Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIn First Place: 9,351,849 - In Second Place: 8,197,535 - Distant Third Place: 6,946,679
[img][/img]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
20 replies, 872 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
20 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In First Place: 9,351,849 - In Second Place: 8,197,535 - Distant Third Place: 6,946,679 (Original Post)
onehandle
Apr 2016
OP
But if you look at a map, it appears that Bernie's got more acres and square miles.
NurseJackie
Apr 2016
#2
The 'Not Hillary' Party is fine with denying actual people's votes. Sides with the GOP.
onehandle
Apr 2016
#8
No, it's just how the process works. The Hillary people are grasping at straws, as the
silvershadow
Apr 2016
#9
Of course that graphic fails to mention that several caucuses are not represented in those numbers
Bjorn Against
Apr 2016
#19
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)1. Thankie!
The deleagte lead is, of course, what matters, but I do love seeing these numbers!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)2. But if you look at a map, it appears that Bernie's got more acres and square miles.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)6. Rocks and tumbleweeds are All In For Bernie! nt
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)7. Ha!! :-D
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)3. math without the algebra
Keep using this line, i'm enjoying watching her lead shrink
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)4. Raw votes don't win elections. Delegates do. Edited:
Remember when GWB won with less votes than Kerry?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)8. The 'Not Hillary' Party is fine with denying actual people's votes. Sides with the GOP.
Got it.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)9. No, it's just how the process works. The Hillary people are grasping at straws, as the
writing on the wall becomes clearer as time moves on.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)11. Millions of votes ahead and we're grasping at straws.
Good to know.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)13. Better to understand the process of gaining delegates so you don't get
overly confident. It is a long way to convention.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)5. A lot of democrats voted for the republicans worst candidate Trump.
stellarmom
(6 posts)10. How are caucus votes counted?
At my caucus table there were 28 voters present, 26 for Bernie and 2 for Hillary.
Bernie got all 4 delegates from our table. Does that count as 4 in your totals or are
caucuses not represented at all? Just wondering.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)12. pretty well says it all . . . and explains the 250 pledged delegate lead
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)14. That might mean something
If it was over. As it stands it's just belly button lint from your navel-gazing.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)15. Try as you might
The race isn't over! April 19th is coming and there is only one Democratic candidate who's going up in the polls.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)16. Big numbers. What do you think they'll buy you?
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)17. sad - lots of stupid on display
...
FourScore
(9,704 posts)18. More numbers:
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)19. Of course that graphic fails to mention that several caucuses are not represented in those numbers
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)20. "We the people" and having our own revolution. Nt