You know that Bernie Sanders hasn't challenged the outcome of a single State, right?

When Saint Bernie wins the skies open up and the angels sing and all is right in the world.

people from the right and left wings compete for supremacy. It's be called "Worst Losers Ever."

hacked/coded too.

...and Bernie Sanders hasn't requested a recount anywhere.

We fill out ovals on paper forms that are fed into electronic readers that tabulate the vote. There is a rather dubious legend out there that samplings of the paper forms are checked afterward by handcount.

Whether you mark an X or fill in an oval. you're voting on paper. We TALLY the votes electronically, but the ballots are retained in case a recount is needed. So far, Bernie hasn't challenged the outcome of ANY race, so I have no expectation that New York will be any different.

Paper forms are fed into electronic readers. Only the machines count the forms, unless an election authority as you say determines that "a recount is needed." That cannot safeguard against possible corruptions of the electronic counting process, whether intentionally or inadvertantly, or by whatever means or actor. What candidates thinks of the process also doesn't change that.

Just get out there and work to win, there is no "fix" in NY.

are whiny and pathetic. To claim cheating before a vote has been cast tells everyone exactly what they need to know about you.

we Dems were worried that machines were going to be hacked before the 2004 and 2008 elections because of what already happened, so Dems then were sore losers and whiny and pathetic? So in 2000 were you one of those on the street corner carrying signs saying "sore loserman"? From your post sounds like you were

And, of course, you have some proof that cheating is going on to deny Bernie of his justified nomination. It couldn't possibly be that more people are voting for Hillary - 2 million plus more. Time to leave your DU bubble and realize this board in no way represents the Democratic party.

answering the question, same argument Bush/Cheney supporters used,
good job at avoiding

If you've got proof of cheating, serve it up.

move the goal post why don't you can't stay on message, again answer my question your dems worried about machines in 2004 and 08 pathetic and whiny?
because people are concerned
your disingenuous that avoids the question

and never has proof been provided. And with your charges, I see there is still no proof. Exactly as I suspected.

Bush and Cheney cheated, see I knew you were a closeted republican

Silly OP.

past the Republicans in Congress.....LOL

Bernie donors outnumber Clinton's by about 5 to 1. The Clintons can't fill a high school gym without shenanigans, Sanders fills stadiums.

We don't need to flip any of the increasingly tiny number of hard core Clinton supporters to win this primary.

...and that, despite rally crowds, Clinton is ahead by 2.5 Million votes?

Or surrogate ballots. We need real people and lots of them.

and has had that for at least a decade. We are far from the only such state.

can't spend 8 hours caucusing to go screw themselves and that they should be denied a vote because you don't like how they cast it.

Stop pretending to be progressive, because you're not fooling anyone.

Superdelegates are the appointed stewards of democracy telling 55%+ of those who did caucus to go screw themselves, apparently.

Perhaps you could stop pretending to be a psychic and stick to the facts.

Have a great day

is BEHIND by ALL measures - popular vote, pledged delegates and superdelegates is simply trying to get people to see what's in front of their faces. Reality seems to have no place in Bernie world.

people at rallies ? voters.

She's got millions more votes and more delegates, and we're heading into big closed primaries.

The will of the Democrats is for Hillary.

frankly i dont know how he does it at 75.
Hes to old. Hes 6 years older than my dad when he died.
10 years older than my aunt, my mom is only 4 years older.

Democrats need to endorse amoral evil and systemic corruption more openly.

Focus on the real world.

berated her and in March of that year he declared his site to be a Hillary free zone just like he did this year to Bernie. Template Tantrums from a guy who was 10 years old when his hero Ronald Reagan let Americans die in neglect.

Kos on Hillary 2008:
"First of all, the only path to victory for Clinton is via coup by super delegate. She knows this. That's why there's all the talk about poaching pledged delegates and spinning uncertainty around Michigan and Florida, and laying the case for super delegates to discard the popular will and stage a coup. Yet a coup by super delegate would sunder the party in civil war. Clinton knows this, it's her only path to victory, and she doesn't care. She is willing -- nay, eager to split the party apart in her mad pursuit of power."

"She is willing -- nay, eager to split the party apart in her mad pursuit of power." But this year, she's just so great we have to help hand her the full platter, early and on command.....
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/03/kos-clinton-doe.html

They're achin' for a historic outcome. They don't care that the person who would be her predecessor uses terms like "careless" to describe her actions in the job they see as her biggest qualification for the job she's seeking. It doesn't matter that the person who would precede her in the job she's seeking merely believes her careless actions failed to impact national security.

What's the POINT of pitching Bernie Sanders to people who believe making history is more important than solving the problems our nation is besieged by? What does it matter?

When carelessness ceases to be a disqualifying factor for the most important job in the world, supporting anyone else becomes an exercise in futility.

They don't care that the person who would be her predecessor uses terms like "careless" to describe her actions in the job they see as her biggest qualification for the job she's seeking.

Nope. Sorry. One is a blunder, the other is criminal.

Misspeaking is when you say something you didn't intend. Bernie fully intended to say Hillary wasn't qualified, which he based on someone's outright stupidity for not checking to see what she had actually said.

That's like when Romney tried to say his "47%" speech was him misspeaking. Sorry, no one misspeaks for fifteen minutes.

secrets on an unsecured server out of convenience.

Get real.

Your claim that anything Bernie Sanders has done is "even more damning" than possibly affecting national security in a negative way is beyond my ken, and arguably the stupidest comment I've seen here. That's saying a lot, seeing as how it's "silly season" at DU.

Your post takes the cake.

Bernie is out making the rounds, saying he has serious questions about Hillary's judgment, and until the media backlash bit him he was saying she isn't even fit to be President. If he runs a campaign where he sloppily turns a headline into a multi-day firestorm, he's careless. If he runs a campaign that can't tell the difference between being invited by a world leader, and merely attending a conference nearby, he's careless.

And if you're going to be that careless, while calling out the judgment and qualifications of the other candidate, it's even more egregious.

NSA and have a totally transparent government. Same people who champion Snowden.
It really doesn't ring true.

I.e. NOT pitch Bernie Sanders to Hillary supporters.

Realistically, it's becoming increasingly obvious that the path to victory runs directly through running them over, into the sea or out of the Democratic party.

It's not a race, it's a war. You're on the wrong side of it.

record!

this will go over well.

is showing them all the videos of Hillary lying her face off.

They seem to believe that lying is a virtue.


Maybe if someone could catch her in a rare moment of telling the truth, and we showed them that, it might have some affect?

but I won't try to explain to you why.

I was always going to stand with Hillary.