Clintonites had when they "won" Laramie County - then it counted!

And fell well short of how many he needed to stay on pace to win nomination.

Let's go, Bernie!

congrats on the resounding triumph which caused Sanders to fall further behind.

I did actually LOL. Thanks.

the insurgents who now see this momentum blunted before NY because of antiquated caucus rules.

I am talking about supporters from your side who have taken a 56-43 defeat and run to this site to try to win a war of 1 delegate.

That's who.

who has been a Democrat for her entire adult life as opposed to those who support the candidate who decided to run for office as Democrat after proudly proclaiming to be an Independent for how many years?

Got it.

and carry different meanings. But I am sure you knew that already Granny

I asked for clarification of your post. But, I'm sure you knew that already.

There are a few bones to the masses in her campaign rhetoric, but mostly it's Republican lite, both on foreign and domestic issues. More so in the governing than in the campaigning, of course.

We support Sanders because he stands up for what we've been told Democrats stand for, yet you hit him for not being a lifelong Democrat. You're focused on labels instead of policies. At least that's how it looks from here.

surrogate votes for HRC in Laramie county even
though they may not have shown up?

and it seems all those surrogate ballots were for HRC.

I hope that's not right.

at the caucus. If it works in WY like it did in WA, you can use a surrogate ballot if, on the day of the caucus, you are sick or disabled, or have a religious observance, work or military service. There is really no one who checks that one of those conditions actually exists for each person who submits a surrogate ballot.

The whole caucus process is so undemocratic anyway, that, to me, it would feel slimy to verify those conditions while ignoring the fact that poor people without vehicles, or gas money, or bus access, or babysitters etc, often can't participate in caucuses because the venues are too far away. There is no surrogate ballot with a low-income provision for them.

Clinton's demographics are elderly people. They are often sick or disabled, so the overwhelming majority of those surrogate ballots will naturally be ones from Clinton supporters. That said, it seems like that in proportion to the pool of caucus attendees there were a LOT of surrogate ballots.

for HRC. It needs to be investigated.

It does not make sense otherwise.

Sanders fans whining on Twitter is not sufficient cause for an investigation.

If Sanders volunteers weren't getting surrogate ballots from their constituents also, I'd be upset.

Go Bernie Dems in NY!

He's still 200+ delegates down and the next batch of states are very favorable to Hillary.