The @ sign breaks your link.

I'm glad you fixed it!

"They may get one…the Clintons’ are very good at making mistakes and apologizing for them, what they are not good at? Getting it right the first time."

He displayed what he is and always has been. Anyone who was paying attention to his political career knows this. Some of his best friends and campaign contributors are bottom feeders and the worst kinds of scum. And his policies speak for themselves. He wanted to look tough on crime instead of putting things in place that could have actually helped. Like neighborhood revitalization projects and funding for at risk families in impoverished communities.

GATS meant no more public housing ever.

Due to it's "standstill".

It's true that there are violent people. But, it's also true that if you create an environment that lifts people up there will be a lot less violent people.

Using government "redevelopment" grant money.

Either one will do.

Justice John Paul Stevens http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/23/AR2005062300783.html A ruling so heinous that even conservatives were pissed off. I suppose it started much sooner than that. As you point out, but now with the blessings of the Supreme Court.

Ben Jealous is such a good writer.
K & R

He was pandering to a different group of voters.

The upcoming primaries are in the North East part of the country.
Think about it.

I've read about that.

It's all coming back to me now.

Basically, triangulation is making fine changes in your position to optimize the capture of that nation-state.


State capture is what we have now. Its a form of regulatory capture.