Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:01 PM Apr 2016

Sanders aide: Clinton got 'almost all of the money' from Clooney fundraiser

"A top aide to Democratic presidential Bernie Sanders says a fundraiser hosted by actor George Clooney is only benefiting Hillary Clinton, not any down-ballot Democratic candidates.

“This fundraising arrangement that George Clooney and others have donated into believing that they’re giving money to the down-ballot candidates, two-thirds of that money is going actually to Hillary Clinton,” Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver said on MSNBC on Monday.

Only a third has been going to down-ballot candidates,” he added. "In addition to that, $15 million of that money has gone into other operations that primarily benefit only Secretary Clinton.

“It seems as it’s not working as it’s supposed to, which is to benefit the Party and down-ballot. Almost all of the money is going to Hillary Clinton.”

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/276694-sanders-aide-on-clooney-fundraiser-clinton-gets-almost

I think we will find out who's right soon enough.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders aide: Clinton got 'almost all of the money' from Clooney fundraiser (Original Post) NWCorona Apr 2016 OP
"almost all" compared to none at all lol btw it is not actually almost all. this is just a PR stunt msongs Apr 2016 #1
I know right? They should be happy with crumbs NWCorona Apr 2016 #2
This will be documented. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #3
True! NWCorona Apr 2016 #4
Bernie Sanders Campaign Oddly Accuses Clinton and DNC of Troubling, Perhaps Illegal, Fundraising Pra Gothmog Apr 2016 #5
Thanks for the link! NWCorona Apr 2016 #6
Prof. Hasen is one of the better legal blogs on election law Gothmog Apr 2016 #7

msongs

(67,413 posts)
1. "almost all" compared to none at all lol btw it is not actually almost all. this is just a PR stunt
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:07 PM
Apr 2016

by the bernsters, like his stunt trip to rome

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
2. I know right? They should be happy with crumbs
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:10 PM
Apr 2016

Even tho the money is coming in to supposedly help down ticket dems.

Gothmog

(145,291 posts)
5. Bernie Sanders Campaign Oddly Accuses Clinton and DNC of Troubling, Perhaps Illegal, Fundraising Pra
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:22 PM
Apr 2016

Prof Hasen analysis on these silly claims http://electionlawblog.org/?p=81996

This letter from Sanders’ lawyer Brad Deutsch (and see this accompanying press release) say there are some “serious apparent violations” of campaign finance law. I’m not so sure that’s right, and suspect this letter is less about legality and more about feeding into the Sanders’ campaign theme that Hillary Clinton is corrupt in her campaign finance dealings.

Here’s the deal. Clinton, like Sanders and other presidential candidates, has set up a joint fundraising committee with her political party. The JFC allows you to raise a huge chunk of change (more now than in past campaigns, thanks to the Supreme Court blowing out the aggregate federal limits in the McCutcheon case). A small bit goes to the candidate’s committee under the federal limits (currently $2,700 for the primary and $2,700 for the general). The next bit goes to the DNC, and the rest so state parties in $10,000 chunks. Sanders is accusing the joint committee of raising really big donations, and then having the JFC using some of those really big donations to engage in direct mail and internet targeting of small donors. When those small donors donate small amounts, contributions up to the first $2,700 benefit Clinton under the JFC agreement, and because these are small donors, it means Clinton gets all that small donor money.

The Deutsch letter cites no authority showing that this use of the JFC is not allowed, and it is hard to see what provision of the law it violates when donors give only small amounts that happen to benefit only Clinton. The letter says that maybe this is like an in-kind contribution from the DNC to the Clinton campaign, but I don’t see how it is that if the money is coming from the JFC not from the committee. The letter even says this means that those giving big checks to the DNC might thereby be giving more than the $2,700 to Clinton, which is not literally true—it is what the JFC is doing with the money, over which the donors have no control.

So legally this seems weak.

And politically, it is quite odd for Sanders, who would need the DNC’s support to win the presidency should be be the Democratic nominee, to be attacking the DNC. (Then again, Trump has relentlessly attacked the RNC, so this must be the celebration of the season.)
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders aide: Clinton got...