Want to comment on the non-controversy? Anything yet that will destroy him? We all can hope, right?

They've been nothing but impartial.

but being partial towards a candidate doesn't mean they are wrong. If you want to provide some counter-logic, then you may have a point. I would imagine that you aren't impartial when it comes to Republicans. Does that mean every critique you articulate of them and their policies is wrong? Of course not.

and then there's being TYT or HA Goodman.

and address what TYT said. If you can't then just admit ya got nothin.

Bernie Sanders has one, and he's been in public office much longer than Clinton has. Until he releases more than one year, he and TYT can just spare us the nonsense about transcripts.

as to why you keep on focusing on this. You have one year now, anything there that raises red flags? Is there anything you have, any reason what so ever, you suspect would harm him? If so, provide it. Be honest, this is a Clinton campaign talking point, you have nothing what so ever to base your suspicion on. The point is to simply put it in peoples' minds that he is corrupt, to strike at a strength of his relative to her, even if you have absolutely nothing to back this up. Kind of obvious, gotta admit.

Bernie has released his taxes. Where are those transcripts?

And don't give us the lame excuse that everyone else needs to release their transcripts. Hillary is the ONLY candidate running who has given those paid speeches to Wall Street.

That means everyone already HAS released their transcripts.