Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts) Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:39 PM Apr 2016

3

Is the Clinton Fund just a more sophisticated Human Fund?

It sure seems that way.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is the Clinton Fund just a more sophisticated Human Fund? (Original Post) BillZBubb Apr 2016 OP

much more sophisticated restorefreedom Apr 2016 #1

Nope. The Clinton Foundation actually does important work. You ought to read up on it Hoyt Apr 2016 #2

Yeah, it does important work all right. BillZBubb Apr 2016 #3

Yeah Haitians and Africians with HIV are good examples of favoritism. What's your Hoyt Apr 2016 #4

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)

1. much more sophisticated

Reply to BillZBubb (Original post)

Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:50 PM

Apr 2016

and much more dangerous

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)

2. Nope. The Clinton Foundation actually does important work. You ought to read up on it

Reply to BillZBubb (Original post)

Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:24 PM

Apr 2016

before posting BS.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)

3. Yeah, it does important work all right.

Reply to Hoyt (Reply #2)

Sun Apr 3, 2016, 11:18 PM

Apr 2016

Make a big "donation" and that pet project gets an OK.

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)

4. Yeah Haitians and Africians with HIV are good examples of favoritism. What's your

Reply to BillZBubb (Reply #3)

Mon Apr 4, 2016, 04:55 AM

Apr 2016

problem with that?

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is the Clinton Fund just ...