Her support is very soft.

They only had one job to do... Show up!

I would have loved to be a delegate. I don't get it.

Supporting but then not show up for the follow up meetings.

Can't even get your support out to seal the deal... embarrassing!

I LOVED THE "Z" FORMATION!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_on...

Bernie supporters here were outraged about a group of caucus voters wearing the wrong t-shirts but are just fine with the whole outcome of an election not reflecting the will of the voters?

Is different than elected delegates not showing up. What should we do? We aren't gonna hold our delegates back lol

If the will of the voters isn't important, she should keep them.

Sounds like an equitable deal to me.

It's on Hillary's supporters if they can't be arsed to show up.

Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, once again.

As long as it's our guys doing it.

Frankly I think it's disgusting whenever the system allows for any sort of disenfranchisement, and in particular, I expect Democrats to not be taken by it, even though it can be enticing.

I think SDs are also disenfranchising and unnecessary. I think we should do away with all caucuses, too.

deciding to choose all of their delegates from the caucus instead of our mail in ballot primary. We Washingtonians love our mail in ballot primary. I can only conclude that because WA was heavily for Bernie they wanted to suppress the vote which they did. WA still went heavily for Bernie however. Didn't exactly work the way they wanted it to. I have always hated caucuses but as long as parties decide to have them then they have to live with the results of those choices. If their delegates don't show up, that is not the fault of Bernie or Bernie supporters. At my precinct caucus, there was a very long pause before anyone would volunteer to be a Hillary delegate and she was complaining about her schedule. I have to wonder if she will show up at the next level caucus.

and the first night of the caucus--is only the first step in the process. The first night of the caucus the final total is always referred to as "estimated delegates" or "delegate equivalents."

After caucus night, we have County Conventions, District Conventions, State Conventions and the National Convention.

Delegates must show up at each Convention and be counted.

The night of the caucus, delegates are named and told that they must show up at County Conventions. Great effort is put into getting delegates to these conventions.

This is the third time that we have heard that Hillary delegates haven't shown up. In my state of Iowa, 117 Hillary delegates were no-shows in my county alone--the largest county in Iowa. Hillary initially won my county by 24 percent, the night of the Iowa caucuses; but after our County Convention (because her people didn't show up), she is only ahead by one delegate.

In Nevada, I've heard that 600 of her delegates didn't show in Clark County. Now Missouri.

The responsibility is on the supporters to get their butts to these conventions.

her supporters play dumb and act like they have no idea how the nomination process works.

nice win.

Innit funny how the will of the voters means squat if we are talking about superdelegates, or polling places running out of ballots, or people are told to just go home - but when Hillary's peeps just don't show up when they are supposed to, and we all follow the rules that have been in place for quite a while, "the will of the voters" is squawked about? Not like Bernie's delegates were forcing Hillary's delegates to sit and stand around for hours and hours for recount after recount, hoping a bunch would give up, right? The delegates just did not show up.

The will of the delegates!

Just like convoluted apportioning rules for delegates. Why is one worth criticizing over the other if they affect the will of the voters?

Hillary's people doing recounts at the caucuses was shit, too, that's just one of many many reasons caucuses are undemocratic.

Saying stop the Clinton Corruption. LOL.

But that means Brock is getting ad money from them lol.

fool me once, shame on you.
fool me twice, shame on me.

"Then I'll get on my knees and pray...
We don't get fooled again!"

Bush was entertaining at times

Perhaps the problem is one of MATH.
If one has the numbers, it was claimed that 90%+ of Dems supported Hillary Clinton going into this circus so it was a god-given coronation, but doesn't have any enthusiasm that isn't bought, then one doesn't have numbers that can actually cover a real election.
MATH can be multi-level, especially when it factors in TIME.

I read through a couple of the "news" stories there. I think they are satire even though the author of the site specifically denies that the site is a fake or satirical news site. It's like a form of dry humor that I've seen from members of the "Flat Earth Society" who won't admit that they're only joking.

Like the companies that denied that smoking chemically enhanced tobacco entailed a cancer risk.

It might provide material for satire, but it's still real.

hillarys superdelegate - 7th district - called me yesterday - to make plans for saturday - i let the conversation go for a while before i dropped the Sanders bomb

conversation ended quickly after that

it starts in colorado in about ten hours

not enough to make a difference

i have been called five times by sanders people making sure that i am there

i think we will be fine

we might even pick up a delegate or two in colorado

hillary has a core of dino's - old women who have work for the party for a long time but...

the Sanders supporters here are very very motivated

We've heard that in Iowa, Nevada and now Missouri--that Hillary's delegates have been not showing up.

It will be interesting to see if these states are anomalies, or if this is a trend.

I was shocked that 117 of Clinton's supporters were no-shows in my County alone.

Please let us know!

when you can

Isn't this the second week with no good news for Hillary?

Kinda sad really

no stopping now!!!!

I thought we have proven what a load of crap that blog is.Every time someone uses it, it puts any respect for them in play.

But to be able to throw it back at them is pretty nice.

FROM THE ARTICLE IN THE OP

Sanders supporters once again tried to steal a state.

Their claim this is once again that delegates for Hillary Clinton mysteriously failed to show up; last time they made this claim, it was because a local official who was apparently in the tank for Sanders sent out messages telling Clinton delegates they didn’t need to show up, while Sanders supporters – seemingly aware in advance that such an opportunity was going to be created – organized to pack the hall so they could be named alternate delegates.

This time around it’s not yet clear how the Bernie Sanders supporters managed to deceive the Hillary Clinton delegates into not showing up, which is an occurrence that could not possibly happen without trickery or subterfuge being involved. The forum post makes the asinine false claim that the delegates assigned to Clinton “just don’t show up for her” while the Reddit post makes the equally ludicrous claim that Bernie is now the “winner” of Missouri – a state which Hillary definitely won without any question three weeks ago.

Again, these “sources” are to be looked upon with extreme skepticism, because they represent claims being made by individuals who are bragging about having rigged the delegate process against the will of the people. If they’re willing to cheat, they’re willing to lie about the results of their cheating. In other words, even though the Sanders supporters once again cheated at a delegate nominating convention, it’s nearly a given that Clinton is still the winner of Missouri. Fact checkers have already confirmed that Hillary Clinton is still the winner of Nevada.

That's already been vetted out. All delegates received the same message. But sanders camp reaches out multiple times to their delegates. I did see thatbHRC reaches out tonher's in NV as well. But motivation and enthusiasm play a roll here.

If anyone is disenfranchising voters it's the delegates that don't show up. they are given their information on caucus day, to start. It's on their dem websites, then they're sent reminders. If you want to be counted, you need to show up. Simple. In primary and caucus states we elect delegates, the process is just different getting to national.

and will work so well in November against Trump/Ryan/Cruz.

Actually, I've been a delegate in two different caucus states. It's not some weird and obscure mystery that it is a multi-step process, and that once you're a delegate in the first place you have to show up at the next step of the process.

So if Hillary delegates don't show up, IT'S NOT THE FAULT OF BERNIE SANDERS. Do I need to repeat that? If a candidate's delegates don't show up at the next level, it's not the other candidate's fault.

It seems as if in Nevada, and apparently in some other caucus states, that the Hillary delegates were somewhat less than fully committed to her. Hmmm. I wonder why.

Under the Missouri Delegate Selection plan, the results of the primary are binding and can not be changes. See rule 6A of the Delegate Selection plan https://drive.google.com/a/chriskoster.com/file/d/0Bw8qd8A8ZSVLY0RGWFNtMlJkdXc/view?pref=2&pli=1 In addition each Candidate has approval rights over their delegates under rule 5 of the Delegation Selection Plan. In Texas, I have been asked to help vet the delegates to the national convention for my Senate district for the Clinton campaign. The campaign takes this vetting process seriously.

I am not sure what the Sanders people think that they are doing. The primary is binding and they can not change the results fo the primary under Missouri Democratic party rules.

BTW, the Nevada delegate selection plan is also clear and the Sanders people will not be able to steal Nevada http://nvdems.3cdn.net/728ffa1321e41a0452_9ym6idkbz.pdf

Except to Hillary partisans

It was just some reverse psychology.