Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HomerRamone

(1,112 posts)
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 04:13 PM Apr 2016

Is the 2016 Election Already Being Stripped & Flipped?

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/36110-focus-is-the-2016-election-already-being-stripped-a-flipped

Is the 2016 Election Already Being Stripped & Flipped?

By Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman, Reader Supported News
03 April 16

Disturbing signs of the time-tested “Strip and Flip” strategy for stealing elections have already surfaced in 2016. Will they ultimately decide the outcome, as they have in too many recent elections?

The core approach is to STRIP citizens of their voting rights, then FLIP the electronic vote count if that’s not enough to guarantee a win for the corporate 1%. (Listen to a one-hour discussion with us, Brent Blackwelder, and Randy Hayes.)

Historically, “stripping” has been based on race. It’s rooted in the divide-and-conquer strategies of slavery and Jim Crow segregation. Today it centers on racist demands for photo ID and other scams designed to prevent blacks, Hispanics, the young, and the poor from voting.

“Flipping” is related to electronic voting machines, on which the vast majority of Americans will vote this fall. Nearly all these machines were bought with money from the 2002 Help America Vote Act, which came after the theft of the 2000 presidential election. Virtually all these machines are 10 years old or more, and can easily be hacked. Swing states Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Michigan, Iowa and Arizona, among others, have GOP governors and, except for Florida, secretaries of state who can easily flip the vote counts, once they are cast, without accountability or detection. Also, private partisan voting machine companies have unlimited access to the electronic poll books, voting machines, and central tabulators.

Those who dismiss such warnings as “conspiracy theory” might confront this simple question: “How will the electronic vote count in the 2016 election be verified?”

The answer is simple: “It can’t be.” The vote count in 2016 for the offices of President, US Congress, governorships, state legislatures, county commissioners, dog catchers, and thousands of others will come through electronic black boxes. The veracity of the outcomes will vary from state to state based on the whims and interests of those in charge of the electronic tallies.

In the meantime, we have already seen deeply disturbing signs of the “strip and flip” scam in the 2016 primaries. All, of course, have been to the detriment of the Bernie Sanders campaign:

Despite the claim that Hillary Clinton “won” the Iowa and Nevada caucuses, there’s clear evidence Bernie was the rightful winner in both states. In Iowa, Clinton’s “victory” apparently turned on six coin tosses, all of which she allegedly won.

There’s clear evidence that Bernie actually won the Massachusetts primary, which the corporate media and official vote count gave to Hillary. Analyst Richard Charnin has examined pre-election polls and post-election exit polls, both showing Bernie substantially ahead of Clinton prior to the voting. In a phenomenon we have seen elsewhere (most notably as George W. Bush “beat” John Kerry in New Mexico 2004), Bernie won all the precincts with hand-counted paper ballots but lost all the ones with electronic voting machines. Exit polls significantly “outside the statistical margin of error” are the international gold standard for determining election fraud. If the U.S. held the same standards as the European Union, the government would be conducting investigations for election fraud not only in the Massachusetts primary but also in the Missouri, Illinois, and Ohio primaries.

In Arizona we saw a re-run of Ohio 2004, where left-leaning Democratic urban areas were stripped of precincts and short-changed on voting machines and back-up paper ballots, resulting in long lines and thousands of citizens being deprived of their vote. African-Americans in Cleveland, Columbus, Toledo, Dayton, and Cincinnati waited up to seven hours and more to vote in 2004, causing mass disenfranchisement that helped give Bush Ohio and a second term in the White House. In Arizona this year, thousands of citizens were also robbed of their vote due to the elimination of precincts, machine shortages, and the failure to provide back-up paper ballots. Many were handed provisional ballots which regularly are discarded and never counted.
According to investigative reporter Greg Palast, hundreds of thousands of potential voters are now being stripped from the registration rolls in key swing states, including Ohio. Palast, whose work is strictly non-partisan, broke the major stories in Florida 2000 showing Gov. Jeb Bush had disenfranchised tens of thousands of registered voters (in an election decided by 537 votes) using a computer program allegedly showing them to be ex-felons (they weren’t). This year Kansas secretary of state Kris Kobach, using a computer program called Interstate Crosscheck, is doing the dirty work. This program allegedly tracks down people who have voted twice (none actually have) and denies them their right to vote. Palast says the names indicate a heavily African-American and Hispanic constituency being disenfranchised, which would have a significant impact on the presidential race, but also on Congress, governorships, state legislatures and more.

As reported by Brad Friedman and others, a wide range of irregularities in other states have also dogged this primary season. They could well be the determining factor in who gets the nomination in both major parties. Official reports have now surfaced in Wisconsin of “problems” with poll books and other electronic apparatus in the lead-in to that states’s critical primary.

A recent study by Harvard and the University of Sydney, Australia, found that the United States had the “worst elections of any long-established democracy.” The U.S. ranked 47th out of the 47 long-term democratic nations.

Something serious must be done. Without radical action, these carefully engineered precinct eliminations, ballot and machine shortages, mass disenfranchisements, and too much more will not only determine who wins the presidency this fall, but also who controls the Congress, numerous governorships, and state legislatures and the whole gamut of elective offices around the country.

In the long run, only universal automatic voter registration, a four-day national holiday for voting, universal hand-counted paper ballots and other reforms will guarantee us a fair and reliable vote count. Posted at www.freepress.org, we call it the “Ohio Plan.”

But none of that will be in place this fall. In our coming articles, and in two weeks with our PowerPoint compendium, THE STRIP AND FLIP SELECTION OF 2016, we will discuss what we can do in the interim.

Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman have co-authored six books on election protection, including the upcoming power point compendium THE STRIP & FLIP SELECTION OF 2016: FIVE JIM CROWS AND ELECTRONIC ELECTION THEFT. Bob’s FITRAKIS FILES are at www.freepress.org. Harvey’s AMERICA AT THE BRINK OF REBIRTH: THE ORGANIC SPIRAL OF US HISTORY will be published soon via www.solartopia.org.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

brooklynite

(94,670 posts)
1. Don't unsupported conspiracy theories belong in CREATIVE SPECULATION?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 04:15 PM
Apr 2016

Can you point to a single instance of alleged vote theft that Bernie Sanders has filed a complaint about?

CentralMass

(15,265 posts)
3. It's just like that Harvard University,starting conspiracy theories
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 04:21 PM
Apr 2016

A recent study by Harvard and the University of Sydney, Australia, found that the United States had the “worst elections of any long-established democracy.” The U.S. ranked 47th out of the 47 long-term democratic nations. "
 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
4. Unsupported?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 04:23 PM
Apr 2016

Voter fraud, election fraud have been going on for some time now. Where have you been? We tried to get Bill Clinton to obey voting laws, and got shown the door by the law and others who support Hillary.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
7. Where were you when the Bush Admin stole 2 elections?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 04:40 PM
Apr 2016

I seem to remember we called for investigations and changes to prevent that from happening again. Where did that go?

brooklynite

(94,670 posts)
15. Point to evidence of an actual conspiracy of vote flipping...
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 09:10 AM
Apr 2016

...unless you're suggesting rigged coin flips?

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
16. Where have you been? Even Hillary has publicly acknowledged
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:33 PM
Apr 2016

there is a vast, right-wing conspiracy network that operates in this country.

smiley

(1,432 posts)
5. There's major problems with our electoral system.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 04:27 PM
Apr 2016

Turning a blind eye to the problems mentioned in this article, and dismissing them as false, is dangerous and naive.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
6. We've been fighting this for decades-
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 04:38 PM
Apr 2016

The stripping anyway. And the flipping for about 15 years. We shouldn't have faith-based elections. It almost doesn't matter if there's been actual theft yet(although I would place money on the answer being yes) Elegible voters should be able to vote and we should have transparent and verifiable elections where people can say with some confidence that their votes were counted. Anything else is undemocratic as hell. And screw anyone ok with the rigged system cause they think it helps their side.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
11. This fits with why they want a weak candidate like Clinton.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 08:47 AM
Apr 2016

Rather than run someone who can win straight up, they may prefer a candidate who very much needs the shenanigans to win because that gives more power to the machine.

If Clinton needs this stuff to "win" in 2016, she will need it in 2020, meaning she needs those who control it much more than they need her.

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
12. Last week, a voter registration government computer system crashed for 3 hours in WI
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 08:56 AM
Apr 2016

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A government computer system crash caused headaches for Wisconsin election clerks trying to access voter registration information on Friday, the last day residents could turn in absentee ballots.

The Government Accountability Board, which oversees Wisconsin elections, said it also received calls from a handful of residents who said they couldn't obtain a driver's license or state identification card. Residents will be required to show a photo ID before voting during Tuesday's primary elections.

The GAB said the outage lasted roughly three hours, beginning at 8:45 a.m. The state Department of Transportation said it wasn't clear how many people weren't able to get IDs because of the computer problems. GAB attorney Mike Hass said his agency received several calls about the outage, but said only a handful of people were affected.

County and municipal clerks couldn't access poll books or the state's voter registration system during the outage. They still conducted absentee voting but efforts were delayed because they couldn't immediately verify voters' registration information, the GAB said in a news release...

http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/article/Server-failure-cuts-clerks-from-Wisconsin-voter-7222482.php

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
13. Bernie people using conspiracy theories to delegitimize the votes of Democrats
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 08:57 AM
Apr 2016

They can't win on the merits so they invent fairy tales.

Sore loserism fused with wild crazy talk.

Looking forward for this stuff to be gone from DU after June 7 when it's only Democrats and allies here.

Splinter Cell

(703 posts)
17. It's not just a theory.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:38 PM
Apr 2016

I saw the bullshit that went on here in Ohio in 2004.

Anyone that doesn't believe vote fraud via electronic voting is a real problem has their head in the sand. It's killing democracy in the United States.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
18. it most certainly is a batshit insane theory as applied to the Democratic primary race.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:41 PM
Apr 2016

The Ohio polling showed Clinton kicking Sanders's ass.

She wound up kicking his ass.

Massachusetts polling showed her ahead, and she won.

Michigan polling showed her ahead, and Sanders won, yet no conspiracy theories about Michigan.

Wonder why that is?



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is the 2016 Election Alre...