And the one Gloria Allred is involved in?

Quite disappointing, because we already know he's a cheating businessman, it does not present anything new.

Damn. I'm sure Shitt can talk his way out of that. Just the cost of doing business.

it is typical of him to do something like that--lie or fudge the numbers for a friend so his wife (soon to be ex) is cheated out of a lot of money. (unless it could be proven he perjured himself--which is doubtful).

and talks about how Romney helped cheat her . . . .

usual the Mitt Robme way. Just like Robme said regarding the businesses he plundered; he would "harvest them at significant profit."
I wouldn't be surprised if Robme ripped off Maureen Stemberg in order to help her husband's side of the balance sheet in this divorce.

The story about a woman being attracted to mitt seems highly improbable, IMHO.

The story about mitt lying seems remarkably believable.

On the other hand, if he were accused of telling the truth about something I would have to be skeptical.

but helping his friend cheat his soon-to-be-ex-wife out of money during divorce proceedings by perjuring himself, yeah, that's the Robme we've all come to know and loathe!

But I wasn't saying mitt wouldn't be a cheating husband, just that I have a hard time imagining a woman who would want to cheat WITH him!

What an ass. Even rich women are going to be ticked he pulled that stunt.

He lied to screw over the wife in a divorce. Every woman's nightmare who went through a bad divorce.

Not helping with the women..just adding to his and gop's War On Women and the Binders Full of Women mentality.

wouldn't be involved.

If there is a gag order and it was sealed, but who knows, will have to wait if its anything at all.

It's a woman getting screwed over by a powerful man, and it HUGE publicity and a lot cameras. Gloria will be right there.

She represents female victims.
If a woman was cheated out of money that should be good enough, IMO.

I want the salacious shit

At least he did in Feb this year

evil creep


http://lenfaucher.blogspot.com/2012/01/blood-money-true-romney-legacy.html

and she sold half of it before it went public. Now, I have no idea how much those shares were worth, but they raised $37 million from the IPO. The stock started at $1 per share and stayed under $5 a share until 1996. Then it started taking off, eventually getting as high as $26 a share.

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=SPLS+Interactive#symbol=spls;range=my;compare=;indicator=volume;charttype=area;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=off;source=undefined;

My question is, if Mitt testified it was "overvalued" why did Bain stay invested and why did he serve on the board for 15 years?

If Romney undervalued the stock, Ms. Stemberg would naturally demand MORE of it. If the intent was to rip her off, he would have overstated the potential value so she would demand fewer shares.

Last edited Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:00 AM - Edit history (1)

Maybe there's something else there, and that's why Allred and the Globe are trying to get at the records.

Edit: Unless the use the "over-valued" as a ruse to get the -ex to accept come other (less valuable) consideration.

MA is a 50/50 state. Thus, the half she was given was less.