Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 01:21 PM Apr 2016

Is Bernie going to be flying in a private jet to Rome for that conference?

There doesn't seem to be any commercial flight available for his timeframe. It would be awesome for him to fly a private jet over to Europe to give a 10 minute speech about economic inequality. Can't beat those optics. Especially after lying about being invited by the pope.

95 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is Bernie going to be flying in a private jet to Rome for that conference? (Original Post) DanTex Apr 2016 OP
Your obsession is unhealthy and rather telling RufusTFirefly Apr 2016 #1
And yet, there is still no answer as to how he will travel to the Vatican. MoonRiver Apr 2016 #3
Who really cares? revbones Apr 2016 #8
Has the question even been asked to Bernie? NWCorona Apr 2016 #9
Seems like a completely uninteresting line of inquiry. bjo59 Apr 2016 #43
We don't know. Who's paying? Hortensis Apr 2016 #44
Well, now I know he's taking a charter plane. MoonRiver Apr 2016 #51
So not interested in the Wall Street transcripts... Bohemianwriter Apr 2016 #77
He's taking a surfboard, I believe LondonReign2 Apr 2016 #54
How many threads are we going to have about Bernie's mode of transportation? cwydro Apr 2016 #2
Thank you for your post... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #4
It's pathetic AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #14
Your concern for the Sanders campaign and its "optics" is awesome DefenseLawyer Apr 2016 #5
I'm not "concerned," I'm enjoying the trainwreck from a safe distance. DanTex Apr 2016 #6
You are on the train AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #13
He is the train. HERVEPA Apr 2016 #28
The Little Engine That Couldn't jberryhill Apr 2016 #80
Oh Dan, you speak of optics, but your girl... Barack_America Apr 2016 #24
Hillary is "Bigfoot" in carbon footprint... Human101948 Apr 2016 #35
Do not forget her surrogate in hong kong holding a fundraiser as well that evening. timmymoff Apr 2016 #49
Speech at the Vatican vs. $$$$$ dinners with the Cloonys. Optics indeed. nt jmg257 Apr 2016 #16
Maybe he will be there via virtual reality. itsrobert Apr 2016 #7
10 minutes more than Hillary though right? revbones Apr 2016 #10
Hillary supporters are besides thrmselves with envy AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #11
Probably gonna use Frequent Flyer mileage. You can swing a good price on a rent-a-car & a hotel too jmg257 Apr 2016 #12
Dunno. Is Hillary taking a private jet to her FBI interrogation? HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #15
She'll be taking her private jet to her $350,000 per couple fundraiser. Barack_America Apr 2016 #22
#PopeGate vs #FBIGate it's no contest which side is better nt Kalidurga Apr 2016 #30
Valmorphanize into a bird. Then he'll say, "I just flew in from NY and boy are my arms tired!" TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #17
So many lies in such a short paragraph. basselope Apr 2016 #18
Wrong, the Pope doesn't invite anyone personally to such events CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #48
No. basselope Apr 2016 #50
Wrong. The Vatican is no more the Pope than the President is the US government CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #58
Incorrect analogy. Poor Clintonites. basselope Apr 2016 #59
You are not well informed CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #63
Actually, it is you who are not well informed. basselope Apr 2016 #65
Don't twist what I wrote CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #66
I didn't twist it at all. basselope Apr 2016 #67
Are you Catholic? CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #68
A long winded justification that says nothing. basselope Apr 2016 #70
Unfortunately you are one of the (hopefully few) Sanders supporters who lives in... CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #71
another long winded desperate response. basselope Apr 2016 #72
I feel like I have been talking to a windmill CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #73
I know I have been talking to someone who doesn't understand politics basselope Apr 2016 #74
... CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #75
So sorry it didn't work out for you. basselope Apr 2016 #76
You are wasting your time on this one. Saint Bernard , in full drool , said " The Pope" pkdu Apr 2016 #78
And so... Bernie met the pope.. basselope Apr 2016 #89
Sander did not have a meeting with the pope, he shock hands and said "Hi", nothing more CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #92
LOL. basselope Apr 2016 #95
Goal post moved, from White House to U.S. Government? ViseGrip Apr 2016 #93
Who cares? mythology Apr 2016 #19
This is really starting to take the appearance of a jilted lover. frylock Apr 2016 #20
Is this serioues? libtodeath Apr 2016 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Apr 2016 #23
I told you, Dan- he will be flying on a fully equipped BernieBroeing 747 Warren DeMontague Apr 2016 #25
Meanwhile, Hillary flies to the West Coast to charge $353K to sit with her at dinner. strategery blunder Apr 2016 #26
Yes but she is raising money for other Dems. :) Lucinda Apr 2016 #52
Reminds me of 2008 strategery blunder Apr 2016 #56
yep! raising money to pay them off for endorsing her!nt m-lekktor Apr 2016 #81
Guess you haven't seen the breakdown of downticket payments from her Victory Fund... revbones Apr 2016 #83
Saint Bernie doesn't need a plane CorkySt.Clair Apr 2016 #27
St. Christopher will carry him... Human101948 Apr 2016 #39
Nope. He's Jewish - so it's Ark or Whale jberryhill Apr 2016 #82
St. Christopher is not a bigot... Human101948 Apr 2016 #85
Obviously the references to Noah and Jonah were lost on you jberryhill Apr 2016 #86
Nope...they just don't make any sense... Human101948 Apr 2016 #88
I've heard he'll be flying in a dirigible - powered by unicorn waste gas... jonno99 Apr 2016 #29
Since we do not know here on DU oldandhappy Apr 2016 #31
Ha ha you got BERNED!!! Kalidurga Apr 2016 #32
No, silly. Angels will bear him on their beautiful, strong wings and soar majestically Peregrine Took Apr 2016 #33
On gossamer wing...they will soar with the Sainted One wrapped in their loving arms. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #62
What is Hillary having for dinner? Will it be healthy? Shouldn't she watch her cholesterol Live and Learn Apr 2016 #34
Day 4 since the news of Bernie’s excellent Vatican adventure and it still berns riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #36
Yeah, that 10 mins of talking time prior to a coffee break CorkySt.Clair Apr 2016 #37
As Jeff Weaver relayed from Bernie, some things transcend politics. riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #45
Meh, it's shameless pandering for Catholics before a primary. CorkySt.Clair Apr 2016 #46
Shrug, you do obviously nt riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #47
It's got to be a record for them! JimDandy Apr 2016 #55
Sanders should spend that time doing the taxes he JanetLovesObama Apr 2016 #38
Is Hillary still thinking about her speech transcripts... Human101948 Apr 2016 #41
Well, yes, since Jane (the CPA) says they use the easy short form, Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #61
Whatever mode he uses beedle Apr 2016 #40
Someone is very, very jealous their candidate was left giving speeches on Wall Street. Vinca Apr 2016 #42
Yep. It's pretty bad optics. Lucinda Apr 2016 #53
Paid with campaign money? NurseJackie Apr 2016 #57
Now that's and interesting question CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #64
The potential outcry about the "carbon footprint" left by Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #60
Since It's At the Vatican SDJay Apr 2016 #69
I hope so. dchill Apr 2016 #79
he might be, is there any problem with that? silvershadow Apr 2016 #84
Trashing Thread B Calm Apr 2016 #87
He was invited by the pope and then got to meet him. basselope Apr 2016 #90
Kickety Rec'idy! cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #91
Seems those optics are paying off nicely, Dan! At least via CNN coverage. nt jmg257 Apr 2016 #94

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
1. Your obsession is unhealthy and rather telling
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 01:24 PM
Apr 2016

Not to mention, kind of pathetic.
But then, you knew that.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
3. And yet, there is still no answer as to how he will travel to the Vatican.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 01:26 PM
Apr 2016

Seems like an easy question to answer.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
8. Who really cares?
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 01:28 PM
Apr 2016

Will it affect your life more than having someone who lied that they were under sniper fire get elected? Doubt it.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
9. Has the question even been asked to Bernie?
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 01:29 PM
Apr 2016

I don't think team Bernie feels the need to answer these weak threads.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
44. We don't know. Who's paying?
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:30 PM
Apr 2016

What's it doing to Sanders' carbon footprint?

Anyone figured that for the whole 2-year American GE period alone? We could do severe campaign finance control and take a significant step to save the planet at the same time.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
51. Well, now I know he's taking a charter plane.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 08:30 PM
Apr 2016

Next question is, who's paying for that expensive plane. Answer: his devoted donors. Little did they know they were subsidizing a trip to Italy. Oh, and is he taking Jane? Hope they post pics!

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
77. So not interested in the Wall Street transcripts...
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 12:05 AM
Apr 2016

Because who's paying for a commercial flight to Europe for Bernie is a much bigger scandal?




LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
54. He's taking a surfboard, I believe
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:34 PM
Apr 2016

He'll be riding the wave of tears coming from Team Hillary's collective tantrum over this issue.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
2. How many threads are we going to have about Bernie's mode of transportation?
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 01:25 PM
Apr 2016

I'm a Hillary supporter, but jeez, leave it alone.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
5. Your concern for the Sanders campaign and its "optics" is awesome
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 01:27 PM
Apr 2016

It's great to see a Clinton supporter putting politics aside to try and help out the opponents' campaign.

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
24. Oh Dan, you speak of optics, but your girl...
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 04:56 PM
Apr 2016

...will be flying off (in her private jet) to a $350,000 per couple fundraiser in CA, while Sanders is at a social justice conference at the Vatican.

How do you like them optics?

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
35. Hillary is "Bigfoot" in carbon footprint...
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:15 PM
Apr 2016

EXCLUSIVE: Hillary hops on carbon-spewing private Learjet after winning endorsement from environmental group that says fighting global warming is its 'top priority'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3314183/Hillary-hops-carbon-spewing-private-jet-winning-endorsement-environmental-group-says-fighting-global-warming-priority.html#ixzz45YSvlpnw
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
10. 10 minutes more than Hillary though right?
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 01:30 PM
Apr 2016

And all the speeches are 10-15 min. Interesting they chose him though over Hillary and the Pope snubbed her invitation back in Sep 2015.

But if such trivial matters are all you have to fill your day with, carry on.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
11. Hillary supporters are besides thrmselves with envy
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 01:30 PM
Apr 2016

It's almost sad watching them tie themselves in knots

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
12. Probably gonna use Frequent Flyer mileage. You can swing a good price on a rent-a-car & a hotel too
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 01:31 PM
Apr 2016

if you do a package deal.

Gotta figure they checked Expedia and Egencia.


Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
22. She'll be taking her private jet to her $350,000 per couple fundraiser.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 04:52 PM
Apr 2016

Seriously.

That's where she'll be while Sanders is at the Vatican.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
18. So many lies in such a short paragraph.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 01:35 PM
Apr 2016

First, there are charter flights available that you can use credit card points one.

Second, he WAS invited by the pope, since he was invited by the Vatican. Guess what.. if you receive an invitation to the White House, you have been invited by the President, even if the president didn't personally extend the invitation.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
58. Wrong. The Vatican is no more the Pope than the President is the US government
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 10:06 AM
Apr 2016

The Vatican is a complex bureaucracy with many moving parts which operates at many different levels. As usual in complex bureaucracies, some of the Cardinals have their own agendas. Even if he were a compulsive micro manager, and Pope Francis has shown no indications that he is, the Pope has to delegate and let other below him do their jobs. There is no indication in this case that Pope France even knew that Sanders had campaigned hard to get the invitation. He will not even attend the event and currently there are no plans for Sanders to meet with the Pope. Given the brouhaha that has been stirred up, I am betting no such meeting will occur.

Sanders was invited to a lower level scholarly conference sponsored by the Vatican's Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. He was invited by the organization's Chancellor, Monsignor Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo. He probably doesn't understand politics well enough to know the ruckus he would be stirring up by inviting a candidate from any country who is in the middle of a campaign.

Monsignor Sorondo is a lower level functionary in the Vatican bureaucracy, there are 215 Cardinals, but Monsignors are a dime a dozen in Vatican City.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
59. Incorrect analogy. Poor Clintonites.
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 11:18 AM
Apr 2016

The Vatican is to the pope as the white house is to the president.

The pope is to Catholic Church as the president is to the US government.

The Vatican is HIS HOUSE. Being invited to the Vatican is being invited BY THE POPE.

And, yes, it is very VERY likely Sanders will meet the Pope at this extremely important conference on the Pope's largest subjects, upon which his entire rule has been based thus far.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
63. You are not well informed
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 11:55 AM
Apr 2016

The Vatican a city. The Vatican is country or more properly as City State. The Pope is technically it's bishop. The Vatican is also the governing body of the Catholic Church and the Pope is undisputed leader and, as such, is he is also the undisputed leader of the Catholic Church. Like the President, the Pope does not make or approve every decision made in the Vatican, he doesn't have the time or the scope to handle everything.

I doubt seriously whether he got involved in the decisions made by a lowly Monsignor on who to invite to a scholarly conference that he won't even attend. If he had, I can almost assure you that Senator Sanders would not have been invited. A person does not get appointed Cardinal, much less elected Pope, unless he has a firm grounding in politics, both personal and public. Pope Francis would have never made the mistake of inserting himself into a political campaign - it simply isn't done. (Note the the Monsignor is probably not well grounded in politics. He as probably already received constructive counseling.)

For that reason I doubt seriously that Pope will meet with Sanders given the present situation. Under normal circumstances it is fairly easy for a visiting dignitary to obtain an audience with the Pope; it's done all of the time. I don't think it will happen this time because that would give the further appearance that Pope Francis is trying to insert himself into an election. The church and the Pope is supposed to be above such things. Given the flap, you can rest assured that the Pope has now been briefed However, dis-inviting Sanders at this point would cause an even bigger fuss.

I suspect that Sanders will go to Rome, give his little speech, and then the meetings will continue for several days without him. The Pope will probably eventually get a report on what was discussed. He may even find time to read it.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
65. Actually, it is you who are not well informed.
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 01:09 PM
Apr 2016

These are the signatures issues of the Pope's papacy. To suggest that this conference is "low level" is just... well.. silly.

Second, to suggest that the Pope doesn't get involved in politics is also to ignore this Pope who came to DC to speak to congress about these VERY SUBJECTS.

Finally, you want to remove Pop Francis from the Vatican.. but you can no more do that than you can remove Obama from the White House. Obama is the commander in chief, but he is not responsible for every aspect of government, but even if he doesn't make personal decisions on who visits the White House... when you are invited to the White House, you are invited by the president, even if by proxy. Sometimes you meet him.. sometimes you don't. Depends on why you are there... but you are still being invited by the President.

The same applies to the Vatican. The Vatican is the Pope's house, city, country or not. He is the head of that entity and an invitation from that entity is an invitation from him... like it or not.

And no, the Pope won't come out and endorse a specific candidate, but he makes his wishes known when he and one certain candidate use similar language, the language the pope used when he came her and spoke to congress.

Sanders will go to Rome, give his speech at this high level conference and very likely have a quick meet and greet with the Pope before returning. It will not be a photo op, but it will happen.

They actually share many of the same values, unlike the Pope and all the other presidential candidate.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
66. Don't twist what I wrote
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 03:36 PM
Apr 2016

I said the Pope will not want to appear to pick sides in a political campaign - period - end of story.

Sander was invited to Vatican City, not the Pope's private residence. That's like getting invited to attend a conference in Washington DC, but not being invited to the White house; that happens all of the time.

Sanders wasn't invited by the Pope, he was invited by a lowly church functionary. If you and other Sanders supporters want to think this is a big deal, that's cool, I shouldn't care what what you guys think. It doesn't change the situation.

And again, given the controversy that has arose, I would be highly surprised if Pope Francis granted Sanders and audience on this trip. Under any other circumstances probably no problem, but this time around I don't think so. We'll see if I'm right.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
67. I didn't twist it at all.
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 05:18 PM
Apr 2016

And the POPE has appeared to pick sides with his words.

Sanders was invited by the Vatican, which is the Pope.

Sanders will meet the Pope.

It's just reality.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
68. Are you Catholic?
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 06:41 PM
Apr 2016

If you perhaps you will understand what I am about write: While I am now fallen away, I grew up in a Catholic home. My father was an ordained Deacon in the church, which a more serious position in the Catholic religion than in most protestant demonstrations because it requires years of study, and serious vows to the church. I graduated from a Catholic High School where I was taught the Christian Brothers and priests. There among things Catholic I learned about the Church's organization structure and how it works. My posts until now were based on that knowledge.

I also know enough to determine that you my friend are clueless on this subject.

But since you don't believe me, perhaps you would have more faith in another source, perhaps the Daily Beast:

Vatican: Pope Didn’t Invite Bernie Sanders

On Friday, Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders announced that he was “very excited” about having just received an invitation to speak at a small, invitation-only scholarly conference at the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences celebrating the 25th year anniversary of an encyclical, “Centesimus Annus,” written by Pope John Paul II on the evils of capitalism.

Francis is not expected to attend the conference, which will take place April 15 and 16 with around 30 participants, including Bolivian President Evo Morales and Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa. Francis will be traveling to Lesbos, Greece, on the 16th to shed light on the Syrian refugee crisis there.

The Vatican spokesman, Father Federico Lombardi, told The Daily Beast that it wasn’t the pope who personally invited the politician. “The invitation was made on behalf of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, not by Pope Francis,” he said. “There is no expectation that the pope will meet Mr. Sanders.” He then added that he could not completely exclude the possibility, but that nothing was on the agenda at the moment.

Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, said that Sanders invited himself. “Sanders made the first move, for the obvious reasons,” Archer told Bloomberg. “He may be going for the Catholic vote but this is not the Catholic vote and he should remember that and act accordingly—not that he will.”

Not long after, Monsignor Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences stepped in to dispute Archer’s statements. “I deny that. It was not that way," Sánchez Sorondo told Reuters. “This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus.”

Sánchez Sorondo later toned down his initial comments telling CNN the invitation should not be seen as an endorsement of the senator’s nomination. “It does not signify any support of the campaign," Sánchez Sorondo said. "We want to establish a dialogue between North America and South America so we thought to invite a [U.S.] politician. The president of Bolivia will also be there. Perhaps the others [candidates] would have been interested but they did not request to come."

He also confirmed to CNN that Sanders had reached out to the Vatican first. “He has expressed an interest many times in the Pope's encyclical and it's clear that he has an interest in studying it,” Sánchez Sorondo said. “It might have that effect, but we are not looking to support the campaign."

The monsignor expressed dismay that there was such a fuss about an invitation to a conference few people would have even heard about. “I don't know what is the problem," Sánchez Sorondo told the National Catholic Reporter. "We have two presidents from Latin America, and we don't have a problem. And we have a problem because we invited one candidate to the White House of your country? It's a little impossible to understand."

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
70. A long winded justification that says nothing.
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 07:00 PM
Apr 2016

All the quotes in the world doesn't change the fact that Vatican IS the pope.

All the denials in the world doesn't change the fact that on the subjects of income inequality and health care as a right ONLY Bernie Sanders and the Pope are speaking the same.

You also included the completely debunked claim that Sanders "invited himself".

Reality. This is a high level conference on the issues nearest and dearest to the Pope's heart. The Vatican (aka The Pope) invited Bernie Sanders to speak. The Pope will be there and the the Pope will meet the speakers invited to the conference to speak on his most important of topics.

All the debunked bold faced claims in the world doesn't change it.

Sorry they didn't choose "her", but maybe the Pope just doesn't respect people who get paid 225K to speak to the very people who are creating the problems he is speaking against.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
71. Unfortunately you are one of the (hopefully few) Sanders supporters who lives in...
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 08:35 PM
Apr 2016

his/her own little world where reality seldom intrudes. And why would it? The world is as you you have created for yourself, and you have banished reality from it. You know everything, and anyone that disagrees with you is simply wrong. Why? Because you know it is true.

Even if someone were to present you with a mountain of evidence that you are wrong in one of your pronouncements, all you have to do is continue to insist against all logic that you are right until you convince yourself.

Even if Sanders was given a one in one hundred chance of winning the nomination you would still go forth and proclaim that his victory is a certainty. And sadly, you probably think that if you wish it were hard enough, it will happen.

You don't seem to care that the person you are having a discussion with has concluded, with good justification, that you have simply lost it. Why would you bothered with that; you know you are always right.

It must be tough being you, or maybe without reality intruding you have convinced yourself that your life is grand.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
72. another long winded desperate response.
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 09:18 PM
Apr 2016

With how much mis information you have given why would I care what you think of me or anything?

I know reality has gotten under your skin.


So sorry it didnt work out for you or "her".

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
73. I feel like I have been talking to a windmill
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 11:47 PM
Apr 2016

I don't know if you're clueless or just pretending to be clueless, but in the end it doesn't matter.

So let me put it to you this way - Your candidate, Bernie Sanders is lose and lose badly. You an either start adjusting you personal "reality" now to get used to the idea or you can be shocked later. or maybe in your present state you won't even notice.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
74. I know I have been talking to someone who doesn't understand politics
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 11:52 PM
Apr 2016

Or basic reasoning and analysis.

Good luck with that.

So sorry it didn't work out for you.

pkdu

(3,977 posts)
78. You are wasting your time on this one. Saint Bernard , in full drool , said " The Pope"
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 12:06 AM
Apr 2016

Ergo , pretzel logic must be employed , despite corrections from the Popes representatives to the contrary, to show it was indeed , really the Pope ...Gods left hand man.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
92. Sander did not have a meeting with the pope, he shock hands and said "Hi", nothing more
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 05:12 PM
Apr 2016

This is a description of the situation and what the Pope had to say about that situation:

The two ran into each other in the lobby of the pope's residence, the Domus Santa Marta hotel in the Vatican gardens,where Sanders and his wife, Jane, stayed overnight on the same floor as Francis.

"This morning when I left, Sen. Sanders was there..(in the lobby)... He knew I was leaving at that time and I had the kindness to greet him and his wife and another couple who were with them," the pope told reporters traveling back with him to the Vatican.

"When I came down, I greeted them, shook their hands and nothing more. This is good manners. It's called good manners and not getting mixed up in politics," the pope said. "If anyone thinks that greeting someone means getting involved in politics, they should see a psychiatrist."


So Sanders hung around in lobby the Hotel where the Pope lives and where he was staying because he knew the Pope would be coming through the lobby on his way to Greece. Rather than being rude and totally ignoring Sanders, Pope shock his hand and greeted him. That is not "meeting". Notice that Francis went out of his way to make this clear. This is like you hanging around somewhere where Bernie Sanders was scheduled to walk through, getting to shake his hand, and then you go back and tell your friends and tell them you "met" with Bernie Sanders.

If that is why Sanders went to Rome, he should have stayed in NY and campaigned in hopes he won't lose by more than 10%.

By the way, you proved yet again that you are totally clueless on this matter. Saint Bernie did not "meet" with the pope, he "met" the Pope.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
95. LOL.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 05:38 PM
Apr 2016

But it wasn't supposed to happen at all. The Pope wasn't even going to be NEAR this "low level" conference.

And sorry, but if the pope did NOT wish to meet with Sanders, they EASILY could have cleared them out.

This was obviously an arranged meeting.

So sorry this didn't work out for you.

Response to DanTex (Original post)

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
25. I told you, Dan- he will be flying on a fully equipped BernieBroeing 747
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:01 PM
Apr 2016

Fueled by nothing more than misogyny, social conservatism and the rage of the subaltern, whose democratic free will he and his campaign of white male privilege defenders are ceaselessly attempting to subvert.



btw

strategery blunder

(4,225 posts)
26. Meanwhile, Hillary flies to the West Coast to charge $353K to sit with her at dinner.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:02 PM
Apr 2016

Probably also on a private jet.

(Incidentally, since both candidates have Secret Service protection, I imagine that it is far more practical as a matter of protective logistics to fly private than commercial. I don't begrudge either candidate for flying private at this point for that reason. But since you decided to bring it up, turnabout is fair play.)

strategery blunder

(4,225 posts)
56. Reminds me of 2008
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 01:38 AM
Apr 2016

when then-candidate Barack Obama said he supported campaign finance reform, but that he would not "unilaterally disarm" and surrender the fundraising advantage to his opponent under the campaign finance rules as they were then.

Well, we know how that turned out. After taking office and before Citizens United came down, there was very little movement on campaign finance reform. President Obama used his position to separate the DNC from lobbyist money, which temporarily helped, but was hardly enough. It was more symbolic than anything else, though persuading a Congress dependent on campaign donations to stringently regulate campaign donations was always going to be a very difficult proposition.

Then the SCOTUS issued its Citizens United ruling, which Democrats have been overeager to use ever since, to the point of DWS reversing Obama's directives regarding keeping lobbyist money out of the Democratic Party, while Obama quietly looked the other way.

(He could have asked for DWS' resignation from the chairpersonship of the DNC at that point, and the base would have cheered him for it, but he remained tellingly quiet.)

And the situation wrt campaign finance right now is much, much worse than it was in 2008. Admittedly the vast majority of that damage came from the SCOTUS. But the Democratic Party could have done a lot more to keep itself clean, but took the corrupt money floodgates anyway.

Yes that $353K to sit with Hillary is technically 'legal.' Yes some of it might trickle down to downticket Dems. (With DWS, however, I can't be sure.) But let's be honest here...legal and technical explanations aren't going to pass the smell test when most voters have a vague notion of a supposed $2700/election limit on candidate fundraising.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
83. Guess you haven't seen the breakdown of downticket payments from her Victory Fund...
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 12:41 AM
Apr 2016

Many of those bribed by it are feeling a bit shafted now.

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
85. St. Christopher is not a bigot...
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:35 AM
Apr 2016

Nor are you I trust.

Legend is that St. Christopher carried a child unknown to him across a river. Only after did the child reveal that he was Christ.
He is the patron saint of travelers. Jesus was a Jew by the way.

jonno99

(2,620 posts)
29. I've heard he'll be flying in a dirigible - powered by unicorn waste gas...
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:04 PM
Apr 2016

(iow - nobody really cares - nor should they...)

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
31. Since we do not know here on DU
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:05 PM
Apr 2016

perhaps you could email him and ask him directly. None of us here make his arrangements.

Peregrine Took

(7,415 posts)
33. No, silly. Angels will bear him on their beautiful, strong wings and soar majestically
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:07 PM
Apr 2016

over the heavenly white clouds until they gracefully and so carefully deposit him at Vatican City.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
34. What is Hillary having for dinner? Will it be healthy? Shouldn't she watch her cholesterol
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:08 PM
Apr 2016

and salt intake? So much to worry about!!

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
45. As Jeff Weaver relayed from Bernie, some things transcend politics.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:31 PM
Apr 2016

It sounds like this has been a "bucket list" event for Bernie.

I find the mocking of that distasteful.

This conference will touch on one of his biggest interests. The chance to discuss this topic with like-minded colleagues is priceless for him.

I'm sorry for the Hillary supporters who can't relate to something like that in their life.

 

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)
46. Meh, it's shameless pandering for Catholics before a primary.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:36 PM
Apr 2016

I see it for what it is, a political ploy. Only gullible Bernie supporters would believe otherwise. Of course they also believe he's going to get their college loans forgiven and provide a unicorn sparkle pony in every yard so no surprise that they would buy into this charade.


Bernie's bucket list?



Again, who GAF?






 

JanetLovesObama

(548 posts)
38. Sanders should spend that time doing the taxes he
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:17 PM
Apr 2016

says he doesn't have time to do which we all know is just more b.s. What is Sanders hiding?????

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
41. Is Hillary still thinking about her speech transcripts...
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 05:25 PM
Apr 2016

Yes, I'm sure that Bernie is hiding all sorts of huge income that he received when he made those speeches to Goldman Sachs.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
61. Well, yes, since Jane (the CPA) says they use the easy short form,
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 11:28 AM
Apr 2016

it should take only a couple of hours to get those TurboTax forms together for public perusal.

One afternoon at home in Vermont should do it.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
53. Yep. It's pretty bad optics.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 09:03 PM
Apr 2016

I still think it's fine that he is going...but on many levels it plays badly.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
64. Now that's and interesting question
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 12:14 PM
Apr 2016

If he does pay for it with campaign money, wouldn't that mean he is only going to further his campaign. I'm sure that Jane is going with him. Since she gets paid as a "consultant" by the Sanders campaign, will she get paid extra for overseas travel.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
60. The potential outcry about the "carbon footprint" left by
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 11:23 AM
Apr 2016

a private jet would be interesting, too.

For this unparalled champion of climate change activism, the optics might be problematic.



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is Bernie going to be fly...