Found her 'about page' at the Truman project. A week later, that page was password protected, as it is today.

http://trumanproject.org/home/team-view/aisha-dew/

It was on the first page of google results, but there was a focus on her FaceBook page.

That said, Nico is in SERIOUS need of a tutorial on PR.

here http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:fdk8W3WK4lYJ:trumanproject.org/home/team-view/aisha-dew/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk

[IMG][/IMG]

It all circles back to John Podesta.

http://www.muckety.com/Truman-National-Security-Project/5094448.muckety

I'll pm you.

Vid/Multi Media forum back during North Carolina's primary that describes a similar experience there.

Coyne claims Caiazzo canceled their events, provided out-of-date voter roles, denied them canvassing material, and gave them orders to not open a campaign office. All of this worked against the best interests of the Sanders campaign, Coyne says, and demoralized volunteers, who subsequently quit.

to the campaign worker's video & is inclusive of his video :

http://caucus99percent.com/content/my-investigation-so-far-claim-bernies-nc-campaign-was-sabotaged-hrc-moles-now-w-new-niko

Well, if Bernie can't handle Hillary's sabotage, he has no chance against the Republicans. I guess he's just not ready for prime time. Too bad, since he's ethical, but as the OP implies, Hillary and her team are far better at hardball politics than Bernie. That said, Bernie was pretty clever in Nevada, stealing more delegates than the democratic election result allotted, so maybe he knows how to play the game, too.

Thanks for your post, and no thanks for your ethics. BTW, Bernie didn't steal Nevada delegates, your cohorts didn't bother to show up.

... if you think Hillary is winning because of her corrupt politics, then just imagine what the Republicans will do to Bernie. I don't think Hillary is doing anything illegal anymore than Bernie did something illegal in Nevada. They are both playing the game according to the rules, and the rules have always sucked. Of course, you'll defend anything Bernie does, just as Hillary supporters will defend anything she does, but some of us are more neutral and try to look at the situation with a degree of objectivity. I like both Bernie and Hillary (and in fact voted for Bernie in the MA primary), but I don't think he walks on water. He's a good politician, and so is Hillary.

He has an edge: He doesn't have to remember what lie he told to what crowd at what venue.

He can stand there and say the same thing that he has always said, and wait for an opening to jab his opponent with. People know him. They don't have to get piecemeal introductions, because his cards are on the table.

That scares the fuck out of people trying to play political poker against him, Democratic and Republican alike.

When is the debate?

... The Republicans will surely try to frame Bernie as an anti-American, pro-dictator (Castro) radical, who waffled on gun rights, and who failed in his tasks at oversight of the VA hospitals. They will use voter intimidation, voter ID laws, reduced voting places, and probably even Diebold technology to try to steal the election. They will do everything possible to make Bernie look like a liar, just as they did with Hillary. The belief that Hillary is dishonest and corrupt was manufactured by Hillary's enemies on the right and the left, and some are stupid enough to fall for it. Hillary may be ambitious (a terrible quality in a woman to some), she may change her views, she may make mistakes, and she may be greedy, but she's not corrupt or dishonest.

but I stopped at this.

"Hillary may be ambitious (a terrible quality in a woman to some)"

I have worked in a male dominated field for decades. I get along with my male subordinates and my peers in general.

There are two types of ambition, Onlooker.

One is ambition for self gain.

The second is ambition for project and principle.

The second moves mountains as a team. Bernie Sanders says that it is not me, it is us. So right he is!

Your candidate says "fighting for us". Fighting.

I'm a doer. If you asked me whether I would like furniture bought at an upscale boutique, or the materials to build my own, say desk, I'd choose the latter.

I know this because I did build my own desk. Lacquer is the most heinous of oil based paints, but when applied correctly, lacquer seasons fantastically and is durable. I don't recommend using it if you are not prepared to have to scrub any drops that you get on your a week.

Hillary IS a liar and I'm finding this is one of her BETTER qualities.

She has told numerous "tall tales" that didn't really happen, like ducking sniper fire in Tuzla.
In MY book, that is dishonest. That is only ONE example.

You DO realize that the Republicans are going to brand Hillary as a 'Gun Grabbing Socialist" too?
Yes?
The Republicans have done that to EVERY Democratic contender since FDR.
That is why I really don't worry about what The Republicans are going to do.
I already know...and that is their problem.
My problem is fielding a candidate that can beat the Republicans no matter WHAT they do, and Hillary is NOT that candidate. WAAAAAAY too much baggage and dirt for them to roll around in.

You know, everybody laughs when someone from the Hillary Group tries to label Sanders as "dishonest". That dog don't hunt. It doesn't even make it off the porch.

I'd be so afraid of debating someone who has pledged to raise taxes. How could you possibly argue with that?

George W. Bush!

Stealing the White House is what they did best.

The "sister" 501(c)(3) organization of the Truman National Security Foundation is an organization named Center for National Policy.

Their web site has been taken down.

Wikipedia:

The Center for National Policy was founded in 1981. Peter Kovler, Director of the Marjorie Kovler Fund, serves as Chairman of the Center, succeeding Leon Panetta, CNP’s National Advisory Board Chair and former White House Chief of Staff.

Previous Presidents and Chairmen of CNP include U.S. ambassador to India and former six-term member of Congress, Tim Roemer, three former U.S. Secretaries of State, Madeleine Albright, Edmund Muskie, and Cyrus Vance. Other CNP Board members have included former U.S. Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Thomas Foley, former Republican Members of Congress Jack Buechner and Rod Chandler, and former Democratic Members of Congress John Brademas and Michael Barnes.

....................

http://patch.com/connecticut/stonington/truman-project-and-center-for-national-policy-announc99c8162971 --more at the link.


The Truman National Security Project recently announced a groundbreaking new partnership with the Center for National Policy, a national security organization that has been a leading policy voice for nearly 40 years.

The move combines values-based national security policy and politics in a partnership that will help define what American leadership means in a changing world. While each group will retain its name, the two organizations are combining staff and operations to create a powerful national force with deep roots in Washington D.C. as well as broad national reach to turn forward-looking ideas into reality.

"The goal of this partnership is to support a new generation of leaders with new ideas to advance American leadership in a changing world," CNP President Scott Bates said.

“As a former President of CNP and a current Advisory Board member of the Truman Project, I am excited about this new partnership. Not only do the Truman Project and the Center for National Policy unite strong policy and smart politics, but they also bring together generations of forward-thinking national security leaders. The national community, advocacy talent, and policy knowledge of these two organizations can make a true difference in how America fulfills its leadership role,” former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said.

”We are thrilled to create a national powerhouse that unites generations, combining the wisdom and experience of CNP’s current and past leaders with the rising policy, political, and veteran leadership of the Truman Project. It’s a pleasure and an honor to join forces, and we are looking forward to even greater impact in 2013 together,” Truman Project President Rachel Kleinfeld said.

As Truman Project Chairman John Driscoll explained, "Smart American foreign policy for the 21st century requires the right ideas and the right leaders. This partnership lets us arm the rising decision-makers of our country with the knowledge they need."

CNP Chairman Peter Kovler added that, "This is a big step forward for our organization and the additional energy and expertise of the Truman Project can only enhance our common mission of trying to help our government make the best possible choices."

of BEING in the business of getting Democrats elected. Alot of good people are being smeared with these bogus charges of conspiracy.

Did anyone seriously think David Axelrod was sabotaging Barack Obama because he once worked for John Edwards? IMO, people are prone to believe these types of political infrastructure jobs/teamwork over the years is sabotage because they never spent 4,6,8 or more years doing the actual groundwork that needs doing EVERY ELECTION in EVERY year. We all jump in and do the work needed to get our preferred Dem primary candidates elected, then the Dem nominee elected over the Republican. Period.

that you are omitting, is that David Axelrod worked hard and produced results for Obama.

These volunteers were incompetent beyond belief.

Many examples of them failing to do their job and engaging in behavior that harmed the Bernie campaign. Consistent incompetence led people to start turning over rocks. Red flags were thrown up about these people before anyone knew about their backgrounds.

that people are trying to conduct campaigns as though everything they say and do is not recorded. I realize that some politicians operate on saying whatever they think will appease their given, momentary audience, but that type of ploy just doesn't work in the information age.

First of the Truman National Security Project is a gaggle of neocons. Believe in having a strong military does not make on a neo con.

Before Bernie Joe Caiazzo worked for Don Berwick. He ran for Governor on a single-payer healthcare platform.

Seems like someone who would naturally support Sanders.

Also "Debbie the Sane Progressive" does not seems like a reputable news sources.

And that is the point here, isn't it? That Hillary is a neo-con and hawk?

... is not a neo con organization. If you think they are you either ignorant meaning you don't know much about them or you complete ignore fact.


Sanders folks here have been living in a fact free zone for a long time.



I used to admire Sanders. I now lost almost all the respect I once had for him. I am very liberal person I didn't think that was possible.

in the Sanders' campaign is just fine?

And you think obviously that this kind of militaristic

group serves the country well, when most normal

citizens have had enough of wars?

It seems that so many people are intertwined with so many think tanks and foundations and so on....all raising money to influence national policy. Lobbyists, essentially, raising money as tax exempt entities.

It's kinda revolting and scary.

CIA is involved in all of it, because Congress
gave up its oversight duties long ago and
voluntarily.

Mail Message
On Mon Apr 4, 2016, 07:11 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

And I would make a bet that the
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1639873

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Loony conspiracy theory that the CIA is working to get Hillary elected and is behind election fraud in the US. This kind of total conspiracy BS should be hidden, and no just replying won't do the trick, this stuff needs to be stopped in its tracks. This isn't Free Republic.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Apr 4, 2016, 07:15 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Unsubtantiated conspiracy crap.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Plenty of other conspiracy theories are allowed to stand, some of them getting dozens of recs and winding up on the front page. Though goofy, the tepid assertion in this post isn't hide-worthy.

Leave it.



Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

The person who you are accusing of sabotage worked in 2014 Democratic Primary for arguably the most progressive candidate for Governor of MA.


Debbie the Sane Progressive as I noticed earlier is not a reputable source of information.


And it is not a neo con organization. They don't believe it perpetual war.

kindly connect how the topic of sabatoge relates to sanders platform and his integrity?

your statement reminds me of what a liar and a cheater does when caught in the act and who turns around and then blames the 'catcher' or target of such an act of being the liar and the cheater.

The sabotage allegations are BS.


In terms of why I lost respect for Sanders.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1390509

Saying he has "conditions" for supporting Clinton. If he is "real Democrat" like so many of his supporters claim he needs to support her unconditionally if he get nomination.

I would support him 100% if he got the nomination.

Anyone who can't see that Hillary in 500x better than a Republican is just plain stupid.

Also his supporters don't help him either.

The Goldman Sachs Guide To Manipulating Commodities

By Marcus Stanley July 24, 2013, at 4:50 p.m.



Americans have learned a lot in recent years about how our largest financial institutions make their money. But few would have imagined that a million and a half tons of aluminum – a quarter of the national supply at any given moment – typically sits in a network of 27 Detroit warehouses owned by Goldman Sachs. And hardly anyone would have thought that manufacturers seeking to purchase that aluminum might wait 18 months or more for delivery, while warehouse owners like Goldman Sachs collect additional rent, paid for by consumers of aluminum products ranging from beer cans to home siding.

In an important hearing yesterday before the Senate Banking Committee, Tim Weiner of MillerCoors described the operation and how it boosts prices for real-economy companies. The witnesses at yesterday's hearing explained how the largest Wall Street banks have accumulated massive amounts of physical commodity infrastructure, ranging from warehouses to oil tankers to power generation plants....


http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/economic-intelligence/2013/07/24/how-goldman-sachs-and-wall-street-manipulate-alumnimum-and-other-commodities

Was that photoshopped? Was that photo misrepresented, and it was a different person standing side by side, either with Schultz or Day?

I am repeatedly shocked by the fact that old school politicians forget that the internet has a looooooong memory, and they think they can just shrug and pretend it didn't happen.

That says way more about Debbie Wasserman-Schultz's incompetence than it can ever say about anybody else.

with the next 4 years. Republican obstruction like Obama never met and a fragmented Democratic base planning to primary her in 2020.

We live in interesting times.

If these relationships are true, why on God's earth did Sanders hire them in the first place? What sort of campaign--or employer of any kind--doesn't verify the backgrounds of the people it hires, particular state field directors?

I've read other accounts that said the events were cancelled because the organizers didn't bother to security permits.


I've seen a lot of these allegations. I don't know if there is any truth to them, but what I find astounding is that Sander supporters actually put it out there as though Hillary Clinton is responsible for what, if true, can only be a stunning level of incompetence by Sanders himself. Do they seriously think these arguments help Bernie? If he can't manage to vet his own campaign staffers, why should the American public entrust him with staffing the executive branch of the federal government?

None of this is surprising when we are talking about a candidate who refuses to even take responsibility for his own votes in congress, whether voting for the crime bills against closing Guantanamo.

I think the far more likely explanation is that his supporters are engaging in baseless conspiracy theories because ultimately they refuse to come to terms with the simple fact that voters prefer another candidate.

Like my co-worker would say, you are too much in Logic Land.

I suspect that you will learn things that you did not want to learn.

I know I did.

so that it doesn't seek.

This is an excellent article that should be an eye-opener for some!

Thank you for posting this, grasswire. You are one of my favorite DUers.

You made me smile.

You're not too shabby yerself!

Lord have mercy I make typos.

Thank you for getting the gist of the post despite my fumbling.

and get to the bottom of all this shit.

I wish the Hill campaign were more honest and above board.

Thanks, grasswire.

I have big problems voting for cheaters.

Sacrificing the future of the country that my kids have to live in in order to spite those I don't like. Which is why, in the unlikely event that he wins the nomination, that I will be a militant Sanders supporter. He will need militant support, employing hardball tactics of the first order!

Amazing self control!

Watch as irascible old Bernie Sanders refuses to take responsibility for anything in his life! Especially his terrible presidential campaign...

That is how pathetic a candidate Her is.