she's energizing it like never before...against her and the greed hog establishment.

Keep it up, Hillary!

It is naïve to expect something for free without a significant cost on the other end.

that said, the cost will be paid with certain trades in WS that will not affect the 401 K holders, just the day traders that tend to at times trade the same stock several times a day. This has been explained, but I understand you not getting it. It's not like CNN has bothered explaining it. though CNN-I has. Yup, my head hurts.

understand how Sanders plan involves real structural changes and actual fiscal policies that are not about the Republican meme of 'free stuff'.

Just wanted to tell you that I think you're brave and very impressive to keep speaking out where there's so much pressure and hostility. It would've been hard for me to speak out against the crowd if I were a few years younger.

Another blatant lie and misrepresentation in GDP.

Can we cut the crap please?

The presentation may be more heavy handed, but the message is what she herself keep repeating -- "Abandon all hope ye who enter here."

in a month or two, she'll be offering the same thing to get votes

She should have run this ad 2 months ago to finally finish him off once and for all. Now she needs to run ads on telling everybody how much taxes are going to go up under all of his "free stuff" proposals.

Because I never seem to hear Hillary supporters discuss cutting corporate subsidies, or trimming the bloated military budget. Funny how that is.

You might even leave a comment if you are so moved to...

No worries, Bernie's trolls are sure to have already hit that video to silence any alternate views.

You claiming berniebro's are in the internets censoring other peoples videos?

and review the differences between commenting and censoring.

I am quite certain your education is lacking as you are conflating the two.

gaming the system by stalking all of her videos and virtually all videos she is in to downvote them translates to a form of censorship in that it prevents others from seeing them. If engaging in an activity that prevents others from seeing other perspectives isn't censorship I don't know what is. I've heard there's a similar process at work on redditt. There's a whole brigade of Bernie fans online that stalk Clinton videos to downvote them so others don't see them. It's been the same for months.

You are suggesting it is a mass conspiracy and yet when Sanders supporters discuss the very obvious bias of DWS and the DNC towards Clinton, you dismiss us as conspiracy theorists.

The system is the system, as y'all say. Clinton supposedly dislikes CU but uses it to rake in millions for her campaign. So the Sanders supporters know and work the social media system better than Clinton supporters. Quit your whining about it and go do something about it. Y'all could down vote Sanders videos. Y'all could post in his Redditt forums.

But trying to claim that she is a victim and this is censorship is just spurious nonsense.

not even bothering to watch them and downvoting them. I welcome other ideas and don't try to censor speech. You're hostile and not interested in conversation I'm moving on.

then it makes little sense to complain.

No one is censoring speech. If you actually acted like you understood that, it might be a conversation. As it stands, you are conflating terms irrationally.

Not use to being called out on silliness, eh?

you would lose the personal insults. Goodbye.

It is merely criticisms of your comments. If you do not want to risk getting replies that might upset your delicate sensibilities, you might not want to post on an open forum.

Sanders' plans for adopting his proposals depend on these new voters. Here is how Sanders thinks that he will be able to force the GOP to be reasonable http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/2/21/1483791/-Imagine-Bernie-Sanders-wins-the-White-House-Then-what

... and Bernie has received millions and millions of votes.

You've been sleeping since January.

No one has seen any evidence of the so-called Sanders revolution and Clinton iis leading Sanders by 2.5 million popular votes https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/02/10/sorry-bernie-sanders-there-is-zero-evidence-of-your-political-revolution-yet/

Bernie Sanders recorded a resounding victory in New Hampshire's Democratic primary Tuesday. He crushed his rival, Hillary Clinton, with no less than 60 percent of the vote. If Sanders hopes not only to win the election but to achieve his ambitious progressive agenda, though, that might not be enough.

To succeed, Sanders might have to drive Americans who don't normally participate to the polls. Unfortunately for him, groups who usually do not vote did not turn out in unusually large numbers in New Hampshire, according to exit polling data.

https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=1484

...As for Sanders, he credited his victory to turnout. "Because of a huge voter turnout -- and I say huge -- we won," he said in his speech declaring victory, dropping the "h" in "huge." "We harnessed the energy, and the excitement that the Democratic party will need to succeed in November."

In fact, Sanders won by persuading many habitual Democratic primary voters to support him. With 95 percent of precincts reporting their results as of Wednesday morning, just 241,000 ballots had been cast in the Democratic primary, fewer than the 268,000 projected by New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner last week. Nearly 289,000 voters cast ballots in the state's Democratic primary in 2008.

To be sure, the general election is still seven months away. Ordinary Americans might be paying little attention to the campaign at this point, and if Sanders wins the nomination, he'll have the help of the Democratic Party apparatus in registering new voters. The political revolution hasn't started, though, at least not yet.

And wasn't 2008 a 3 person race versus a 2 person race in 2016... And you want to talk about who can't get the vote out? Wasn't Bernie's vote total one of the highest in the history of the NH primary?

Polls show that Hillary is steadily losing ground. He may not have enough time to overcome her name recognition but the fact that she can barely beat him does not bode well for the general election.

How many of those popular votes are in states that the Democratic candidate will surely lose in November? What counts is winning states that will win electoral votes for the Democratic candidate. It also remains to be seen who will be the Republican candidate. The dynamics of the race will change if Trump does not get the nomination.

I must have missed that.

Or what you are saying is that Hillary Clinton was unable to get an enthusiastic group of people out to match Bernie Sander's voters.

It's been torn off and trampled in the dust. She and the other 3rd-wayers are Republicans

I like how they kept teasing her with the cash. Someone was probably saying "you need to promise me (to do something for us)"

not bad. Gentle too. "attack". Yeah, okay...

"you can promise me the moon, the stars, and the sun, but before you promise me anything show me what you have done."

yeah that's some harsh stuff...

a destroyed Libya with the words:
Here is what you have done?

How does your statement make this gentle rhyming ad an "attack"?


This is off topic and not an area I'm up on, but, it seems like you're saying that you preferred the dictator committing genocide on his people before the Libyans and the international community begged for our assistance to the instability they have now as they continue to transition. As for myself, I don't know enough about the subject to make those assessments. (My foreign policy knowledge is probably worse even than Bernie's...)

I would probably target things like his vote against amber alert or something, not do gentle rhyme advising people to be careful of empty promises by looking at what someone has actually managed to do... The point is this isn't an attack ad as the poster called it.

She's been using the whole RW playbook on him so far.

More insults to an audience that already detests her. An ad any Republican would be proud of.

opponent during the GE?

They might like to have it.

But you knew that already.

The Sanders Camp complaining about Right Wing Attacks!

I've well and truly seen it all. The lack of self-awareness is fucking breathtaking.

The Bernie or Bust movement.

Hillary and Co earned everyone of the people that will not vote for her.
Instead of trying to win our votes they keep digging the hole deeper.

I think most voters that see that, and aren't involved in politics are going to see

a) lots of negativity in an ad undirected at anyone specific
b) childish annoying poetry
c) very annoying imagery which could be the establishment taunting youth

and then Hillary's logo.

It just seems to bundle up negativity and then not give you a release point at all except for her own logo at the end. This is terrible.

It's so weird seeing the positive ads and messaging from Bernie's campaign. Even the ones that are supposedly negative are really just "here are some facts..."

Does anyone think this will help at all?

Which is fine...since only the spectacularly naive believed it, anyway.

try again.

If Bernie is not the nominee the Democratic Party is doomed.