2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHRC:"There is not even the remotest chance that (indictment) is going to happen"
seems troubling to hear someone under FBI investigation make this statement. Of course, she is bluffing, to try not to let her fear and desperation show. But it's nonetheless troubling to imply that she knows the outcome already. Has she been assured of this outcome? By whom?
http://www.today.com/news/will-email-scandal-leave-hillary-handcuffs-clinton-responds-gop-criticism-t85231
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Don't make that call.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)The Anointed One's propaganda troops would like a "word" with you.
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)..."well, you know, I have to say, there is some possibility that I could be indicted."
What else could she possibly say to this question? Of course she's going to say it's not going to happen. It's a meaningless answer.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)reassure voters that the endless streams of lies are not true. What else can she do?
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)DOJ is not going to press charges on her....Well I just made that one up but you never know. She is too too sure of herself...in that comment.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)That was total fluff so I wonder if team Hillary knows something is coming soon.
That said, I doubt she's gonna say I'm about to be locked up.
brooklynite
(94,679 posts)Knowing when someone speaking calmly is expressing "fear and desperation" is a nifty trick.
amborin
(16,631 posts)timlot
(456 posts)of the first viable woman from becoming President. I support her, but I believe she was wrong for having a private email server. Did she commit crimes in doing so? Don't know.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)She is guilty guilty guilty and needs to be indicted.
SamKnause
(13,108 posts)The club, the establishment, the elites or whatever term you want
to use will protect her at all costs.
It has been proven time and time again in this country that
some people are above the law.
jeepers
(314 posts)First it was a coronation now it is an exoneration.
If Hillary gets the nomination and this FBI business is not resolved before that
happens are we willing to risk losing the democratic party choice in the GE based on just this woman's wished for, best of all possible outcomes prayer ? If the left wants a voice going into the future, even if it means a third party run, the progressive left needs to stay organized and run a candidate in the general.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)Press Virginia
(2,329 posts)It's less remote when the FBI is granting immunity to people who worked for her
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)I will await the verdict of the FBI in conjunction with the Department of Justice.
Martha Steward thought she was safe. So did Scooter Libby. We shall see.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)He may have a different take on the situation.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Of course, she won't consider any possible backlash. Conservatives never do.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Just forget that notion. This is altogether different. It's serious, and it is substantial.
Hillary is lying through her teeth, it's a Clinton m.o. -- look right in the camera, look right in your eyes, and lie to your face. It's what they do.
There will be "hitting the fan". The question is, to what degree, and when.