We've been told that this is no big deal but I'm still disgusted and shocked that she would go there.

It would absolutely end his run.

Clinton I compromised on LGBT rights. Looks like Clinton II is already working on compromising on womens rights.

Wonder what next group will get a compromise? Considering recent comments to and about the AA community, and her daughters extreme concern over how dangerous ending the racist system of mass incarcerations I think it's easy to see the next group she'll compromise one.

She also recently called it "the unborn child" and said that anti-abortion people can be feminists.

it made me then...and hearing this makes me now. Disgusting.

But here she is agreeing to bargain away our rights.

What she really does is something else entirely.

Not going to speak at a conference at the Vatican and meeting the pope.

I thought it ran a quarter mil a speech.

somehow think she is the champion of them. They are totally deluded.

They're not as easily fooled as older women who've believed the Hillary-hype for decades. I mean, who defends this kind of capitulation?

cannot tell the TRUTH then THIS is what you get!

It's a form of tough love feminism...

You really like to rub it in our face that you're not Democrats, doncha!

You'll have all the finest amenities, such as screaming crying and pouting at your heart's leisure... and all without having to worry about any comments from me! Congratulations! I rate you as official beneath my notice.
Have a great day!

!

Already married.

did you click 'reply' on the wrong post? did you mean to respond to a hillaroid?

What would such an amendment say, pray tell?

the SCOTUS has spoken a number of times giving women certain rights.

Isn't it cool that she's willing to "compromise" away some of the reproductive rights of America's women in order to try to win an election for herself?

I think that she meant a law that would not be unconstitutional.

Weird.

Last edited Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:32 PM - Edit history (1)

was needed. Still is, IMO. However, there is an issue whether they back the right women candidates and in the right circumstances. For example, they backed Martha Coakley in a primary against three men, including Representative Capuano, who is an outstanding Representative.

i agree with hillary that they're frequently better at the job

ayotte isn't loved by the left but she's pretty good for a republican

anyhow, my point is that i agree with your premise.

even though she supported and defended everything he did right up until this run. This makes my head spin.

without compromising, cruelly compromising, the expectant mother's right to privacy?

Hillary's idea about abortion makes sense until you think about how it could work in practice.

This is repeatedly the problem with Hillary. Whether it is a question of the Iraq War or breaking up the banks or abortion or whatever, Hillary thinks in theory, not in terms of practical solutions.

Let's take the bank issue. Hillary doesn't seem to understand that the way to break up the banks is to demand as part of a legal settlement of a claim against a bank or in response to a bank's request for a bail-out that the bank divest itself, break itself up. That's how these things are done in real life. But then when has she ever lived in real life?

And with abortion. This must be the right of the woman and it cannot be limited to only certain situations because it would be horrible if the fact that a woman had an abortion was a matter of public knowledge or could because of an accusation, a legal case or some public statement that her abortion was illegal because it was for a wrong reason and not for a reason related to health, be made public knowledge. How horrible for that woman, especially as is likely to be the case, the accusation is false and unfair.

Hillary Clinton is just plain wrong on this issue. She is not thinking far enough. She is just not very farsighted in her thinking. I am sometimes amazed that she made it through law school. She just isn't all that smart. Sorry. But she isn't.

This "compromise" would be horrible for women in conservative states in which conservative politicians would hold witch hunts to try to find out why women got abortions. This is a terrible idea.

Hillary should be embarrassed for even suggesting such a "compromise." The only thing it compromises is a woman's right to privacy at an extremely difficult moment in her life.

Hillary Clinton could compromise on a universal constant, abortion is chump change to her.

Some measure of restriction makes sense. I would actually not vote for a candidate who was in favor of no restrictions. Neither would 75%-80% of the country. Without seeing what the restrictions are, I can't comment. If it would be codifying some of the restrictions that have always been in place, I'd be fine with it.

I know of 0 bedrock issues for Hillary Clinton.

which is why all of the PP petitions on my fb page got put on ignore.

she know they could never come up with such a 'compromise' so there was no threat of it happening. It's a common negotiating strategy.

because undoing Roe is the Way of the Womyn-Born-Womyn

When someone calls a fetus an "unborn person", they aren't pro-choice. She slips up, the mask slips, she's only human.