If you know what I mean.

rabid Clintonite just now.

And some people say,"You're missing out on all those opposing viewpoints. You might learn something."

But, get real, I only ignore those who present no actual viewpoint. That just happens to be a lot of them it seems.

If they did, then there is an issue.

If a lot money flowed through to the Clinton Foundation or Clinton Foundations partners abroad...

there could be an issue depending how much.

the Foundation and some Canadian Charity.

Insiders have already suggested that Hillary Clinton sounded like a senior manager/partner at Goldman Sachs and that she blamed irresponsible behavior of homeowners.

And yes there is the possibility of pay for play and influence peddling through the Clinton Foundation.

These kind of foundations for past presidents have questionable optics for retired presidents.

For people in senior administration or future president it's incomprehensible.

This could be a buffet for Republicans to attack.

Why Hillary Clinton's Goldman-Sachs speeches matter.

http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/04/12/hillary-clinton-goldman-sachs-why-it-matters/

Can a tax payer sue Clinton for release of those speeches to Goldman-Sachs? If Goldman-Sachs tax deducted those speeches as an "expense", then it would be interesting to find out if a regular taxpayer has "standing" to sue. This would be based on the "regular" taxpayer paying more in taxes or getting less in services because of the lost revenue to the government due to the $675,000 tax deduction.

This situation is why she stands at between 57% and 59% disapproval rate. Her lack of perceived "honesty" makes her a VERY flawed candidate. Frankly, if she were to get elected, if Republicans retain control of the Senate and House, they will file impeachment charges on day one, and there will a transaction by transaction investigations of her and Bill's speeches, their "foundation" and ties to decisions made while she was Secretary of State such as the Swiss bank UBS situation.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then-it-pays-bill-15-million-in-speaking-fees/400067/

The bottom line is there are too many risks for her getting elected let alone being allowed to govern due in large part to the and Bill's actions. Is it true they registered corporations in Delaware? If they did, the only reason one does that unless they live in Delaware is to evade and/or avoid something.

And she's not "limping" into her HOME state (the one Sanders fled about 50 years ago!) "battered and bruised" by a few losses in small, rural open caucus states.

You apparently don't even know the nature of the FBI investigation.

As for your question about what does the Foundation do anyway? You didn't do your homework.

This is what it does:

https://www.clintonfoundation.org/clinton-global-initiative

no assets. Thought you knew.

Well it might take a few minutes, I'm going through my history as we speak. I will edit this post ongoing until I find a source for you. While I am reading, here's what all I am going through...It will be in one of these:

Inside Panama Papers: Multiple Clinton connections
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article72215012.html

Clintons omit shell company from public financial files
http://nypost.com/2015/05/26/clintons-omit-shell-company-from-public-financial-files/

That's been widely disseminated on this site already.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]

If it walks like a corrupt crook, if talks like a corrupt crook, if it hides things like a corrupt crook.

It's a corrupt crook.