2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumActually we really DO need a revolution of the kind Bernie Sanders is talking about.
When 50% or fewer than the voting populace participates in a Democracy, it is sick beyond help.
When so much money is involved in politics that politicians spend FAR more time collecting it for their next election, it is sick beyond help.
When lobbyists write the legislation because politicians are too busy raising money and and too much in their pockets, it is sick beyond help.
We DO need a revolution.
What we do not need is status quo protection disguised as "incremental change". We are in deep trouble and a sea change is needed.
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)We will be lucky to have many more elections. But a lot of people can't see the forest for the trees. Carol King, for example, is voting Hillary based partially on concern for the environment....
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)We're like a bunch of collective idiots.
If we don't stop the people pulling us to our doom, we are fucked.
Of course it is those same people pulling us there that will be the safest.
I believe the WANT a mass die off.
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)CIA Crack, etc etc, all of it I thought was just too far out there, But I have had to eat a lot of my words, especially when it was explained to me that many people find solace in knowing we are living in end times. I mean, if that's really some people's world views I almost understand why others choose to vote for a corporatist. But not quite.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Other than poor black people, Hillary really only wins in the upper income brackets.
It is a class war, we are and will be fighting for resources.
This is a part of it.
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)Until they won't survive outside of them at all.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)There is ALWAYS a revolution and the people at the top never believe it will happen to them.
It will.
And that's when they will learn that the rich to poor ratio that used to be so fun and special is not such a great thing.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)we're sure to address the problem?
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)Or something like, as much as I wish we were fixing our myriad problems unfortunately we have passed the tipping point.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)When the price of oil is high enough, it's worth trading the planet's future. Ask Ukraine.
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Nobody can credibly say that Hillary will be better on climate change than Bernie.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)WhiteTara
(29,721 posts)electing democrats...such as for the supreme court in Wisconsin. Bernie needs to extend his coattails for anything close to a revolution.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)offer himself to help lead it if the time is right.
He has done everything that could be asked of him.
The man doesn't want the job for the same reasons we are accustomed to seeing.
WhiteTara
(29,721 posts)and it is on him to bring better people into his government. How on earth will he get a thing done if he has no support? One man can't do anything alone and we all know what millions of people in the streets mean...most of us were there when *co went to war in Iraq and it didn't mean squat; I doubt it will mean squat if Democrats are in the minority in the House and Senate and Supreme Court, even with Bernie as president.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)He has tremendous support.
WhiteTara
(29,721 posts)you must be kidding...but as you said, you stopped reading. He may have LOTS of support of everyday people, but laws are not passed by us, this is a representative government and he needs democrats and lots of them.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)would not be solidly behind him in his battles with the right?
And what do you mean "senators and reps on the right"?
Are you capable of having a serious conversation about this? Please don't waste my time.
WhiteTara
(29,721 posts)but your use of DEMOCRAT congress people put you on my ignore list. You don't wish to have a conversation, you are just in attack mode. Goodbye.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)But I guess the jig is up now! I am actually a Republican operative.
WhiteTara
(29,721 posts)in US politics.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)no text
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)I've never given two shits about the party being called democrat rather than democratic. Really...the ship is sinking and we've got lightweights arguing whether the color of the drapes is grey or gray.
You may not like his message, but arguing about the use of "ic" to avoid continuing the conversation...
amateur.
Put me on IL as well, Tara. Yours will be the first one I'm on here. But if you're not ashamed for your argument, I am for you. Put me on your IL please.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)WhiteTara
(29,721 posts)went red to the long term detriment of that state. He could have done something there...maybe have her on stage? With his clout, he needs to step up to the plate of filling the slots with democrats if he wants this revolution to be more than a keyboard war.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)He doesn't claim to be a miracle worker. He has repeatedly said and emphasized -- that this is about changes much larger than him personally -- it also includes getting a more supportive Congress, more citizen involvement, etc.
But you also have to realize that many elected Dems are actively working against him in favor of Clinton...The changes have to be a two way street.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)only for self. I mean, simple logic, right?
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)that he is doing it only for "self". That seems to be based on emotion and is unsupported.
In fact, I completely disagree.
The "self" candidate to me is clearly Hillary. But there you go. When people have different opinions, they interpret things differently.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)One can criticize many things about Bernie. But it is not accurate to say he is all about himself.
Uf he were, he would used his political talents to become a 'centrist Democrat," put his time in at Congress and then cash out to join the legion of lobbyists and consultants in the golden revolving door.
And his political orientation is all about "we" rather than me for the same reason.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)I am not talking about claims that Bernie can be rude and impatient at times. Not perceptions or claims of people who are critical of him because of disagreements over issues or political tactics.
Please enlighten me with real demonstrable "facts" that indicate that Bernie us only about himself, and that his message is a fraud.Or the fact that he uses only politics and has a phony message for personal gain.
FACTS.
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)Hillary's $18 Million "Victory Fund" could be spent helping her campaign
Hillary Clinton has raised $18 Million for the DNC and state parties, money that is commonly referred to as a "victory fund." The assumption is that all of this money will go toward helping "downballot candidates" but that is not necessarily true.
During the primary campaign, donors are limited to $2,700 in direct contributions to the candidate. To elicit larger contributions from willing donors, a candidate can set up a Joint Fundraising Committee which allows donors to cut one check that gets distributed to the candidate as well as a state party and the national party. The first $2,700 goes to the candidate's campaign, and any additional money can go to the state party ($10,000 limit) and the national party ($33,400 limit). Clinton's campaign has so far raised $18 Million for the national and state parties.
However,
There is nothing stopping the state party from using the money to help the eventual nominee
Could that $18 Million be spent on helping Hillary's campaign? At least part of it can. I was unable to find out if that same lack of restriction also applies to the national party which receives the bulk of the JFC money.
It's also possible that some of that $18 Million could be spent on Bernie Sanders' campaign, should he win the party's nomination.
One could speculate that the closer the presidential race is between the Democrat and the Republican, the more likely it would be for these funds to go toward the presidential candidate rather than the downballot candidates. So the candidate who trails or only has a slight lead against the Republican might end up sucking away a portion of the victory funds otherwise meant for the downballot candidates. I'll leave it to the reader to interpret the polling of potential matchups and draw their own conclusions as to the various scenarios regarding the likelihood of that money being spent on the presidential candidate.
So who has been helped down ticket so far? Can you name anybody? And by how much? Is Wasserman Schultz helping Canova?
Seems to me you are absent facts here.
revbones
(3,660 posts)under the guise of helping down ticket incumbents but really to use as a way to funnel large sums into their own campaign and avoid the $2700 limit, while bribing super-delegates!
Simple logic right?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)And those pushing Jill Stein need to be PPR'd right fucking now.
The rats are multiplying and the trolls are already in control.
revbones
(3,660 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)I think it speaks pretty poorly of someone that resists all criticisms of their leaders. Perhaps anyone feeling that way should just move to N. Korea and enjoy the universal love for "Dear Leader" there if they can't abide criticism from party members that want the party to be better.
Terms of Service say "But that does not mean that DU members are required to always be completely supportive of Democrats. During the ups-and-downs of politics and policy-making, it is perfectly normal to have mixed feelings about the Democratic officials we worked hard to help elect. When we are not in the heat of election season, members are permitted to post strong criticism or disappointment with our Democratic elected officials, or to express ambivalence about voting for them. "
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Response to seabeyond (Reply #32)
revbones This message was self-deleted by its author.
apnu
(8,758 posts)Its all well and good to have Bernie elected and fighting for the common American. But if there's no revolution down ticket, then all of this is a waste of time.
Revolutions have to happen on the local and levels. What is Bernie's campaign doing for that?