2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum" Fearful Older Democrats, When Did You Give Up?"
excepts:
"How effective will the incremental change you want be at fixing problems like global warming where the planet is heating up faster than scientists ever expected? Those failures to act will now cost trillions more to fix if it is possible at all to do so."
"When people wake up and demand change it happens quickly and they are willing to not show up for a broken system if they are not given a real choice between Progressive and radical right. They know the risks are already significant and that failure to win will still bring on failure with the moderate go slow choice.
When you were their age, you believed and had dreams of fairness, good government, honest business, civil discourse and truth. They have dreams of a government not corrupted by money but responsive only to the people. They have dreams of a planet that is livable for all life on earth. They have dreams of financial stability and economic fairness for everyone.
So I ask again. When did you give up on that dream? When, and why?"
https://www.laprogressive.com/older-democrats/
:
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,836 posts)but it seems like what now passes for the Democratic party and its supported candidates have. That makes this old Democrat very sad on one hand, but very happy to support Bernie on the other.
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)Worried senior
(1,328 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)shanti
(21,675 posts)#boomers4bernie
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Have these folks heard about the bleaching of Coral Reefs... and do they understand what that means to the oceans? Just a thought.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)And retaking the Senate.
After the 2020 census, we will retake the house.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)The question wasn't about a Democrat, it was about what type of Democrat.
Right now the "No we can't" Democrat has the lead for the party's nomination. That's the I give up candidate.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)The only thing that matters is winning. It doesn't matter what kind of Democrats we elect, as long as we become the majority party again. Then we can really... um... really keep getting reelected.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)It is not a "type of Democrat," just Democrats. We older Democrats have not given up, no matter who we support.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)You are willing to settle, as long as a Democrat wins, no matter what the policy implications.
Hillary's "No we can't" is the position of people who have given up.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)We are not willing to allow Republican's to gain full control of all Branches of Government again if we can stop it.
We continue to push for change but will not accept massive change for the worse if one candidate lacks appeal to the majority of the Democratic Party.
We take the long view of history because the system we have is designed to change slowly.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)It has been two since the last election when most Democrats decide to stay home because the change they wanted was Republican change.
That would be a bad idea this time.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It's twisted wrong-headed enthusiasm, but it is because the GOP is agfgressive in fighting for their beliefs. (But that con job is reaching itsd sell-by date.)
With a few exceptions, Democrats have not inspired voters because they are selling tepid gruel, instead of a clear agenda.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)If that is true then all those people wanted the teaparty racists.
People who don't vote, get the government they deserve, and even if they complain, I think that is the government they want. They jsut don't have the courage to say so.
I vote in every election. Sometimes the decisions are difficult. Often, I would prefer a better candidate.
A government is going to be elected whether I vote or not. I can not complain if I have not voted, and I would deserve the worst possible government that can be elected it I do not vote.
With citizenship comes great responsibility. I take it seriously.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)We'll vote - but for the other woman running.* Her platform is more in line with ours.
*If Hillary is the nominee.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)not having to give up too much of your privlidge until after you dead
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 17, 2016, 12:52 PM - Edit history (1)
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)for the best government from the options we are given.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)If you don't like Sanders, fine. But it would be best not to nip hope in the bud yet again.
We can have better options. But not if we continue to passively accept bad ones and shoot down all efforts to create good ones.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Up to this point, a good majority of Democrats have decided Sanders is not the right choice.
This is not an attempt to snuff anyone's hope, and it is not giving up.
It is a difference of opinion.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)But what is systematically being done to Sanders and his supporters -- and the effort to smother the positive energy it could bring in -- goes beyond whether candidate A is better than B.
When we reach a point where a former president and the husband of a current candidate "joking" that Sanders and his supporters want to "shoot every third person on Wall St." those kind of messages are going beyond the pale.
(And I know some Sanders supported sometimes go over the top too....But this massive effort to stifle the message as well as the messenger is on a different scale.)
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Why do we deserve better options? Because we are special? We get what we work for and earn. I am one of the few here who like both candidates equally and am not going to get in a pissing match about it. But had Bernie decided to join the party years ago and done the hard work of building an organization perhaps he would not be behind the eight ball now.
More importantly, had his supporters decided to join the party and actually done some hard work, perhaps they would now have candidates more to their liking. I realize many of his supporters have been hard-working party members for years. But a huge never have never even voted in a Democratic primary and expect to get their way just because.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)smiley
(1,432 posts)I've been an independent my whole life until Bernie. I'm proud of this fact.
I don't expect to get my way. In fact I'm very prepared to have to support a candidate I don't agree with.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)My dream is for my 20something year old daughters.
I want to leave them a better America and a more peaceful world.
peace13
(11,076 posts)Average age of our peace line....62. The young people need to get to the polls and that is every election not just every for years.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Been waiting 40 years for a candidate like him.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Yavin4
(35,445 posts)and then another 8 years of Bush II. Must be nice to have only Obama as president.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)When Dems have power, they allow the corporate Wall St. donors to call too many of the shots....And they always use the GOP as an excuse not to even TRY.
The powder is so dry it is dessicated.
We need change.
ornotna
(10,807 posts)My fear is exactly why I support Bernie. Hillary does not champion issues that will help me or my family now, or in the future.
Response to bkkyosemite (Original post)
Downwinder This message was self-deleted by its author.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)I am a lifelong Democrat. I carried a coffin labeled "Death of the New South" at Georgia's Lester Maddox's inauguration. I am a results oriented person. I am an excellent point A to point B strategic thinker. Bernie presents no plan as to how he will implement his so called revolution. I'm in the music business and I come across a lot of big talkers with lofty goals that have no idea how they will reach their goals. He is great at pointing out problems but not realistic solutions. Bernie is not using his popularity to raise money to help elect down ballot Dems-he has no plan for retaking the state houses-no plan to retake the Senate. The "bully pulpit" is no plan-I hear that a lot from BSS as a way to get things done. Having a million people show up at Mitch McConnels office is not going to change anything. So far that's all I've heard. I see Bernie as totally unelectable and if by some miracle he did win the nomination, he has stated that he will not compromise his principals for anything. That sounds great, but our system of government relies on compromise to get things done. Nobody gets everything they want. I know that BSS hear that and they start calling me a Republican or "No We Can't". The true test of Bernie's intentions will be if he works to turn out large numbers in the mid-terms. So far, he has not inspired large turnouts to the polls-he gets great crowds-apparently that is not translating to vote totals. Hillary is a flawed candidate for sure, but in my estimation she will accomplish more than Bernie with his no compromise stance. I like a lot of Bernie's message, I just don't see Bernie as someone who can build coalitions-he has very few colleagues that believe in him. I was and still am a huge Jimmy Carter fan. It pains me to admit his Presidency was not successful- he has been an inspiration to me in his post Presidency. He and Bernie are similar in some ways. They have some pure streaks that work make them being ineffective politicians. I am a thoughtful person, but the insulting, condescending attitude that Hillary's backers are somehow brain dead zombies that are also immoral, oligarch supporting, war mongering conservatives makes it very difficult to even put my reasons out there.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Above any concept of public good. She won't push for radical action on climate change, campaign finance reform or economic or social justice because she won't risk offending the people who need to be offended by those changes. She supports the right causes at exactly the moment she calculates she can do so without major political risk, and given the shape of the world right now, that isn't nearly enough any more.
Frankly I'm sick of hearing about how her poor judgement and bad decisions can just be waved away years later, and yes if you support her candidacy then you're aligning yourself with someone who has clearly demostrated immorality, oligarchic support and war mongering tendencies. If that offends you, then join the club, it offends me that 'Democrats' are still supporting her.
creon
(1,183 posts)very well said!
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Old Codger
(4,205 posts)Has not given up yet....But it is getting close now, this is the worst I have ever seen our elective process go. This also is the worst most useless slate of candidates I have ever seen in the more than 50 years I have been old enough to vote.. couldn't start til I was 21 One candidate gives me hope if he wins that hope will continue but if they pull some more crap and the so called super delegates go against the popular vote that will pretty get me a lot closer if not over the line..
Buzz cook
(2,474 posts)Why should I be?
Jackilope
(819 posts)Not giving up hope. I despise the tactics of HRC and Third Way. No matter the rigging or struggle, we continue fighting.
Response to bkkyosemite (Original post)
dwrjr This message was self-deleted by its author.
dwrjr
(24 posts)Last edited Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:06 PM - Edit history (1)
I saw Jack Kennedy in the flesh. Remember how strange it was for him to be in color. Had only seen him on TV in black and white. I also saw his brother get shot, on black and white TV.
You young uns have a lot more old uns on your side now than we who opposed the Vietnam War did in the sixties and seventies. Heck, the world is feeling the Bern.
SamKnause
(13,110 posts)I haven't given up.
That is why I support Bernie.
In my opinion, voting for Hillary would be giving up.
argyl
(3,064 posts)But I do Feel the Bern.
jpb33
(141 posts)is alot of these Hillary supporters used to be moderate republicans. Since the dem party abandoned the working class for corporations and banks the mod reps who where with the republican party because of business philosophy left when the republican party got too conservative. They then went over to the dem party because the democratic party became the corporate/banking party or party of business.
Vinca
(50,303 posts)People shouldn't be so patronizing toward geezers . . . it pisses us off.
Gothmog
(145,553 posts)I live in the real world and have to deal with real world issues. Sanders' proposals are really sad in that they have zero chance of passage. Sanders' revolution has been a bust and there is no way that Sanders could ever hope to adopt his plans. Sanders' plans for adopting his proposals depend on these new voters. Here is how Sanders thinks that he will be able to force the GOP to be reasonable http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/2/21/1483791/-Imagine-Bernie-Sanders-wins-the-White-House-Then-what
Thats a phrase Sanders uses often, but what does he mean by it? Sanders has said that if he wins the presidency, his victory will be accompanied by a huge increase in voter turnoutone that he thinks might end Republican control of Congress. But Sanders acknowledges that the House and Senate could, in spite of his best efforts, remain in GOP hands come next January.
Given that likelihood, Sanders offers an alternate means for achieving his political revolution. He says he knows that a Democratic president cant simply sit down and negotiate with Republican leaders and forge a series of compromises. Anyone who's observed the GOPs behavior over the course of Barack Obamas presidency would not dispute that, and in any event, no compromise with Republicans would ever lead to single-payer anyway.
So what then? How would a President Sanders get Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan to pass any of his big-ticket items? This is the model he proposes:
What we do is you put an issue before Congress, lets just use free tuition at public colleges and universities, and that vote is going to take place on November 8 ... whatever it may be. We tell millions and millions of people, young people and their parents, there is going to be a vote ... half the people dont know whats going on ... but we tell them when the vote is, maybe we welcome a million young people to Washington, D.C. to say hello to their members of Congress. Maybe we have the telephones and the e-mails flying all over the place so that everybody in America will know how their representative is voting. [...]
And then Republicans are going to have to make a decision. Then theyre going to have to make a decision. You know, when thousands of young people in their district are saying, You vote against this, youre out of your job, because we know whats going on. So this gets back to what a political revolution is about, is bringing people in touch with the Congress, not having that huge wall. Thats how you bring about change.
The rest of the DK article debunks that concept that Paul Ryan or Mitch McConnell could be influenced by these new voters but we never get to this issue and Sanders himself admits that he will not bet elected without this revolution. So far we are not seeing any evidence of this revolution. Again, Sanders's whole campaign is based on this revolution and so it is appropriate to ask where these new voters are?
It is hard for me to take Sanders' proposals seriously including the ones you want to talk about unless and until we see some evidence of this revolution.
Again, where are these millions and millions of new voters?
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)creon
(1,183 posts)They are not there.
A little over half the eligible voters vote in a presidential year.
The number in off year elections is much lower.
That must be where these new voters come from.
They haven't done it before.
is there a reason they would now?
I doubt it.
hack89
(39,171 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)You go for Hillary if you fear real change.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I don't need a rude and sanctimonious BernieBro telling me what I really believe.
creon
(1,183 posts)I am not afraid.
Do you want to tell me why I should be?
Romulox
(25,960 posts)It's as simple as that.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)the 'glory' days of 1990's , after all it's possible a good number of that set would like to set their chronometer back 20-25 year
me I'm a bit more realistic and I'm 60