Like, for example, mailers saying "vote for Bernie Sanders".

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
205. so by your logic
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:07 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary is lying about her oil money contributions?

I'll see your "NRA wrote a letter" and raise you "4.5 Million in Big Oil contributions".

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
192. What hypocrisy? I'm saying the exact same thing in both posts
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:27 AM
Apr 2016

Candidates can't control outside groups. The charges against Clinton and Sanders are equally dishonest here.

questionseverything

(9,657 posts)
204. uummm at 10:09am this morning you thought clinton did
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 04:57 PM
Apr 2016

Kentonio (1,596 posts)
37. Apologies, for some reason I thought it had been posted as a reply to you.

"...But Clinton’s campaign chairman was not pleased by the news that Correct the Record was about to unleash an attack on Sanders’ health. “Chill out,” campaign chairman John Podesta tweeted at Brock. “We're fighting on who would make a better president, not on who has a better physical fitness test.”
..."


Here's the Washington Post talking about the SuperPACs decision to split off and coordinate directly with the campaign via the loophole in the rules by the way.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/05/12/how-a-super-pac-plans-to-coordinate-directly-with-hillary-clintons-campaign/
A clear conscience is a sign of a bad memory..
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to Kentonio (Reply #37)Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:09 AM
Star Member Recursion (47,324 posts)
39. That's a violation of law

I hope the FEC fines the Clinton campaign for it
Finalement quand on voit ce qui peut être fait au nom de Dieu, on se demande ce qu'il reste au diable comme activité

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
61. The OP is pimping a guy who profits from the school-to-prison pipeline...
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:45 PM
Apr 2016

aaaaaand who served as COO at Michelle Rhee's StudentsFirst.

Gotta be brave and fight online for the marginalized, donchaknow?!



Welcome to the new and improved DU!

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
64. Figures. How does he feel about Jews?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:46 PM
Apr 2016

The blogs I've seen linked to lately are from some nasty bigots. People should be careful what they link to here.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
76. I had her pegged from the get-go, and that PPR was long overdue.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:58 PM
Apr 2016

I have another one pegged, too.

I guess the rationale is that the latest offending comments weren't actually made at DU. If such comments were made here, a PPR would be in order. IF the site owners are consistent...

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
78. Indeed. I have heard of instances where they banned people for what they posted elsewhere.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:02 AM
Apr 2016

But remember what Orwell wrote:

"Four legs good, two legs better!" *










*Note to jury: no one is being called an animal in this post even though it is a quote from Animal Farm, see explanation here. Thank you for serving.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
82. LOL! I almost added...
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:05 AM
Apr 2016

"some animals are more equal than others" but decided against it, what with are sure to be itchy alert fingers in this thread.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
182. It took a year. I had a few posts hidden for calling that bigot out but it was worth it.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:54 AM
Apr 2016

It takes the admins far too long to contend with the blatant bigots. A year after her first vile rant is a year too long.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
200. I remember, no one should get their posts hidden for calling out bigoted trolls.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 04:34 PM
Apr 2016

People who are more outraged by uncovering and pointing out bigotry than by the bigotry itself have some messed up priorities.

Docreed2003

(16,869 posts)
163. Scottie...I salute you...
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 02:34 AM
Apr 2016

You've done the yeoman's work around here defending Bernie and you do so in even the most absurd posts. My mother used to say "Patience is a virtue", and as a teenager I'd retort "One I don't have". Well if patience is a virtue you're a damn saint, cause I couldn't put up with half the crap you do. You're amazing, keep up the great work!

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
164. Well thank you very much.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 02:39 AM
Apr 2016

Dad taught us how to debate at the supper table, lose your temper, lose the debate.

It helps to keep in mind that no one pays any attention to what people post in here. Most of the time my opponent ignores my points so I do it for the sport and for the benefit of other Bernistas.

When all else fails there's always turtle bombing.


jfern

(5,204 posts)
36. No one said Bernie is perfect
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:17 PM
Apr 2016

But he doesn't have the 67% not honest and trustworthy rating that Hillary has.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
11. Straight demagogue
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:02 PM
Apr 2016

Wouldn't have thought it at the outset, though his cowardly stance on guns always had me wondering. But now it's clear, he is a straight up and rather dangerous demagogue. I'd be scared of his people if he took power. He's attracted a lot of fanatics of the "liquidate those who don't agree" variety. It would make the world better, after all, you see.

Scary.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
87. Among my Sanders supporter friends
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:07 AM
Apr 2016

some are and some aren't. I hate fanning flames where none exist. Are you trying to fan more flames or was there another point you're making that I'm missing here?

dchill

(38,512 posts)
92. OP poster has had some issues with Sanders' ...
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:15 AM
Apr 2016

Um, ethnicity, which I believe informs her opinions. I have no such issues. I'm just protesting here.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
101. I don't see that mentioned in this thread.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:30 AM
Apr 2016

Now look at my last comment on this thread and tell me you agree with that vote. EX IM BANK

 

jack_krass

(1,009 posts)
214. "He's attracted a lot of fanatics"
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 12:09 AM
Apr 2016

Maybe that's your perception. My perception is that Hillary has attracted a lot of anti-Semites. Which is worse?

Anti-semites:
-Hate Jews

"Bernie fanatics":
-Hate Millitary/Prison/Pharma indistrial complexes
-Hate endless Drug warss against all socio-economic classes
-Hate endless wars and "regeime change" in the middle east
-Hate Money in politics
-Hate Classroom to Prison pipeline
-Hate Fracking
-Hate Corruption
-Hate Large corporations which deport hundreds of thousands of jobs
-Hate Racist Dog whistles and demonizing minorities
-May have a Distaste for pant-suites and fake accents

You can count me in the later category, plus a damn million.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
129. Truth can still be found on DU...
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 01:00 AM
Apr 2016

but never from this OP.

Yeah, guess you're right... it's not up there with well-known anti-Semitic rants.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
98. Yep they have.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:24 AM
Apr 2016

And even to the point of saying Sanders supporters are like the Nazis and want to exterminate their opponents...Unbelievable...never thought I would hear it on DU.

But I guess going over to the dark side is justified by the end.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
33. Mehlhorn was COO of Michelle Rhee's StudentsFirst.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:16 PM
Apr 2016
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/04/michelle-rhees-studentsfirst_n_2411484.html

He's also on the board of American Prison Data Systems. Ooh! Lookie here under Select Investors and Advisors:

Andrew Kessel
CFO, Clinton Foundation

Dmitri Mehlhorn
Partner, Vidinovo

http://apdscorporate.com/#about

Chief Operating Officer of Bloomberg Law, Bloomberg L.P.

Anti-union and profiting from the school-to-prison pipeline... not very Social Justice Warrior-y. Tsk.

It's good to know the players.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
88. DU had a field day with Michelle Rhee.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:08 AM
Apr 2016

It's amusing that her former COO is introduced to DU as someone whose opinion we're supposed to value. Some may fall for it, but the rest of us won't. And that's what really pisses off Camp Weathervane.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
102. Yes, Dmitri Mehlhorn, anti-union and prison profiteer.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:33 AM
Apr 2016

That last one is priceless, considering the OP's never-ending lectures about social justice. I mean, seriously, PRICELESS.

cloudythescribbler

(2,586 posts)
34. this is exactly the kind of attack that I reject when bernie supporters post against hillary ...
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:16 PM
Apr 2016

To cite just one point in the column, bernie's promise about college applies to PUBLIC colleges, whose student bodies are not on the whole made up of the richest Americans. True, rich people are much more likely to send their kids to college, but they are particularly more likely to send their kids to much-more-expensive private colleges than poorer families are. Making public colleges tuition free would make them less onerous a financial burden on less well-heeled families, and be a major boon to those of limited means

It is also at the more general level false to suggest that bernie does not support the full range of policies for those of limited income. but intimate knowledge of his platform on these issues (he has over the years consistently supported the proposed budget of the Progressive Caucus in Congress which does precisely that) in his platform may be more extensive on the part of others at DU

Obviously folk can post a broad range of stuff, but should hillary get the nomination, these kinds of posts back and forth would only make the task of bernie supporters who do NOT embrace a bernie-or-bust position (which he himself has consistently eschewed) that much more difficult

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
35. It's not doing the NRA's bidding when you get a D-minus rating from them.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:17 PM
Apr 2016

The only thing he voted their way on was corporate liability, and that's trivial compared to everything he voted against them on.

No court anywhere would ever have ruled gun manufacturers liable anyway.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
195. The Washington Post said 147 FBI Agents were investigating Hillary but they got fact checked on that
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:42 AM
Apr 2016

WaPost also pulled out some 50 year old protest photos and claimed they did not show Bernie Sanders but they got fact checked on that as well. WaPost has falsely attacked both Democratic candidates with bogus lies this cycle. Why anyone would promote them as a trusted source is beyond me. Both candidates they subjected to gossipy rumors and cheap accusations made by their rivals.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
57. Thankie much for the article! I hadn't seen the Wapo piece about the NRA and
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:39 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie's elections that was linked in the article. Much appreciated!

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
65. One point I'd take issue with is that Bernie started clean and turned dirty.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:47 PM
Apr 2016

He started by bashing Obama for the TPP and asking for fast track authority and went dumpster diving on day 1 by openly insinuating that the Clinton Foundation is corrupt in every interview. Basically it's the only tune he knows.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
75. True. Nobody knew him, so he was this shiny new thing. But little by little, the luster is
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:56 PM
Apr 2016

vanishing, and the truth emerges.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
77. Wrong. If you were paying attention during the lead-up to the Iraq War...
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:01 AM
Apr 2016

you'd know exactly who Bernie Sanders is.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
89. That "ONE war" has changed everything.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:10 AM
Apr 2016

That you make light of it is disgusting.

Some of us were paying attention, and know exactly who Bernie Sanders is.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
91. Well, you are the ones who keep saying "They just don't know him. Once they do
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:13 AM
Apr 2016

they will LUUUUVE Him"

That's one of the Sanders camp favorite memes

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
93. I've never said that.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:16 AM
Apr 2016

Keep digging.

I ask that voters get to know all they can about each candidate and make informed decisions.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
94. What other "wars" did he vote for?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:17 AM
Apr 2016

He voted to stop genocides and go after Bin Laden but knew better than to give Bush what he wanted:



Too bad your candidate didn't listen.


ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
97. Kosovo for one:
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:22 AM
Apr 2016
In spite of claims of being antiwar, his “hawkish” support of Clinton’s military actions in the 1999 Kosovo War caused one of his advisers to quit. When antiwar activists occupied Sanders’ office in 1999 because of that support of Clinton’s war policies, he had them arrested.

In 2001, Sanders did not support the vote in Congress to oppose the war in Afghanistan. Congresswoman Barbara Lee stood alone! This vote was followed by his support for appropriations to support both the war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In 2003 he supported the resolution that gave support to George W. Bush in both Iraq and in the larger war against terrorism, although Sanders has been a critic of the Iraq War.

Then Sanders supported only a gradual withdrawal from Iraq. When impeachment was on the so-called table against George W. Bush in 2006, he said that impeachment was “impractical.”

Sanders, like his Democratic allies, has supported Israel’s aggressive Middle East policies against Palestinian statehood. He supported HR 282, the Iran Freedom Support Act, which was similar to the resolutions leading to the Iraq War. Indeed, it appears that Sanders is even to the political Right of many liberal Democrats!

http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/07/27/bernie-sanders-savior-or-seducer-of-the-anti-war-left/

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
99. I covered that. You're comparing Iraq to stopping a genocide and preventing ethnic cleansing?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:26 AM
Apr 2016
The Kosovo War was an armed conflict in Kosovo that lasted from 28 February 1998 until 11 June 1999. It was fought by the forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (by this time, consisting of the Republics of Montenegro and Serbia), which controlled Kosovo before the war, and the Kosovo Albanian rebel group known as the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), with air support from the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) from 24 March 1999, and ground support from the Albanian army.[57]

The KLA, formed in 1991,[58] initiated its first campaign in 1995 when it launched attacks targeting Serbian law enforcement in Kosovo, and in June 1996 the group claimed responsibility for acts of sabotage targeting Kosovo police stations. In 1997, the organisation acquired a large amount of arms through weapons smuggling from Albania, following a rebellion which saw large numbers of weapons looted from the country's police and army posts. In 1998, KLA attacks targeting Yugoslav authorities in Kosovo resulted in an increased presence of Serb paramilitaries and regular forces who subsequently began pursuing a campaign of retribution targeting KLA sympathisers and political opponents[59] in a drive which killed 1,500 to 2,000 civilians and KLA combatants.[60][61] After attempts at a diplomatic solution failed, NATO intervened, justifying the campaign in Kosovo as a "humanitarian war".[62] This precipitated a mass expulsion of Kosovar Albanians as the Yugoslav forces continued to fight during the aerial bombardment of Yugoslavia (March–June 1999).[63][64] By 2000, investigations had recovered the remains of almost three thousand victims of all ethnicities,[65] and in 2001 a United Nations administered Supreme Court, based in Kosovo, found that there had been "a systematic campaign of terror, including murders, rapes, arsons and severe maltreatments", but that Serb troops had tried to remove rather than eradicate the Albanian population.[66]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo_War


Hillary voted to illegally invade a sovereign nation, Bernie voted to prevent genocide.

Not all military actions are equal.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
104. His own constituents strongly disagreed. Bernie had them arrested:
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:34 AM
Apr 2016
So outraged were peace activists over Sanders’ support of the Kosovo War that they occupied his office in 1999. Sanders had them arrested.


http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/11/15/a-socialist-in-the-senate/

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
113. Oh please, you're quoting an anti-Semitic bigot. *I* was one of his constiuents ...
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:42 AM
Apr 2016

and those idiots who protested wanted to allow the slaughter of Muslims to continue.

The majority of Vermonters supported intervention.

Bernie was right.

The author of that piece is an anti-Semitic bigot who faults Bernie's position even though he supports a two-state solution and has been an outspoken critic of Israel.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
119. Read it for yourself.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:49 AM
Apr 2016
Indeed, Sanders has consistently defended Israel through it worst crimes against Palestinians and Arabs. Unsurprisingly, some Sanders staffers have also worked with the American Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC)–including David Sirota, now a Democratic Party strategist, and Sanders’ former communications director Joel Barkin.


Bernie is a Jew so according to her he's automatically a hard liner when it comes to Israel.

Perhaps the worst part of all this, though, is that they inject covert bigotry into a debate that needs none of it. Make no mistake about it: It is entirely possible to criticize the Israeli government, military, and right-wing political establishment without being anti-Semitic. Indeed, I’d go so far as to say that one of the biggest problems with America’s foreign policy in the Middle East is that pro-Israel hawks have successfully stifled opposition by lobbing the “anti-Semite” charge at their critics even when it doesn’t apply (which is most of the time). By relegating Palestinians to a state of second-class citizenship, stealing Palestinian land through building settlements, and engaging in disproportionate warfare that takes thousands upon thousands of Palestinian lives, Israel has developed an appalling human rights record that is deplored by decent people everywhere.

At the same time, when a Jewish person who recognizes these things is automatically assumed to be pro-Israel simply because of their background, that is anti-Semitic. It may not be chic to say as much (I am certain, if nothing else, that I will receive considerable backlash for being a “Zionist” for making this point, despite my own views on Israeli policy) but it’s true nevertheless. Whether they realize it or not, the people who can look at the record of a Jewish critic of Israel – be it Bernie Sanders or anyone else – and only see evidence that they’re too pro-Israel is operating from a bigoted assumption.

This kind of prejudice needs to be called out. The time to start is now.


http://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/bernie-sanders-plight-jews-criticize-israel-mrzs/#sthash.1mIt07VG.dpuf

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
124. I supported it. She's a loon who writes for the Socialist Worker and imo an anti-Semitic bigot.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:57 AM
Apr 2016

I cited an article that highlights that kind of bigotry, if you have proof to the contrary cite it.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
128. Reading is fundamental:
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:59 AM
Apr 2016
At the same time, when a Jewish person who recognizes these things is automatically assumed to be pro-Israel simply because of their background, that is anti-Semitic. It may not be chic to say as much (I am certain, if nothing else, that I will receive considerable backlash for being a “Zionist” for making this point, despite my own views on Israeli policy) but it’s true nevertheless. Whether they realize it or not, the people who can look at the record of a Jewish critic of Israel – be it Bernie Sanders or anyone else – and only see evidence that they’re too pro-Israel is operating from a bigoted assumption.

This kind of prejudice needs to be called out. The time to start is now.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1634702

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
125. Done:
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:58 AM
Apr 2016
At the same time, when a Jewish person who recognizes these things is automatically assumed to be pro-Israel simply because of their background, that is anti-Semitic. It may not be chic to say as much (I am certain, if nothing else, that I will receive considerable backlash for being a “Zionist” for making this point, despite my own views on Israeli policy) but it’s true nevertheless. Whether they realize it or not, the people who can look at the record of a Jewish critic of Israel – be it Bernie Sanders or anyone else – and only see evidence that they’re too pro-Israel is operating from a bigoted assumption.

This kind of prejudice needs to be called out. The time to start is now.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1634702

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
130. You made a serious claim. You've provided no proof.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 01:00 AM
Apr 2016

Please support your claim that Ashley Smith is an "anti-Semitic bigot" or retract it. Thanks.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
131. I don't take orders from you and I cited proof, not everyone has to agree with you. Get over it
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 01:02 AM
Apr 2016
?quality=0.8

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
133. You've provided nothing showing Ashley Smith is an "anti-Semitic bigot." Please support your claim
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 01:04 AM
Apr 2016

or retract it.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
144. Oh noes! You're *bookmarking* my post! I am terrified. Really. This is me:
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 01:23 AM
Apr 2016


Seriously, do you read your posts?

You're going to keep a post of mine because I criticized a writer for the Socialist Worker? Who do you think is going to care?


beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
153. Ashley is rabidly anti-Israel, to the point of being unhinged and she LOATHES Democrats:
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 01:47 AM
Apr 2016
The Democratic Party enforces support for Israel in a manner that would be familiar to the apparatchiks of the former Stalinist regimes of Eastern Europe.

...

During the Second World War, Roosevelt supported "the establishment of a National Home for the Jews in Palestine, and, despite the setbacks caused by the disorders there during the last few years, I have been heartened by the progress which has been made and by the remarkable accomplishments of the Jewish settlers in that country."

Since its establishment, each Democratic President has backed the Zionist state. Truman famously boasted, "I am proud of my part in the creation of this new state. Our Government was the first to recognize the State of Israel." John Kennedy declared, "Let us make it clear that we will never turn our backs on our steadfast friends in Israel."

...

SUCH PROCLAMATIONS aren't restricted to just Democratic Party presidents and leaders. The self-proclaimed progressives or liberals of the party have almost universally either joined in the cheerleading of Israel, or kept their heads down, agreeing not to raise questions about Palestine solidarity. Thus, liberal Democrats at best betray Palestine when it matters--or advocated for Israel outright at worst. Their party's commitment to U.S. imperialism requires such behavior.

The behavior of liberal Democrats during Operation Protective Edge has proved the rule. The darlings of progressive activists, from Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren to New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (a nominal independent who campaigns for Democrats and caucuses with them in the Senate), have made their commitment to Zionism clear. In the Senate vote on the pro-Israel resolution, none of the liberal stalwarts like Elizabeth Warren, Al Franken, Sherrod Brown and Bernie Sanders, made a peep in opposition. The same was true in the House.

...

Not a single member of the CBC, despite their much heralded brand of standing for civil rights and against apartheid here and around the world, bothered to publicly question the racist ethnocracy that is the Israeli state. After signing the blank check with the rest of their colleagues, CBC members Conyers (MI), Lee (CA), Johnson (GA) and Ellison (MN) tried to cover their shame with a letter to Secretary of State Kerry urging a cease-fire, something which Kerry claims to have been doing anyway.

...

The PEPs can't be consistent opponents of U.S. imperialism, since they support Israel, a key bulwark of the empire. They compromise their anti-racism since they back Israel as Jewish homeland--where Palestinians are deprived of most or all basic human rights. Unsurprisingly, PEPs are frequently prone to promulgating anti-Arab racism and Islamophobia--the ideological means for the Israel and the U.S. to justify the continuing oppression of Palestinians and Arabs.

...

THE SECOND conclusion to take away from this analysis of the Democratic and its support for Israel's war machine is that anyone who wants to see justice in Palestine--anyone who support the BDS campaign and Palestine's liberation from occupation--should not support nor vote any member of the Democratic Party.

...

The Democrats have shown which side they're on when it comes to Palestine. We need to concentrate on using every means to mobilize the other side to stand up for justice for Palestine.

http://socialistworker.org/2014/08/13/liberal-champions-of-apartheid


Sure, go ahead, bookmark my post and then drag it out the next time you want to defend this anti-Democratic left wing loon.

To make it even easier for you I'll repeat myself: in MY opinion, anyone who hates Israel this much is anti-Semitic.

Bookmark it.

I can hardly wait to see you defend her.


ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
161. Justice for Palestinians is not "anti-Semitic bigotry." And Sanders is supposed to be a Socialist.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 02:12 AM
Apr 2016

You still haven't supported your claim which in any case had nothing to do with the fact that Sanders had anti-war protesters arrested in 1999. To sum up, the OP has been amply demonstrated.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
162. Logical fallacies, logical fallacies everywhere...
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 02:26 AM
Apr 2016
Justice for Palestinians is not "anti-Semitic bigotry."







And Sanders is supposed to be a Socialist.







You still haven't supported your claim







which in any case had nothing to do with the fact that Sanders had anti-war protesters arrested in 1999.







the OP has been amply demonstrated.


The blogger is a lying shill, see his claims about Bernie taking money from the NRA.
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
183. Totally agree...I think he considers this the only way to win
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:02 AM
Apr 2016

He has no record of accomplishment, so he by default must try and create the impression that the only accomplishment Hillary has even achieved has been on the wrong side of history. He and Weaver etc have written the narrative and perpetuate the meme with embellishments, half truths and outright lies. The sign of a campaign with absolutley nothing to offer. Clearly there are those previous Sanders supporters that are seeing through the freebies, finally, so the only thing left to present to his constituency are the reasons not to defect to Hillary camp.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
230. Could you provide links please
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:45 PM
Apr 2016

Aside from the TPP being bad, which most agree on, could you provide links to support your statements about Bernie saying anything about the Clinton Foundation please?

MattP

(3,304 posts)
81. Bernie was a C and now a D
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:04 AM
Apr 2016

F is the only acceptable grade from the NRA, sorry and yes he did vote 5 times against the Brady bill there is no excuse

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
103. Bernie Sanders didn't take money from the NRA.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:34 AM
Apr 2016

Last edited Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:01 AM - Edit history (1)

In 1990, the NRA sent out a mailer promoting him without his permission.

They never did that before or since. His most recent rating from the NRA is D-.

He won the 1990 election by 16.5 percentage points. I doubt he felt that a last minute NRA mailer, after most people had made up their minds, gave him the election.


SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
114. "But that year, he was the enemy of the NRA’s enemy."
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:44 AM
Apr 2016
BURLINGTON, Vt. — A few days before Election Day in 1990, the National Rifle Association sent a letter to its 12,000 members in Vermont, with an urgent message about the race for the state’s single House seat.

Vote for the socialist, the gun rights group said. It’s important.

....

“The gun vote brought us down,” said Judy Shailor, Smith’s 1990 campaign manager. She said she had warned gun groups that, in the long run, Sanders would prove too liberal for them.

“The gun groups would say to me, ‘We are going to put him in office for one term and teach Peter Smith a lesson. Then we’re going to vote [Sanders] out,’ ” Shailor said. “I said, ‘You won’t get him out.’ .?.?. He’s one of the best master politicians I’ve ever come across.”

http://crooksandliars.com/2015/07/nra-helped-bernie-sanders-get-elected


How perfect -- as I'm typing this, Beck is on Austin City Limits. (Some will get that...)

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
185. Seriously?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:04 AM
Apr 2016

In this environment, that means absolutely nothing.

Y'all keep bringing that up as if it's some kind of AHA moment.

You've got it backwards, of course, people have been alert stalked into multiple hides. Admin FINALLY reconnized this and did something about it.

You guys need some new material.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
118. Speaking of politically expedient paths...this sounds so familiar about Bernie
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:49 AM
Apr 2016

Remember Sierra Blanca?

"Three West Texan protestors went to Vermont to plead with then Representative Sanders that the dump site shouldn't be located in this poor minority community, Mr. Sanders told the three activists, "My position is unchanged and you’re not going to like it.” When asked if he would at least visit the proposed site in Sierra Blanca, he said: “Absolutely not. I'm gonna to be running for re-election in the state of Vermont."

“He didn't listen,” Curry said. “He had his mind made up."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/2/8/1481494/-Sierra-Blanca-Bernie-Sanders-Paul-Wellstone-a-Poor-Minority-Community-and-a-Nuclear-Waste-Dump

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
126. Bernie Sanders wants the US to phase out nuclear power by not renewing plant licenses.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:58 AM
Apr 2016

In the meanwhile, we have a problem about where to put the waste.

Governor Ann Richards and President Bill Clinton also thought that Sierra Blanca was a better place for the waste.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
132. Doesn't New York send their sewage to Sierra Blanca?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 01:03 AM
Apr 2016

I believe they did, there was a NYT article posted here about it.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
180. They did, for years 'The Poo Poo Choo Choo' trains delivered tons of NYC sewage to be spread over
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:50 AM
Apr 2016

acres at Sierra Blanca. New York started dumping sewage there when the Federal Government ordered then to stop dumping it in the Atlantic as they had previously done, those elegant and sophisticated NYers'....

New York's Sewage Was a Texas Town's Gold
It is hard to imagine places more different than New York and Sierra Blanca, and the contrast has always underscored the mercenary marriage between the nation's largest city and the small town where it has dumped its sewage since 1992. That year, after Congress had prohibited the city from dumping its sludge in the Atlantic Ocean, New York signed contracts with several companies to treat and transport its sewage. One of them was a Long Island joint venture, which began shipping up to 250 tons every day on the 2,065-mile journey to West Texas. The Texas Observer, the political journal, recently called it ''the poo-poo choo-choo.''
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/27/us/new-york-s-sewage-was-a-texas-town-s-gold.html

Details and photos at Toxic Texas:
Sierra Blanca, the Nation's
Largest Sewage Dump
http://www.txpeer.org/toxictour/merco.html


 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
140. If Clinton can deny it, so can Bernie.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 01:18 AM
Apr 2016

Post after post here on DU says the Clinton campaign does not get money from corporations because that's illegal. I guess the same applies to the Sanders campaign, and he does not get money from the NRA. Works both ways.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
156. Bernie is running a purity campaign talking about Clinton State to State
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 01:59 AM
Apr 2016

Bernie Sanders was the ONLY left person who Voted Against Ex-Im Bank. Very puzzling since this is not a vote any democrat would ever make. Well it is a vote that benefits the KOCH BROTHERS who in turn gave money to Sanders Campaign. http://www.rollcall.com/politics/sanders-unique-among-senate-democrats-opposing-export-import-bank/ http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/2016-election-defense-military-industry-contractors-donations-money-contributions-presidential-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-republican-ted-cruz-213783 http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-votes-against-ex-im-bank

Also, the NRA.. Supporters excuses are weak. #VettBernie

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
155. Let's see...
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 01:58 AM
Apr 2016

About Fact 1:
a) I don't care about the NRA, though I am annoyed by how they changed the definition of the 2A, but I'll discuss that in another thread.

b) I absolutely love the idea of single-payer college. Why wouldn't I want to live in a more highly educated society? The benefits seem obvious to me.

c) Yeah...that seems to be the case.

About Fact 2:
I call bullshit here. We have endless money when it comes to war. HRC voted for the Iraq war, and we all know war isn't cheap. This isn't about money, it's about priorities.

About Fact 3:
Maybe. I would want to review Politifact's breakdown of what was honest and what wasn't before spouting my mouth off on this.

TheDormouse

(1,168 posts)
165. what is a "seed investor"?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 02:40 AM
Apr 2016

Dmitri Mehlhorn describes self as a "seed investor."

Sounds very 1%-ish to me. Either someone who is part of the 1%, or carries their water.
I would not expect such a person to even try to offer an objective assessment of any of Bernie's proposals or to comment fairly on Bernie's character and history.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
186. Exactly but also on the board of American Prison Data Systems, part of the prison for profit system
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:06 AM
Apr 2016

Changing Corrections, for Good
Delivering technology that makes prisons safer, cheaper, and more effective
http://apdscorporate.com/#problem

Cha

(297,446 posts)
166. "Exhibit A: Taking money from the NRA and then doing their bidding. In the largely rural and white
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 03:40 AM
Apr 2016
state of Vermont, the left’s bête noire is the National Rifle Association. Did Bernie accept money, endorsements, and support from the NRA? Yes"

Fact #2: Bernie’s Budgets are Full of Falsehoods

•Jared Bernstein, who is friendly to Sanders and leads the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, cited several assumptions as “wishful thinking” in a conversation with the New York Times.

Left-Leaning Economists Question Cost of Bernie Sanders’s Plans

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/16/us/politics/left-leaning-economists-question-cost-of-bernie-sanderss-plans.html?_r=0

And, that's just the tip of the freaking iceberg with BS.

Thank you, brave~

Gothmog

(145,433 posts)
170. A dark turn for the Sanders campaign
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:20 AM
Apr 2016

From the Boston Globe https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/04/01/dark-turn-for-sanders-campaign/iQXKhLKcLadSzNhbxo2WOI/story.html

The candidate who pledged last May that his campaign would not be about Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton, but “about the needs of the American people”; the candidate who boasted he’d never run a negative political attack in his life; the man who said he would be “driven by issues and serious debate . . . not reckless personal attacks of character assassination,” has begun to run a very different race.

Sanders is increasingly embracing the tactics he once decried. Rather than trying to unify the Democratic Party behind its almost certain nominee, Hillary Clinton, he is ramping up the attacks against her. While once Sanders refused even to mention Clinton’s name, now he doesn’t go a day without hitting her.

And the focus of his attacks is always the same — that she is too close to Wall Street, that she has flip-flopped on trade, and that she was wrong on the Iraq War. In Ohio last month, he said, “I proudly stood with the workers! Secretary Clinton stood with the big money interests!”....

There’s also the much bigger question of why he is doing this. Sanders likes to tell his supporters that he has the momentum to win the Democratic nomination. But the simple fact is that it would take a miracle for Sanders to overtake Clinton’s wide delegate lead. As campaign stat guru Nate Silver pointed out recently, even in the most optimistic scenario for Sanders, he would still likely fall short.

While I understand the need to maintain a brave face for his supporters, Sanders is doing them and the party he wants to represent no favors not just by misleading them about his chances, but by increasing their dislike of Clinton. Sanders has said on more than one occasion that he thinks Clinton “on her worst day” would be an “infinitely better candidate and president than the Republican candidate on his best day.” I have no doubt that he believes this. Perhaps he should start acting like it.

Response to bravenak (Original post)

riversedge

(70,267 posts)
177. Google search for --> News NRA Sanders and New York News
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:39 AM
Apr 2016

turns up the news reports.


Also try:
bernie sanders and new york times

News NRA Sanders and New York News
Clinton Shines Spotlight on Gun Control Against Sanders in New York
Swampland3 days ago
Editorials from around New England
WKRG News 5 Mobile22 hours ago
Republicans' gun-free zone
Jackson Hole News & Guide1 day ago

More News NRA Sanders and New York Headlines
NRA praises Bernie Sanders over gun comments ... - NY Daily News
www.nydailynews.com/news/.../nra-praises-bernie-sanders...

NRA praises Bernie Sanders for stance on not ... Bernie Sanders has an unwelcome new friend: The NRA. ... View Gallery New York Daily News front pages on ...
Bernie Sanders gets praise from the NRA | New York...
nypost.com/2016/03/07/nra-praises-sanders-for-opposing...

Mar 06, 2016 · ... ” the National Rifle Association posted on Twitter. ... Clinton’s team delighted in the NRA’s support for Sanders. ... New York Post. Share this ...
NRA-ILA | Bernie Sanders Wins Big in New Hampshire
www.nraila.org/articles/20160212/bernie-sanders...

Bernie Sanders Wins Big in New Hampshire. ... and how big a win it was for Sanders. New York Times: ... is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of ...

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
184. The author sits on the board of American Prison Data Systems....
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:04 AM
Apr 2016

Changing Corrections, for Good
Delivering technology that makes prisons safer, cheaper, and more effective

How do we deliver cost savings?
"eliminate cost centers such as libraries"

http://apdscorporate.com/#about


He is part of the Prison For Profit Industry.....making his citation here extremely ironic. Also disgusting. But very, very ironic.

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
196. An unbelievable pile of garbage
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:46 AM
Apr 2016
Fact 1, sellout argument:

(a) NRA ties. This is a form of attack that all legislative members are open to. A vote is a blunt instrument: yes/no/abstain. However, a bill is extremely complex and often has an equally complex development process. So the attack is made by overly simplifying the history of a bill and then using the final vote to derive some meaning.

OP is simultaneously attacking Sanders for getting a pitch from the NRA during one of his election bids. Here's a relevant article that explains the actual history of that whole event.

Short version: NRA tried to use Sanders as a foil to knock out a politician that didn't play ball with them. Although they planned to replace Sanders at the next election they just couldn't. In every race since they have opposed Sanders. So if he really did do their bidding, they sure have been ungrateful. It's awfully hard to believe that he would continue to do their bidding.

To tie this into what I said about bill complexity, the process behind the waiting period legislation and the later Brady bill shows no evidence that Sanders voted as a result of NRA influence. He appears to have voted in-line with his stated beliefs, even when unpopular. FWIW I disagree with Sanders on guns, but mischaracterization is mischaracterization.

(b) Characterizing free college as a handout to the rich is just a stupid argument. You could just as easily argue that reigning in drug prices is a mendacious handout to the ill.

(c) Going negative? The author does not substantiate this argument aside from linking to an OP-ed from Krugman. OP-eds are not a compelling argument to any but those who already agree. But beyond that, the linked Op-ed doesn't even try to prove that claim either--Krugman just asserts it as well. So absolutely no evidence provided by the author or sources.

None of that demonstrates that Sanders is dishonest.

Fact 2, budget reality argument: (No (a), (b), etc. breakdown this time. So much for parallelism.)

The author starts off with a strawman argument: “Other people — undeserving people—will pay for it.” Take the college tuition idea, for starters. We used to have free tuition and it wasn't by taxing the undeserving, it was by taxing across society. People who formerly benefited from that system later paid back into it. Th fact of the matter is that college graduates are supposed to be a powerful driving force in the economy: they're joining the workforce, they're making investments in homes and finance, and they're starting the next generation of families. However, our current model front-loads their lives with burdensome payments plus excessive interest. The result has been further economic slowdown and people putting their lives on hold--childbirth is later, marriage is later or not at all, renters are on the rise, home owners are falling, and retirement accounts are simply vanishing. Spreading the costs of school throughout the economy and disposing of the interest costs would unshackle an important piece of the economy without dragging anyone else down.

The author then pits opinions from economists against one another with no analysis--it's just a matter of who's credentials you like better. He really, really lays the credentials on thick because he has nothing else to present.

Further, the articles he linked are (excluding the MJ opinion piece) all part of a cluster of articles that came out at the same time, largely making the identical argument that Friedman's analysis is wrong. Let's assume that's true. It does not show that Sanders' plan is unrealistic or even bad--it only shows that one economist is wrong. Repeating the same argument multiple times through a series of links to similar articles does not make a claim "more true" or make the claim say anything beyond what it actually says. It's only an attempt to add weight to a non-point.

Now, the MJ article tried to make the connections that the Sanders campaign is somehow responsible for that analysis, but all it actually shows is that the campaign quoted it. He fails to mention, however, that the campaign stopped quoting it once the analysis was debunked. That's a good example of the campaign being wrong, but not of being dishonest.

Once again, the author fails to show the campaign being dishonest.

Fact 3, Clinton's trustworthiness argument:

The author begins with an actual lie this time, but told by the author: "Bernie’s final lie is that Clinton is not trustworthy."

The author makes no attempt at all to support that statement. No quotes from Sanders, no quotes from the campaign, not even quotes from third-party supporters. Instead he offers up some evidence that Clinton is actually trustworthy, and he takes a shot at Sanders: "Bernie’s former colleagues in the House and Senate describe a self-promoting grump with narcissistic tendencies." He also provides nothing to support this claim.

Once again, the author fails to show the campaign being dishonest.

Summary:
The author then wraps things up with a nice non-sequitur: "The bottom line is that those who fund his campaign are now doing Donald Trump’s dirty work with false attacks on Hillary’s character." They typical "you're with us or you're with the monster" knock against anyone that finds the author's lousy writing unconvincing.

bravenak, why do you always post such trash?
 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
197. When someone is on record saying they hate Jews...
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 11:09 AM
Apr 2016

I don't really see how any smear they promote about a Jewish politician can be taken seriously.

Response to Marr (Reply #197)

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
209. I have to assume so. Or at the very least
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:14 PM
Apr 2016

they don't actually give a shit about bigotry, so long as it's in service to Hillary.

 

jack_krass

(1,009 posts)
213. "all the people who rec'd her post"
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 11:43 PM
Apr 2016

Same list of usual suspects we see here day after day defending the undefendable. No surprise they'd stand by the OP(at best, an admitted troll who believes in nothing, at worst, an anti-semite), or the author of this self-serving anti-Sanders hit piece.

I suspect at least some of them are just trying to keep their paychecks coming in, and will rationalize anything they do in pursuit of that.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
210. ^^^THIS^^^
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:52 PM
Apr 2016

Countless threads smearing Bernie using questionable sources and no sign of slowing down yet.

Rob H.

(5,352 posts)
212. She's on record saying Sanders' fans are racists, too
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:30 PM
Apr 2016

and she hates him and them. At this point everything she posts about him can be ignored completely, imo.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
220. Damn straight. I don't sit online all fucking day
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:13 PM
Apr 2016

Talmbout revolution. Pathetic. Look at them. Angry and vituperative losers. Running around screamin revolution from their ivory towers, knowing damn well they aint never even had a fist fight.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
232. I'm not seeing much "revolution" here
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:10 PM
Apr 2016

In fact, much of the energy is spent talking about other people. If you could see half of this thread it would look a lot like this...

[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
234. Sad they have such limited lives...
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:12 PM
Apr 2016

I figured that is what was going on here. I bet they think I care what they think.
That's sad too. I dont care.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
215. Damn. I can only see about fifty posts in this thread.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:07 AM
Apr 2016

I guess my own personal TMZ is still following me around thinking I give a damn what they talmbout.

Fozzledick

(3,860 posts)
218. That's what happens when you stick your head in the sand.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:04 PM
Apr 2016

I can understand why you don't want to see what people are saying about you after all the nastiness you've shown us, but you have no one to blame for that but yourself.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
219. Why would I give one fuck what people on the internet who would be SCARED SHITLESSS
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:07 PM
Apr 2016

to come at me in person have to say? I dont. None of you matter. At all.

Fozzledick

(3,860 posts)
221. Oh please, you're not fooling anyone anymore. We can all see how desperate you are for attention.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:14 PM
Apr 2016

Repeatedly posting nasty bigoted shit just to provoke people and start fights.

Fozzledick

(3,860 posts)
227. Oh yeah, you're a real Legend in Your Own Mind
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:30 PM
Apr 2016

Frankly, you remind me of Donald Trump - endlessly spewing the most offensive, bigoted bullshit you think you can get away with just to attract the attention you can never get enough of.

Fozzledick

(3,860 posts)
231. I've just always had this thing about standing up to bullies.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:46 PM
Apr 2016

I just can't stand them, but I've learned from experience that once someone stands up to them they always turn out to be cowards underneath.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
236. Ohhh! Posting on the internet is not standing up for jack. It's posting on the internet.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:14 PM
Apr 2016

Want to stand up to bullies? Leave your house.

Fozzledick

(3,860 posts)
238. You're not really challenging me to confront you in real life, are you?
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:39 PM
Apr 2016

That would be terribly hypocritical after all the complaining you've been doing about alleged contacts.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
224. And not releasing his tax returns.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:17 PM
Apr 2016

And having a wife investigated for fraud. And put all his stuff in her name. And lies. And promises the moon to idiots too dumb to realize they buying woof tickets. And and and.

Vinca

(50,299 posts)
235. I imagine you'll want those "idiots" to vote for Hillary if she's the nominee.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:13 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary says she feels sorry for them. You call them "idiots." And you call that running a positive campaign.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
237. Once again
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:14 PM
Apr 2016

I do not give a fuck who anybody votes for. They can figure that out for themselves.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Pervasive Dishonesty ...