For what that is worth.

Like Bernie's, they look pretty good. in other words, we Democrats would have been wise to be more like him rather than the other way around, position wise.

Ralph Nader has opposed the trade deals from the beginning, and his organization has been the most consistent and reliable opponent of them in the US and perhaps the world.

A lot of what I learned about their problems I learned at citizen.org (I just wish their site was better organized, if it was it would be a formidable resource)

in this election cycle.

"My mistake was trying to destroy the Democrats as an Independent. What he's doing is genius!"

Wonder why that is?

On Tue Apr 19, 2016, 12:50 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

I wonder if Ralph is bitter or respectful of Bernie's out-Nadering him
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1777329

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Falsely attributed quote (one return from Google: this thread) to Nader to attack Sanders as a person attempting to destroy the Democratic party. These trolling attempts by poster make DU suck - worse when people take his bait and get their own posts hidden which is his favorite game to play.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Apr 19, 2016, 12:59 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The quote is accurate and current - not something dragged out from years ago nor modified. Trivial alert AND a personal attack on the poster, too. Alerter should get a hide!
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: FFS. If something is false, provide the correct information.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Can't justify something this inflammatory without legitimate sourcing.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

away for it if it hadn't been for those meddling kids."

Don't you think?

he always has been on top of this, plus he more than most of us knows the backstory, which is rooted in trade policy.

Thats also why we shouldnt vote for her, that would would be seen elsewhere as an endorsement of a ton of policy that Americans have not been told about for the simple reason that we would almost all of us disagree with it. It would hurt us economically and not do its stated goal which is to help poor people in poor countries, instead it will help rich people in rich countries and rich people in poor countries.

All he would hear from me is a loud "CLICK!"

If he called back, he would hear a loud, "ASSHOLE!" Then a loud "CLICK!" And then, repeat as necessary.

His idea of united progressive members of Congress around a caucus seems like a good one.

That's because of 2000 when he set the progressive movement back years and years!

And if he calls again, he gets the "FUCKING ASSHOLE! CLICK!" Treatment.

Which is understandable

Try texting.