eom

so why would you be overwhelmed. Cracks me up everybody is pretending like they know what's coming and writing it off already.

UNDERwhelmed ......

Cracks me up when people get words completely back asswards ....

think about it. thanks.

one poster says he's underwhelmed and the other poster wonders how he could be overwhelmed if nothing has come out. It's valid.

Character issues? Which character, the guy has played more of them than the entire run of Saturday Night Live. He's a creep, and he's a putz. A creepy putz, if you will. Ms. Allred isn't going to make him look any worse than he's already managed on his own, and the people who already don't give a shit about him being a creepy putz aren't going to be turned off by anything she reveals.

thus far.

Why is everyone here thinking this is for them. It's not. You're vote is a given (or better be), but to many undecided or borderline folks this kind of stuff makes a difference. Sad but true. And anything to widen that gender gap is a plus.

At the minimum it washes Trump's BS. Remember we are also trying to fight for a narrative momentum.

I really wish the base would just shut it and just toe the line for once at least for two weeks.

And they'll go "Oh shit, forgot to vote... Oh well" just like they always do.

the point is not that it might reveal what we already know, the point is to make M.R, deservingly it seems, get bad press.

Never mind. I am relatively certain Romney is a vampire.

Rofl

Time will tell.

but, it sounds right now like it could be more than just "Binders Full Of Women" and the GOP WAR ON WOMEN being mitt's women problems.

That would add Women being cheated out of fair alimony settlements..and just women in general who don't like it.

really rather inconsequential.

It would seem so, at this point. Quite the yawn fest, thus far.

Allred has a long history of being a camera chaser and those panting after her every word on this are little better.

Going after this makes us and the President look petty at best.

She's representing a client, if the story is true. .. I make no assertions beyond that as I agree thus far, it seems irrelevant.

I'm a lawyer and there are things in this article that are at odds. It's talking about sworn "testimony" which would make you believe Romney testified on the stand and was questioned by both sides. However, it also says "sworn declaration" which means to me that it is more likely an affidavit which is just a document and there would not have been live testimony or cross-examination.

Disclaimer: I specialize in criminal defense, not domestic relations, so I might be missing something here.

from what I can tell.