eom

This was a mild op that made a positive case for one candidate and you couldn't even cope with that? How do you navigate the world with such blinders?

I love this. There wasn't even an argument here, a back n forth with lots of fun and nasty words exchanged, which is what usually leads to an ignore. No, just a churlish "I don't like you, nyaa nyaa not listening anymore!" post and you flee.

Pity.

Im curious about what other people think as long as they are civil and if they aren't I just keep walking. some of the ridiculous stuff is amusing.

Would it please you if the next time we put a "trigger warning" in the title for you?

Fucks given == zero.

If the poster chooses to break it as an act of defiance, okay. I wanted to make sure they were aware.

I'm looking forward to tomorrow night. My family will be toasting and eating a lot of popcorn!

I would have hoped you'd have thought of the 16 million American children living in poverty that Goldman-Sachs doesn't give a crap about.

I do not think he will lose tomorrow and nor would I celebrate if he does.

We thank you for your vote! Your payment is on the way.

about letting others think something, but not doing it to prove them right. Wish I could remember how it went.

Huh?

You like neocons?

You want to lose the general election?

A good measure of improving schools is improving graduation rates. HRC was First Lady of Arkansas from 83-92. I would draw your attention to Table 18 in the attached document from the dept of education.
It shows graduation rates and numbers through 1996.
It also show graduation rates fell between 1985 to 1996. All years that would have been impacted by improvements to the state education system....
http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/98018.pdf

I disagree with the very large majority of it...but that's not the point. You presented (civilly...) your reasons for preferring your candidate. Not nearly enough of that around here... You are one of the few actively-posting Hillary supporters not on my Ignore list. Posts like this, and the person they indicate is behind them, is why.

They all start off positive, with complements to Hillary regarding her experience, her resolve, etc. Then they shift to being disappointed in Sanders for his eccentricity, his support of gun makers, etc. At least this one doesn't start by claiming to be a former Sanders supporter.

Are you for real?

Here's some facts you overlooked.
Hillary was paid heavily for speeches to the same institutions who crashed the economy with their hedge fund schemes and toxic mortgage-backed securities.

Her son-in-law worked 8 years in the hedge fund industry at Goldman Sachs before starting his own hedge fund group into which the Goldman Sachs CEO is invested.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/03/23/business/dealbook/for-clintons-a-hedge-fund-in-the-family.html

And her campaign manager John Podesta (Group) handles PR (public relations) for billions of dollars in arms sales to the Saudis from such big players like Lockheed Martin.
You know Saudi Arabia?... the country responsible for 9/11?
Well the John Podesta Group is essentially a go-between that helps Saudi Arabia with their image to further sales growth in weaponry, etc.

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/01/07/washingtons-multi-million-dollar-saudi-pr-machine

In Latin America her support for coup regimes, militarization, and privatization; trade deals that wreak economic havoc, all of which have resulted in death.

http://www.thenation.com/article/a-voters-guide-to-hillary-clintons-policies-in-latin-america/

"Hillary has nothing to brag about: Her foreign policy record is a disaster"

http://www.salon.com/2016/01/23/there_is_no_foreign_policy_d_league_hillarys_foreign_policy_disastrous_experience_partner/

She has waffled mightily regarding the potentially disastrous Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal (TPP).

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/08/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-now-opposes-trans-pacific-partners/

She was for fracking and the Keystone XL pipeline before she told us she isn't.

"Hillary Clinton's State Department Sold Fracking to the World"
http://m.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron

She is a recent convert to supporting same sex marriage after a decade of opposing it.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/jun/17/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-change-position-same-sex-marriage/

Look...the military industrial banking complex is powerful and they want her at the helm.
The .1%'s gravy train must be protected in their view.

Bottom line...The powers that be are much more comfortable with her as President rather than Bernie.

but not the list of ingredients?

I implore you to redo your candidate research and use both pro and con articles on both candidates from at least 3 sources. Dig as deep as you can.

American imperialism, Wall Street banks, corruption, outsourcing, debt slavery, exploitation by the rich, predatory capitalism, taking away power from the American worker, declining living standards for the majority of society, poverty in America, etc...

I hope your happy with yourself.

….ISIS and Iranian nukes are actually insignificant by comparison.

Really!

He corrected the mistake when he realized.

He also graduated from an elite university without legacy, btw.