2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhich feminist icon popularized the slogan "She's a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty."
If you guessed "Clinton's Brain," you'd be right!
Smearing Anita Hill: A Writer Confesses
And last week the mystery took another turn, thanks to former American Spectator character assassin David Brock, the man designated by the right to destroy Hill's reputation and scrub Thomas'. Brock confesses in a Talk magazine excerpt of his new book, Blinded by the Right, that he had printed "virtually every derogatory and often contradictory allegation" he could to make Hill seem "a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty."
http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,167355,00.html
Isn't it interesting that disgusting, "recovering" Conservative WHITE MEN land the top jobs in Hillary's campaign.
Hillary Clinton: Empowering Women by Hiring White Misogynistic Conservative Hitmen
Why are Hillary's misogynists OK but Trumps are not?
And, isn't that a little racist?
Why are Hillary's racists OK but Trumps are not?
Fortunately, I've come to the place where feminists and blacks can explain all the nuances of misogyny and racism to white guys like me. All I have to do is ask.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)penance for years. Unfortunately, he's still a ratfucker at heart, just now for Team Clinton.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Would love to read that interview.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)women set to testify against Thomas. They love him. He's like Joe Biden they say, just like Joe. Brock is made of regret and of sorrow and the money he gets for destroying innocent people hardly makes him feel better at all.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)racist to do her thinking.
Seems like a sellout to me, and an insult to female political strategists.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)racist and misogynistic hit man to go after the "Trump vote".
Now it makes perfect sense.
Well played, Madam Secretary. Some of your own 3-D chess.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)and his willingness to go as far as he has gone to destroy someone's reputation. He is a poo flinger and HRC has revealed herself and how she would run the country by this extremely poor choice to run her campaign.
There are plenty of brilliant people she could have chosen instead who would have taken the high road, but she chose this one, and it is a mystery why he gets such a pass from so many in the AA community.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)A slap in the face to female political strategists.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)there is a insatiable desire for power, something the country has had enough of.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Lying, smearing and dragging down the level of political discourse does not represent a change of character, or a desire to ber a better person -- even if he switches "teams."
If Brock were truly different, he would not be indulging in similar behavior now.
What does it say that that Clinton allows him to participate in such a high profile "support" role?
