2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNew CBS poll shows that Clinton has a 10-point lead in NY (not a good sign for Clinton)
There are very few polls I trust these days. However, Qunnipiac and CBS News Battleground Tracker polls have been reliable and fairly accurate.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-hillary-clinton-keeps-new-york-edge-leads-bernie-sanders-in-california-election-2016/
I was happy to see that the new CBS Battleground Tracker has Clinton with only a ten-point lead (53% - 43%).
Clinton's eight-year tenure as a New York senator (and her advantages with the New York establishment and media) should have secured the state for her. She should be 25 points ahead. Despite the relentless attacks, she has not been able to deliver the New York knock-out punch that she so desperately needs. If she can't do it in a state where she is extremely well known, that doesn't bode well going forward in upcoming states. The optics of a close race in New York looks bad for her.
Of course--I wish Bernie was ahead. However, she's only ahead by ten points. Anything could happen.
A New York Bernie win will be tough, but it is possible.
This narrow margin for Clinton screams volumes about her weakness as a candidate. She was a Senator in New York for eight years. And she's fighting for her life there? A ten-point would fail to justify any Clinton rhetoric about Bernie dropping out.
We've heard grumblings about "internal polling" from both camps showing that the race is tight. This CBS polls solidifies those rumors.
These tight numbers also explain the extreme obsession that the Clinton camp has exhibited over Bernie's trip to Vatican City--and the relentless attacks which border on the absurd. If Bernie gains just a few percentage points from undecided New Yorkers or those on the fence--this becomes a single-digit race, which would be even more embarrassing for Clinton.
I am very pleased with this poll. We're still in it. With high voter turnout, Sanders could pull off a surprise win. In the end, if these poll results hold--the delegate count will pretty much be evenly split and this race will move forward with both candidates fighting for the nomination.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)The 1st seed Cleveland Cavaliers are 10.5 point favorites at home against the 8th seed Pistons this afternoon:
http://www.vegasinsider.com/nba/odds/las-vegas/
This means it's really anybody's game.
BTW, there has been absolutely ZERO movement in this poll in two weeks:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ny/new_york_democratic_presidential_primary-4221.html#polls
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Maybe I should visit.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)The Miami Heat blew a 26 point lead against the Celtics on Wednesday night.
http://espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400829104
There were 2,460 regular season NBA games played this season and that was the biggest blown lead. I assure you gamblers aren't calling their bookies to bet on teams that are down twenty six points at half time.
Michigan was an anomaly.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)You're right, this is an alternate universe, where primaries equate to basketball games and we just close our eyes and plug our ears and go la la la, Michigan didn't count...la la la la la
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)əˈnäməlē/Submit
noun
1.
something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected.
"there are a number of anomalies in the present system"
synonyms: oddity, peculiarity, abnormality, irregularity, inconsistency, incongruity, aberration, quirk, rarity
"the growth on the duck's bill is a harmless anomaly"
2.
ASTRONOMY
the angular distance of a planet or satellite from its last perihelion or perigee.
I have to go to Costco. When I come back I expect you to provide me with a logical response. Please don't disappoint me.
Thank you in advance.
beedle
(1,235 posts)in voting, the size of the crowd, and who they cheer for does make all the difference in the world.
Bernie has voter enthusiasm on his side. The polls may show who would win the election if calling them on the phone and asking "who would you vote for' was considered an official way to count votes.
In reality though you need those people to be excited enough to get off their butts and actually cast the vote.
In the limited range of people being considered in the polls, Registered Democrats, the phone call answer may well be accurate and 10% more of them support Hillary, but if only 1/2 of them are going to bother to go out and actually vote, while 75% of people called who prefer Bernie are excited enough to go out to actually vote, then the 10% polling difference is meaningless.
And before you start into how I am cheering on the hope that some people won't vote, it is quite the opposite ... I wish everyone who wanted to vote could indeed vote .... because that too would result in a Bernie win.
But either way, in the medium term it doesn't matter ... the establishment Democrats are toast even if they win the primaries and even if they win the presidency ... they are establishment, they can no longer hide that fact, and either they stop being establishment (in which case we win,) or they remain establishment and are tossed out in 2018 and 2020 (again we win.)
A Hillary 'victory' is just a band-aide on a fatal wound ... traditional media still has enough of its fading social influence to administer this round of first-aid to a seriously damaged establishment campaign ... in 2 more years that influence will be laughable .. in 4 more years it will be non-existent, and if there is one thing the Hillary Establishment camp should have leaned about social media this cycle, is that there are no establishment media there to control the narrative ... your lies are no longer turned into 'official narratives', they are just exposed as lies.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again;
there is nothing new under the sun.
-Ecclesiastes 1
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Isaiah 60:22
If you believe in the Bible, then surely you must know or believe that many things can be accomplished with faith and/or with belief.
There is nothing wrong with having true believers, and for those believers to be fighting for the values they see necessary in the world. And all sorts of things can happen. Even miracles, especially with belief.
And if you are working on the side of what is right for the common good, even better.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)A while back there was a thread here about a morbidly obese man who tore his ACL and rather than seek surgery he just sat in his reclining chair and waited for God to heal it. He died in that chair.
I told the story to a friend of mine who is a United Church Of Christ minister and she said "that's not how it works."
Have a great rest of the day and keep the faith.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Setting aside the southern states, Bernie has consistently over performed the polling, often by large margins.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Like the great southern state of Ohio:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/oh/ohio_democratic_presidential_primary-5313.html
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)So it makes sense they would look at the polls the same.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)a Bernie supporters we hope they are not. Lot's of first time voter registrations, also lot's of independents that switched to Democrat.. Are you confident that the Poll models are up to date. It's gonna be an interesting night.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)A 10 point loss is a win!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Since delegates are apportioned based on congressional districts a ten point NY win will yield a 25 to 50 net delegate lead.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)the national polls, I wouldn't count on parallel universes. They don't count the kids with cells. They don't count a lot of different groups. Even if its only 2-4 points between them, she loses, Mrs. Inevitability.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)This race is over.
Bookmark this post. If Hillary isn't the nominee I will grind up my lap top into little bits, throw some Sriracha sauce on it, eat it, and put it all on youtube.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)TRUTH...
still_one
(92,382 posts)amount, which doesn't Appear to be the case for the remaining primaries
In addition the big northeastern states are closed primaries, so it is less vulnerable to independents
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Anything close to this and its pretty much game over.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)And employing the same likely voter model.
We'll see what the real turnout is Tuesday!
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)because if that happened, she could make a solid case for Bernie exiting.
She can't make that case if the end result is within this range.
I want him in, through to the convention.
Of course, I'd rather see Bernie ahead by 20. Obviously! However, for now, it looks like New York will not be the linchpin that allows her to pressure Bernie out of the race.
R B Garr
(16,975 posts)Look at all this PHONY outrage manufactured. How ridiculous and transparent. A poll of your choosing shows Hillary's 10-point lead, and you work like the devil to spin it into how wicked she is for asking him to "exit", when she's never said that, and you only introduced that yourself so you can have a contrived pile-on that Clinton is going to do something bad to Bernie.
Good Lord, the phoniness of these hater screeds is reaching a crescendo of completely unreadable hooey. It was unreadable before, but it's completely out of control now. Shameful. But this is why it's so easy to dismiss the Hillary haters because of these basic logical flaws and outright falsifications and misinterpretations just to jump on the hater bandwagon.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)There is no outrage. You are seeing things that aren't there.
I'm merely commenting on NY being a ten-point race.
Of course, I'd love it (and prefer) that Bernie be ahead by 20 points. However, I see her ten-point lead as something that we can work with. He could lose by 15. He could lose by 5. He could win.
Stranger things have happened. She was ahead by 10 in Michigan.
I'm simply relieved, that two days before the NY Democratic primary--that we're behind by a number that isn't horrid--and that a win for Clinton in that range--will not justify her calling for Bernie to get out.
It's an opinion. Get a hold of yourself.
R B Garr
(16,975 posts)generators that they are. If I told you to go drink decaf, I bet my post would be hidden. You must be exhausted rooting out yet other non-issues to have a cow about. Ridiculous.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)R B Garr
(16,975 posts)Southwest College campaign stop. It was too crowded and we didn't get in the small venue, but while there I heard conversations all around me that were so refreshing and intelligent, all without the filters of getting posts hidden that we have to endure here. It made me realize how extreme and out-of-touch some of the haters are here!
TY again.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Zynx
(21,328 posts)I'd be elated by a 10 point Hillary win in NY on Tuesday.
Corporate666
(587 posts)The following week is PA, CT, DE, MD, RI.
Most of those are big delegate number states, and Hillary is leading most by double digits.
After Tuesday, it's over for Bernie. A week on Tuesday when he loses those other delegate heavy states, if he hasn't dropped out, he's just a self-aggrandizing and selfish person who cares more about his own ego and taking money from doe-eyed believers than he cares about actually getting anything done in government.
Then again, his whole failed career shows he is a master of not getting anything done. Well, except naming post offices and such. He's really good at that.
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)No wonder he can't win the election with people like you keeping score for him.
artyteacher
(598 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)but winning by 5 or so is still good enough. It increases her lead and removes another big delegate state that Bernie could have gained big.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)Bernie is out of real estate at that point.
Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)center types who can vote, the better the chance she can hold on. Let's hope they're enough registered NY Democrats who have paid enough attention to the race to recognize a Sanders victory is far better for the party in the long (and short) term.
DeeDeeNY
(3,356 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:17 PM - Edit history (1)
My family and I will all be voting for Bernie.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Only by a point, but that says something.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)in particular, in counties where fracking is the number one concern for many. Teachout lost to Cuomo, but she surprised New Yorkers with her impressive wins (70 percent in several counties), where fracking has become the most important issue for many.
Bernie has come out very strongly against fracking and has done several rallies in those counties. Those rallies have been very-well attended.
Clinton's fracking stance, has been fuzzy--at best. Those upstate activists understand very well that Bernie is on their side and Clinton is not.
If Bernie could duplicate Teachout's commanding wins in those counties with high turnout (and it's highly probable that he will), this could boost his numbers immensely in NY.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)But I don't agree about Clinton's stance being fuzzy. She created an entire office for promoting it as SoS.
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
I guess the trick is to get the average person who may not know this to understand it.
In regards to the race, if he gets upstate and the BBQ, game on!
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I think she has gone to great lengths to make her stance "fuzzy."
And I agree with you, the average person may not understand the issue (or care about it as much) as others.
I see those in upstate NY has having a VERY clear understanding of her positions and her actions regarding fracking. For many New Yorkers in those areas, fracking is their number one issue.
Very cool about ZT following you on Twitter! Nice!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Is that the NBC the Wall Street Journal Marist Polll conducted April 10-13 that shows Bernie losing New York by seventeen points?
Yes it is:
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/poll-clinton-s-lead-new-york-grows-n556201
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)That, and fracking, is probably helping him there.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Michigan was an open primary and New York is closed, but pollsters are aware of that and presumably have done their best to account for it.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)Michigan was an aberration.
rock
(13,218 posts)On all your points. I ain't gonna spend time addressing each one. You're full of it.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)apcalc
(4,465 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)...shit I made up.
apcalc
(4,465 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I'd like to see him pull off an upset, of course.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)A close loss for Bernie will be devastating
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)you, we may not. but the revolution is underway... if you win this time it's only because we ran out of time... the revolution will continue for the next 2 to 3 generations at least. The sad fact is Clinton will lose the GE..
We still have quite a few Americans yet to vote. Don't count those chickens quite yet
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Bernie's Hail Mary ambush didn't move the needle.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)4.4 points! That could be very good. The last big win matched the extreme margin of error I think. so she is between 1.2-18 points ahead. I like the looks of that. Many of the polls take far more Hillary voters in to account because of the age and technology bias against Bernie's side (less landlines, less likely to pick up, and younger people are discounted far more often in polls due to the likely status). Wallstreet/HRC better put out another poll, the other one has been reposted so many times the ink has faded.
MadBadger
(24,089 posts)So no change at all. Not good for Bernie
pnwmom
(108,992 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)It's silly to even make a post saying something like this.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)4.4 is high, that could man a larger gap, but it could also mean 1.2%.
MineralMan
(146,329 posts)Wednesday morning. Any win in NY would increase Hillary Clinton's lead among pledged delegates. For Bernie to have a chance at the nomination, he has to get rid of that lead, not watch it get larger.
Senator Sanders needs a substantial win in NY, and in the primaries that take place a week later. Any losses widen the gap in pledged delegates and make it even more difficult for Sander to have a majority of those delegates. Unless he can get a majority of pledged delegates, he will not be the nominee.
So, a 10 point win by Hillary Clinton would just make it harder than before for Bernie to catch up. Even a tie won't help him erase her lead in the pledged delegate count.
The math of this election is what it is. There's no getting around it. Bernie has to win, and win with substantial margins. That's the only path for him to become the nominee.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Our democracy is broken.
.
MineralMan
(146,329 posts)Sorry, but that's nonsense. We will have our primaries and the results will determine the outcome. I'll be voting for the Democratc nominee. How about you?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,379 posts)and banks.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,379 posts)Stole that one.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Hillary actually outperformed them all slightly. CBS had Bernie up 2% in Illinois and he lost by a little under 2%.
Beacool
(30,251 posts)Hillary will handily win NY. The only question is by how much.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)And so ends the primary season.
Beacool
(30,251 posts)These kinds of posts verge on the ridiculous and end up being embarrassing. Who are they kidding?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)He will just snap his fingers and we will have free everything for everybody and only the rich will pay for it so...their grip on reality is tenuous at best.
Beacool
(30,251 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,342 posts)You have a point.
PufPuf23
(8,828 posts)that show final polling numbers as compared to results?
My general impression is that in most if not all states Sanders has exceeded what was expected from polls in the actual vote.
BTW The other day you posted a factoid about fracking and I responded with more informed thoughts plus a pdf from the Congressional Research Service and you never responded nor corrected yourself.
I tend to think that Hillary Clinton will be Democratic nominee but I hope not.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Spin away. Ten points is an ass kicking.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)+2 Sanders. Final result? +14 Sanders.
If same trend occurs here Sanders should eek out a win.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)The effort to 'stop Trump' produced advertising that had both sides up, although the r's turnout was bigger.
Open primary and same day registration helped the last day gotv efforts push turnout.
With a closed primary in NY and questions about some voters having their affiliations changed without their involvement make comparisons pretty iffy, imo
kcjohn1
(751 posts)My whole point is that polling for primaries, especially when this election is not going to look like traditional primaries, is spotty.
In terms of closed, this will be the first contested closed primary (not including those in the South). The common wisdom is that this will hurt Sanders because he does better with Independents. True, but the other factor not taken into account is there are 2x as many registered Dems as GOP. Those who already lean Dem, are registered as Dem vs in open states where registration is mean less.
Other ways WI/NY are different is NY is much more liberal electorate. More white working class voters (especially Men) are registered as Dem and can't vote for Trump. Overall what hurts him most in NY is lack of same day registration.
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)elleng
(131,098 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Bernie's little Roman escapade didn't work. Pathetic the way he had to ambush the Pope
Tarc
(10,476 posts)to maintain any viable shot at the nomination, I'd say Hillary is cruising just fine.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)No link, it's an email I just received.
TMontoya
(369 posts)And likely an outlier anyway.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Are you sure?
538 has it listed you can also read the poll which has the dates listed.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Here we come, Xxxxxxx. One month ago, we were down 48 points in New York. With just two days to go until the primary, weve cut the lead in Hillary Clintons home state all the way down to six.
Gravis Poll - New York Democratic Primary
Hillary Clinton: 53%
Bernie Sanders: 47%
Are you sure this isn't a new poll?
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)It is not a new poll in any way, shape or fashion. Or a particularly good one either.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Don't know what more to say.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)It really implies that this is a new poll.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)They did not run two polls in ten days.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)You probably don't remember seeing it because it wasn't aggregated.
pnwmom
(108,992 posts)Check fivethirtyeight.com whenever you want more information about a poll result.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)I don't use RCP because it's a right-wing source. 538 is good once is a while if I want a little more in-depth analysis.
Tanuki
(14,920 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)Purveyor
(29,876 posts)pnwmom
(108,992 posts)There is always some variation among different pollsters, but it is significant when the same pollster gets exactly the same results.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)That is called no movement at all, which isn't good news for the guy that needs a lot of movement to happen.
pnwmom
(108,992 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)http://www.marketwatch.com/story/unpopularity-dogs-trump-clinton-cruz-wall-street-journalnbc-news-poll-2016-04-17
People don't like her. They just don't like her.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Go figure!
senz
(11,945 posts)that even if she finagles the nomination, she will lose the GE.
So you can crow all you want, but what you have is not only a dishonorable person but a fatally flawed candidate who would put a Republican in the Oval Office.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Oh, cry me a river.
senz
(11,945 posts)But I will tell you this, DemocratSinceBirth, the propensity of Hill supporters for expressions of pleasure at the thought of Bernie supporters "crying" belies a level of schadenfreude and sadism that makes me extremely glad to not be among you.
It appears to be a very low place, indeed. Too bad you've let your candidate drag you down to her level.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)May we please stop with the manufactured outrage?
Thank you in advance.
I will just let your kind words toward me and the candidate I support hang out there.
senz
(11,945 posts)contempt with outrage.
I don't feel outraged.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)like you, you little whippersnapper.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)RandySF
(59,205 posts)The NBC poll taken around the same time has Hillary up by 17.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ny/new_york_democratic_presidential_primary-4221.html
And where did you hear about internal polling? It's not in the article.