I wonder how you know who has credibility and when?
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/watch/politifact-fails-again-destroy-277552195924

Hie them to that special hell reserved for those who DARE to unfeel the Bern!!!1!

of the corporations you revere so dearly, will prevail. Maybe not today or tomorrow but we will throw off the yoke of oppression that you seem to adore.

how it was all done.

It is especially important that he not receive money from a super pac or even KOCH. He is the one smearing Hillary while claiming he is running a purity grass roots campaign. You can't go city to city smearing someone with innuendos you have in your own campaign. I don'y know why there isn't more of you calling him out.

Is there a template or model? Just curious. Here's another example:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024374818

At any rate, most middle-of-the-road voters are tired of the "donations" meme at this point. Hillary is winning, and the debate over PACs is old news that everyone has heard about for years. Remember Colbert's explanation a couple years ago? At such, there is a consensus building that will someday attempt to change the system.

Meanwhile, we are living with something that needs transparency and repair, but that's the way it is for 2016. Whether you think that Hillary's donations come from corporations or that Bernie's donations are under-the-table donations from Koch operatives or whatever CT you can imagine, no one here is going to change their mind because of the "bash and trash" posts - but they continue to take up time and energy that otherwise would be used to GOTV with real voters.

So I'm not arguing that you stop posting these repeated ideas; I do wonder what the source and motivation are for such prolific OPs over and over. Even progressive pundits (like Thom Hartmann and Stephanie Miller and Ed Shultz) occasionally mention that it actually hurts Bernie's campaign when blogs, tweets, etc. are over zealous, or Bernie supporters act badly.

I guess it's better to post an OP here to deaf ears than to be waving a sign at a Clinton rally.

Its clearly a clever trick by the Hillary camp to make Bernie supporters look bad.

I just formatted the article into DU, putting excerpt around the quotes in the DailyKos article. Is there anything about the article that is a lie?

Politifact has shown itself to be less than factual this cycle. I've seen other lies from it. They rated a claim false by Sanders that he outperforms Clinton in all general election matchup polling. I know everyone here knows Sanders or Clinton supporter alike that he has been doing so since the race has really gotten underway. I guess if you go back to when he had no name recognition you might find differently, but then that is just being disingenuous.