2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumA Yuuge problem for Hillary. 31% favorable rating *52%* NEGATIVE Rating.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/22/politics/2016-election-poll-donald-trump-hillary-clinton/And then this recent poll taken earlier this month has her at a 55% negative rating.
Fifty-five percent of Americans say they have a negative opinion of Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton in the latest AP-GfK poll.
http://www.businessinsider.com/poll-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-unfavorable-rating-2016-4
Doesn't this concern her supporters?
Faux pas
(14,681 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)They believe they have this in the bag.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)who have and will vote for Hillary, what exactly are they in your opinion?
Remember, almost all of them voted for Barack, both times, the first Clinton, Carter, etc.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)And the poster implied that Hillary supporters dont care about anything but winning.
And yes, most Bernie supporters voted for those other folks as well.
Seems though, all of a sudden, they (many, not all) have decided to draw a line (if Bernie loses, this has nothing to do with primaries) at Hillary.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)When half said they would not vote for Obama?
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)Cue the outrage for calling out that democrats can be bought too.
If hillary wins, the right wing will be focusing so hard on trying to impeach her that they might have less energy for passing bathrooms laws, so there's that i guess.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)The only reason not to vote if Hillary is the nominee is if you believe the only way to true change is to shock the system with a severe shock, so to speak.
Problem with that is while giving all power to the GOP will indeed cause over the top harm and destruction, there is no reason to believe people will react any differently than before, leaving us with a right wing government.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)"CLEAR!" Dr. Sanders
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)He would shock the system only in that the wealthy and Wall Street and corporations might finally have to pay their proper share.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)PufPuf23
(8,791 posts)I was a dedicated Democrat before I could vote.
I had the leaning already (anti-Vietnam War) when my roommate Eric at sophomore year at boarding school 68-69 was the son of Maya Miller (of Nevada's Washoe Valley) and have been politicized and Democratic ever since.
revbones
(3,660 posts)You can take from that what you want...
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)cluster bombs and giving banks free rein. Among other things. The unpleasantness is just "extra".
Avalon Sparks
(2,566 posts)About disagreeing with the things Clinton stands for?
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)I wouldn't worry about the unfavorable rating either if there weren't so many ethical red flags flying around her. But there are and Democrats are walking through a minefield with her at the head of the ticket.
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)Joyous voters who love her and are willing to stand in line for hours to cast that magic Hillary vote!!
Not gonna happen.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)She's an old-school Republican, at best, whether you like it or not.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Guaranteed!
revbones
(3,660 posts)Once the FBI investigation.... Yeah, I'd be very proud of supporting a candidate where I could say things like that...
DCBob
(24,689 posts)other than breaking a few rules and regs that many in her position break.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)Looks like you and Sec. Clinton have the same poor judgment in common. You think it's no big deal to break rules and regulations because other people do it? Wow. You really set some really low standards for who will get your vote.
Regulation - Legal Dictionary | Law.com
dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1771Law.com Legal Dictionary
Marr
(20,317 posts)She had low favorable ratings before the FBI started investigating her activities. The investigation itself is, if anything, a negative-- regardless of how it plays out.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)and they most certainly will rise once she is cleared.
I didn't realize being investigated by the FBI for violating a USCode was fake.
Guess we need to release all those so-called terrorists from prison since FBI investigations are fake.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It's the whole Bill and Hillary package. A lot of people are tired of them -- and worse -- because of the cumulative baggage they carry, most of which they have packed themselves. And many are tired of the stale brand of status quo politics the Clintons represent.
She might get elected -- But as for actually governing? Not so much. She will galvanize the GOP and right wing, and she will not have the national credibility to use the "bully pulpit" to win over the general population for much of anything.
I think she'll be lucky to get a Post Office named after George Washington.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)April 12, 2016
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Bernie Sanders is still behind when it comes to delegates and votes, but he has one clear advantage over his Democratic and Republican presidential rivals - a lot of people actually like him.
By 48 percent to 39 percent, more Americans have a favorable than an unfavorable opinion of Sanders, giving him the best net-positive rating in the field, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll. Unlike the other candidates, Sanders also is doing better as more Americans get to know him: His favorable rating is up from an earlier AP-GfK poll.
The numbers speak to Sanders' rapid rise from a relatively unknown Vermont senator to a celebrated voice proclaiming political revolution. They also reflect just how unpopular the rest of the field is.
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/hillary-clinton-favorable-rating#!selectedpoll=24128
Apr.4, 2016
Clinton
Unfavorable 55.0%
Favorable 40.2%
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/clinton_favorableunfavorable-1131.html
Clinton
Apr. 8
Unfavorable 55.0%
Favorable 40.2%
And the overall favorable to unfavorable for Clinton keep going on a steady downward slide.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)she puts the party back together.
which is after they try and destroy and smear the only honest candidate running.
sure. that will happen
senz
(11,945 posts)PufPuf23
(8,791 posts)to a double cross if political winds shift or if position gets in the way of wealth, corporations, or MIC.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)It means Hillary will never be president,
especially after the brokered Republican convention puts up someone like Ryan.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)We deserve a better choice.
Land of Enchantment
(1,217 posts)Party in the dust where it belongs.
PS 'Happy National Grilled Cheese Sandwich Day' today. I heard that on the Weather Channel this morning!
http://www.foodandwine.com/slideshows/best-grilled-cheese-in-the-us
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Sometimes I read posts a few days later. I missed it.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Her negative rating won't matter because his is worse.
That's why she says she'll worry about bringing the party together later, because she believes Dems will vote for her even if they hate her.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)They will rig the convention and get someone else in there, possibly even someone that is not even running yet. Unfortunately for us Bernie supporters the same thing will happen at the Democratic convention. They will make sure Hillary is the nominee.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Zira
(1,054 posts)Republicans who will be. Too many on the Left won't vote for her. She was at 30% won't vote for her two weeks ago and it's growing by 7% a month.
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)I don't like Hillary, and I actually despise Bill Clinton, but I will vote for her in the general if she is the Dem nominee, because the Repukes are thousands of times worse.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)If she's the president and tries to ram TPP or mean-testing Social Security through Congress, many of her loyal Democratic subjects there will be given cover to pass it.
However, if a Republican tries to do it, they'll stand up to him.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)You hit the nail on the head. Thank you.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Don't care about Hillary's negative attributes, any time they are faced with a negative, yet truthful, facts against Hillary, they tend to just brush it off as a 'right wing smear'. That is why she is going to do poorly if she makes the GE.
Land of Enchantment
(1,217 posts)likely continue to rise as she goes more negative on Bernie and now that he has caught fire she finds herself at the fork in the road. The more she hammered Obama (also unknown in 2008) the more her negative numbers climbed. She can't really ignore Bernie either although she has tried and that didn't work. Even though some of her surrogates have asked her to 'run like Sanders' and try clear, clean direct answers she has not taken their advice.
As Yogi Berra once said, "When you come to a fork in the road, take it."
Thanks for the thought provoking post that is now like an earworm for me. It's a VERY good question.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)I still think she's going to win.
I do think it's a topic for some rational examination, but this isn't really the place.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....the candidate that is leading in the primaries and will go on to get the nomination.
What possible purpose does one have posting something like this on DU?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Lone_Wolf
(1,603 posts)He's taking a lot of heat off of Hillary because he's the only one who has a higher unfavorable rating.
Nyan
(1,192 posts)And that's enthusiasm & shame factor.
They should ask questions like, "Will you definitely show up to vote for the candidate A?" "Who is your first and second choice in a hypothetical GE match-up?"
White people tend to hide the fact that they're supporting Trump becaused they're embarrassed. Trust me, I've seen some white folks who seem to like him but are pretending otherwise. And while (young) white liberals and progressives don't like Trump, they don't like Hillary, either. It's very likely that they'll not be excited enough to show up. Or they'll show up to vote for Jill Stein.
If it's Trump vs Hillary, the racial divide along the party line will be immense. And she may not get enough white votes to win.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)They love love her, and thats all that matters. Damn the party. Damn the GE.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)onecaliberal
(32,864 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Set aside the rivalry between the two Democratic camps and just look at those damn figures! How exactly can we be seriously contemplating running a candidate with a 31% favorable in a general election?! Are we seriously just sitting and hoping that the Republicans do self destruct and nominate someone with even worse favorables? Is that really how low we've fallen?