2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI don't think Sanders is going to Rome..
I don't know if he decided not to go since he was outed on not meeting the Pope or if he was dis-invited..
A Roman news agency specializing in Vatican affairs has reported that following the controversy, Sanders may call his visit off and postpone it for a more opportune moment. The agency, Il Sismografo, also notes that there has been no official confirmation that Bernie Sanders will take part in the Vatican meeting, even though Bishop Sanchez himself sent a letter on April 8 announcing Sanders participation.
The Vatican has insisted that Catholic institutions not offer platforms to speakers who publicly agitate for moral positions contrary to Church teaching, notably on the abortion issue. Vatican voices have also criticized the invitation as completely out of place in the midst of an election year in the United States, and only four days before the New York primary, given the Churchs stated intention to remain outside party politics."
http://catholiccitizens.org/news/65121/amidst-pushback-bernie-sanders-rumored-suspend-trip-speak-vatican/
I don't know what to make of this but I said yesterday that it was all a publicity stunt.
Discuss..
It's sleazy if you ask me.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)demmiblue
(36,865 posts)Thanks, Skinner!
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Why not? Discuss...
Fozzledick
(3,860 posts)What else is there to discuss?
BTW, the question is "who stole the money and rigged the elections?"
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)That you don't like it doesn't make it sleaze.
I'm not surprised that there is disagreement within Catholic communities over this. Where people are, there will be disagreements. I doubt the group meeting in the Vatican would withdraw an invitation already issued, tho, so the question for the campaign now as before is probably simply will it benefit Sanders? Catholics in NY have their own, differing opinions, of course.
Fozzledick
(3,860 posts)It only looks like "information" if you don't know where it's coming from, or why.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)The guy that was fired for stealing from the Clinton campaign?
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)Is that you peers have spoken loudly on your judgement re: what is "sleazy".
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)There is no reason for your campaign to belabor this.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Vinca
(50,278 posts)If he goes he goes. If he doesn't go he doesn't go. I'd rather talk about why Hillary was never invited. Must be the $250,000 an hour speeches. Greed doesn't go over well with you-know-who.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)as he did. Simple.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Control-Z
(15,682 posts)Or just not pandering for the Catholic vote. There are actually any number of reasons why she wouldn't ask.
TMontoya
(369 posts)He forced his way on the "invite" in hopes that NY voters would be awed by his "vatican" trip. As if people really are that naive.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Hey, if it works for Mrs. Clinton, why not Senator Sanders?
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)means his speeches aren't worth much.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)this has been disproven.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)I am thinking he's not the pathetic one in your post.
TM99
(8,352 posts)what you are talking about do you?
He is the Amendment King, hardly a back-bench Senator with no accomplishments.
The problem with this narrative is that it is completely false. Not only has Sanders gotten a lot more things done than Clinton did in her own short legislative career, he's actually one of the most effective members of Congress, passing bills, both big and small, that have reshaped American policy on key issues like poverty, the environment and health care.
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/bernie-gets-it-done-sanders-record-pushing-through-major-reforms-will-surprise-you
merrily
(45,251 posts)time. So, he got an invite. Stop believing every half truth you read in the msm or on DU--especially on DU.
TMontoya
(369 posts)In reality the Sanders campaign pressed their way into an invite because they are trying to use this as "Vatican supports Sanders" nonsense for NY. Sorry but people aren't stupid to fall for it. This is actually really backfiring badly on him.
choie
(4,111 posts)There is nothing in Sanders' history that indicates that he would do that. You, your fellow Clinton supporters and Clinton herself are projecting because that's EXACTLY the kind of pandering SHE would do.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Sanders and why he invited him.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Where can I read about him being in communication with the Vatican for awhile now? Thank you..
merrily
(45,251 posts)of all the twisted crap I was reading on DU about this conference.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I am catholic and if he used this as a publicity stunt and is now not going...I want to discuss his intentions. Why did he go on several TV shows and PLUG this? First he said he was meeting the Pope. The Pope will be in Greece so that was not true and now he was speaking at a conference. I feel uneasy when people USE religious leaders for political gain! Is he going or not? I hope after all this hullabaloo he does go.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I am hoping he does meet the Pope. I don't want to feel like he announced meeting the Pope for a sinister reason.
Fozzledick
(3,860 posts)to help spread his message of economic inequality and the need for social justice.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)So you do think he is meeting the Pope?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)A day will come when we learn WHO in his group, his inner circle of advisers, convinced him that this would be a good idea.
I have my suspicions as to who that might be, but I'm keeping them to myself for now.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)His source for the entire premise of his hit piece. You must be so proud of this hack.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I am asking for discussion.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)And that shoots down his credibility as a source of any kind of worth while discussion. YMMV.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Lets see how this plays out but I am expecting a cancellation as the whole thing..
think
(11,641 posts)that too.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Why not just go to NewsMax or Free Republic?
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Many of you have been using RW attacks on all dems except Bernie.
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)The piece comes straight from Breitbart.
MADem
(135,425 posts)languages at all:
http://ilsismografo.blogspot.com/2016/04/vaticano-il-senatore-sanders-potrebbe.html
Ciò ha originato qualche polemica da parte di qualcuno che ha interpretato il fatto come una sorta di ingerenza (vaticana) nella campagna presidenziale statunitense, soprattutto a pochi giorni delle importante primarie nello Stato di New York. Per enfatizzare la questione si è anche scritto che Sanders sarebbe stato invitato dal Santo Padre, cosa non vera come ha già chiarito a più riprese il Direttore della Sala stampa p. Federico Lombardi. Negli inviti dei dicasteri vaticani, in merito alle loro numerose attività e iniziative, non interviene il Papa che, naturalmente, non può occupare il suo prezioso tempo nello stilare liste di eventuali ospiti. Inoltre - e questo vale anche per i Presidenti della Bolivia e dell'Ecuador, Evo Morales e Rafael Correa, anche loro relatori del convegno dell'Accademia - il protocollo vaticano da sempre non considera la formula "invitato dal Papa". La dicitura appartiene esclusivamente alla stampa e spesso si trova nelle dichiarazioni degli ospiti, ma non è esatta, ragion per cui è del tutto inutile la polemica sulla presunta natura pontificia dell'invito. Per alcuni analisti una visita di Sanders in Vaticano, senza essere ricevuto dal Santo Padre, potrebbe danneggiare la sua immagine.
POSTED BY IL SISMOGRAFO ORE 10:28
LABELS: -VATICANO, (NEWS IN ITALIANO), [AMERICA], STATI UNITI, VATICANO
MADem
(135,425 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)go to NewsM and FR.
merrily
(45,251 posts)surely, not by much.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)She didn't get invited.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)This is a transparent stunt by Bernie, and he's getting burned by it.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)She's also running from investigators, buts that's another matter for discussion.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)I knew it was just a matter of time.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)did information about Hillary runs rabid here and you don't complain about that.
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)Even if Sanders goes, he may not necessarily get to meet with the Pope
840high
(17,196 posts)of his trip.
Joob
(1,065 posts)MuseRider
(34,111 posts)by hiding an article by Breitbart. No we do not have to talk about it. It is from a place where bullshit regularly passes in some places as news but it is not and we do not need or have to talk about it. You sound so innocent here.
This is not supporting your candidate, this is not even working as a democrat. This is middle school sniping and picking and trying to climb over someone else by deceiving.
Sleazy is not what Bernie is doing.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I just want your opinion. Do you think he will go?
MuseRider
(34,111 posts)and "serious" is far from how you present yourself. You do not get my opinion more than what I already said. I have better things to do with my time than let myself get baited into a ridiculous conversation with someone who never listens.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Say Sanders gets on a plane right after the debate.
11 PM NYC time is 5 AM Vatican Time.
It's a nine or ten hour flight. That puts him wheels down at Fiumicino--assuming he has a tail wind--at around 2 PM.
Let's assume he asked the STATE DEPARTMENT to send "the guy" (I used to know "the guy" very well--I wonder if he's retired already, and who the new "guy" is?) who will speak with the customs officials and work to get him expedited through customs (because, without "the guy" that's an extra hour in the terminal, damn near) and he's through the gauntlet by, say, 2:30.
Now, he's got to get in a car and drive from the airport to Rome--do they ask the carabinieri to give him a WAAAAwaaaaWAAAAwaaaWAAAAwaaaa escort? Because without one, he's gonna CRAWL there. What car does he travel in? One from the STATE Department? That would be a bit sketchy, that.
He could also take the train in, but he still has to get over to the Academy from the train station. He would need to grab a cab.
Also--I'm trying to figure out what plane he would take that leaves at 11PM? Are there any red eyes out of JFK or Newark going to Rome? Unless he has a buddy with a fast private plane, he might have trouble getting there before his 4:30 PM 'ten minute speech.'
If he doesn't end up going, I'll bet Margaret Archer will feel no small amount of grim satisfaction. She'll probably be looking for a more loyal Number 1 to serve her, too.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Let it go! Let it go!
MADem
(135,425 posts)easy shuttle - jumper from Boston.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)kennetha
(3,666 posts)they all want to see Italy, especially in the middle of a New York Primary. Little Italy in Manhattan just isn't the same.
MADem
(135,425 posts)kennetha
(3,666 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)They also asked about the taxes and her excuse was "I haven't been home."
Then she said they were in "boxes" and she'd have to find them.
I could be in Timbuktoo and access my taxes if I needed to. This internet is a hella thing!!!
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I like to think most people would never use the Pope as a distraction for a bad week in a campaign but that is what it is looking like. I hope I am wrong.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)And that person is of course the evil tool of the oligarchy, Hillary Clinton.
MADem
(135,425 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)the conference itinerary was revealed today with his speaking slot, I find it highly improbably that he would cancel now. He is a man of his word and has integrity. He would not bail on something like this.
The only sleazy ones are those that continue to push bullshit, lies, smears, and rat-fuckery to bolster their candidate who is sucking up to big money on the same day Sanders is at the Vatican.
MADem
(135,425 posts)LOL!!!
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)had the schedule changed to insert a 10 minute slot for Sanders after the pandering stunt blew up all over Sanders' empty suit this weekend.
i wonder how much Sachs was bribed/had to arm twist to get his way.
Sanders is the one who LIED On national tv, not once, but twice saying he was going to meet the Pope/invited by the Vatican.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)As a catholic, I am concerned about his intentions. I think I have a right to know. What is going on here. I wish there was a Sanders supporter willing to rationalize and explain this.
TM99
(8,352 posts)at a yearly conference to which he was invited the end of March.
Your candidate, her Machine, and your fellow supporters are trying to turn it into some sort of smear.
Maybe you ought to question their intentions instead of Sanders. He is walking his talk with this conference.
TM99
(8,352 posts)pathetic with this.
Sanders misspoke on the View, and the correct information has been out there before and after from numerous news sources including the Guardian.
You have proof of course for your libel here right?
You can't even get your facts straight so I know you are lying. Sachs is not a foreign policy advisor. He is an economist. He did not become Sanders team advisor until late last week which was after the invitation made the end of March.
You will also notice that most speakers are doing 10 minutes, 15 minutes, and a few at no more than 30 minutes. Having actually organized APA yearly conferences, I can assure you from experience that no one is just inserted retroactively. These things are planned out months in advance.
I am so sick of the Clinton lies. It is pathological, truly pathological.
polly7
(20,582 posts)here, and it's not from Sanders.
Fucking jealous, petty, and pathetic, imo.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)How do you misspeak about meeting the Pope?
TM99
(8,352 posts)she does it all the fucking time. We are supposed to excuse bigger ones like snipe fire.
He was asked and nodding and said yup and before he could say anything further the host on the view kept talking. He then moved on to the conference. He has corrected it since numerous times. Why y'all won't accept speaks to the dishonest of the entire Clinton Machine.
And yes, if you push blatant lies that have been debunked and you don't apologize and correct it, I hate to break it to you but yes, that is a lie. For Catholic you appear to have missed that in Cathecism and Confirmation?
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I'm no where near perfect. So what? This has not been debunked BTW.. IS he going or not?
Response to fun n serious (Reply #123)
Post removed
MADem
(135,425 posts)We pretty much know that isn't true. He horned his way in and his buddy got him a slot on the schedule that takes away from the pee break.
Response to MADem (Reply #118)
Vilis Veritas This message was self-deleted by its author.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)nothing but papal "interference" in US politics-- a major no-no.
This is diplomatic speak for "the crap is really hitting the ventilator, and the Vatican is right in it's trajectory."
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)As a catholic, I feel a bit insulted and shocked that someone would inject the Pope in a political arena. IF that is what happened.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)This Academy is located within the Vatican.
The Vatican was not "snookered".
It's name was inserted wrongly by Sanders and his campaign.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)That said, the Vatican and the papacy are now at the center of an unfortunate international diplomatic incident.
Manifestly, what the Academia does reflects for good or ill on its umbrella organization. The Academia inadvertently allowed itself to be "snookered" into extending an inappropriate invitation.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)if it was just the first three words.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts).
It's not a far leap from support to spite when the current intent of discourse is trickery.
.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I will not support GOP. Don't know how you come up with that.
TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts).
One day, the justifications will manifest, warranting a short-term political conversion.
The funny thing is, the more one professes support and conviction, the swifter the shift.
.
blm
(113,065 posts)I think shortsightedness is STILL what's for supper with some here at DU.
MADem
(135,425 posts)That was where this whole pile of shit started to go pear shaped!
The phrase "Oh, how the mighty have fallen" comes to mind.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)blm
(113,065 posts)with the vitriol, imo. It serves absolutely NO purpose.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)and said he was going to be meeting the Pope.. Turns out he is speaking for a few minutes at Vatican city in a conference at a critical time in his campaign. The Pope likely was not involved and probably knew nothing about this
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)A presidential candidate scheduled to attend a high-profile conference on social justice.
And yet the noble purpose of the conference and the spotlight it shines on it to have a presidential candidate in attendance is utterly obscured by the noxious effluence of envy.
Kudos to the slime patrol. You know who you are.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)What there is is great amusement at the utterly transparent and completely ineffectual attempt by Bernie and the gang to elevate this thing into a quasi endorsement by the Pope of Sanders economic message.
Okay, maybe there's a little contempt thrown in for good measure for his phony high-mindedness.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)The guy is going on a trip. Why is it such a big deal to you people?
Give it a rest. For once.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)Seriously, I have to wonder whether the Hillaroids took lessons in trying to find pointless minutiae from the GOP's Benghazi investigators, worrying this like a not-too-bright dog with a dried up old bone. Either Bernie goes or he doesn't, but it's doubtful he'd have accepted for a specific speaking time if he didn't think he could make it. I know you think Bernie and his staff and his supporters are all hopelessly stupid, but I'd bet the staff are quite capable of figuring out time zones and flight schedules.
If Bernie does go he'll be talking about the idolatry of money while Hillary is busy idolizing money at George Clooney's $350K fundraising bash with the glitterati. The optics are ugly for Hillary, and you know it. But maybe she should have been invited to the Vatican conference just to present an opposing view.
But really. Just give it up. The more you whine and pick at this the more envious and spiteful you look.
TM99
(8,352 posts)and she has had Brock doing her dirty work from day one. So this should come as no surprise to us. It just saddens me seeing posters I thought I once respected stoop to this level of lying, smearing, envy, and jealousy. It is truly pathological. There will be no unity after this convention.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)"The agency, Il Sismografo, also notes that there has been no official confirmation that Bernie Sanders will take part in the Vatican meeting,"
Other then a change in the official program listing him as a speaker, I guess.
And then there is a link at the "Roman news agency specializing in Vatican affairs, Il Sismografo", about the invitation...
https://rootedcosmopolitan.wordpress.com/2016/04/11/the-papal-invitation-that-wasnt/
"When I sat at my computer Friday morning and saw that Bernie Sanders had been invited to the Vatican I was stunned. Though I voted for Hillary Clinton in the Illinois primary, my reaction was not the Democratic nomination. I thought wait, this has to be wrong, there is no way the Vatican could be this dumb, it is bad for the Vatican to get embroiled in a US election. Through the course of Friday it became obvious that in fact no office that directly represents the Pope or is an important body of the Holy See was involved in inviting Sanders to what turned out to be a conference of mostly academics. ..."
TM99
(8,352 posts)She is still pushing the already thoroughly debunked guns coming from VT to NY lie.
This is just more smears, innuendo, and rat-fuckery.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Who cares if he goes or not. I prefer him not go to the House of Pedo. It's silly and a waste of time. He needs to spend in NY and PA.
MADem
(135,425 posts)SHE is going, too...
Is this pre-recorded????
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)No way! This is pathetic. He had better get his tush over to Italy after all this.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)After all what? The fake and ugly waste of time and space nothing you've tried to make of a good decent man attending a conference he was invited to in March involving inequality and suffering - social justice issues he's cared about and fought for all his life?
It's too bad Clinton has all that ugly past you need to distract from, but it's really not Sanders' fault. Your hatred isn't justified ..... (though fully expected.)
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)You guys have made a big deal about something that never mattered.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Bernie doesn't have to fake it or take a crash course on the subject.
He doesn't even have to evolve.
He has basically devoted his entire life to it.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Because the Hillary camp really is making a complete backside out of yourself and your candidate on this one, when you have much larger concerns to worry about right now. Particularly with her last banking scandals brewing.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)I don't believe he's going.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Hillary is called a liar here on DU everyday and Sanders misspeaks. Give me a break!!
840high
(17,196 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)This is getting ridiculous, the attacks of Bernie and Hillary, I hope this nightmare is over soon.