Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:11 PM Apr 2016

Hillary Clinton is the most divisive figure in the Dem Party. The schism will only worsen after 2016

The other day, I looked into the "we must come together after the primary" meme.
It appears clear (see graph), after Obama defeated Clinton in 2008, the Democratic Party filed for divorce. That was a rough, bitter primary, but this primary seems even more so. The big difference being, Sanders joined the Democratic Party but the Democratic Party has rejected him, and in the case of her supporters, vitriolicly so. Not a good sign for the Party as people continue to leave and Hillary, and her mocking supporters, have managed to alienate young people.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/166763/record-high-americans-identify-independents.aspx

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton is the most divisive figure in the Dem Party. The schism will only worsen after 2016 (Original Post) WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 OP
The mocking and the castigating is certainly very puzzling.... villager Apr 2016 #1
Not just young people. Jester Messiah Apr 2016 #2
Remember Rahm Emanuel, Obama's COS, calling progressives "fucking retards"? riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #15
yes, and at at least one point, amborin Apr 2016 #35
Agreed. I don't think I can support that warhawk. I will remove myself from this board Zira Apr 2016 #27
That conclusion doesn't follow the info at the link Dem2 Apr 2016 #3
She disappeared 4 years ago. What's also clear is the sharp drop after 2008 WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #5
I've been registered independent for my entire adult life Dem2 Apr 2016 #18
That's very optimistic in the face of trends. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #29
Just more dome and glome. riversedge Apr 2016 #4
Nonsense. LonePirate Apr 2016 #6
Did you see that thread about the massive congressional losses incurred by the Dem Party since 2008 WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #7
The D and R are 2 corporate brands.. HughLefty1 Apr 2016 #10
Gore Vidal--two sides of the money party amborin Apr 2016 #36
That has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that the Dem party will rally around its new Preside LonePirate Apr 2016 #13
You're correct. Congressional losses didn't tell half the story. I'll look for the thread and get WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #16
Save your time. The story you are trying to tell is not going to happen. LonePirate Apr 2016 #17
Your idea of rallying: since 2008, Dem Party has lost 900 seats at all levels WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #22
Why are you making an irrelevant discussion here? LonePirate Apr 2016 #23
First of all, you're using an irrelevant marker in Janiary 2017. Elections roll around every 2 years WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #25
You created a thread about a lack of Dem unity in January. That was your OP. LonePirate Apr 2016 #30
Lol did I? WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #31
Yeah, it's pretty clear that you're wrong. LonePirate Apr 2016 #33
Where's the Independent Party then? CalvinballPro Apr 2016 #8
An "Independent Party" is a contradiction in terms. John Poet Apr 2016 #9
There is an independent party, but it's a far-right vehicle and so I won't advertise it. CalvinballPro Apr 2016 #12
Agree Dem2 Apr 2016 #19
I Disagree With This: SDJay Apr 2016 #20
I've always considered myself a Democrat but..Here's my honest truth. Joob Apr 2016 #11
I don't vote for labels. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #14
Policy, not label. nt VulgarPoet Apr 2016 #21
Sanders Supporters Must Stop Repeating GOP Lies About Hillary Clinton - a Sanders supporter's plea Bill USA Apr 2016 #24
Ahhh! Hillary's supporters were just too eager to take the low road. And remember, this isn't the WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #32
K&R CharlotteVale Apr 2016 #26
Sanders supporters: Vote for Bernie, or else! Metric System Apr 2016 #28
Yeah, and...? n/t Jester Messiah Apr 2016 #34
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
1. The mocking and the castigating is certainly very puzzling....
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:12 PM
Apr 2016

...for anyone claiming to want "party unity," etc.

Perhaps we are headed for a four-party system eventually, anyway....

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
2. Not just young people.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:12 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie's supporters, en block, were referred to by Bill Clinton as the Left-Wing Tea Party. The derision and scorn coming from the Hillary wing of the party are palpable. Anyone expecting us to "fall in line" after a Hillary victory is in for a massive disappointment.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
15. Remember Rahm Emanuel, Obama's COS, calling progressives "fucking retards"?
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 03:10 PM
Apr 2016

The derision and scorn towards us has been brewing for many years....

 

Zira

(1,054 posts)
27. Agreed. I don't think I can support that warhawk. I will remove myself from this board
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 05:34 PM
Apr 2016

when I file Independent which I am very close to being forced to do. I will not support everything I've been against for decades. War, Trade pacts, etc.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
3. That conclusion doesn't follow the info at the link
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:13 PM
Apr 2016
PRINCETON, NJ -- Forty-two percent of Americans, on average, identified as political independents in 2013, the highest Gallup has measured since it began conducting interviews by telephone 25 years ago. Meanwhile, Republican identification fell to 25%, the lowest over that time span. At 31%, Democratic identification is unchanged from the last four years


Basically Republicans are fleeing their party.
 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
5. She disappeared 4 years ago. What's also clear is the sharp drop after 2008
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:23 PM
Apr 2016

What you cite arguably supports my claim. The OP pins the schism on Hillary and suggests she and her supporters are alienating, not growing the Democratic Party.

Of course this is a prediction. But, like I said, it doesn't bode well for the Party.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
18. I've been registered independent for my entire adult life
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 03:53 PM
Apr 2016

Means nothing, I've never voted for a Republican.

People are encouraged to register independent so they can participate in the other party's primary if their's is uncontested.

LonePirate

(13,429 posts)
6. Nonsense.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:40 PM
Apr 2016

If she is President in 2017, Dems across the country will rally behind the newly elected President just like the parties do each time they have a new President. If she is not elected President, she will leave the public stage and will begin the fade into obscurity as the party and/or the country will have moved on.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
7. Did you see that thread about the massive congressional losses incurred by the Dem Party since 2008
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:52 PM
Apr 2016

do you want me to find it or do know the bloodshed by heart now? Hardly indicative of a Party coming together, in fact, indicates nothing could be further from the truth. Again, another argument that supports my claim.

HughLefty1

(231 posts)
10. The D and R are 2 corporate brands..
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:01 PM
Apr 2016

It's no freakin' wonder people are abandoning both parties in droves. Both brands only speak to the elite 1% . They have no desire to hear grass roots or any dissenting voices to their corporatist agendas.

LonePirate

(13,429 posts)
13. That has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that the Dem party will rally around its new Preside
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:54 PM
Apr 2016

The party gained House and Senate seats in 2008 and 2012. The same will be true in 2016 regard of which Dem is elected. To claim otherwise is just stupid and oblivious to all facts. There will be no talk of congressional losses in off-years come January and it certainly will dampen the joy of a new Dem president.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
16. You're correct. Congressional losses didn't tell half the story. I'll look for the thread and get
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 03:35 PM
Apr 2016

back to you.

LonePirate

(13,429 posts)
17. Save your time. The story you are trying to tell is not going to happen.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 03:47 PM
Apr 2016

If a Dem is elected President this year, your dreams of massive Democratic disunity if it is Hillary are never, ever going to happen. Neither Dem candidate will have a divided Dem party in January no matter how stoked you are for there to be protests and hatred.

LonePirate

(13,429 posts)
23. Why are you making an irrelevant discussion here?
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 04:06 PM
Apr 2016

Those losses - which will be pared this year - will not impact Dem unity whatsoever in January. It is not going to happen.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
25. First of all, you're using an irrelevant marker in Janiary 2017. Elections roll around every 2 years
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 05:31 PM
Apr 2016

This isn't complicated but a little moreso than your denial of data and stance that they'll rally because I say so.

LonePirate

(13,429 posts)
30. You created a thread about a lack of Dem unity in January. That was your OP.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 05:37 PM
Apr 2016

Trying to cite off year losses as a reason that will prevent Dems from rallying behind a newly elected Dem president is ABSURD. I have no idea what will happen in November 2018 but I guarantee you a huge supermajority of Dems will unify around whichever Dem is President in January 2017 - even the alleged Millenials which you think she has alienated.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
8. Where's the Independent Party then?
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:55 PM
Apr 2016

Oh, right, it's still too much work for the people that want one to actually go out and make one.

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
9. An "Independent Party" is a contradiction in terms.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:00 PM
Apr 2016

When someone joins a party, they are no longer an independent,
even if they join something called the "Independent Party".

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
12. There is an independent party, but it's a far-right vehicle and so I won't advertise it.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:09 PM
Apr 2016

It's also specious to call oneself an independent when regularly voting for the same political party over and over, as a majority of independents do.

My point is that people who claim to be outside of a two-party system really are not, because they don't go and form alternate parties with enough viability to be a challenge to the two-party system. An America based on parliamentary coalition-building won't spring fully-formed from the ether. It has to be built, over multiple election cycles, by people.

SDJay

(1,089 posts)
20. I Disagree With This:
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 04:02 PM
Apr 2016

"It's also specious to call oneself an independent when regularly voting for the same political party over and over, as a majority of independents do."

I am registered as unaffiliated and I don't remember ever voting for a repuke so I think I can speak to this personally. I happen to agree with the ideology of the Democrats wholeheartedly. I'm not going to run through the whole list, but it's rare when I think that the Democrats are wrong and I've always voted on the 'D' side of the ticket.

However, I despise the DNC. I hate the corruption and incompetence of this out-of-date machine and what we're seeing now, which is almost open cynicism towards the election process. I will never send them money, I will never support someone like DWS and I can't foresee that ever changing.

That doesn't mean I'm not a good liberal. I'll also confess that if forced to do so in order to vote in primaries, I'd register as a Democrat. Thankfully in CA I don't have to do that.

I think it's just fine to believe in the issues that a party does but not how the party operates. That's why I think so many people are registered as independents or unaffiliated.

Joob

(1,065 posts)
11. I've always considered myself a Democrat but..Here's my honest truth.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:04 PM
Apr 2016

This was the first election I voted in though, and it was for Bernie Sanders.
I must admit I don't think the values of the Democratic Party are mine because I don't like what I've seen
from the DNC, and really I don't like money in politics.

I don't like how people choose to ignore how much money people give to Clinton and assume there's no agenda.
And I honestly can't see myself thinking this is right, this is what I want to vote for.
I highly doubt I'll be a Democrat after this election and will look at third parties more closely because
this is ridiculous, to me, and from what I've seen, It's not to most Democrats.

That's my honest opinion, those are my values. I'm not even talking policies yet because those are the issues that bother me the most.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
14. I don't vote for labels.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 03:05 PM
Apr 2016
"I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever, in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else, where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent. If I could not go to heaven but with a party, I would not go there at all." Thomas Jefferson

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
24. Sanders Supporters Must Stop Repeating GOP Lies About Hillary Clinton - a Sanders supporter's plea
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 04:12 PM
Apr 2016

(all emphases my own)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511490285



I belong to a number of pro-Bernie Sanders groups on social media, and[font size="+1"] the sheer volume of anti-Hillary posts by individuals from conspiracy or conservative websites is staggering. These people link Breitbart, Infowars, March Against Monsanto, The Daily Caller and other websites to make their claim that Hillary Clinton is the worst person ever – or that President Obama was a gay prostitute in his younger days. [/font]

As I have repeatedly stated before, I am a Bernie Sanders supporter, despite our minor differences on science and genetic technology. I switched from No Party Affiliation to Democrat for the first time in years, simply so that I could vote for Bernie.

~~
~~

Now I stand with Bernie Sanders, but [font size="+1"]I’m imploring fellow supporters to level their criticisms of Hillary Clinton based on well-reasoned arguments involving policy, rather than some blog from a conservative website which was designed to be shared in multiple social media groups by people who don’t check their facts before posting. [/font]

If you do not take pragmatism, reason and fact-checking into consideration before voicing your opinion – the GOP is counting on exactly that for a win in November.


(More)
 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
32. Ahhh! Hillary's supporters were just too eager to take the low road. And remember, this isn't the
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 06:37 PM
Apr 2016

first go around. You should have learned your lesson from your vitriolic mudslinging in 2008.

Since y'all are so blinded by your devotion to her, did you ever pause to ask yourselves: are we converting people or turning them against us? Such an easy question. How many minds have you changed? Hundreds? Nope, an infinitismally small number that approaches 0. And what could you reasonably have expected, hundreds? Nope, next to none.

But rather than taking the high road, you went into the gutter, just like 2008. Then y'all have the audacity to tell Sanders supporters to knock it off.

You made your bed, now you have to sleep in it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton is the mo...