Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:38 AM Apr 2016

Actually we really DO need a revolution of the kind Bernie Sanders is talking about.

When 50% or fewer than the voting populace participates in a Democracy, it is sick beyond help.

When so much money is involved in politics that politicians spend FAR more time collecting it for their next election, it is sick beyond help.

When lobbyists write the legislation because politicians are too busy raising money and and too much in their pockets, it is sick beyond help.

We DO need a revolution.

What we do not need is status quo protection disguised as "incremental change". We are in deep trouble and a sea change is needed.

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Actually we really DO need a revolution of the kind Bernie Sanders is talking about. (Original Post) Bonobo Apr 2016 OP
Honestly our Earth is headed for mass destruction hereforthevoting Apr 2016 #1
We are really in deep shit. Every year is getting warmer and it will accelerate. Bonobo Apr 2016 #2
I used to call my S/O a conspiracy theorist hereforthevoting Apr 2016 #4
People with money are voting in their interest. Look at the voting results based on income. Bonobo Apr 2016 #6
Well, then, they can have fun in their rich lil bubbles hereforthevoting Apr 2016 #7
There WILL be a revolution. If not now, then when things get really ugly. Bonobo Apr 2016 #8
Because as long as we leave money in control of our political system.... daleanime Apr 2016 #3
Yes that is exactly what I said hereforthevoting Apr 2016 #5
Fracking is Good Economics... Octafish Apr 2016 #10
More likely out of concern for her bank account BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #15
This Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #9
The revolution will fail if states are not WhiteTara Apr 2016 #11
Revolutions come when they come. It isn't "ON" Bernie to do anything other than Bonobo Apr 2016 #12
Leading is a big responsibility WhiteTara Apr 2016 #14
No support? I stopped reading there and my jaw dropped. Bonobo Apr 2016 #17
from senators and representatives on the right? WhiteTara Apr 2016 #18
Do you honestly imagine that if Bernie became president that the Democrat congressmen and women Bonobo Apr 2016 #19
I used to respect you WhiteTara Apr 2016 #20
It's midnight here and I live in a non-English environment. Forgive my forgetting to add an "ic". Bonobo Apr 2016 #21
or a foreigner meddling WhiteTara Apr 2016 #22
Wow, I think now I WANT you to put me on your ignore list. Respect, former or otherwise, NOT shared. Bonobo Apr 2016 #23
I've been here for 12 years, Tara... Buddyblazon Apr 2016 #28
Read about what he did in Burlington -- It's a template of what he could do as POTUS Armstead Apr 2016 #34
Recently I saw that the supreme court of Wisconsin WhiteTara Apr 2016 #38
Clinton could have theoretically done the same Armstead Apr 2016 #40
It would help if our Democratic candidates would help to get down ticket elected instead of being seabeyond Apr 2016 #13
I don't have any problem with that statement, Sea except for your conclusion Bonobo Apr 2016 #16
I disagree. I think his whole career, better, life choices are all about self. seabeyond Apr 2016 #24
I know you do. nt Bonobo Apr 2016 #25
That's because you don't want to see otherwise Armstead Apr 2016 #35
Not true. I look at the facts. seabeyond Apr 2016 #36
Interpreted through biases -- (We all do it) Armstead Apr 2016 #37
Interpreted through biases. Facts. There is not interpretation with facts. That would be opinion. seabeyond Apr 2016 #41
What facts do you have that he only about himself? Armstead Apr 2016 #43
What facts? Here's the facts about victory fund and down-ticket helping snowy owl Apr 2016 #39
Yeah! They should all start Victory Funds to scam money from state parties revbones Apr 2016 #26
I am really fuckin tired of being on a Democratic board listening to the attacks on our party seabeyond Apr 2016 #27
Yep. JTFrog Apr 2016 #29
Yeah, cuz if they have a "D" then it means they can't do anything wrong right? nt revbones Apr 2016 #31
Yeah! Cuz that magic "D" makes all the corruption and lies just go away. Oh wait... revbones Apr 2016 #30
The need to be a rebel... without cause. seabeyond Apr 2016 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author revbones Apr 2016 #33
Sure, what's Bernie and his people doing for down ticket races? apnu Apr 2016 #42

hereforthevoting

(241 posts)
1. Honestly our Earth is headed for mass destruction
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:41 AM
Apr 2016

We will be lucky to have many more elections. But a lot of people can't see the forest for the trees. Carol King, for example, is voting Hillary based partially on concern for the environment....

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
2. We are really in deep shit. Every year is getting warmer and it will accelerate.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:46 AM
Apr 2016

We're like a bunch of collective idiots.

If we don't stop the people pulling us to our doom, we are fucked.

Of course it is those same people pulling us there that will be the safest.

I believe the WANT a mass die off.

hereforthevoting

(241 posts)
4. I used to call my S/O a conspiracy theorist
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:48 AM
Apr 2016

CIA Crack, etc etc, all of it I thought was just too far out there, But I have had to eat a lot of my words, especially when it was explained to me that many people find solace in knowing we are living in end times. I mean, if that's really some people's world views I almost understand why others choose to vote for a corporatist. But not quite.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
6. People with money are voting in their interest. Look at the voting results based on income.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:50 AM
Apr 2016

Other than poor black people, Hillary really only wins in the upper income brackets.

It is a class war, we are and will be fighting for resources.

This is a part of it.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
8. There WILL be a revolution. If not now, then when things get really ugly.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:54 AM
Apr 2016

There is ALWAYS a revolution and the people at the top never believe it will happen to them.

It will.

And that's when they will learn that the rich to poor ratio that used to be so fun and special is not such a great thing.

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
3. Because as long as we leave money in control of our political system....
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:48 AM
Apr 2016

we're sure to address the problem?

hereforthevoting

(241 posts)
5. Yes that is exactly what I said
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:50 AM
Apr 2016

Or something like, as much as I wish we were fixing our myriad problems unfortunately we have passed the tipping point.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
15. More likely out of concern for her bank account
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 10:40 AM
Apr 2016

Nobody can credibly say that Hillary will be better on climate change than Bernie.

WhiteTara

(29,721 posts)
11. The revolution will fail if states are not
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 10:32 AM
Apr 2016

electing democrats...such as for the supreme court in Wisconsin. Bernie needs to extend his coattails for anything close to a revolution.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
12. Revolutions come when they come. It isn't "ON" Bernie to do anything other than
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 10:35 AM
Apr 2016

offer himself to help lead it if the time is right.

He has done everything that could be asked of him.

The man doesn't want the job for the same reasons we are accustomed to seeing.

WhiteTara

(29,721 posts)
14. Leading is a big responsibility
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 10:40 AM
Apr 2016

and it is on him to bring better people into his government. How on earth will he get a thing done if he has no support? One man can't do anything alone and we all know what millions of people in the streets mean...most of us were there when *co went to war in Iraq and it didn't mean squat; I doubt it will mean squat if Democrats are in the minority in the House and Senate and Supreme Court, even with Bernie as president.

WhiteTara

(29,721 posts)
18. from senators and representatives on the right?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 10:46 AM
Apr 2016

you must be kidding...but as you said, you stopped reading. He may have LOTS of support of everyday people, but laws are not passed by us, this is a representative government and he needs democrats and lots of them.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
19. Do you honestly imagine that if Bernie became president that the Democrat congressmen and women
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 10:48 AM
Apr 2016

would not be solidly behind him in his battles with the right?

And what do you mean "senators and reps on the right"?

Are you capable of having a serious conversation about this? Please don't waste my time.

WhiteTara

(29,721 posts)
20. I used to respect you
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 10:52 AM
Apr 2016

but your use of DEMOCRAT congress people put you on my ignore list. You don't wish to have a conversation, you are just in attack mode. Goodbye.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
21. It's midnight here and I live in a non-English environment. Forgive my forgetting to add an "ic".
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 10:54 AM
Apr 2016

But I guess the jig is up now! I am actually a Republican operative.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
23. Wow, I think now I WANT you to put me on your ignore list. Respect, former or otherwise, NOT shared.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 11:00 AM
Apr 2016

no text

 

Buddyblazon

(3,014 posts)
28. I've been here for 12 years, Tara...
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 11:20 AM
Apr 2016

I've never given two shits about the party being called democrat rather than democratic. Really...the ship is sinking and we've got lightweights arguing whether the color of the drapes is grey or gray.

You may not like his message, but arguing about the use of "ic" to avoid continuing the conversation...

amateur.

Put me on IL as well, Tara. Yours will be the first one I'm on here. But if you're not ashamed for your argument, I am for you. Put me on your IL please.

WhiteTara

(29,721 posts)
38. Recently I saw that the supreme court of Wisconsin
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 11:54 AM
Apr 2016

went red to the long term detriment of that state. He could have done something there...maybe have her on stage? With his clout, he needs to step up to the plate of filling the slots with democrats if he wants this revolution to be more than a keyboard war.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
40. Clinton could have theoretically done the same
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 12:09 PM
Apr 2016

He doesn't claim to be a miracle worker. He has repeatedly said and emphasized -- that this is about changes much larger than him personally -- it also includes getting a more supportive Congress, more citizen involvement, etc.

But you also have to realize that many elected Dems are actively working against him in favor of Clinton...The changes have to be a two way street.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
13. It would help if our Democratic candidates would help to get down ticket elected instead of being
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 10:37 AM
Apr 2016

only for self. I mean, simple logic, right?

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
16. I don't have any problem with that statement, Sea except for your conclusion
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 10:42 AM
Apr 2016

that he is doing it only for "self". That seems to be based on emotion and is unsupported.

In fact, I completely disagree.

The "self" candidate to me is clearly Hillary. But there you go. When people have different opinions, they interpret things differently.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
37. Interpreted through biases -- (We all do it)
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 11:47 AM
Apr 2016

One can criticize many things about Bernie. But it is not accurate to say he is all about himself.

Uf he were, he would used his political talents to become a 'centrist Democrat," put his time in at Congress and then cash out to join the legion of lobbyists and consultants in the golden revolving door.

And his political orientation is all about "we" rather than me for the same reason.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
41. Interpreted through biases. Facts. There is not interpretation with facts. That would be opinion.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 12:30 PM
Apr 2016
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
43. What facts do you have that he only about himself?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 12:49 PM
Apr 2016

I am not talking about claims that Bernie can be rude and impatient at times. Not perceptions or claims of people who are critical of him because of disagreements over issues or political tactics.

Please enlighten me with real demonstrable "facts" that indicate that Bernie us only about himself, and that his message is a fraud.Or the fact that he uses only politics and has a phony message for personal gain.

FACTS.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
39. What facts? Here's the facts about victory fund and down-ticket helping
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 12:06 PM
Apr 2016
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/1/3/1465719/-Hillary-s-18-Million-Victory-Fund-could-be-spent-helping-her-campaign

Hillary's $18 Million "Victory Fund" could be spent helping her campaign

Hillary Clinton has raised $18 Million for the DNC and state parties, money that is commonly referred to as a "victory fund." The assumption is that all of this money will go toward helping "downballot candidates" but that is not necessarily true.

During the primary campaign, donors are limited to $2,700 in direct contributions to the candidate. To elicit larger contributions from willing donors, a candidate can set up a Joint Fundraising Committee which allows donors to cut one check that gets distributed to the candidate as well as a state party and the national party. The first $2,700 goes to the candidate's campaign, and any additional money can go to the state party ($10,000 limit) and the national party ($33,400 limit). Clinton's campaign has so far raised $18 Million for the national and state parties.

However,

There is nothing stopping the state party from using the money to help the eventual nominee

Could that $18 Million be spent on helping Hillary's campaign? At least part of it can. I was unable to find out if that same lack of restriction also applies to the national party which receives the bulk of the JFC money.

It's also possible that some of that $18 Million could be spent on Bernie Sanders' campaign, should he win the party's nomination.

One could speculate that the closer the presidential race is between the Democrat and the Republican, the more likely it would be for these funds to go toward the presidential candidate rather than the downballot candidates. So the candidate who trails or only has a slight lead against the Republican might end up sucking away a portion of the victory funds otherwise meant for the downballot candidates. I'll leave it to the reader to interpret the polling of potential matchups and draw their own conclusions as to the various scenarios regarding the likelihood of that money being spent on the presidential candidate.


So who has been helped down ticket so far? Can you name anybody? And by how much? Is Wasserman Schultz helping Canova?

Seems to me you are absent facts here.



 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
26. Yeah! They should all start Victory Funds to scam money from state parties
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 11:12 AM
Apr 2016

under the guise of helping down ticket incumbents but really to use as a way to funnel large sums into their own campaign and avoid the $2700 limit, while bribing super-delegates!

Simple logic right?

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
29. Yep.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 11:20 AM
Apr 2016

And those pushing Jill Stein need to be PPR'd right fucking now.

The rats are multiplying and the trolls are already in control.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
30. Yeah! Cuz that magic "D" makes all the corruption and lies just go away. Oh wait...
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 11:21 AM
Apr 2016

I think it speaks pretty poorly of someone that resists all criticisms of their leaders. Perhaps anyone feeling that way should just move to N. Korea and enjoy the universal love for "Dear Leader" there if they can't abide criticism from party members that want the party to be better.




Terms of Service say "But that does not mean that DU members are required to always be completely supportive of Democrats. During the ups-and-downs of politics and policy-making, it is perfectly normal to have mixed feelings about the Democratic officials we worked hard to help elect. When we are not in the heat of election season, members are permitted to post strong criticism or disappointment with our Democratic elected officials, or to express ambivalence about voting for them. "

Response to seabeyond (Reply #32)

apnu

(8,758 posts)
42. Sure, what's Bernie and his people doing for down ticket races?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 12:48 PM
Apr 2016

Its all well and good to have Bernie elected and fighting for the common American. But if there's no revolution down ticket, then all of this is a waste of time.

Revolutions have to happen on the local and levels. What is Bernie's campaign doing for that?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Actually we really DO nee...