Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 02:29 PM Oct 2012

Next up in Arizona: An attempted land grab including the Grand Canyon

http://news.yahoo.com/arizona-ballot-measure-contests-ownership-grand-canyon-025337121.html

A controversial ballot measure backed by Republicans in the state legislature is seeking sovereign control over millions of acres of federal land in the state, including the Grand Canyon.

Proposition 120 would amend the state's constitution to declare Arizona's sovereignty and jurisdiction over the "air, water, public lands, minerals, wildlife and other natural resources within the state's boundaries."

The measure is the latest salvo in the so-called "sagebrush revolt" by Republicans in the West aiming to take back control of major swaths of land owned by various federal agencies, much of it by the Interior Department's Bureau of Land Management.

State Senator Sylvia Allen, one of the Republican backers of the measure, argues that federal retention of the land hurts the economy of the Western states and leaves them struggling to fund public education, nurture their economies, and manage their forests and natural resources.


Hmmm.... didn't South Carolina try something like this once?
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Next up in Arizona: An attempted land grab including the Grand Canyon (Original Post) KamaAina Oct 2012 OP
Is that legal? nenagh Oct 2012 #1
Probably not KamaAina Oct 2012 #3
IF it wins, ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2012 #4
Nothing illegal about the Proposition. Trying to act on it would be a different story. yellowcanine Oct 2012 #7
The damned Prop is worded... Wait Wut Oct 2012 #2
These are the same people who want to break up the USA to get the mineral rights and oil, Coyotl Oct 2012 #5
Two words: federal supremacy no_hypocrisy Oct 2012 #6
Have to have a breathing permit? Downwinder Oct 2012 #8

ProudProgressiveNow

(6,129 posts)
4. IF it wins,
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 02:43 PM
Oct 2012

Will be challenged and thrown out by the courts.


Its chief proponent insists it’s a realistic effort to force the federal government to surrender its title to close to 73 million acres of land in Arizona.

But others who support Proposition 120 concede it may be a legally ineffective measure, because the likelihood of necessary approval by Congress is virtually nil.

On paper, the idea behind Proposition 120 is simple. It would add a section to the Arizona Constitution declaring the “sovereign and exclusive authority over the air, water, public lands, minerals, wildlife and other natural resources within its border.

http://www.azcentral.com/news/free/20121018prop-land-grab-could-toothless.html

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
7. Nothing illegal about the Proposition. Trying to act on it would be a different story.
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 03:24 PM
Oct 2012

Which is probably the point. This is talking points by proposition.

Wait Wut

(8,492 posts)
2. The damned Prop is worded...
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 02:41 PM
Oct 2012

...to appeal to the teapers and morons of this state. Throw the word 'sovereignty' into anything here and the Star Spangled Banner starts playing and a hologram of John Wayne appears.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
5. These are the same people who want to break up the USA to get the mineral rights and oil,
Tue Oct 23, 2012, 03:16 PM
Oct 2012

to steal the 50% of the nation that is federal and public lands.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Next up in Arizona: An at...