had male genitalia, would she be my uncle?

Places like Flint ran out of ballots and turned people away.

due to Snott Walker's vote suppression if Bernie wins.

the nasty tricks by team Hillary that were overlooked? Don't need to poke that hornet's nest? Kind of like Cook County Illinois.

is Hillary's strength, so yes I do care, but the fact of the matter is I am sure she approves, just happened to backfire on her, unlike in Cook County Illinois. I have read many posts here supporting voter suppression by Hillary supporter's. Also how Bernie supporters aren't real democrats. So I say to you.. not really, do you care that bill goes to polling places with his Bullhorn? Own it, she is a great conservative candidate.

Heavy Clinton area ran out of ballots.

...Sanders would have won by a larger margin

considering how well respected Weaver is in that community, but that explains it.

WA stage 2 caucus happens. Sanders could very easily have that happen here. I hope not, but it is possible.

but not as badly or as long as you would if it had been your little toe.

In any case, it won't really affect your support for Bernie.

Nevada who didn't bother to show up.

corrected information.

I'm not saying there is foul play afoot but this seems to be a bigger problem than the incompetance of the Democratic Party in MI, AZ and IA.....

Good new is this did very little as far as delegate math but does make the Sander's people look hypocritical for dismissing the actual voter who voted overwhelmingly for Clinton in the 02/20 caucus.

Clark County Dems sent.

Registration was sufficient to have their vote counted. That's all the rules called for. They didn't bother to register.

Birds would not mess with them!

See, you can follow 'what if' by any outrageous question!

And he won SC because African American Voters where not feed the lie about the picture of his Civil Rights protests arrest being a fake. Or Rep. Lewis lying about how Sanders never did anything During MLK Civil Rights time but Clintons did?

voter information?

The Sanders people would have screamed bloody murder.

But, of course, when it did happen they some how convinced themselves that it was a Clinton scandal and she had wronged him.

They were awful quick to drop their poutrage. There is some reason sanders I suing. I'm sure DWS earned it.

Other then repetitive silly posts about supposed "lies", Susan Sarandon, "unreleased tax returns", defending her lobbyist-connection corruption, and other trivial what-not - I tend to agree.

They would say it was tearing the Democratic Party apart and that it would show that Secretary Clinton would go to any lengths to win.

Basically I expect some human error in the process. But if the shoe were on the other foot I think there would be hundreds of angry, raging posts screaming about election theft and directly accusing the candidate.

And people here were fine since it helped Clinton? Just checking

if the results were the opposite and Bernie lost delegates because they failed to show up, there would be no calls from Hillary supporters to do a damn thing about it, they'd just say 'rules are the rules'.

ASAIK, delegate rules can be changed right up to, and during the convention, so here's a thought, let's all get together and give back Hillary her 3 or 4 delegates in NV and do away with super delegates ... sounds fair to me.

Some by Sanders supporters.

We aren't the villains here.

And there was just as much dodginess in the original caucus result as there was yesterday.