2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders Hits Clinton On Campaign Finance Hours Before New York Votes
NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders accused front-runner Hillary Clinton of apparent campaign finance violations on Monday, ratcheting up the rhetoric against his rival one day before New York states crucial primary elections.
Sanders questioned whether Clintons campaign violated legal limits on donations by paying her staffers with funds from a joint fundraising effort by Clinton and the Democratic National Committee, or DNC.
Sanders has long maintained that the DNC has favored Clinton over Sanders. The U.S. senator from Vermont is a democratic socialist who has run as an independent in his Senate campaigns.
While the use of joint fundraising agreements has existed for some time - it is unprecedented for the DNC to allow a joint committee to be exploited to the benefit of one candidate in the midst of a contested nominating contest, Sanders campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, said.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Ash_F
(5,861 posts)I saw in one article that Clinton got 15 million. How much did Sanders get?
Campaign finance is a murky place.
think
(11,641 posts)By Matea Gold and Tom Hamburger February 20 2016
~Snip~
Ive never seen anything like this, said Lawrence Noble, a former general counsel of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) who is now with the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center. Joint victory funds are not intended to be separate operating committees that just support a single candidate. But they appear to be turning the traditional notion of a joint committee into a Hillary fundraising committee....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democratic-party-fundraising-effort-helps-clinton-find-new-donors-too/2016/02/19/b8535cea-d68f-11e5-b195-2e29a4e13425_story.html
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)think
(11,641 posts)to fund his own campaigning efforts. The Sanders campiign has responded to every problem that's come up from having record numbers of donors and donations.
Hillary is playing fast and loose with campaign finance laws. And that's what the former FEC official was getting at.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)FEC
http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/619/201602250300038619/201602250300038619.pdf
http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/988/201602110300034988/201602110300034988.pdf
These aren't from "former" FEC persons. They are from the FEC itself. Do you know Sanders signed the same joint fundraising agreement with the DNC.
Sanders and Weaver are really on unethical ground here. I knew Weaver would go there, a bit surprised how easy it was to get Sanders there. Really shady on their part.
think
(11,641 posts)addressed. Bernie was not in direct control of all those contributions and it requires a large accounting effort to itemize them all and make sure limits were not breached.
These are normal Americans making small donations. Hillary is using a loophole so extremely rich donors can make a onetime donation that is over 130 times larger than the ones Bernie can take from the normal process. Hillary is then using that money first for her efforts. The money that was suppose to go to the down ticket candidates isn't getting to them.
Sanders knows exactly what he's addressing. Hillary is taking funds she raised for other candidates and using that money to help fund her own damn campaign.
So far, the state parties have served only as a pass-through for their share of the funds. Campaign finance records show that nearly $2 million in donations to the fund initially routed last year to individual state party accounts was immediately transferred to the DNC, which is laboring to pay off millions of dollars in debt.
~Snip~
Ive never seen anything like this, said Lawrence Noble, a former general counsel of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) who is now with the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center. Joint victory funds are not intended to be separate operating committees that just support a single candidate. But they appear to be turning the traditional notion of a joint committee into a Hillary fundraising committee....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democratic-party-fundraising-effort-helps-clinton-find-new-donors-too/2016/02/19/b8535cea-d68f-11e5-b195-2e29a4e13425_story.html
Talk about unethical. Hillary takes the cake...
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)You are playing a game of partisan politics when we actually have one campaign regularly taking part in shady donation practices. That just doesn't play into your game of partisan politics.
think
(11,641 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts)... the Democratic parties of the individual states will not be amused.
2banon
(7,321 posts)But he chose not to go negative and the media certainly isn't going to their job. Except, some in the media are "doing their job" on behalf of the Clinton Camp.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)Sanders campaign is really low-ball in more ways then one.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... and he repeatedly referred to the Democratic Party as the Democrat Party.
Wankers.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)What Sanders is doing here is unethical and malicious. If the DNC and Clinton were as shady as he is they would file suit back for defamation. Really low what Sanders and Weaver are doing.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)It is a money laundering loophole created by the McCutchen vs FEC decision. It enabled Hill to funnel her funds through state parties and the DNC. No one is saying it is breaking any law but it is morally bankrupt, much like the Clinton family M.O.
The requirement for the 33 states participating is that their super delegates MUST commit to Hill. This all happened before she even announced her candidacy. It was an orchestrated slimy activity. The one person, one vote concept is a fucking miserable joke.