Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amborin

(16,631 posts)
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:18 PM Apr 2016

NYDN Editorial: HRC Might Be Radioactive: Did Any of those Emails Touch on Foundation Business?

this is actually from last year; but it certainly still holds true




Democrats, you've been warned: As new reports on the Clinton Foundation's foreign donations surface, Hillary Clinton might be increasingly radioactive in a general election


......serious questions about the money that flowed into her family’s charitable foundation when she was secretary of state.

The party has fair warning: Revelations about the Clinton Foundation’s prowess in scoring large amounts of foreign cash, at times without proper disclosure or accounting, are likely to dominate the candidate’s early going, and perhaps beyond. If other credible candidates are going to make a play to be the party’s standard-bearer, they’d better start calling donors and staffers now.

Democrats have warning also that trying to dismiss the disclosures as hyped right-wing confections won’t fly — not when the New York Times and, soon, the Washington Post are the messengers.

..... the Times delved at length into serious issues surrounding millions of dollars in donations to the foundation from uranium interests at a time when the Obama administration, including Clinton’s State Department, was weighing approval of a Russian takeover of a uranium-mining firm with major American operations.

Also on Thursday, Reuters reported that Clinton charities are set to refile at least five annual tax returns after a review by the news organizations found errors in how they reported donations.


Those errors, Reuters said, “generally take the form of under-reporting or over-reporting, by millions of dollars, donations from foreign governments, or in other instances omitting to break out government donations entirely when reporting revenue.”

It gets worse: “For three years in a row beginning in 2010, the Clinton Foundation reported to the IRS that it received zero in funds from foreign and U.S. governments, a dramatic fall-off from the tens of millions of dollars in foreign government contributions reported in preceding years.

snip

But a “nothing to see here” mantra punctuated by occasional “Koch brothers” coughs will be a tough sell when the chairman of Uranium One, the company selling out to Russian interests, made four donations through his family foundation to the Clinton Foundation totaling $2.35 million.

And when the Foundation failed to disclose the donations, despite Clinton’s pledge to the White House that all such money would be publicly reported.

And when Hillary admits to having deleted troves of supposedly personal emails from the private server she used while secretary of state. Did any of those communications touch on Foundation business?

Clinton and her globe-trotting, fund-raising husband have given Republicans the opening to paint her and the first-gentleman-in-waiting as compromised tools of foreign money, with just enough evidence to make the case stick among some voters — particularly among independents, who constitute a plurality of voters.

snip

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/josh-greenman-democrats-fair-warning-hillary-clinton-article-1.2195981
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYDN Editorial: HRC Might Be Radioactive: Did Any of those Emails Touch on Foundation Business? (Original Post) amborin Apr 2016 OP
Wow -- this is terrible nichomachus Apr 2016 #1
turns out it is from last April, but certainly still applies amborin Apr 2016 #4
Every now and again, the truth seeps out like a silent but deadly. nc4bo Apr 2016 #7
Oh noes! Wasn't the NYDailyNews the favorite site of Hillary followers last week? Uh-oh... revbones Apr 2016 #2
yes, amborin Apr 2016 #6
It does. It ALL does. nc4bo Apr 2016 #11
Hmm... I should get back to the piece on Panama papers nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #3
That's hella lot of ice yourpaljoey Apr 2016 #8
Yup... in fact, I should start with the book that makes that statement nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #10
I think it's important to know if the Clintons can ever draw salaries from the Foundation. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #5
at minimum, they use the $$$$ for over-the-top boondoggle trips, etc.: amborin Apr 2016 #13
Chelsea's salary is $600,000+. Sidney Blumenthal was also receiving $120,000/yr snagglepuss Apr 2016 #20
Benghazi is bullshit. Whitewater was bullshit. The Clinton Foundation is different. BillZBubb Apr 2016 #9
The Huma Abedin angle is cetainly interesting yourpaljoey Apr 2016 #14
but in her testimony, her prevarications were called out: amborin Apr 2016 #17
Sid appears to be Hillary's handler. FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #18
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #12
K&R TheDormouse Apr 2016 #15
probably worth noting it's by a DN editor, not the Editorial Board TheDormouse Apr 2016 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Apr 2016 #19
knr snagglepuss Apr 2016 #21

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
7. Every now and again, the truth seeps out like a silent but deadly.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:29 PM
Apr 2016

Just how many people actually care how compromised Clinton, Inc. could be, remains a big question mark.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
2. Oh noes! Wasn't the NYDailyNews the favorite site of Hillary followers last week? Uh-oh...
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:24 PM
Apr 2016

Wonder how quickly the NYDailyNews becomes part of the "right wing media"...

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
11. It does. It ALL does.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:32 PM
Apr 2016

But do people actually care is the question.

The information is out there and is not propaganda, it's the truth.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
3. Hmm... I should get back to the piece on Panama papers
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:28 PM
Apr 2016

and for the record, those documents are the tip of a very large iceberg, a 7.5 trillion iceberg.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
10. Yup... in fact, I should start with the book that makes that statement
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:30 PM
Apr 2016

for all the rest of the stories have said 35 trillion... which incidentally is the US Budget

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
5. I think it's important to know if the Clintons can ever draw salaries from the Foundation.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:28 PM
Apr 2016

It's one thing to justify the multi-millions being donated to a charity, but it's quite another to think that these millions might end up in the pockets of the Clinton Aristocracy.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
20. Chelsea's salary is $600,000+. Sidney Blumenthal was also receiving $120,000/yr
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 07:30 PM
Apr 2016

when Hillary was SoS. Whether he still is paid by the Foundation I don't know however no way could his salary be justified as charity.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
9. Benghazi is bullshit. Whitewater was bullshit. The Clinton Foundation is different.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:30 PM
Apr 2016

There is plenty about what has been going on there to believe very unethical activities have occurred.

The fact that Huma Abedin had essentially a dual role inside State and at the Clinton Foundation raises a lot of flags.

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)
14. The Huma Abedin angle is cetainly interesting
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:35 PM
Apr 2016

And here I thought Hill didn't do much while SOS.
She was doing more dirty deals than Trump

amborin

(16,631 posts)
17. but in her testimony, her prevarications were called out:
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 09:09 PM
Apr 2016
although the Obama White House believed Blumenthal had spread false rumors about Obama during the 2008 campaign, and although Obama had banned Blumenthal from any State Dept business, SOS Clinton kept up a steady and solicited correspondence with Blumenthal behind Obama's back:



And despite ample evidence on the public record for months that Clinton repeatedly asked Blumenthal to keep sending her updates on Libya and other matters, she repeated previous assertions that his advice was unsolicited.

"I did not ask him to send me the information that he sent me," Clinton said.


"You wrote to him, 'Another keeper, thanks' and 'Please keep them coming
....Greetings from Kabul and thanks for keeping this stuff coming,'" Gowdy shot back.

Clinton then shifted slightly, conceding that she urged Blumenthal to keep up the flow
. "They started out unsolicited and, as I said, some were of interest," she said.

snip

.....You said they were -- you said they were unsolicited," the chairman said.

While Clinton minimized the significance of what Blumenthal sent along, she did not dismiss it entirely, and she defended forwarding the information to aides who sometimes scrambled to respond to the unusual dispatches.

"Some of it I found interesting....

snip

....Allegations relating to Blumenthal's role in that campaign are what kept him from joining the State Department in 2009. Obama aides were convinced that Blumenthal spread false personal and policy rumors about Obama during the battle between Clinton and Obama for the Democratic nomination. While Clinton had more authority to name State Department personnel than any other Obama Cabinet member, Blumenthal was blacklisted--effectively banished by the White House.

When Gowdy asked about Blumenthal's rejection, Clinton didn't dispute it, but said she couldn't remember or didn't know who at the White House put the kibosh on her regular correspondent.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/hillary-clinton-sidney-blumenthal-emails-benghazi-hearings-215083#ixzz42cF2UM5y

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/hillary-clinton-sidney-blumenthal-emails-benghazi-hearings-215083#ixzz42cEb3aOA
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook



Hillary was taking State Dept Advice from Blumenthal and others with Business interests in Libya:


Plus, all the while, Blumenthal was working for the Clinton Foundation:




International New York Times May 20, 2015 Wednesday

Clinton friend's memos on Libya draw scrutiny to politics and business

NICHOLAS CONFESSORE and MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT
Clintons last occupied the White House, Sidney Blumenthal cast himself in varied roles:

speechwriter, in-house intellectual and press corps whisperer. …..Now, as Hillary Rodham Clinton embarks on her second presidential bid, Mr. Blumenthal's service to the Clintons is again under the spotlight. ……

….. a series of memos that Mr. Blumenthal - who was not an employee of the State Department - wrote to Mrs. Clinton about events unfolding in Libya before and after the death of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi.

According to emails obtained by The New York Times, Mrs. Clinton, who was secretary of state at the time, took Mr. Blumenthal's advice seriously, forwarding his memos to senior diplomatic officials in Libya and Washington and at times asking them to respond. Mrs. Clinton continued to pass around his memos even after other senior diplomats concluded that Mr. Blumenthal's assessments were often unreliable.

But an examination by The Times suggests that Mr. Blumenthal's involvement was more wide-ranging and more complicated than previously known, embodying the blurry lines between business, politics and philanthropy that have enriched and vexed the Clintons.

While advising Mrs. Clinton on Libya, Mr. Blumenthal, who had been barred from a State Department job by aides to President Obama, was also employed by her family's philanthropy, the Clinton Foundation, to help with research, ''message guidance'' and the planning of commemorative events, according to foundation officials. During the same period, he also worked for organizations that helped lay the groundwork for Mrs. Clinton's 2016 campaign.

Much of the Libya intelligence that Mr. Blumenthal passed on to Mrs. Clinton appears to have come from a group of business associates he was advising as they sought to win contracts from the Libyan transitional government.

The venture, which was ultimately unsuccessful, involved other Clinton friends, a private military contractor and one former C.I.A. spy seeking to get in on the ground floor of the new Libyan economy.

The projects …..would have required State Department permits, but foundered before the business partners could seek official approval.


The Libya venture came together in 2011 when David L. Grange, a retired Army general, joined with a new New York firm, Constellations Group, to pursue business leads in Libya. Constellations Group, led by a professional fund-raiser and philanthropist named Bill White, was to provide the leads……

Response to amborin (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NYDN Editorial: HRC Might...