2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRep. Cummings Endorses Clinton, Advises Her to ‘Embrace' Sanders' Issues
Rep. Cummings Endorses Clinton, Advises Her to Embrace' Sanders' Issues
By MATTHEW CLAIBORNE Apr 10, 2016, 7:48 PM ET
Rep. Elijah Cummings made it "abundantly clear" today that he is putting his full support behind Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, even if he thinks she ought to talk a bit more like Bernie Sanders.
"I will be voting for Hillary Rodham Clinton as president of the United States of America," Cummings said. "I'm asking every one of you along with Lottie, Dottie and everybody to vote for Hillary Clinton, so it will be abundantly clear I am endorsing Hillary Clinton for president.
However, to a small group of reporters following the event, Cummings advised Clinton to embrace some of the issues that Sen. Bernie Sanders has been stumping about since his campaign began, especially income inequality and college tuition.
"My advice to her [Clinton] would be to try to first of all embrace the types of things that Bernie Sanders is talking about and speak to the needs of those folks who really want to be supportive of progressive policies, and to me that's most important," Cummings said...
Read more:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rep-cummings-endorses-clinton-advises-embrace-sanders-issues/story?id=38295358
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)Or is he worried about getting on Hillary's enemies list?
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)"I really like his ideas and he's right, but I'm voting for Clinton!" And if you ask why you're man/white/bro-splaining...or something.
revbones
(3,660 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Step out of line and watch your campaign money dry up.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)We all know that anyone who endorses HRC over BS has either been threatened or has been bought-and-paid-for.
Only BS supporters/endorsers are honest, patriotic citizens - everyone else is a corporate shill bent on the destruction of democracy.
I wonder what Mr. Cummings' FaceBook page will look like after the BSers get through with it.
revbones
(3,660 posts)"We all know that anyone who endorses HRC over BS has either been threatened or has been bought-and-paid-for."
Nice to know some in the Hillary camp see things for what they are.
Response to revbones (Reply #9)
Post removed
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Maybe you dont.
enid602
(8,620 posts)Truth is, Bernie competes with Cruz in the 'plays well with others' department. Neither have bern widely endorsed by their peers.
Response to Post removed (Reply #15)
Post removed
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Politicians.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)WTF is he talking about? Have some courage and endorse Bernie! Bernie IS... a man of his word!
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)there is already a candidate fighting for what he wants, and he doesn't need to be convinced!
grrrr...
kcjohn1
(751 posts)The people funding her campaign wouldn't allow it.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)I'm sure even Clinton believes in Sanders' spouse.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)You wholeheartedly endorse her, but you want her to implement Sanders' issues? "To me that's the most important"!
You want Sanders' issues and Sanders' emphasis on progressive ideas, but endorse Hillary? The stupid is strong in that one.
think
(11,641 posts)issues.
brush
(53,790 posts)There is such a thing as party loyalty.
Bernie should have joined the dems long ago and he'd be able to call on that.
Sorry, but that's how it works.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Party loyalty vs human beings.
brush
(53,790 posts)He should have joined that party a long time ago.
He would have won some of those early southern primaries, had plenty of super delegates and would probably be leading in total count.
He wanted to stay independent.
Too bad.
Now it is what it is.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)In my politics, and in the actual history of the U.S., changes (good and bad ones) come more often through movements (both elite and people-powered) than through this kind of status quo loyalty. That's why you got the Republicans of Lincoln instead of the Whigs, and women's suffrage, and civil rights, and the conservative "revolution." You're saying it's a good thing that the Democrats are an impediment to change at this time?
brush
(53,790 posts)a span of decades.
But listen, I like Sanders' proposals but the kind of change in the dem party you're talking about is not going to happen in the the nine months he's been in the party.
Too bad he didn't join years ago.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)it was within very short spans. The key victories in civil rights, the rise of the Republicans after 1854, the New Deal (most of it literally in 2 100-day bursts). I think the right timespan for understanding the present moment is not when did Sanders get into the race, because this isn't about Sanders (although the system forces us to pretend it is about individuals). It's the whole period since the 2007-9 crisis and the largely jobless, low-wage recovery that has ensued with enormous wealth gains almost all going to the richest. But this moment may be a touch too soon. I hope not!
brush
(53,790 posts)You know, that economic bullsh_t theory when all the wealth gains started going to the richest, the unions being destroyed starting with Reagan breaking the Air Traffic Controllers union, and on and on. It continued under Daddy Bush, was halted under Clinton for a while with the dot com boom, then resumed with the PNAC plotting and Cheney/Bush.
From the '80s to the destruction wrought by Cheney and Bush is indeed a decades-long span.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)- NAFTA
- Welfare "reform"
- 94 crime bill and mass incarceration
- Big deregulation of financial sector (and media)
- Near agreement with Gingrich on partial social security privatization
All fit seamlessly with the neoliberal economic turn since Reagan (since before Reagan, but obviously from 1981).
brush
(53,790 posts)What was good about the '90s was everybody was working as the economy boomed. I lived in NYC then and when I'd ride the subway on my commute home I'd see young people of color in FEDEX and UPS uniforms riding home too because there was so much commerce.
I mean everybody was working.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)which is what we are seeing play out now on both sides.
DetroitSocialist83
(169 posts)If these people really cared about left wing issues they would have been trumpeting them way before now. They want the 08 model of telling people what they want to hear and then running back to lobbyists after the election. It's not going to work this time, and they will lose the presidency.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)What a strange remark? I've never heard anyone endorse someone and then say they want to make it abundantly clear? Why wouldn't it be clear? Does anyone else think this is strange?
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)If she doesn't follow through on them after the election because she doesn't really believe in them, that's OK. My guess is Cummings is hearing from older Hillary supporters who are talking about their kids who are Bernie supporters pressuring them because Bernie is better on the issues.
TrueDemVA
(250 posts)I like his ideas and what he stands for but I'm endorsing the person that doesn't share these values. What the fuck is that?
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)He can't tell who is better for this country. He has the nerve to think that Hillary Coattails can be more like Bernie and we'll vote for her.
It may work for him, but who cares about him. He's made his money too.
grntuscarora
(1,249 posts)Talk is cheap. Bernie has the record. Any of Bernie's issues HRC chooses to "embrace" at this point are for decoration and political points only.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)think
(11,641 posts)saying as much...
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)as one pundit that covers DC said-"Bernie is not a nice guy"
glowing
(12,233 posts)desmiller
(747 posts)desmiller <---- This guy.
You got taste.
RepubliCON-Watch
(559 posts)SuperPACs, oil & gas, commercial banks, etc. That's no surprise tbh.
Autumn
(45,107 posts)Someone like Bernie Sanders. More than anything I am grateful that I finally at last see that the loyalty of the elected democrats and leaders is to that party. not the people. I think that was the last thread holding me to them. I really thought that somewhere inside they gave a fuck about the people.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)and not in a good way except its shown all thoe who are only truly out for themselves.
Autumn
(45,107 posts)How the fuck can any thinking person say any of that shit . I'm disgusted with him and the whole fucking lot. An endorsement? I understand that but to ask her to talk like Bernie when Bernie is running is way the hell out of line. These people are burning bridges.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)we arent in the club, and they know this is the estsblishments last gasp at power which will soon be overtaken by the peoples revolution. they are going to snatch evey last corrupt dollar they can get.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)when you're President do your own thing.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)I'm from Maryland, so I've watched Cummings' work for a long time.
The Clintons have subverted a lot of previously good people. Done is done though, when I see a tell I know better than to doubt it.
Response to think (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Ino
(3,366 posts)after clinton's superpredator remakrs.her husband going off on BLM,and the swiftboating of bernie he endorses clinton but says she should embrace bernie's issues
2016 has made clear a lot of black leaders in elected office don't really care about civil rights and issues like BLM.only the corporate
money.
another fake progressive like al Franken and Sherrod Brown.
gordianot
(15,240 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)What a load.