Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumObama Administration Publicly Declares Their Opposition to Hillary Clinton's Syria Plan!
CNNObama adviser explains why Clinton's Syria plan won't work
By Matthew Jaffe, University of Chicago Institute of Politics
April 18, 2016
Chicago (CNN) The no-fly zone in Syria proposed by Democratic front-runner and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would be both ineffective and a poor use of resources, according to White House deputy national security advisor Ben Rhodes.
"A no fly zone in Syria would not solve the problem," Rhodes told David Axelrod on "The Axe Files," a podcast produced by CNN and the University of Chicago Institute of Politics. "If you had an area of geography in Syria where planes couldn't fly over it, people would still be killing each other on the ground. ISIL doesn't have planes, so that doesn't solve the ISIL problem. They would still be able to massacre people on the ground. And we would have to devote an enormous amount of our resources -- which are currently devoted to finding ISIL and killing them wherever they are -- to maintaining this no-fly zone. So it's just not a good use of resources."
Clinton, who served under President Obama as Secretary of State, has argued in favor of a no-fly zone. At a CNN/NY1 Democratic debate last Thursday, with Sen. Bernie Sanders, Clinton reiterated her support for such a move. "I do still support a no-fly zone because I think we need to put in safe havens for those poor Syrians who are fleeing both Assad and ISIS and so they have some place they can be safe," she said.
In an hour-long interview with Axelrod, Rhodes reiterated the administration's opposition to Clinton's stance.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/18/politics/axelrod-axe-files-ben-rhodes-syria/index.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 929 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Administration Publicly Declares Their Opposition to Hillary Clinton's Syria Plan! (Original Post)
imagine2015
Apr 2016
OP
leveymg
(36,418 posts)1. Plus, it's not a good idea for us to shoot down Russian aircraft. Period.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)2. You'll have to explain that to Trump and I'm afraid also Hillary.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)3. Looks like either way, we lose.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)4. That would be a neocon's wet dream
To draw Russia into conflict.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)5. They're already part of the conflict. But, before she was a neocon, Hill was a committed Cold
Warrior and has been along with Bill since the time G.H.W. Bush was CIA Director. Also, Bill was classmate at Georgetown with a young Saudi royal, Prince al Turki, who went on to be head of Saudi General Intelligence Directorate. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303949504579260510644966826