2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI support open primaries partially based on personal experience.
I've been a liberal all my life. But I didn't think of myself as a Democrat until I was over 30 and experienced the horror of George W. Bush's presidency.
Most people under 30 don't think of themselves as Democrats or Republicans. But they have most of the same political positions now as they will when they're older.
Regarding liberals who from age 18-30 don't think of themselves as Democratic Party members and from age 31-80 do: I want them to be able to vote in Democratic primaries at both stages of their lives. They're being liberals is what is important.
22 states have no party registration. Minnesota is one of them. In US Senate primaries here, everyone gets the same ballot. There is a box with the Democratic candidates and a box with the Republican candidates, and voters can choose a candidate in either box but not both.
That's a good system because it's simple and encourages voting.
AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)Nothing grows a party like giving people a stake in it and making them feel like their opinions matter.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)... so it can't be had.
dflprincess
(28,079 posts)In Minnesota, in the past, it's usually the DFL that has a primary and the Republicans will not. This year, with none of the big statewide offices on the ballots this could be a problem in legislative races.
It appears that there will be a primary in my state legislative district. The Republican is a Tea Party type with a lot of "true believers" supporting him. I have no doubt that they will cross over and vote for the DFL candidate they consider would be the easiest to beat in the general election.
I have a real problem with the idea that Republicans can pick our candidate.
brooklynite
(94,591 posts)What's your excuse?
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...and they don't need an excuse. They need to be allowed to vote.